「what」の検索結果

List the local NeatContext Contexts available to Codex. Use when the user asks what contexts exist, what can be connected, or explicitly invokes this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List the local NeatContext Contexts available to the current Kimi Code session. Use when the user asks what contexts exist, what can be connected, or explicitly invokes this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a Reddit thread or single tweet the host cannot fetch — 'what does this Reddit thread say', 'top comment on this post', 'what does this tweet say' — when reddit.com is refused or x.com 402s.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reading a contract for risk and constraint — clause shape, redline priority, what the contract actually binds. Triggers on 'review this contract', 'what does this MSA constrain'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes current state and user query to answer BMad questions or recommend the next skill(s) to use. Use when user asks for help, bmad help, what to do next, or what to start with in BMad.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read the project's knowledge record before answering from memory or from the files. Use before answering about the project's state, a number, a date, a decision, a source, a deadline or what was agreed - even a casual 'what's the situation with X' or 'is that quote still current'; before changing a recorded value; and whenever the opener or a grounding line names entries. After finding relevant IDs, prefer kpop context to read them with their declared dependencies and checks. Uses pull for concise readings or when the checked reader is unavailable, affects for changed inputs, and search when no ID is known. A missing id is not absence. Not for showing the record's page (the hub skill). Requests come in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or implementing empty, first-run, no-result, offline, error, or waiting states in Apple-platform apps — every empty state explains what is missing, why it matters, and what to do next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before improving anything, show the spread of what can concretely be done on this specific input — a short menu of 3-5 interventions from lightest to heaviest touch, then wait for the user to pick. Domain-agnostic; works on any material the user hands over. Trigger when the user says "spread", "show me my options", "what can you do with this", or asks to improve or fix something without specifying how. Do NOT trigger when the user has already named a specific fix — then just do the fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user adds a project to the workspace, opens an unfamiliar repo, asks "what is this project", "explain this codebase", or invokes explain-new-project. Explores a newly opened workspace project and writes a plain-language report for a self-taught, non-technical user—quick start (what it is + how to run) first, then optional depth—and always saves PROJECT_GUIDE.md in the project root.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when returning to a repo after a break, asking what changed, what's new for this stack, or invoking project-catch-up after explain-new-project. Scans the stack for important updates, deprecations, new helper tools, agent skills, and MCP servers online—plain-language brief saved as PROJECT_CATCH_UP.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

At the end of a long working session, produce a counterfactual trace note — a backward walk through the session that identifies the small number of load-bearing moments (observations, failures, accidents, decisions) without which the final outcome would not exist. Use this whenever the user asks to "close the session", "run the butterfly", "trace back", "what actually mattered here", asks for a session retrospective, or asks how the session arrived at its result. Also use it when a session ends with a significant outcome (a fix, a design decision, a shipped artifact) and the user wants a note capturing why it happened, not just what happened. Do NOT use for simple summaries of short sessions — this skill is for causal tracing, and it only earns its cost when the session was long enough to contain real forks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preview a signed-off design one release phase at a time — cut it down into a series of phase screens, each showing only what exists by that phase with the layout untouched, then put them on a scrubber you drag to watch the screen fill in release by release. Use when the user wants a Phase 1 / MVP version of an existing wireframe or mockup, phased or staged screens, a design sliced by release phase or story map, or wants to see what a screen looks like before later features land.