2,100 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Security audit of a codebase — web apps, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, daemons, and more. Use when asked to find security bugs, do a security review, audit for vulnerabilities, or pen-test the code. Focuses on exploitable issues with real impact, not theoretical concerns or industry-standard behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up bundle IDs, capabilities, signing certificates, provisioning profiles, and encrypted signing sync with the asc cli. Use when onboarding a new app, rotating signing assets, or sharing them across a team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Health check endpoints for liveness, readiness, dependency monitoring. Use for Kubernetes, load balancers, auto-scaling, or encountering probe failures, startup delays, dependency checks, timeout configuration errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publishes mobile applications to iOS App Store and Google Play with code signing, versioning, and CI/CD automation. Use when preparing app releases, configuring signing certificates, or setting up automated deployment pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable task files using tracer-bullet vertical slices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing between engines or models for an agent pipeline and the answer must come from measurement on your own data, not from marketing pages: speech recognition for meeting recordings, the model that turns a transcript into notes, the critic model that checks it. Runs every variant in an isolated container, measures time, cost per hour of input (USD and RUB, with price source and date) and quality (WER/CER and course terms for ASR; code checks plus a judge of a different model for LLM steps), writes results.json/csv and one static analytics page. Triggers on "бенчмарк", "сравни движки", "сколько стоит час записи", "какую модель взять для пайплайна", "benchmark the pipeline", "compare ASR engines".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic review response strategy guide for RebuttalStudio. Use when developing response strategies for reviewer comments, deciding how to classify concerns, or choosing between Accept/Defend/Clarify/Experiment approaches at any stage of the rebuttal pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build evidence-oriented readiness checklists for frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR, with gaps and remediation priorities. Use when the user needs an internal readiness assessment or control-mapping plan; do not use it to certify compliance or replace an auditor or counsel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Real-world Active Directory environment constraints that silently break attacks when ignored: NTLM disabled (Kerberos fallback), AES-only KDCs (RC4 blocked by GPO), LDAP signing and channel binding requiring LDAPS on 636, Kerberos clock skew (KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW), SPNs that must be FQDNs never short names or IPs (the misleading invalidCredentials), Protected Users / LAPS / gMSA / MachineAccountQuota, LDAP 1000-object paging, and VPN latency. Use this whenever a bind, TGT request, LDAP query, or SMB negotiation fails in a way that looks like bad credentials but is really hardening, or before running any AD tooling against a domain you have not fingerprinted. Standard-tooling knowledge (netexec, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute), no vendor-specific engine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The order of operations for an Active Directory penetration test: setup, collection, exploitation, post-processing. Use this whenever you are planning or driving an AD assessment and need to know what to run before what and why (map before you exploit; harvest easy credentials before spraying to avoid lockouts; collect the graph before you reason about paths). Covers phase sequencing with standard tooling: netexec/nxc, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute, BloodHound CE. Invoke it at the start of an engagement, when deciding the next phase, or when a step feels out of order.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Mathematical Modeler. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Modeler judgment. Reasons from nondimensionalization, conservation/positivity laws, and minimal-viable model structure through mechanistic ODE/PDE, stochastic, and agent-based formulations, profile-likelihood and Fisher-information identifiability, and Sobol/Morris sensitivity analysis, while treating sloppy unidentifiable parameters, structural model uncertainty, and out-of-regime extrapolation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Metrology Scientist. Use when a task calls for Metrology Scientist judgment. Reason from SI traceability, GUM uncertainty budgets, and VIM distinctions between calibration and verification; propagates Type A/B components, CIPM MRA equivalence, and ILAC decision rules before any pass/fail claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Isotope