「validate」の検索結果

Think and work like an expert Cell Signaling Biologist. Use when a task calls for Cell Signaling Biologist judgment. Reasons from RTK–RAS–MAPK and PI3K–Akt–mTOR phosphorylation networks, pathway crosstalk and feedback; validates with phospho-Western, phospho-flow, and PhosphoSitePlus while treating serum-starvation artifacts, inhibitor off-targets, and RNA footprint vs PTM mismatch as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Civil Engineer. Use when a task calls for Civil Engineer judgment. Reasons from load paths, factored load combinations, soil-structure interaction, and governing limit states through ASCE 7, ACI 318, AISC 360, and tools like SAP2000/ETABS, PLAXIS, and HEC-RAS while treating missing load paths, connection and foundation failures, differential settlement, and unvalidated FEA as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Brain–Computer Interface Engineer. Use when a task calls for Brain–Computer Interface Engineer judgment. Reasons from modality–paradigm fit (EEG, ECoG, Utah arrays), CSP/Riemannian decoding (pyriemann, MOABB), BCI2000/OpenBCI pipelines, and charge-density stimulation safety; validates within- vs cross-session claims and treats muscle ICA, impedance drift, and IDE/IRB gates as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Astroparticle Physicist. Use when a task calls for Astroparticle Physicist judgment. Reasons from flux times cross section times acceptance, Poisson counting over structured backgrounds, and Cherenkov photoelectron budgets through SkyLLH unbinned likelihoods, Geant4/CORSIKA chains validated on through-going-muon and calibration samples, and Feldman-Cousins/CLs limits, while treating atmospheric-neutrino and downgoing-muon contamination, ER/NR leakage and the neutrino fog, and look-elsewhere trials as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Behavioral Neuroscientist. Use when a task calls for Behavioral Neuroscientist judgment. Reasons from contingency structure, deprivation state, and latent arousal/motivation variables through Morris water maze, contextual/cued fear conditioning, operant schedules on Med Associates rigs, and DeepLabCut/SLEAP/SimBA tracking validated against ethograms, while treating thigmotaxis-as-anxiety, locomotor confounds of memory deficits, peripheral CNO sedation, and trials-as-n pseudoreplication as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Append-only gap closure and the cadence engine for research theses. Evaluates artifact CURRENT state (never git history, never task checkboxes) against current pins and wrong_if falsifiers, then appends a Convergence section to tasks.md re-proposing the gaps. A clean run leaves tasks.md byte-identical. Deterministic gaps (stale, invalidated) are uncapped; judgment-class gaps are capped per spec 046 Q40.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a structured code review by composing validation checklists from relevant atoms based on what code changed. Loads atoms conditionally -- clean-code always, architecture/DDD/security/tests only when the delta touches their domain. Produces a severity-ordered report with specific locations and fixes. Use when the user asks to 'review this', 'code review', 'quality check', 'validate the code', 'check my code', 'review the delta', or 'review this PR'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply requirement quality principles when generating or validating feature specifications. Enforces feature completeness, scenario structure, AC verifiability, feature independence, and implementation slice quality. Use when writing feature specs, validating existing requirements, or when the user mentions 'validate this spec', 'check this feature', 'requirement quality', 'is this spec complete', or 'requirement-quality'. This skill governs the craft of writing individual feature specifications — not technical design (see design-blueprint), not implementation (see code-forge).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply DDD tactical patterns when working with domain code, and validate proposed domain models before approval (design mode). Enforces aggregate design, value objects over primitives, entity identity rules, and bounded context boundaries. Use when creating or modifying domain models, designing aggregates, working in the domain layer, or when the user mentions 'domain', 'aggregate', 'value object', 'entity', 'bounded context', or 'DDD'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a new Lattice skill — atom, molecule, or refiner — following all framework conventions. Writing skill files manually almost always produces convention violations: wrong section order, missing confirmation gates, defaults.md without the right structure. This skill knows all of that and guides you through it. Use whenever adding any new atom, molecule, or refiner to Lattice, or when the user says 'create a new skill', 'add an atom', 'add a molecule', 'add a refiner', 'build X for Lattice', 'new lattice skill', or 'skill forge'. Does not validate, align docs, or deploy — those are separate skills you run after.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experiment executor and monitor for academic research. 2-agent system covering code experiments (ML training, statistical analysis, ETL, simulation) and human studies (surveys, field studies, interviews). 