「implementation」の検索結果

Master authentication and authorization patterns including JWT, OAuth2, session management, and RBAC to build secure, scalable access control systems. Use when implementing auth systems, securing APIs, or debugging security issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in secure backend coding practices specializing in input validation, authentication, and API security. Use PROACTIVELY for backend security implementations or security code reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session or facing 3+ independent issues that can be investigated without shared state or dependencies - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code - write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass; ensures tests actually verify behavior by requiring failure first

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or developing, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through collaborative questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation. Don't use during clear 'mechanical' processes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working on multiple branches simultaneously, context switching without stashing, reviewing PRs while developing, testing in isolation, or comparing implementations across branches - provides git worktree commands and workflow patterns for parallel development with multiple working directories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a task with sub-agent implementation and LLM-as-a-judge verification with automatic retry loop

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine a draft task specification into a fully planned, implementation-ready task with acceptance criteria, architecture, per-step sub-task files and verifiable phases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Code implementation and refactoring, architecturing or designing systems, process and workflow improvements, error handling and validation. Provide tehniquest to avoid over-engineering and apply iterative improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether and how an existing mobile product should migrate to React Native. Use when auditing one or more product repositories for migration readiness, including products whose iOS, Android, and other clients live in separate directories or repositories; choosing brownfield, greenfield, or a checkpoint-based path; defining a representative trial; or preparing a baseline and ROI decision before implementation. When product scope or material evidence is unavailable, grills the stakeholder with exactly one question per turn instead of sending a questionnaire.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

House style for user-facing documentation — voice, scope, structure, and what to leave out. Use this skill whenever writing, editing, or reviewing anything a user reads to learn how to use a tool — help center articles, getting-started guides, tutorials, feature docs, README usage sections, in-app help, release notes, or FAQ entries. Trigger it even when the request is phrased plainly — "document this feature", "write docs for X", "explain this to users", "write a README for this library", "turn these notes into a guide" — and even when no style guidelines are mentioned. Also use it to review existing docs for tone, bloat, or leaked implementation detail. Do not use it for internal engineering docs, architecture write-ups, RFCs, or code comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Leverage OpenAI Codex/GPT models for autonomous code implementation, code review, and plan review. Triggers: "codex", "use gpt", "gpt-5", "let openai", "full-auto", "adversarial review", "second opinion review", "用codex", "让gpt实现", "对抗式审查", "让codex审查计划", "第二意见". Use this skill whenever the user wants to delegate coding tasks to OpenAI models, run code or plan reviews via codex, get a second-opinion review from a different model, or execute tasks in a sandboxed environment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix GitHub issues end-to-end — analysis, branch creation, implementation, testing, and PR submission. Use whenever the user mentions fixing a GitHub issue, says "fix issue

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Motion-first AI video director for topic-to-video creation. Use when the user gives a theme, idea, article, script, or brief and wants AI to freely create a real animated video instead of a PPT/slideshow-style explainer; when deciding visual metaphors, motion grammar, scene beats, component choices, generated image needs, HyperFrames/Remotion implementation strategy, and anti-PPT QC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Planning phase guidance for creating and reconciling feature task plans. Use when the user wants to create an implementation plan, update planning docs, mark task progress, capture blockers or new tasks, or run dev-lifecycle planning work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Orchestrator for structured SDLC phase skills. Use when the user wants to run the full lifecycle or choose the next phase across requirements, design, planning, implementation, testing, and review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Worktree setup and resume guidance for isolated feature work. Use when starting, resuming, switching, or verifying a feature branch/worktree for lifecycle, debugging, implementation, review, or multi-agent workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or unreliable test failures, or when the user mentions flaky tests, test smells, brittle tests, test isolation issues, mock overuse, slow tests, or test maintenance problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the red-green-refactor TDD workflow: write a failing test first, implement the minimum code to make it pass, then refactor while keeping tests green. Use when a user asks to practice TDD, write tests first, follow red-green-refactor, do test-driven development, write failing tests before code, or phrases like 'make the test pass', 'test coverage', or 'unit tests before implementation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independently assess an RPI plan without editing it. Use when an implementation-ready plan needs a credibility check or a revised plan needs its earlier findings reconciled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Follow an approved RPI plan, keep it current as new information comes to light, check off completed work, and keep a condensed changes log. Use when implementation is ready to begin or resume.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design Thinking learning curriculum covering nine progressive modules across the full Problem, Solution, and Implementation Space methods plus a shared manufacturing reference scenario for teaching and practice

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improves an existing application using its code, product contract, authorized work history and competitor evidence. Use for 取长补短、取其精华去其糟粕、参考竞品优化应用 or evolving an app from successful and failed work. Carries authorized changes through implementation and user-result verification, including REA and reverse Skill composition; use skill-evolver for Skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates several distinct, clickable HTML interaction prototypes for one product surface into a Design Board and collects selection/remix feedback before implementation. Use for multiple UI versions, interaction alternatives, progressive-disclosure options, or when styling is fine but hierarchy/workflow/interaction feels off. Not for static visual-style calibration (use design-style-picker) or a settled CSS tweak.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。