1.3万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Expert security auditor for AI Skills and Bundles. Performs non-intrusive static analysis to identify malicious patterns, data leaks, system stability risks, and obfuscated payloads across Windows, macOS, Linux/Unix, and Mobile (Android/iOS).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform audio recordings into professional Markdown documentation with intelligent summaries using LLM integration
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and designs iOS/macOS/watchOS/visionOS interfaces against the Apple Human Interface Guidelines, including the Liquid Glass design language (announced WWDC25, shipped with iOS 26/macOS Tahoe, Sept 2025). Use when reviewing an Apple-platform mockup or app for HIG compliance, checking contrast or tap-target sizes, or designing native-feeling Apple UI (e.g., 'audit my iOS app against the HIG', 'is this text readable on Liquid Glass?').
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up, audit, and debug analytics tracking implementation — GA4, Google Tag Manager, event taxonomy, conversion tracking, and data quality. Use when building a tracking plan from scratch, auditing existing analytics for gaps or errors, debugging missing events, or setting up GTM. Trigger keywords: GA4 setup, Google Tag Manager, GTM, event tracking, analytics implementation, conversion tracking, tracking plan, event taxonomy, custom dimensions, UTM tracking, analytics audit, missing events, tracking broken. NOT for analyzing marketing campaign data — use campaign-analytics for that. NOT for BI dashboards — use product-analytics for in-product event analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Geracao de imagens humanizadas via Google AI Studio (Gemini). Fotos realistas estilo influencer ou educacional com iluminacao natural e imperfeicoes sutis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches. AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a comprehensive code quality audit covering security, performance, and maintainability. Use for quarterly audits, pre-release reviews, or when onboarding to a large codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an infrastructure-first security audit of a repository - secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, CI/CD pipeline, LLM/AI attack surface, agent skill supply chain, OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat model, and data classification - with a confidence gate and a pre-emit verification gate that suppress speculative findings. Use when asked for a security audit, threat model, pentest-style review, OWASP pass, or a pre-release security check. Not for reviewing a single diff - use requesting-code-review for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintenance for agent-flow context. Runs /doctor, /sync-context, /audit-risk, /repair-docs, /garden, /debt and /audit-lean; re-verifies context claims against the code before refreshing timestamps; turns repeated agent mistakes into mechanical checks. Use on a schedule, after merges flagged [CONTEXT_STALE], or when asked whether AGENTS.md is stale or the risk baseline needs review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Practical security review and hardening guidance for application code in Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a security review or audit, wants to harden authentication (password hashing, sessions, JWT, OAuth2/OIDC, MFA), fix OWASP Top 10 issues (injection, XSS, IDOR, CSRF, SSRF, deserialization), threat-model with STRIDE, clean up secrets and .env handling, or set up dependency scanning (pip-audit, npm audit, osv-scanner, gitleaks, SBOM). Also trigger for "make this secure", "is this safe to deploy", bcrypt/argon2id, rate limiting logins, RBAC/ABAC, CSP and security headers, cookie flags, and secure-by-default coding help.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-generate a professional, client-ready GEO service proposal from audit data. Creates a full proposal in markdown and PDF including executive summary, findings, recommended service packages (Basic/Standard/Premium), pricing, timeline, and terms. Use when user says "proposal", "proposta", "offerta", "preventivo", "generate proposal", or after completing a GEO audit for a prospect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full website GEO+SEO audit with parallel agents first and skills fallback. Orchestrates a comprehensive Generative Engine Optimization audit across AI citability, platform analysis, technical infrastructure, content quality, and schema markup. Produces a composite GEO Score (0-100) with prioritized action plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing HOW to record change history / audit trails — walks the tier matrix (columns → audit log → temporal → event sourcing). Triggers on 'wer hat was wann', 'audit log'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quando o usuário quer auditar, revisar ou diagnosticar problemas de SEO no seu site. Também use quando o usuário menciona "auditoria de SEO," "SEO técnico," "por que não estou ranqueando," "problemas de SEO," "SEO on-page," "revisão de meta tags," ou "verificação