4 modes: run (execute + monitor code), manage (track human studies), validate (statistical interpretation + reproducibility verification), plan (Socratic experiment design). Use when a researcher wants to run or monitor a research experiment, manage or resume a human-subject study, check the statistics or reproducibility of research results, or design an experiment or study, in English or Chinese (e.g., 跑實驗、管理研究、驗證結果、規劃實驗).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate email addresses for deliverability, check reputation scores, verify MX records, and assess email-sending safety. Covers deliverability checks, reputation scoring, bounce risk assessment, and bulk validation for outreach campaign preparation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads, validates, and prepares CDISC SDTM and ADaM clinical trial data for analysis. Covers SDTM domain joins (DM, AE, EX, VS, LB, DS), ADaM architecture (ADSL, BDS, OCCDS, ADTTE) with traceability, treatment-emergent AE conventions, baseline derivation, SUPPQUAL/NSV handling, Define-XML 2.1, and Pinnacle 21 / CORE validation. Use when working with clinical trial datasets in CDISC SDTM/ADaM format, preparing analysis-ready data, or validating for regulatory submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download large datasets from NCBI efficiently using EPost, history server, batching, rate limiting, and retry logic. Use when bulk-fetching tens of thousands of sequences, pulling all results of a large ESearch, designing reproducible pipelines, comparing E-utilities to NCBI Datasets v2 CLI, or implementing checksum-validated downloads. Encodes WebEnv TTL (~8h), EPost 200-ID limit, retmax caps, parallelization design, and integrity verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate alignment quality with insert size distribution, proper pairing rates, GC bias, strand balance, and other post-alignment metrics. Use when verifying alignment data quality before variant calling or quantification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end biomarker discovery workflow from expression data to validated biomarker panels. Covers feature selection with Boruta/LASSO, classifier training with nested CV, and SHAP interpretation. Use when building and validating diagnostic or prognostic biomarker signatures from omics data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Embedded hardware debugging workflow for probe-rs targets using embedded-debugger-mcp. Use when Codex or Claude Code needs to inspect debug probes, validate embedded debugger setup, start the MCP server, guide a user through ARM Cortex-M/RISC-V flashing/debugging/RTT workflows, or operate without installing an MCP client by using the CLI plus prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a reusable rolling execution pattern (README + TODO-INDEX) like plans/web-reference-react-refactor, and wants to run delivery in small validated loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or modify a konsistent.json configuration file that enforces structural conventions in a TypeScript codebase. Use when the user wants to enforce consistent code structure, validate exports/imports across files, ensure directories contain required files, enforce naming patterns, add/remove/update convention rules, configure case map overrides for acronyms or special casing (kebabToPascalMap, kebabToCamelMap), or troubleshoot why konsistent is reporting violations. Triggers on: "konsistent", "konsistent.json", "enforce conventions", "structural consistency", "consistent exports", "consistent structure", "code conventions config", "add convention", "update convention", "fix konsistent errors", "case map", "case override", "acronym casing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview an instructor and generate a complete MATLAB and Simulink enabled course in IMS Common Cartridge format. Use when the user asks to create a MATLAB course, Simulink course, MATLAB and Simulink curriculum, MATLAB Course Designer-ready course shell, Common Cartridge course package, .imscc export, MATLAB Exercises with validated .m files, or Simulink Exercises with starter and solution model files. Coordinates IDStack, MATLAB Agentic Toolkit, Simulink Agentic Toolkit, matlab-create-course-activity, simulink-create-course-activity, and the existing matlab-generate-grader-assessments skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create MATLAB Course Designer MATLAB Exercise learning activities by wrapping the existing matlab-generate-grader-assessments skill, then validating generated solution.m, template.m, and tests.m files with MATLAB MCP Server tool calls. Use when the user asks to create a MATLAB Exercise, MATLAB course activity, Course Designer MATLAB activity, validated MATLAB solution file, or MATLAB Exercise component folder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create MATLAB Course Designer Simulink Exercise learning activities with starter and solution Simulink model files. Use when the user asks to create a Simulink activity, Simulink Exercise, starter model, solution model, model-based learning activity, or Course Designer-ready Simulink artifact. Uses MATLAB MCP Server tool calls and Simulink Agentic Toolkit guidance to create, inspect, edit, simulate, and validate model files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。