「issues」の検索結果

Manage Linux systems covering systemd services, process management, filesystems, networking, performance tuning, and troubleshooting. Use when deploying applications, optimizing server performance, diagnosing production issues, or managing users and security on Linux servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieves up-to-date documentation, API references, and code examples for any developer technology. Use this skill whenever the user asks about a specific library, framework, SDK, CLI tool, or cloud service — even for well-known ones like React, Next.js, Prisma, Express, Tailwind, Django, or Spring Boot. Your training data may not reflect recent API changes or version updates. Always use for: API syntax questions, configuration options, version migration issues, "how do I" questions mentioning a library name, debugging that involves library-specific behavior, setup instructions, and CLI tool usage. Use even when you think you know the answer — do not rely on training data for API details, signatures, or configuration options as they are frequently outdated. Always verify against current docs. Prefer this over web search for library documentation and API details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates custom dotnet new templates for correctness before publishing. Catches missing fields, parameter bugs, shortName conflicts, constraint issues, and common authoring mistakes that cause templates to fail silently. USE FOR: checking template.json files for errors before publishing or testing, diagnosing why a template doesn't appear after installation, reviewing template parameter definitions for type mismatches and missing defaults, finding shortName conflicts with dotnet CLI commands, validating post-action and constraint configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery), creating projects from templates (use template-instantiation), creating templates from existing projects (use template-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide developers through capturing diagnostic artifacts to diagnose production .NET performance issues. Use when the user needs help choosing diagnostic tools, collecting performance data, or understanding tool trade-offs across different environments (Windows/Linux, .NET Framework/modern .NET, container/non-container).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze MSBuild binary logs to diagnose build failures. USE FOR: build errors that are unclear from console output, diagnosing cascading failures across multi-project builds, tracing MSBuild target execution order, and generally any MSBuild build issues. Requires an existing .binlog file. DO NOT USE FOR: generating binlogs (use binlog-generation), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own concrete MSBuild ItemGroup and item-expression questions. USE FOR: Include, Remove, Update, item identity and metadata, transforms, filtering, batching, duplicate or overlapping items, and reviews that verify whether those operations are correct. Generated items stay in scope when the central defect is item identity, metadata, batching, duplicate declarations, or glob/Remove/Update semantics. For a generated artifact missing from compilation or output, wrong target timing/path, or FileWrites clean tracking without a broader item-semantics defect, use including-generated-files. The item operation may be broken, suspected, or already correct. Exclude property-only issues, general incrementality with no item question, broad reviews with no concrete item concern, and non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for diagnosing and improving MSBuild project evaluation performance. USE FOR: builds slow before any compilation starts, high evaluation time in binlog analysis, expensive glob patterns walking large directories (node_modules, .git, bin/obj), deep import chains (>20 levels), preprocessed output >10K lines indicating heavy evaluation, property functions with file I/O ($([System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(...))), multiple evaluations per project. Covers the 5 MSBuild evaluation phases, glob optimization via DefaultItemExcludes, import chain analysis with /pp preprocessing. DO NOT USE FOR: compilation-time slowness (use build-perf-diagnostics), incremental build issues (use incremental-build), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides creation and validation of custom dotnet new templates from existing projects. Generates a .template.config/template.json that preserves the source project's conventions. USE FOR: creating a reusable dotnet new template from an existing project, bootstrapping .template.config/template.json with correct identity, shortName, parameters, and post-actions, adding parameters or conditional content to a template you are authoring, validating the template.json you are authoring before publishing, packaging templates as NuGet packages for distribution. DO NOT USE FOR: validating an existing template.json as a standalone task (use template-validation), finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery and template-instantiation), MSBuild project file issues unrelated to template authoring, NuGet package publishing (only template packaging structure).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses .NET Framework CLR activation issues using CLR activation logs (CLRLoad logs) produced by mscoree.dll. Use when: the shim picks the wrong runtime, fails to load any runtime, shows unexpected .NET 3.5 Feature-on-Demand (FOD) dialogs, unexpectedly does NOT show FOD dialogs, loads both v2 and v4 into the same process causing failures, or any time someone is wondering "what is happening with .NET Framework activation?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement or review SignalR hubs, streaming, reconnection, transport, and real-time delivery patterns in ASP.NET Core applications. USE FOR: building chat, notification, collaboration, or live-update features; debugging hub lifetime, connection state, or transport issues; deciding whether SignalR or another. