「codebase」の検索結果

Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrates Android applications from the old, legacy Google Mobile Ads (GMA) SDK (com.google.android.gms:play-services-ads) to the new GMA Next-Gen SDK (com.google.android.libraries.ads.mobile.sdk:ads-mobile-sdk). Provides comprehensive mapping tables for imports, classes, and method signatures to help determine migration steps. Use when migrating an existing Android codebase from the old, legacy GMA SDK to GMA Next-Gen SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Router for the 159 SfSkills `apex` skill packages. Apex and SOQL: triggers, Apex governor limits, async processing, OUTBOUND HTTP callouts, security enforcement, and test patterns. Owns calling an external API FROM Salesforce; salesforce-integration owns inbound. Generic nightly scheduling without naming code belongs to salesforce-flow. Codebase security review belongs to salesforce-security. NOT for SOSL — use salesforce-data. Use when the request mentions Apex, trigger, SOQL, Apex governor limit, batch, queueable, @future, schedulable, test class, CPU time, heap, with sharing, StripInaccessible, callout, HTTP callout, HttpRequest, call an external API, consume a REST API from Apex, Named Credential in Apex, HttpCalloutMock, Apex REST service. Finds and opens the exact skill package to read; it does not contain the guidance itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects mismatches between features claimed in App Store metadata and features actually implemented in the codebase, enforcing Guideline 2.3.1 which prohibits misleading app descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run comprehensive code audit for architecture, dead code, and test quality. Use when reviewing overall codebase health, checking for architectural violations, or before marking a feature complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract tacit knowledge through non-obvious microquestions — things only the user knows that can't be found in code, docs, or research. Use when you're about to guess at intent, context, or constraints during SAFEWORD's understanding flow. Also use when user says 'ask me', 'what do you need to know', or when another skill (bdd, brainstorm, debug) needs user context before proceeding. Do NOT use for questions answerable by reading the codebase or searching the web.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs autonomous keep/discard experiments on a codebase to optimize a single metric for a fixed duration, in the style of karpathy/autoresearch. Use when the user says "autoresearch" (optionally with a focus, e.g. "autoresearch the optimizer"), asks to run experiments on a repo overnight, to hill-climb or optimize a metric autonomously, or points at a repo with a karpathy-style program.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve an existing agent SKILL.md through one gated cycle: select the target (default this skill), snapshot the committed baseline, diagnose against skill-design-principles plus four rubric dimensions, apply exactly one focused change, and ship only if a different agent than the author PASSes with quoted evidence. Use when the user says "improve this skill", "improve-skill", "iterate on SKILL.md", or "apply skill-design-principles to a skill". Do not use for code slop over a duration (anneal), generic timeboxed work (timeboxed-iterating), graph orchestration (workgraph), metric hill-climb on a codebase (autoresearch), or stripping slop from existing prose (catalog-deslop).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adopt declscope on an existing Go codebase and drive its diagnostics to zero. Read this when introducing declscope to a repository, when choosing its configuration, when running declscope shrink for the first time, or when clearing a declscope baseline. Covers sizing each rule before enabling it, reading the diagnostics as structure, the remedy for each shape, and the measurement traps that produce false confidence. For writing new code in a repository that already runs declscope, use declscope-authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ward the codebase — an ad-hoc test-gap audit that reveals unguarded code (untested functions, uncovered edge cases, missing error-handling and integration tests) and conjures ready-to-paste test skeletons as protective wards against regression, surfaced inline in the session. Scoped to your current diff by default, or to a path/area you name. Use before merging risky changes or when you suspect thin coverage. Replaces the old always-on `testgaps` daemon worker (alias: /test-gaps).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quicken the codebase — an ad-hoc performance audit that reveals what drags (N+1 queries, needless re-renders, missing caching, memory leaks, redundant computation, hot-path complexity) and prescribes the fix, surfaced inline in the session. Scoped to your current diff by default, or to a path/area you name. Use before a perf-sensitive merge, when something feels slow, or when you want a targeted optimization pass. Replaces the old always-on `optimize` daemon worker (alias: /perf-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core conventions and patterns used in the Squad codebase

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map a codebase into feature-grouped flowcharts, identify duplicated concerns across features, and propose a unified architecture. Use when asked to "find the ideal path," unify duplicated systems, or audit architecture before a refactor. Emits a proposed unified flowchart plus per-system /make-plan prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic planning consultant that produces decision-complete work plans through Socratic interview, codebase exploration, Metis gap analysis, and optional Momus high-accuracy review. MUST USE when the task has 5+ steps, scope is ambiguous, multiple modules are involved, or the user asks for a plan. Triggers: plan this, create a work plan, interview me, start planning, prometheustic, plan mode, help me plan this, break this down.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after /unikit-plan or to improve a /unikit-fix plan, or when the user says "improve the plan", "what's wrong with the plan", or "update the plan from research". Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused investigators that write reproducing tests to validate suspected bugs. Thoroughness over speed. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural review workflow. Analyzes codebase organization via noun analysis and produces a target blueprint. Advisory only — does not implement changes. Always offers to cut tickets for the planned work; orchestrators receive the proposal and apply their own autonomy judgment to approve / edit / decline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a multi-category code audit on the cqs codebase. Spawns parallel agents per batch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture architectural decisions made during Claude Code sessions as structured ADRs. Auto-detects decision moments, records context, alternatives considered, and rationale. Maintains an ADR log so future developers understand why the codebase is shaped the way it is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search a codebase or UI for places that don't animate but should, and reject everything that shouldn't. Read-only; it proposes motion with exact values, it does not implement it. Use when the user asks "what could be animated here?" or wants to "make this feel more alive". For fixing existing animations, use improve-animations or review-animations instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans codebase for hardcoded secrets. Returns normalized findings with severity and remediation guidance. Pre-commit hook integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persistent cross-session knowledge base. Manages per-project learnings that compound across sessions — patterns, pitfalls, preferences, and project quirks. The agent gets smarter on your codebase over time. At session start, searches relevant learnings. During sessions, logs discoveries. Supports review, search, prune, and export. Use proactively when the agent encounters a durable project quirk, user preference, or pattern that would save 5+ minutes next time. Also use at session start to recover context. Triggers: "remember this", "log this", "what have we learned?", "show learnings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。