「reports」の検索結果

"Management accounting toolkit for internal decision support: ABC costing, variance analysis, transfer pricing, and responsibility accounting. Use for product profitability disputes, budget variance diagnosis, inter-division pricing design, and business-unit manager performance evaluation. Triggers: 『這個產品真的賺錢嗎』『成本分攤』『事業部之間怎麼算錢』『本月成本超支』『評核廠長績效』『內部轉撥』『ABC 作業成本』『差異分析』『責任中心』『管理會計』. For Taiwan EMBA cases, term reports, and management-decision simulations (台大／陽交／成大 財管必修).".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze test coverage with detailed metrics, identify gaps, and generate comprehensive reports. Use when measuring code coverage, finding untested code, or validating coverage thresholds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Works through the surviving mutants that cargo-mutants reports for packages/engine — classify each one as a real test gap, a mutant not worth killing, or dead code, then fix it and verify with `just mutants-diff`. Use when picking up the weekly "Mutatietesten" issue, when asked to improve engine test coverage, or when a pull request fails the Mutation Testing (diff) gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search, screen, deeply read, synthesize, and publish recent research papers for a user-specified topic, window, count, quality/attention balance, and language. Use for evidence-anchored literature digests, cross-paper comparisons, original-language excerpts, Chinese explanations, guided Feishu setup, or Feishu research reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Condense long reports, documents, or data exports into structured summaries with key findings, implications, and recommended actions. Use when the work is distilling dense content for busy readers. Do not use for original analysis, strategy formulation, or when the source material needs expert interpretation beyond summarization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze survey and feedback data with statistical distributions, cross-tabulations, significance testing, and open-ended theme extraction. Produces executive-ready survey reports with segment comparisons and action recommendations. Use when processing NPS, CSAT, employee engagement, or market research surveys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write one-page executive briefs and decision memos that turn messy inputs into a concise recommendation, options, risks, decision ask, and next steps. Use when leaders need a fast read before approving budget, policy, vendor, headcount, or strategy changes. Do not use for long-form reports, slide design, or generic summarization without a decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Digital forensics and incident response triage skill for disk, memory, network, cloud, and endpoint artifacts. Covers Volatility 3, Velociraptor, KAPE, Plaso, Autopsy, Chainsaw, Hayabusa, Zeek, Arkime, EVTX, AWS/Azure/GCP audit logs, and timeline reconstruction. Use to extract IOCs, build incident timelines, and produce defensible analyst reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Malware reverse engineering and suspicious artifact analysis skill for defensive triage, static analysis, dynamic analysis planning, unpacking strategy, indicators of compromise, behavior summaries, YARA/Sigma ideas, and remediation guidance. Use for suspicious binaries, scripts, documents, logs, memory artifacts, sandbox reports, and malware family analysis in isolated environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Purple team automation skill that links offensive emulation (Atomic Red Team, Caldera, Stratus Red Team, Leonidas) with detection validation, telemetry-gap analysis, and continuous control testing. Use to design adversary emulation plans tied to MITRE ATT&CK, execute safe tests in lab or controlled environments, and produce evidence-backed detection coverage reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI and LLM red-teaming skill for evaluating prompt injection, jailbreak, data exfiltration, tool abuse, agent hijack, RAG poisoning, model denial of service, and unsafe tool-use chains in Gemini, Claude, GPT, and open-weight models. Use to build evaluation harnesses, attack corpora, defensive guardrails, and red-team reports for AI systems you own or are authorized to test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes professional bug bounty reports for HackerOne, Bugcrowd, and Intigriti with CVSS 4.0 scoring, business impact, working exploits, and remediation. Runs 5-check Pre-Report Verification first: hallucination detection, AI writing patterns, PoC reproducibility, duplicate detection, and impact plausibility. Use when user describes a vulnerability, shares HTTP logs, HAR files, recon output, or screenshots; says 'write a bug report', 'format my finding', 'draft a vuln report', 'is this valid', 'rate my vulnerability', 'verify my report', or any variant. Trigger for partial or messy input — raw notes, one-liners, or full writeups all work. Do not wait for perfect input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement the 5-stage Funnel workflow (Notes → Leads → Primitives → Findings → Reports) for structured bug bounty hunting. Based on Critical Thinking Bug Bounty Podcast Episode 166.