de saúde de SEO." Para construir páginas em escala visando palavras-chave, veja programmatic-seo. Para adicionar dados estruturados, veja schema-markup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill whenever the project involves writing, editing, or reviewing content for a general audience, including UI copy, help text, error messages, documentation, and instructions. Under no circumstances use jargon, complex sentence structures, or unexplained acronyms without providing plain alternatives. Absolutely always target a reading level accessible to the broadest possible audience. Load alongside content-design/SKILL.md for all content work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run on an existing project to decide KEEP / MERGE / ARCHIVE — never limbo. Forces a call on tools that already exist and may have stopped earning their keep. Trigger on "is this still worth keeping", "audit this repo", "tech-debt cleanup", "sweep the folder", "what's dead here", or any signal that something hasn't been touched in months. Judged from both the agent lens (still legible, still drivable, still safe) and the human lens (do I still reach for it, does it nag). Includes a non-negotiable footgun check for stale pipelines that can overwrite live data. Outputs a backed AUDIT.md and a one-line verdict note in the project root docs. Do NOT load for greenfield projects (use new-project-gate), one-off bug fixes, or when the answer is already obvious.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use between coding-agent runs (Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Aider, etc.) to stop the project from drifting, overbuilding, or accumulating dead weight. Forces a read-only audit that classifies every active item as KEEP / DELAY / REMOVE and ends with a single, unambiguous next action. Trigger on "audit before continuing", "what should I do next", "this project got too big", "between runs", "trim scope", "stop adding stuff", or any signal that the project feels noisy and the next step is unclear. Do NOT load for trivial one-line fixes, when the next action is already obvious, or when you're mid-run and just need to keep going.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Protected Health Information (PHI) and Personally Identifiable Information (PII) compliance patterns for healthcare applications. Covers data classification, access control, audit trails, encryption, and common leak vectors. Use when code touches PHI or PII in a healthcare system, or when auditing access control, audit trails, or leak vectors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Semantic audit of the IDD instruction corpus for leaked session context, cross-file contradictions, fresh-memory completability gaps, automation blockers, and restatement-discipline drift. Use on request to audit .github/instructions, the issue-authoring skill bundle, and the installed agent entry files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md). Read-only — never edits files or mutates issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a deep, honest peer-review of how someone uses Claude Code by statistically analyzing their local session data (~/.claude/usage-data/ and ~/.claude/projects/). Trigger whenever the user asks to review, analyze, audit, or critique their own Claude Code usage, workflow, habits, or skill level — including phrases like "analyze my cc usage", "review my cc sessions", "peer review my cc workflow", "deeper than /insights", or any ask for an honest audit of their AI workflow. Also covers portfolio/hiring-manager framings (e.g. "portfolio for Anthropic/OpenAI/xAI"), but ALWAYS ask the user in Step 0 which version to build (self / hr / both) before running — never silently produce an HR report, because that version goes to outsiders and needs explicit privacy setup. The HTML report is laid out ledger-first for SELF (opening band, output/team/leak/trend ledgers, then peer review, 9-dim scoring, try-this-week, case study, claim-indexed evidence). The HR variant is a recruiter version v1: identity card, earned badges (threshold-based, earned-only), allowlist-filtered output ledger, one case study, and a methodology & scope disclosure — no scores, no peer-review memo, no charts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Commodore 64 SID 6581/8580 sound emulation in EMULATORS, including $D400-$D7FF register decoding, voices, frequency, pulse width, control bits, ADSR/envelope behavior, oscillator sync/ring/noise/test, filters, volume DAC/sample clicks, paddles, read-only registers, mirrors, and reSID integration. Use when Codex reviews or edits SID, Sound, audio wrapper, register, filter, waveform, envelope, or mapped SID behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure and audit C/C++ code size, namespace distribution, function complexity, nesting, recurrence, and namespace coupling in the EMULATORS framework. Use when Codex needs codebase statistics, complexity baselines, namespace comparisons, duplication indicators, hotspots, architectural growth analysis, or before/after complexity reports while excluding third-party code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。