「elf」の検索結果

Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AlphaFold2 / AlphaFold-Multimer structure prediction for validation and confidence scoring. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm2-sequence-scoring. For QC thresholds, use protein-design-qc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal — for Boundless team members only. Query Boundless broker telemetry tables on Redshift for prod/staging operational data. Use when the user asks about broker health, request evaluations, request completions, proving times, skip rates, telemetry data, or wants to run SQL against the telemetry database on live networks. Also covers historical telemetry through 2026-04-24 stored as Parquet archives in S3 (queried via DuckDB). Do NOT use for debugging local code changes, reviewing PRs, or investigating issues in the codebase itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal — for Boundless team members only. Cross-reference Boundless indexer API data, broker telemetry, and service logs to investigate production and staging operational issues. Use when the user wants to understand why slashings happened on prod/staging, diagnose prover or service failures in deployed environments, correlate market events with broker behavior, investigate fulfillment rate drops, look at prover/service logs, or perform any analysis that requires combining on-chain indexer data with off-chain broker telemetry and CloudWatch logs. Also use when the user asks to "investigate", "diagnose", or "find root cause" for prover, service, or market issues on live networks. Do NOT use for debugging local code changes, reviewing PRs, or investigating issues in the codebase itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Submit proof requests on the Boundless ZK proof marketplace. Covers wallet setup, CLI configuration, building or discovering guest programs, self-hosting via Cloudflare Quick Tunnels (no Pinata/S3 needed), submitting, and retrieving results. Use when a developer wants to request a ZK proof, submit a proof request, get started with Boundless, try Boundless, or learn the requestor workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal — for Boundless team members only. Query AWS CloudWatch logs for Boundless services (provers, slasher, distributor, order stream, order generator, indexer, signal) on prod/staging environments. Use when the user asks to look at service logs, debug service behavior from log output, search logs for a request ID, or investigate errors using CloudWatch. Do NOT use for debugging local code changes, reviewing PRs, or investigating issues in the codebase itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal — for Boundless team members only. Query the Boundless Indexer REST API for on-chain market data, staking, PoVW rewards, delegations, and market efficiency on prod/staging environments. Use when the user asks about proof requests, provers, requestors, staking data, PoVW rewards, delegations, market aggregates, leaderboards, or wants to fetch data from the indexer API on live networks. Also use when the user mentions "indexer" and wants to look up addresses, requests, or market statistics on deployed environments. Do NOT use for debugging local code changes, reviewing PRs, or investigating issues in the codebase itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-agent self-inspection of your AI-agent stack. Audits skills, MCP servers, hooks, plugins, commands, credentials, and memory files across Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, and NanoClaw. Produces a structured inventory and narrative briefing with cross-ecosystem risk analysis. Use when the user asks to audit their own setup, check what they have installed, review their agent stack security posture, or understand cross-tool interactions. Use when a user has accumulated skills/plugins/MCP servers over time and wants visibility into their attack surface. Use after installing new skills or plugins. Do NOT use for vetting external code before install (that is repo-forensics). Do NOT use for incident response during active attacks. Do NOT use for fixing or patching vulnerabilities (forensify is read-only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the bundled self-contained Godot WeChat Mini Game adapter kit to an official Godot checkout. Use when the user wants to port official Godot to WeChat Mini Game, refresh a nearby 4.6-based port, or inspect the shipped patch/source bundle for WXMEMFS, `wx.request`, audio cleanup, display/input, WXGLX dual-path rendering, `.wasm.br`, and `wx.exitMiniProgram`. This skill is version-locked to the bundled upstream base and must not be described as a generic “Godot 4.x” patch dump.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create evidence-aware, interactive visual explainers as self-contained offline HTML. Use when a user asks to explain a concept, repository module, engineering tradeoff, or incident with a diagram, walkthrough, ELI5 treatment, data/request trace, failure view, or teach-back. Do not use for a plain short answer, ordinary prose rewrite, generic website implementation, or unsupported claims presented as facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an interactive bash wizard that walks a human through steps only they can perform. Use when provisioning infrastructure, setting up credentials or CI secrets, walking an unfamiliar third-party dashboard, or running a one-off migration or cutover. Don't invoke this for steps the agent can perform itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Craft verifiable, tight goal prompts for AI coding agents (Claude Code /goal, Codex Automations, Pi), either from a standalone task interview or from an already-approved to-goal handoff. Use when the user says "给我一个 goal 提示词", "帮我写个 goal", "设置一个自动化任务", "我想让 agent 自动做 X", or asks to turn a task into a self-running loop. Ensures every goal has a checkable completion criterion so the agent knows when it's done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate release readiness with evidence-based go/no-go decisions. Covers go/no-go checklists, smoke test suite design, staged rollout validation, rollback criteria and procedures, and post-deployment verification. Ensures release confidence comes from data, not feelings. Use when: "release ready," "go/no-go," "smoke test," "release checklist," "rollback plan," "staged rollout," "canary deploy." Not for: safe-release techniques (flags, canary, dark launch) applied during the rollout itself — use testing-in-production; scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use synthetic-monitoring; designing new tests from prod telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: testing-in-production, qa-metrics, ci-cd-integration, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage test data with factory patterns, fixture strategies, data anonymization, and synthetic data generation. Covers Fishery (TypeScript), FactoryBot (Ruby), Factory Boy (Python), database seeding, cleanup strategies, and GDPR-compliant data handling. Use when: "test data," "fixtures," "factories," "seed data," "synthetic data," "test database," "data anonymization." Not for: migration/integrity testing of the DB itself — use database-testing; environment provisioning