「plan」の検索結果

Execute a phased implementation plan using subagents. Use when asked to execute, run, or carry out a plan — especially one created by make-plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a detailed, phased implementation plan with documentation discovery. Use when asked to plan a feature, task, or multi-step implementation — especially before executing with do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user hands over a GitHub issue to be delivered end to end — 'resolver a issue #42', 'loop na issue 42', 'deliver issue https://github.com/o/r/issues/42' — or when an Orca worker preamble dispatches `feat-loop #N`. Turns the issue into a plan, executes it, reviews the result and runs at most 2 fix cycles until APPROVED, then opens a pull request that closes the issue. Never merges. Do NOT use without an issue (feat-feature / feat-quick), to only plan (feat-feature), to only review (feat-review) or to execute an existing plan (feat-exec).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants the existing codebase analyzed for planning — 'mapear o código', 'analisar o projeto', 'atualizar o contexto', 'map codebase' — or when a planning skill reports a missing or stale map. Runs a deterministic read-only evidence scan and writes codebase.md plus the architecture, conventions, testing and concerns context documents under .planning/feat/. Do NOT use for code review (feat-review), architecture decisions, or writing the project instructions file (feat-setup).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for the state of pwdev-feat plans — 'status do feat', 'quais planos estão pendentes', 'show feature status' — listing pending, complete, with-caveats, failed and resumable plans plus codebase-context health. Read-only. Do NOT use to execute (feat-exec) or query the audit trail (feat-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive developer experience plan review. Explores developer personas, benchmarks against competitors, designs magical moments, and traces friction points before scoring. Three modes: DX EXPANSION (competitive advantage), DX POLISH (bulletproof every touchpoint), DX TRIAGE (critical gaps only). Use when asked to "DX review", "developer experience audit", "devex review", or "API design review". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan for developer-facing products (APIs, CLIs, SDKs, libraries, platforms, docs). (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx review", "developer experience review", "devex review", "devex audit", "API design review", "onboarding review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a concise plan. Use when a user explicitly asks for a plan related to a coding task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides HOW to mutate a DAG when a node fails, quality is below threshold, or new information changes the plan. Selects from mutation strategies (add node, replace agent, fork paths, loop back, downgrade model) based on failure type, cost budget, and execution history. Activate on "DAG failed how to fix", "mutation strategy", "replan on failure", "adaptive DAG", "recovery strategy", "what to do when node fails". NOT for detecting failures (use dag-quality), executing mutations (use dag-planner), or runtime execution (use dag-runtime).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design AgentSpeak-style BDI plan libraries with explicit event, context, failure, and authority boundaries. NOT for treating BDI plans as safety approval or guaranteed execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Time-blind friendly planning, executive function support, and daily structure for ADHD brains. Specializes in realistic time estimation, dopamine-aware task design, and building systems that actually work for neurodivergent minds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, evaluate, and adopt agent infrastructure for a named workload. Use for agent runtime/framework selection, agent evaluation or observability plans, memory and tool boundaries, infrastructure cost controls, and organizational adoption. Covers workload-first comparison, risk and recovery planning, held-out evaluation, cost accounting, and staged rollout. Not a vendor ranking or a production certification. NOT for implementing a specific agent behavior (agentic-patterns), building a specific agent (ai-engineer), prompt optimization (prompt-engineer), or conventional ETL workflow design (jury_rig-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Planktonによる書き込み時コード品質強制 — ファイル編集ごとにフックを介した自動フォーマット、リンティング、Claude駆動の修正。

Executive coaching skill that helps you plan your 2026 using research-backed process goals. Guides you through discovery questions, creates outcome goals, converts them to daily behaviors, and sets up accountability systems. Use when you want to plan your year, set goals, or need a coach to help you stay focused.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts formal explanation letters for Canadian Study Permit applications by structuring the argument around program attractiveness, background relevance, choice rationale, and family benefits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch personalized daily horoscope forecasts from zodiac-today.com API based on natal chart calculations. Use when a user wants: (1) daily guidance on what activities to pursue or avoid, (2) life planning help — best days for interviews, travel, romance, important decisions, (3) energy/focus/luck/romance forecasts to optimize their schedule, (4) lucky colors and numbers for the day, (5) future date analysis for planning events, trips, or milestones (paid tiers). Triggers: horoscope, zodiac, star sign forecast, daily guidance, lucky day, best day to, astrology advice, what should I do today, is today a good day for, plan my week astrology. Required env: ZODIAC_API_KEY (hsk_ API key), ZODIAC_PROFILE_ID (birth chart profile ID). Collects sensitive PII (email, birth date, birth city) for natal chart — requires user consent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep project planning workflow—goals and non-goals, work breakdown, dependencies, critical path, risks and buffers, milestones, and communication rhythm. Use when kicking off initiatives, replanning after slips, or coordinating cross-team delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure AI work artifacts under .aiwork/{YYYY-MM-DD}_{slug}/ folders using the project's protocol (intent, triage, research, spec, prd, areas, plan, review, notes, docs/). Use when the user asks to plan, capture an intent, make a spec, triage, research a task, write a report, code review, summarize findings, save the work, document decisions, record this, write that down, persist findings, or references any path under .aiwork/. Also use when starting a non-trivial task that needs a plan or spec before implementation, or when finishing one and capturing notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive rollout plans with preflight checks, step-by-step deployment, verification signals, rollback procedures, and communication plans for infrastructure and application changes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Issue Planning and Automation prompt that generates comprehensive project plans with Epic > Feature > Story/Enabler > Test hierarchy, dependencies, priorities, and automated tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a Beads-first refactor plan through detailed interview, repo verification, alternatives, scope boundaries, testing decisions, and tiny working increments. Use when the user wants to plan a refactor, write a refactoring RFC, or turn a risky change into safe incremental work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates comprehensive content outlines and topic clusters for SEO. Plans content calendars and identifies topic gaps. Use PROACTIVELY for content strategy and planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as the single visible starter and controller for workspace work that may change files, runtime assets, planning state, docs, settings, or governance. Normalize the request into the Super Agent lifecycle: intake, spec registration for non-trivial work, planning registration, specialist routing, execution, testing, review, closeout, and planning-state updates before implementation begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。