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack retrospective method for completed workstreams, identifying what worked, what failed, process changes, and role-skill improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes git diffs or staged changes and generates narrative commit messages that explain WHY a change was made, not just what changed — following Conventional Commits format. Use when asked to "write a commit message", "generate a commit", "describe my changes", "what should I commit this as", "commit this", "summarize my diff", or "help me commit". Works with git diff output, staged files, or plain descriptions of changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive onboarding tour for the context-matic MCP server. Walks the user through what the server does, shows all available APIs, lets them pick one to explore, explains it in their project language, demonstrates model_search and endpoint_search live, and ends with a menu of things the user can ask the agent to do. USE FOR: first-time setup; "what can this MCP do?"; "show me the available APIs"; "onboard me"; "how do I use the context-matic server"; "give me a tour". DO NOT USE FOR: actually integrating an API end-to-end (use integrate-context-matic instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts what the user actually wants instead of what they think they should want. Achieves this through one-question-at-a-time interview until ~95% confidence about the underlying intent. Use when an ask is underspecified ("build me X" without "for whom" or "why now"), when the user explicitly invokes ("interview me", "grill me", "are we sure?", "stress-test my thinking"), or when you catch yourself silently filling in ambiguous requirements before any plan, spec, or code exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates Azure deployments before they run: Bicep syntax, what-if previews, and permission checks. Use before azd up, azd provision, or az deployment, when preparing or reviewing Bicep files, or to preview what a deployment will change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-launch review of a shipped PRD against the brief's success metrics. Did we move the metric? What did the data actually show? Which assumptions held, which broke? Which accepted-gap decisions resolved (confirmed vs. invalidated)? What would we do differently? Triggers on "outcome review", "did it work", "post-launch review", "did we move the metric", "retro the feature", "was it worth it". Produces a Confluence outcome-review page and updates the brief + linked decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a local codebase and infer the architecture it is actually using, including repo kind, best-fit dominant architecture, directly evidenced coexisting patterns, major subsystem exceptions, confidence, docs-vs-code drift, and repo-fit hints for downstream agents. Use when prompts ask what architecture a repo uses, whether it is really hexagonal or just layered, what subtle patterns shape a repo or slice, how a target slice fits a hybrid monorepo, whether documented architecture matches implementation, or when `/tw-tk` needs a repo-dialect preflight before making a minimal change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The router for how a change legally happens in this repo — which sign-off gate fires for which kind of change, what counts as approval, how the packages-edit guard works, and how work is allowed to reach main. Use when starting ANY change and unsure which rules apply, when an Edit to packages/* gets BLOCKED, when a pipeline issue sits on status:blocked and you need to know what unblocks it, or when asked "do I need sign-off for this", "how do I get this merged", "can I deploy this", "who approves X", "why won't my approval label/reaction do anything".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The case-law chronicle of this repo's major failures — symptom, root cause, evidence, status, and the rule each battle minted — so nobody re-fights a settled battle or re-proposes a rejected fix. Use when a bug/incident looks familiar ("didn't this happen before?"), when you're about to propose an approach that may have been tried and rejected (e.g. shipping a migration from a package), when someone asks "why does rule X exist" / "why is done-by-lgtm a thing" / "what was incident 988", or when a bug-archaeology run hits the shallow-clone wall and needs the pre-June-2026 history. Trigger phrases: "has this broken before", "why can't packages ship migrations", "why did graduation fail", "why is the green-build lesson a rule", "what did we learn from incident NN". (For a live "build is green but the app is broken" symptom, start at crouton-diagnostics-index. NB keep this description free of any space-then-hash sequence — an unquoted YAML scalar treats space-hash as a comment start and silently truncates.)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activates a structured decorator framework that modifies how Claude reasons, responds, and formats output. Trigger this skill whenever a prompt contains one or more markers prefixed with +++, such as +++Reasoning, +++StepByStep, +++Tone(style=formal), or any other +++ marker, regardless of what follows in the prompt. Also trigger when the user asks to activate, list, or clear decorators, references the prompt decorator framework, or uses phrases like "use decorator", "apply +++", or "what decorators are available". This skill must be active for any +++ marker to take effect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert Claude's Markdown output to each channel's native text syntax before delivery. Adds zero-dependency formatting for WhatsApp, Telegram, and Slack (marker substitution). Also ships a Signal rich-text helper (parseSignalStyles) used by the Signal skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add WhatsApp emoji reaction support — receive, send, store, and search reactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。