1,729 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Invoke only when the user explicitly asks to review code through the "single level of abstraction / layered error handling" lens — a function does only its own layer's business logic while errors are handled above or below. The agent reports detections, raw-count measurements, and move directions. Apply only when the user explicitly requests this lens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when cutting, debugging, or verifying a pythinker-code (TSC monorepo) release — changesets flow, the ci release-packages version PR, release.yml anatomy, npm Trusted Publishing OIDC, native assets, brew tap, CDN redeploy, and their failure modes. Invoked by /release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enter talk mode — conversation and research, no repo changes. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/talk` or `$talk`; never auto-select from a natural-language question or design discussion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Do a task end-to-end — implement, PR, CI loop, ship. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/do` or `$do`; never auto-select from a natural-language request, even one that sounds like an end-to-end task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for the `odu` runner — how to invoke a full pipeline, a single recipe, or a platform-pinned node, and how to attach to a live run, from a project whose CI odu runs. Trigger when the user asks to "run CI", "run the pipeline", "re-run a check", or names a specific recipe by `<recipe>@<platform>`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing delays that must survive process restarts (e.g., 24-hour cart abandonment, scheduled follow-ups), waiting for human approval or external events with timeouts (review gates, webhook callbacks, async API completion), polling external services without losing state on crashes, calling other functions and awaiting their results, memoizing expensive operations so they don't re-run on retry, or running async work in parallel inside a workflow. Covers Inngest step methods: step.run, step.sleep, step.waitForEvent, step.waitForSignal, step.sendEvent, step.invoke, step.ai, plus patterns for loops and parallel execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building functions that must survive process crashes, retry automatically on failure, run on a schedule, react to events, or maintain state across infrastructure failures — e.g., webhook handlers that drop events, flaky cron jobs, background jobs that fail mid-execution, or workflows that need to resume where they left off. Covers Inngest function configuration, triggers (events, cron, invoke), step execution and memoization, idempotency, cancellation, error handling, retries, logging, and observability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when upgrading an existing TypeScript codebase from Inngest SDK v3 to v4, or when fixing mixed v3/v4 API usage. Covers detecting current SDK usage, moving triggers into createFunction options, replacing EventSchemas with eventType/staticSchema, moving serve options to the client, updating realtime imports, rewriting step.invoke string IDs, checkpointing/serverless runtime settings, Connect option changes, and verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
REQUIRED before writing code for any feature touching auth, payments, credentials, tokens, sessions, file upload, user data, untrusted input, deserialization, network endpoints, or data deletion. Scope by that surface, not the task label — a research/experimental/local-only feature with none of it doesn't need this. Invoke it, record answers inline in the design doc or PR description, then write the code. Skipping this is how auth bypass, token leakage, and delete-the-wrong-record bugs ship. If the feature touches any of those surfaces and this hasn't run, the design is incomplete — do not proceed to implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up the prerequisites for the Quarkus + LangChain4j agentic stack in the coding agent you are running — detect and (with approval) install the toolchain, register the Quarkus Agents MCP and context7 MCP servers, and write the conventions file into your project. User-invoked only, via /setup-agentic-scaffolding; it prepares the environment the /scaffold-project and /audit-project skills depend on.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an existing Quarkus + LangChain4j project against this stack's agentic conventions — a read-only conformance or gap-analysis review. Use when the user asks to audit, review, check, assess, or validate a Quarkus project against the LangChain4j agentic conventions, or wants to know whether an existing project conforms to (or is ready to adopt) this stack. User-invoked only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Phase 2b (implementation, Green phase) and Phase 2c (refactor) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-builder to implement minimal code to pass failing tests, then refactor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Phase 1a (behavioral specification) and Phase 1b (verification architecture) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-builder to write EARS-format requirements and purity boundary analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Phase 2a (test generation, Red phase) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-builder to generate failing tests for all spec requirements. Records red phase evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Phase 5 (formal hardening) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-verifier to execute proof obligations, security hardening, and a purity-boundary audit before convergence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to know where a piece of reporting actually came from — the user gives an article URL and asks "where does this come from?", "who is the original source?", "is this just a rewrite?", or another skill needs the provenance chain before grading or citing a report. Follows an article's links and named attributions back to the originating vendor, government, victim or actor document and returns the chain, the primary's stated access and confidence language, publication dates, and every hop it could not resolve. Deterministic — a script or the Liberty91 platform resolves the chain; the model does not reconstruct it from memory. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /intelligence-writing. Works on any URL with no API key.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user asks to scan, investigate, or characterize a URL. Submits to URLScan (unlisted by default), cross-references with VirusTotal and OTX, extracts the parent domain and resolved IP for follow-up investigation. Returns verdict, redirect chain, contacted infrastructure, and screenshot. Invoked by /cti-orchestrator when the target is a URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence on an indicator (IOC reputation for an IP, domain, hash, or URL — malicious confidence, linked actors, malware families, reports) OR on an adversary (threat-actor profile, origin/target search, MITRE ATT&CK TTPs, finished intel reports). Answers questions like "look up 1.1.1.1", "what TTPs does Charming Kitten use?", "which threat actors operate from Russia?", and "latest report on Mustang Panda". Commonly invoked by the four /*-investigation skills, /ioc-enrichment-workflow, /threat-actor-profiling, and the regional espionage cells. Other agents/skills can chain this for vendor-authoritative actor and finished-intel context. Requires a Falcon Intelligence subscription.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need abuse-report history for an IPv4/IPv6 address — confidence score, total reports, distinct reporters, usage type. IP-only. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation. Retrieval only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user asks to check, identify, or characterize a file hash (MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256). Chains VirusTotal and OTX, optionally triggers /malware-analysis for deeper behavioral review. Returns detection signals, malware family, behavioral tags, and pivot candidates (communicating IPs, dropped files). Invoked by /cti-orchestrator when the target is a hash.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user asks to investigate, check, enrich, or characterize an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6). Chains VirusTotal, Shodan, AbuseIPDB, GreyNoise, OTX, and optionally Censys in parallel, then consolidates findings and prioritizes follow-up IOCs. Invoked by /cti-orchestrator when the target is an IP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to check an IP, domain, file hash, or URL against VirusTotal's reputation database. Returns detection ratio, verdict, community score, and key findings. Commonly invoked by investigation skills (/ip-investigation, /domain-investigation, /hash-investigation, /url-investigation) and by analysts enriching IOCs. Other agents/skills can chain this for VirusTotal enrichment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to answer "which attacker techniques do our controls actually stop, and how well?", "what controls should I have for this threat?", or "what telemetry should I collect to detect it?" — joining a customer's or your own security control baseline to ATT&CK techniques using a public, versioned evidence base of 9,545 control-to-technique mappings from six sources. Produces four ranked lists (addressed strongly, addressed weakly, real gaps, and techniques no control anywhere addresses). Use for control gap analysis, security programme prioritisation, board reporting on coverage, or the Resistance Strength side of a FAIR risk assessment. Invoke after /threat-actor-profiling or /lookup-liberty91 has produced a technique list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。