and database branching strategy — use test-environments. Related: test-environments, database-testing, api-testing, unit-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runtime per-test healing with evidence: multi-attribute selector healing, environment-aware diagnosis, flake classification, quarantine management, and confidence-scored auto-repair. Goes beyond simple locator fallbacks to cover action-level healing, data healing, and observable repair workflows. Use when: "flaky test," "test stability," "self-healing locator," "broken locator recovery," "unreliable test," "quarantine flaky test." Not for: bulk regenerating selectors after a planned UI refactor — use selector-drift-recovery (this skill heals ONE test at runtime; that one rewrites many tests offline). Not for: classifying/clustering CI failures into bug reports — use ai-bug-triage. Related: playwright-automation, selector-drift-recovery, ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hybrid fingerprint + LLM pipeline for bug classification, deduplication, and ticket generation. Normalizes CI logs, creates stable fingerprints, clusters near-duplicates, then uses LLM for severity classification and ticket writing. Includes bug reporting templates and severity/priority matrix. Use when: "bug triage," "classify bugs," "failure analysis," "auto-classify," "CI failures," "bug report," "defect template." Not for: runtime self-healing of one flaky locator — use test-reliability. Not for: designing new tests from production telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: qa-metrics, qa-dashboard, ci-cd-integration, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test application security against OWASP Top 10 (2025) with automated CI tooling: OWASP ZAP (DAST), dependency/supply-chain scanning (OSV-Scanner, SBOM, provenance), Semgrep SAST, auth/session tests (JWT, OAuth, RBAC), and XSS/CSRF/SQLi/SSRF Playwright patterns. Use when: "security test," "OWASP," "vulnerability," "ZAP," "XSS," "SSRF," "dependency scan," "auth testing," "OWASP LLM Top 10." Scope is automated scanning + negative-path security tests in CI, not manual penetration testing. Not for: mapping security controls to regulations (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR) — use compliance-testing; pipeline stage wiring and deploy gating mechanics — use ci-cd-integration; purely functional API auth/input tests with no attacker model — see api-testing; testing your product's own LLM features or defending the agent itself (prompt-injection detector, indirect injection, jailbreak red-teaming) — use ai-system-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, compliance-testing, api-testing, shift-left-testing, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a single sprint or release test plan. Covers feature decomposition into testable scenarios, requirements-to-test coverage mapping, effort estimation by test type, prioritization matrices (risk × effort), resource allocation, and scheduling with buffers. Use when: "sprint test plan," "release test plan," "what to test this sprint," "test estimation," "coverage mapping." Not for: multi-quarter strategy — use `test-strategy`. Not for: ranking areas by risk — use `risk-based-testing`. Not for: the go/no-go decision itself — use `release-readiness`. Related: test-strategy, risk-based-testing, release-readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a multi-quarter QA strategy document. Covers scope, risk-based prioritization, test levels (unit/integration/E2E), pyramid analysis, entry/exit criteria, quality KPIs, tool selection rationale, CI scaling levers, and timeline planning. Output is an actionable strategy document, not a shelf document. Use when: "test strategy," "QA strategy doc," "testing approach," "QA roadmap," "multi-quarter QA direction." Not for: a single-sprint or single-release plan — use test-planning. Not for: identifying which areas carry the most risk — use risk-based-testing first. Related: risk-based-testing, qa-metrics, release-readiness, test-planning, test-reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Seed a fresh (greenfield) repository with the PRD-Driven Context Engineering scaffold — PRD.md, SoT/ knowledge files, EPIC templates, domain-profile config, and agent MEMORY starters. Invoked as /prd-ce:init when the plugin is installed. The framework itself (skills, agents, hooks, scripts) ships LIVE in the plugin; this skill only plants the consumer-owned files the plugin cannot carry as behavior. Triggers on "/prd-ce:init", "set up PRD lifecycle here", "scaffold a new PRD-CE project", "initialize the methodology". Outputs a seeded scaffold + a verification report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symfony UX LiveComponent for reactive server-rendered UI -- components that re-render via AJAX on user interaction, zero JavaScript required. Use when building live search, real-time filtering, dynamic forms, inline validation, dependent selects, auto-save, polling, deferred/lazy rendering, or any UI that updates itself based on user input. Code triggers: AsLiveComponent, LiveProp, LiveAction, data-model, data-loading, data-live-action-url, ComponentWithFormTrait, LiveListener, emit, defer, lazy, polling. Also trigger when the user asks "how to build a search that filters as I type", "how to validate a form in real-time", "how to make a reactive component in PHP", "how to build dependent selects", "how to defer component rendering", "how to communicate between components via emit", "how to bind a form to a LiveComponent". Do NOT trigger for static reusable UI without reactivity (use twig-component), pure client-side JS behavior (use stimulus), or page-level navigation (use turbo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create dark-themed, animated technical diagrams as self-contained HTML+SVG files — flowcharts whose connectors visibly flow, and architecture diagrams where requests travel as light dots through the system (Diagrid/Temporal landing-page style). Use this skill whenever the user asks for a flowchart, workflow, pipeline, process diagram, state machine, system architecture, infrastructure, cloud, microservices, or network topology diagram — and especially when they mention "animated", "flowing", "dynamic", "alive", "GIF-like", or want a diagram for a landing page, README, docs, or product demo. Also use it to convert Mermaid source (a mermaid code block or .mmd file) into an animated diagram — "animate this mermaid", "make this flowchart move". Prefer this over static diagram output whenever the diagram represents anything that moves: requests, events, data, jobs, messages, or control flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the knowledge/ base and the .claude/ skills, agents and workflows for staleness, self-contradiction, and drift from their own stated rules — four independent adversarial auditors (two lenses over two trees) verify every load-bearing claim against the current tree, cross-examine each other within their tree, and reach a consensus on if/what needs changing. Use periodically, after a run of deliveries that changed build config, target layout or the skills themselves, or whenever you suspect the docs have aged out of true.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。