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ERPNext-aware reasoning for accounting, selling, buying, stock, manufacturing, projects, HR, support, education, CRM, and other ERPNext module work. Use when a task affects ERPNext module behavior, configuration, reports, dashboards, workflows, or customizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frappe backend guidance for Python and backend-adjacent JavaScript surfaces such as client interaction patterns, hooks, APIs, patches, scheduler logic, reports, and server-side review. Use when implementing or reviewing Frappe backend behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR or the current branch for a Lumen design-system change — routes each changed file to React (web/Tailwind) or React Native (useStyleSheet) guidelines, checks the Nx version plan, and reports a flat, severity-scored finding list. Use when the user asks to review a PR, review code changes, check a branch, do a local code review, or provides a GitHub PR URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Append a session/state snapshot to MEMORY.md (regardless of where it lives — for this repo it's `founder/MEMORY.md`). Use when the user says "snapshot memory", "save state to memory", "/memory-snapshot", "log what happened in MEMORY", or otherwise asks to record the current session's outcomes for the next orchestrator. Locates the project's MEMORY.md, prepends a dated entry above the previous snapshot (newest first), preserves every existing entry (NEVER overwrites or truncates), and reports back the file path + byte delta. Not for one-off feedback memories (use the user-level memory system at ~/.claude/.../memory/ for those). Not for trimming or deleting old entries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect or exercise the paused gaia curate orchestration scaffold for one source URL. The command currently persists an INITIALIZED run ledger and reports status; its 25 named workflow states and transition methods are a design skeleton, not an implemented automated curation or merge pipeline. Use only for scaffold development, status inspection, or dry-run contract work. For live curation, use gaia-full-pipeline or gaia-consult. Trigger phrases: "/gaia-quick-curate", "inspect gaia curate", "curate scaffold", "quick curate status". For batch/multi-page runs use gaia-curate-dynamic; for crawler branches use gaia-bot-curate; for pending intake proposals use gaia-draft-curate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate a whole-registry sweep of Gaia — fan out 13 parallel audit agents across every skill, run adversarial verification, surface Semantic Fusion candidates, propose new generic skill references, and synthesize a publish-ready HTML report under docs/meta/reports/. Use this skill for broad, systemic analysis across many skills at once: "run a meta sweep", "sweep the meta", "full meta audit", "audit the whole registry against META.md", "widespread nomenclature issues", "find all skills missing a GitHub link", "produce a meta report", "check for evidence type mismatches across the registry", "find skills that document a third-party tool with no attribution", or explicitly types /gaia-meta-sweep. This is the registry-wide macro companion to /gaia-meta-audit (a prioritized queue, single-pass) and /gaia-audit (fixes one skill). Use it when you need the full surface — 13 audit dimensions, adversarial verification, fusion proposals, and a durable findings artifact — not just a queue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Updates this skill pack from upstream, and owns the consent that decides whether it ever updates on its own. Checks whether the clone is behind, asks the user — update now, always keep me up to date, not now, or never ask again — and carries out the answer: applies the update through ./scripts/update.sh, records the consent flag the SessionStart hook already reads, snoozes on an escalating ladder, or turns the check off for good. Summarizes what changed between the two commits from the CHANGELOG. Use when the user asks to update or upgrade the pack, get the latest skills or the newest version, when the session banner reports that updates are available, when they ask whether their clone is current, when they want unattended updates switched on or off, or when they want to stop being asked. It never applies an update without an answer, and notify-only is the default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit essays, reports, literature reviews, dissertations, proposals, and source-backed assignments for high-score academic quality. Use when the user asks whether a paper can get a high grade, wants teacher/rubric feedback addressed, needs a pre-submission review, or needs checks for strict rubric compliance, academic standards, prompt/rubric alignment, argument quality, comparative analysis, evidence hierarchy, table/figure integration, citation specificity, conclusion strength, academic language, source-claim integrity, or evidence boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a feature before writing any code. Use this skill at the START of non-trivial feature work — when the user says they want to "add", "build", "implement", "create", "develop", or "ship" a feature, endpoint, component, page, service, or capability. Especially trigger when the user's prompt is short or under-specified ("add a dashboard", "build an auth flow", "let's do user activity reports") — those need planning, not direct execution. The skill walks through requirements clarification, codebase exploration, sketches a Mermaid architecture/flow diagram of the proposed design, and produces a plan.md document the user can hand off to a fresh AI session for execution. Skip only when the change is genuinely trivial (typo fixes, single-line tweaks, renames). When in doubt, plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses capa to identify malware capabilities from a binary: running rule-based detection over disassembly, mapping matched capabilities to MITRE ATT&CK and MBC, and interpreting results to focus deeper analysis. Activates for requests to run capa, generate a capability report, or map a sample's behaviors to ATT&CK automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。