3,047 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Draft flexible daily or weekly schedules around a user's priorities, availability, energy patterns, and fixed commitments. Use for day planning, deadline reverse-planning, focus protection, or a time audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate concise daily standups, reflection prompts, and weekly retrospectives for individuals or teams. Use for planning a day, surfacing blockers, reviewing user-provided entries, or drafting a check-in without assuming prior history.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a ticket must go to a human before any reply is sent, and how the first reply should read. Use when drafting a customer reply or setting needs_human_review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chinese-first research paper writing, revision, polishing, section drafting, rebuttal, peer-review response, thesis prose improvement, and manuscript argument planning. Use when the user asks to write or revise论文正文, abstracts, introductions, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, related work, responses to reviewers, LaTeX/Overleaf text, or academic prose. Preserve formulas, English paper titles, terms, citations, and measured results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compose one publication-grade multi-panel figure. Start from a one-line claim plus immutable data Artifact Version references, or inspect an existing figure and draft its outline directly. Plan a 12-column panel outline, delegate one worker per panel, compose and inspect the result, then run at most three adversarial review rounds while regenerating only affected panels. For a standalone plot use `figure-style`; for whole-paper figure ordering use `paper-narrative`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track how AI assistants describe your brand over time and catch wrong, outdated, or damaging claims. Claude builds your monitoring prompt set, compares runs week over week, and drafts the correction plan when answers drift. Platform: AI visibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove AI tells from LinkedIn posts/comments: 2026 vocabulary density, reveal bridges, staccato fragments, stacked triads, performed sincerity. Tiered rewriter plus `--mode audit` LinkedIn post auditor and `--mode profile` voice builder. Not for drafting from scratch (use linkedin-post-writer) or beating AI detectors. Keywords: humanize, de-AI, post audit, post auditor, audit before posting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track which of your LinkedIn comments earned author replies. Flags the 6-24h warm-reply window where thread momentum peaks, classifies threads as hot/warm/cool/dormant, and routes warm ones to linkedin-reply-handler for follow-up drafts. Powered by Apify, no LinkedIn login. Triggers on "what threads need follow-up", "author replied", "monitor my comments". Not for analyzing likers on a post (use linkedin-engager-analytics).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a 7-day LinkedIn content plan from a theme, audience, and pillars. Produces per-day post pillar, format, hook type, CTA, posting time, daily comment targets, and a weekly inbound-readiness check. Use when the user wants to plan a week or month of content, not draft a single post (use linkedin-post-writer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview the user for the raw material their posts are made of. Builds a lasting Story Bank of roles, numbers, turning points, scars and positions, or runs a focused interview that turns one topic into a post spine. Use when a draft has nothing concrete to draw on, or the user says interview me. Not for learning how they write (use linkedin-humanizer --mode profile).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repurpose existing content into a native LinkedIn post. Take a tweet, thread, YouTube video, blog, or newsletter and rebuild it for LinkedIn: re-hook before the fold, expand to the 900 to 1300 char sweet spot, add whitespace and a CTA, move links to the first comment, run the humanizer, publish via Publora on approval. Not for writing from scratch (use linkedin-post-writer), not for auditing a draft (use linkedin-humanizer --mode audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strip AI writing patterns from text. Checks 24 patterns across 4 categories (structural, lexical, rhetorical, formatting) with academic economics adaptation. This skill should be used on any text that reads too "AI-generated", or as a final pass on drafted sections. Triggers on "humanize", "de-AI", "make it sound natural", or "strip AI patterns".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, conducting literature reviews, finding related work, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, citation verification workflows, and paper discovery/evaluation criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to co-author documentation, draft a proposal, write a technical spec, create a decision doc or RFC, or structure a substantial document through iterative collaboration and reader testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Humanization Pipeline Orchestrator v3.1 - Multi-pass 4-layer transformation pipeline Orchestrates G5 (Auditor), G6 (Humanizer), F5 (Verifier) in sequential passes Enforces checkpoints between every pass with mandatory AskUserQuestion Supports conservative (L1-2), balanced (L1-3), balanced-fast (L1-3 merged), aggressive (L1-4) modes Rich Checkpoint v2.0: section-level scores, selective humanization, target auto-stop G5+F5 parallel execution, section-selective humanization Triggers: humanize, humanize my draft, humanize manuscript, make natural, remove AI patterns Korean triggers: 휴먼화, 자연스럽게, AI 패턴 제거
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VS-Enhanced Academic Style Auditor - Academic Writing Quality Analysis Identifies 24+ writing patterns that reduce scholarly quality, adapted from Wikipedia AI Cleanup guidelines Use when: checking drafts before submission, improving academic writing quality, preparing for style improvement Triggers: writing quality, style audit, pattern check, writing review, academic style check
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prose quality checker for Quarto (.qmd) files, grounded in William Zinsser's *On Writing Well* (30th Anniversary Edition). Checks for clutter, weak verbs, hollow qualifiers, clichés, inflated academic voice, poor leads and endings, pronoun and tense inconsistency, and unclear explanation. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to improve prose quality, tighten writing, reduce clutter, or apply Zinsser's writing principles to a draft. For grammar and punctuation, use the proofread skill. For APSA style rules, use the apsa-style skill. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, draft and refine research papers with reproducible analysis and publication-ready manuscripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants substantive academic feedback on a paper — not just surface edits. Triggers include: "review my paper", "give me feedback on this draft", "what would a referee say", "anticipate referee objections", "act as a referee", "check my identification strategy", "is my argument convincing", "review this manuscript", "critique my paper", "will this pass review", or any request for deep critique of academic writing beyond typos and grammar.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors found — not substantive academic critique. Triggers include: "proofread", "check for typos", "grammar check", "look for errors in my draft", "proofread all", "polish this", "check my writing", "are there any mistakes", "proofread before I send this", or when the user wants a clean-up pass rather than feedback on arguments or methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a complete academic literature survey from scratch using multi-agent orchestration. Searches academic databases (OpenAlex, CrossRef, Unpaywall), downloads PDFs, builds BibTeX, drafts a LaTeX review, compiles it, reviews for quality, and revises based on feedback — all automated. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "generate a literature review", "write a survey paper", "review recent papers on [topic]", "create a survey of [field]", "综述", "文献综述", "survey papers in top journals", or wants a multi-agent pipeline to produce a publishable-quality literature review. Also trigger when the user wants to search multiple journals for papers on a topic and synthesize findings into a structured document. Works for any academic field but optimized for economics journals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for writing the abstract of an academic economics paper. Use this skill whenever the user asks for help writing, drafting, revising, or structuring an abstract for an economics paper - whether empirical micro, development economics, applied economics, or related fields. Also trigger when the user mentions "abstract," "paper summary," or asks how to compress their findings into a short description. This skill synthesizes best practices from David Evans (CGDev), Marc Bellemare, and patterns observed in top economics journals (AER, QJE, AEJ: Applied, etc.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for writing the introduction to an academic economics paper. Use this skill whenever the user asks for help writing, drafting, revising, or structuring an introduction to an economics paper - whether empirical micro, development economics, applied economics, or related fields. Also trigger when the user mentions "intro," "introduction section," "opening paragraphs," or asks how to motivate, frame, or present their research question in a paper. This skill synthesizes best practices from David Evans (CGDev), Keith Head, Claudia Sahm, Marc Bellemare, and Deirdre McCloskey.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。