2,075 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Test a product concept with Amazon's Working Backwards method: write the press release for the finished product first, then answer hard customer and stakeholder questions, ending in a complete PRFAQ document. Use when the user requests to 'create a PRFAQ', 'work backwards', or 'run the PRFAQ challenge'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply evidence-first engineering discipline to any agent-built software project: fact discovery before action, evidence-calibrated status reporting, explicit change boundaries and stage gates, controlled confirmation for risky or external actions, sensitive-information redaction for anything shared publicly, and resumable continuity after interruptions. Use when users ask an agent to take over an existing codebase, deliver a feature across stages, verify whether work is actually complete, judge release readiness, or keep conclusions honest about what is proven versus assumed. This foundation skill is domain-neutral; vertical suites (for example mini-program engineering) build on it by adding domain facts and platform rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, preview, implement, and assess mini-program interfaces against an approved prototype, screenshot, visual reference, design system, or bounded UI request while preserving product semantics and existing accepted behavior. Use when users ask to reproduce a mini-program screen, refine visual hierarchy, adapt layouts across device sizes, handle safe areas or keyboards, inspect touch targets, scrolling, media, or gesture conflicts, compare an implementation with a reference, or prepare a device-verification matrix. Separates proposed visual previews, user approval, source integration, local checks, and real-device evidence; never invents product functionality for visual completeness or claims device validation without device-specific proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify mini-program implementations and fixes with risk-calibrated evidence across static checks, unit tests, integration tests, state matrices, simulators, real devices, cloud environments, and release artifacts. Use when users ask to test, validate, accept, regression-check, quality-check, confirm readiness, or determine whether a mini-program feature is actually complete. Binds results to a source and build fingerprint, records commands and observable evidence, separates passed, failed, blocked, and not-run layers, prioritizes the next highest-information check, and never converts local success into device, cloud, release, or formal acceptance claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert a vague mini-program idea, feature request, or partially documented product into an evidence-calibrated product specification with target users, core problem, version-one scope, main and exception flows, page responsibilities, state matrices, and testable acceptance criteria. Use when users ask to define an MVP, clarify requirements, organize product flows, specify page behavior, resolve ambiguous product states, or prepare a stable handoff before architecture or implementation. Separates facts, user decisions, assumptions, unknowns, and future ideas; never invents product logic merely to complete a screen or technical plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate PRD, UX, Architecture and Epics specs are complete. Use when the user says "check implementation readiness".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate accurate, runnable quantitative strategy code for the JoinQuant (聚宽) platform. Use this skill when the user asks to write a stock/ETF/futures backtest, paper-trading, or live-trading strategy on JoinQuant — the skill provides progressive-disclosure access to the complete JoinQuant API knowledge base (14 categories, 294KB official docs), 5 production-ready strategy templates (single-stock MA, multi-factor, ETF rotation, momentum, mean-reversion), and a lint tool that catches hallucinated APIs, future-function violations, and unset price-mode/slippage/commission. Chinese-friendly. Code generated by this skill should paste directly into the JoinQuant online editor without modification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous project bootstrapper. Generates complete project from a description — structure, code, tests, docs, config. Orchestrates ba → plan → design → fix → test → docs → git in one pipeline. The "0 to production-ready" skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-commit quality gate that catches 'almost right' code. Use when about to commit — auto-fires before commit to validate logic correctness, error handling, regressions, and completeness. Goes beyond linting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete developer marketing playbook covering DevRel programs, documentation as marketing, API developer experience, community building, and hackathon strategy. For dev-tool founders who need to reach engineers. Follow @WeiYipei on X.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete B2B marketing pipeline combining LinkedIn content, cold email sequences, and webinar funnels. Designed for SaaS founders doing $0–$1M ARR who need predictable lead generation. By @WeiYipei.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The complete first-timer's guide to launching on Product Hunt. Covers timing, hunter selection, asset prep, launch-day engagement, and post-launch follow-up. Follow @WeiYipei on X for more launch strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews Elixir documentation for completeness, quality, and ExDoc best practices. Use when auditing @moduledoc, @doc, @spec coverage, doctest correctness, and cross-reference usage in .ex files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use as the follow-up to brainstorm-beagle when a spec has an Open Questions section (or quietly carries latent gaps) that need closing before planning or implementation can begin. Triggers on: "resolve the open questions", "close the gaps in this spec", "research the open items", "finalize my spec", "make this spec implementation-ready", "answer the TBDs". Also triggers whenever the user points at a brainstorm-beagle spec and asks for research, proposals, or answers to unresolved items. Orchestrates parallel research subagents when available (falls back to inline sequential research otherwise), proposes answers one at a time for user approval, then rewrites the spec in place so it arrives at planning with no known gaps. Does NOT write code, design implementation, or create plans — it only produces a complete spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Archive a completed RIPDPI OpenSpec change through the fail-closed taskctl lifecycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate CLAUDE.md structure and completeness
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the complete 5-step development workflow: focus problem → prevent over-development → test-first (TDD) → document → smart commit. Use when starting a new feature, or when the user runs /workflow or asks for the full development flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A complete fiction-writing studio, run as a team of named specialist agents, that guides an author from a bare idea to a polished prose manuscript. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write, plan, or revise fiction — a novel, novella, short story, or series. Trigger on requests like "help me write a novel", "I have an idea for a story", "develop my characters", "build a world for my fantasy", "outline my plot", "fix this scene", "my dialogue feels flat", "give me beta-reader feedback", or any time the user is doing creative storytelling and would benefit from structured, craft-aware guidance. Also trigger when the user names a studio member (Homer, Aristotle, Fyodor, Tolkien, Scheherazade, Oscar, Max, Virginia, Borges, Bloom) or asks to switch creative roles / bring in a specialist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Flagship orchestrator that launches 5 parallel agents (cashflow, debt, investments, retirement, protection) to produce a comprehensive financial health analysis with a composite Financial Health Score (0-100), letter grade (A+ through F), and a prioritized 90-day action plan. Use when the user says "/finance analyze", "full financial analysis", "financial health check", "analyze my finances", or any request for a complete financial picture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs contract-driven compliance review of insurance certificates and endorsements against CRE/site-access and vendor agreement requirements. Produces pass/fail/conditional determinations, deficit lists, and broker-ready remediation instructions. Use when reviewing COI packets, ACORD 25 forms, or endorsements for additional insured, primary and non-contributory, waiver of subrogation, completed operations, umbrella alignment, limits adequacy, or insurer rating compliance. Trigger terms: COI, ACORD, additional insured, certificate holder, cancellation notice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。