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review Blazor components (.razor files) with correct architecture. USE FOR: writing new Blazor components that do NOT involve JavaScript interop, implementing parameters and EventCallback, RenderFragment slots, component lifecycle (OnInitializedAsync, OnParametersSet), async patterns, IAsyncDisposable, CancellationToken, CSS isolation, code-behind. DO NOT USE FOR: creating new projects (use create-blazor-project), JavaScript interop or calling browser APIs from Blazor (use use-js-interop), forms and validation (use collect-user-input), prerendering issues (use support-prerendering), HTTP data fetching patterns (use fetch-and-send-data), coordinating state between unrelated components (use coordinate-components).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build forms, validate data, and react to user input in Blazor. USE FOR adding forms, search boxes, filter panels, inline editing, data-entry UI, file uploads, validation (annotations or custom), handling form submissions, and binding input controls. Covers EditForm, built-in input components, DataAnnotationsValidator, custom validation, SSR form patterns (SupplyParameterFromForm, FormName, AntiforgeryToken, Enhance), and @bind for simple interactive controls. DO NOT USE for project scaffolding (see create-blazor-project) or prerendering issues (see support-prerendering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summon shadow clones: genjutsu's full-scale pipeline for a whole website or web app, from scratch or as a full redesign. Harvests the client's real material, researches in parallel, lets Impeccable lead the direction and genjutsu the motion, builds the pages with parallel agents, then loops fixes, verdicts and a cold-eyes art director until only minor issues remain, the round cap of the chosen tier is reached, or a round fixes nothing. Announces its cost first and asks twice. Web. Needs a host that can spawn subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 QML code -- or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (47+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering bindings, layout, loaders, delegates, states, and performance. Optionally invokes system qmllint for type-level checks. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only -- never modifies code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 C++ code — or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (60+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering model contracts, ownership, threading, API correctness, error handling, and performance. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only — never modifies code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entrypoint for managing Volcengine Flink (based on Apache Flink) workloads. Use it for developing and deploying streaming and batch jobs, diagnosing real-time issues (e.g., backpressure, checkpoint failures, OOM), troubleshooting resources, and performing SRE actions (stop/start/restart/scale/config changes). It intelligently routes requests to four specialized sub-skills and leverages flink-mcp for tool execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit websites for SEO, technical, content, security, JS rendering, and AI readiness using SEOmator CLI. Returns LLM-optimized reports with health scores across 373 rules and 20 categories, and can diff two audits to show what a deploy changed. Use when analyzing websites, debugging SEO issues, checking site health, or comparing a site before and after a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to analyze Java profiling data collected during the detection phase — including interpreting flamegraphs, memory allocation patterns, CPU hotspots, threading issues, systematic problem categorization, evidence documentation with profiling-problem-analysis and profiling-solutions markdown files, or prioritizing fixes using Impact/Effort scoring. This should trigger for requests such as Analyze JFR profile; Analyze the profile; Analyze the performance; Analyze the memory; Analyze the threading; Analyze GC logs from profiling; Prioritize Java profiling bottlenecks by impact. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to set up Java application profiling to detect and measure performance issues — including trusted preinstalled async-profiler v4.x setup, problem-driven profiling (CPU, memory, threading, GC, I/O), interactive profiling scripts, JFR integration with Java 25 (JEP 518, JEP 520), or collecting profiling data with flamegraphs and JFR recordings. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with profiling; Apply Profiling; Refactor the code with profiling; Add profiling support; Collect JFR or async-profiler data for Java performance. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to refactor Java code based on trusted profiling analysis findings — including reviewing repository-owned or maintainer-sanitized docs/profiling-problem-analysis and docs/profiling-solutions files, identifying specific performance bottlenecks, and implementing targeted code changes to address CPU, memory, or threading issues. This should trigger for requests such as Refactor the code with profiling; Apply profiling; Optimize hot path; Reduce allocations found in profiling; Fix CPU bottlenecks from profiling analysis. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need Jira CLI (`jira`) installation/authentication guidance and a maintainer-authored Jira issue inventory workflow. The agent does not ingest raw Jira issue or JQL output directly; it asks the Jira project maintainer/operator to author sanitized issue summaries before analysis or @014-agile-user-story handoff. This should trigger for requests such as jira issue list; List Jira issues; Jira JQL issue query; Jira CLI issue workflow. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。