Geochemist. Use when a task calls for Isotope Geochemist judgment. Reasons from fractionation theory, decay schemes, reservoir mixing, and closure assumptions through standard-sample bracketing, double-spike deconvolution, isochron/Tera-Wasserburg fitting with MSWD, and ISO Guide uncertainty propagation while treating Pb-blank and lab-air contamination, mass bias, Pb loss and inheritance, and open-system resetting as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Health Economist. Use when a task calls for Health Economist judgment. Reasons from QALY/ICER and NMB opportunity-cost framing, NICE reference case and WTP bands, cohort Markov/PSM models with PSA (CEAC/CEAF), ISPOR transferability and DCE conjoint checklists, CHEERS 2022 and trial-based RCT-CEA reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Hydrogeologist. Use when a task calls for Hydrogeologist judgment. Reasons from Darcy's law, mass conservation, aquifer heterogeneity, and coupled biogeochemical transport through Theis and Cooper-Jacob aquifer-test analysis, MODFLOW/MT3DMS modeling with PEST uncertainty, and low-flow geochemical sampling while treating wellbore-storage and skin artifacts, equivalent-porous-medium failure in fractured/karst flow, and non-unique K-S calibration as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Geographic Information Scientist (GIS). Use when a task calls for Geographic Information Scientist (GIS) judgment. Reasons from location, topology, scale, and positional uncertainty through PostGIS/GDAL pipelines, explicit EPSG/datum choices, kriging with cross-validated variograms, and ISO 19115/FGDC metadata while treating MAUP and ecological fallacy, Web Mercator area statistics, floating-point slivers and broken topology, and spatial-autocorrelation-inflated significance as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Instrumentation Engineer. Use when a task calls for Instrumentation Engineer judgment. Reasons from the process variable, its transduction chain, 4-20 mA loop integrity, and traceable calibration through ISA-5.1 P&IDs, NAMUR NE43 fault bands, ISO 5167 orifice sizing, and GUM uncertainty budgets while treating plugged impulse lines, double-applied square-root, ground-loop noise, and unrevalidated SIS bypasses as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Experimental Physicist. Use when a task calls for Experimental Physicist judgment. Reasons from GUM error budgets, traceable calibration chains, and multiplied signal-chain transfer functions — separating Type A and Type B uncertainty, null runs, and ELN-linked reproducibility before precision or discovery claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Forensic Chemist. Use when a task calls for Forensic Chemist judgment. Reasons from chain of custody, validated methods, measurement uncertainty, and class-versus-individual characteristics through GC-MS, LC-MS/MS, FTIR, and SWGDRUG-aligned identification under ISO/IEC 17025, while treating carryover contamination, secondary transfer, isomer co-elution, and upgrading equivocal results into source attribution as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Environmental Policy Analyst. Use when a task calls for Environmental Policy Analyst judgment. Reasons from statutory authority, baseline definition, and monetization boundaries through NEPA/ESA compliance, Circular A-4 RIAs, EPA SC-GHG and benefit transfer, IAM/IPCC scenario use, and APA regulatory comment while treating discount-rate dominance, weak transfer extrapolation, IAM structural uncertainty, and baseline inflation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Functional Genomics Scientist. Use when a task calls for Functional Genomics Scientist judgment. Reasons from perturbation as causal probe, genotype-to-phenotype linkage, library representation, and effect-size-plus-FDR statistics through MAGeCK/BAGEL/CERES-Chronos, CRISPRcleanR, CRISPResso2, MPRAnalyze, and Perturb-seq pipelines while treating MOI/bottleneck artifacts, copy-number and p53/DSB toxicity, RNAi seed effects, and guide-assignment or gating errors as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Coastal Engineer. Use when a task calls for Coastal Engineer judgment. Reasons from joint-probability surge and waves through CEM/EurOtop runup-overtopping, Van der Meer/Rock Manual armor, CERC–Van Rijn sediment budgets, and CMS/XBeach/ADCIRC–SWAN model selection while treating toe scour, armor breakage, datum mismatch (BFE vs MHHW), and downdrift impacts as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Chemical Oceanographer. Use when a task calls for Chemical Oceanographer judgment. Reasons from seawater thermodynamics, carbonate-system coupling (DIC, TA, pH, pCO2), redox hierarchies, and tracer conservation on density surfaces through CO2SYS/seacarb with Dickson CRMs, Winkler oxygen, IRMS isotopes, GO-FLO clean trace-metal sampling, and GLODAP/SOCAT/GEOTRACES synthesis while treating organic alkalinity, headspace equilibration, pCO2-mooring biofouling, and trace-metal contamination as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。