495 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Investigate GitHub security incidents using tamper-proof GitHub Archive data via BigQuery. Use when verifying repository activity claims, recovering deleted PRs/branches/tags/repos, attributing actions to actors, or reconstructing attack timelines. Provides immutable forensic evidence of all public GitHub events since 2011.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Modernize Golang code to use recent language features, standard library improvements, and idiomatic patterns. Use when reviewing Go code with old-style patterns, when encountering a deprecation warning, or when the user asks for modernization, a Go version upgrade (e.g. to Go 1.27), or a CI/tooling refresh. Not for structural refactors, extracting functions, or moving code between packages (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-refactoring` skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Golang semantic code intelligence via `gopls`, the official Go language server — go-to-definition, find references, call/implementation hierarchy, workspace symbol search, package API discovery, diagnostics, safe rename, refactors (extract/inline/fill/rewrite code actions), formatting, and generated tests. Reaches an agent via gopls's own MCP server (`go_*` tools), Claude Code's native `LSP` tool, or the `gopls` CLI. Use when navigating or refactoring Go code — jumping to a definition, finding call sites before a rename, understanding a file's or package's dependencies, running diagnostics after an edit, or extracting/inlining/renaming. Not for the published ecosystem — packages not in your `go.mod`, versions, licenses, importers — → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev` skill (`godig`). Not for a whole-tree vulnerability audit → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security` skill (`govulncheck`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes genetic variant effects on gene expression (RNA-seq), chromatin accessibility (DNASE), histone marks (ChIP), and transcription factors using the AlphaGenome API. Use when the user asks about non-coding variant effects, pathogenicity, clinical significance, disease associations, functional effects, gene expression changes, splicing disruption, or regulatory effects in promoters and enhancers. Also use for resolving biological terms to tissue/cell-type ontologies (UBERON/CL) or analyzing variants in chr:pos:ref>alt format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive UX audit using IxDF's 7 factors, 5 usability characteristics, and 5 interaction dimensions. Holistic evaluation with redesign proposals based on user-centered design principles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch the latest financial signals and transmission-chain analyses from DeepEar Lite. Use when the user needs immediate insights into financial market trends, stock performance factors, and reasoning from the DeepEar Lite dashboard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Modify protein structures using Biopython Bio.PDB. Use when transforming coordinates, removing atoms or residues, adding new entities, modifying B-factors and occupancies, or building structures programmatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-Omics Factor Analysis (MOFA2) for unsupervised integration of multiple data modalities. Identifies shared and view-specific sources of variation. Use when integrating RNA-seq, proteomics, methylation, or other omics to discover latent factors driving biological variation across modalities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ChIP-seq peak calling using MACS3 (or MACS2). Call narrow peaks for transcription factors or broad peaks for histone modifications. Supports input control, fragment size modeling, and various output formats including narrowPeak and broadPeak BED files. Use when calling peaks from ChIP-seq alignments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when analyzing weekly price charts for stocks, stock indices, cryptocurrencies, or forex pairs. Use this skill when the user provides chart images and requests technical analysis, trend identification, support/resistance levels, scenario planning, or probability assessments based purely on chart data without consideration of news or fundamental factors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "analyze the SERP" or "SERP分析"; maps SERP features, layout, ranking factors, search intent, AI Overviews, and snippet opportunities for a query. Not for keyword demand discovery — use keyword-research. SERP分析/搜索结果
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decompose large-scale changes into independent units and spawn parallel agents in isolated worktrees. Use for migrations, refactors, codemods, and any change touching 10+ files with the same pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage Apify datasets, key-value stores, and request queues programmatically, and orchestrate multi-Actor pipelines. Use when you need to read or write Apify datasets, export scraped data to CSV/JSON/XLSX, store config or binary artifacts in a key-value store, manage a resumable request queue, chain Actors into a scrape → transform → export pipeline, or monitor Actor run status and cost. Trigger with "apify dataset", "apify key-value store", "apify storage", "export apify data", "apify pipeline", "apify request queue".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up local Apify Actor development with the Apify CLI and Crawlee. Use when creating Actors locally, testing with the apify run command, inspecting local storage, or establishing a fast develop-test-deploy cycle before pushing to the platform. Trigger with "apify dev setup", "apify local development", "develop actor locally", "apify run local".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-ready patterns for Apify SDK and apify-client in TypeScript. Use when building Actors with Crawlee, managing datasets/KV stores, or implementing robust client wrappers with retry and validation. Trigger with "apify SDK patterns", "apify best practices", "apify client wrapper", "crawlee patterns", "idiomatic apify".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize Apify Actor performance: crawl speed, memory usage, concurrency, and proxy rotation. Use when Actors are slow, consuming too much memory, or being blocked by target sites, or when a crawl is too expensive per run. Trigger with "apify performance", "optimize apify actor", "apify slow", "crawlee concurrency", "apify memory tuning", "scraper performance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy Apify Actors and integrate scraping into external applications. Use when deploying an Actor to the platform, integrating Actor results into a web app (Next.js, Express), wiring webhooks, or scheduling scraping pipelines. Trigger with "deploy apify actor", "apify Vercel integration", "apify production deploy", "integrate apify results", "apify API endpoint".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map workforce roles and application actors to Algolia team permissions, API-key ACLs, and secured-key restrictions. Use when reviewing least privilege, tenancy, SSO requirements, or access rotation. Trigger with "Algolia RBAC", "Algolia SSO", or "Algolia tenant access".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FAIR-aligned exposure quantification: turns a pile of recon findings into a defensible 0-100 + A-F org risk score (Likelihood x Impact, three ownership-aware factors: exposure/threat/impact), an ownership + proof demotion cap so unproven or weakly-owned findings can't inflate the number, a $-denominated FAIR loss-magnitude estimate (IBM/Ponemon per-record cost bands, cross-source record dedup, threat-factor annualization), attack-path amplification (curated red-team chain catalog + generic graph-walk engine, with a kill-chain vs shared-fate honesty gate), and a board-ready one-pager deliverable (hero $ + letter grade + top-3 findings + top attack path + the ask). Extends osint-methodology's severity rubric and client deliverable templates with quantification. Passive analysis only -- operates on findings already collected, no target traffic, no API keys. Use when asked to score risk, quantify exposure, estimate breach cost, build a board report, translate technical findings to dollars, or explain why a grade or dollar figure came out the way it did.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-validate CLI flags, docs, tests, and targets for consistency across the codebase. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: audit the codebase, check for consistency issues, find undocumented flags, verify test coverage, validate targets.yaml, check handler split conventions, or verify oplog instrumentation. This is a read-only audit — it reports issues but never modifies files. Use after large refactors, before releases, or whenever you suspect docs/code/tests have drifted out of sync.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitates deliberate skill development during AI-assisted coding. Offers interactive learning exercises after architectural work (new files, schema changes, refactors). Use when completing features, making design decisions, or when user asks to understand code better. Supports the user's stated goal of understanding design choices as learning opportunities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RSA attack playbook for CTF and real-world cryptanalysis. Use when given RSA parameters (n, e, c) and need to recover plaintext by exploiting weak keys, small exponents, shared factors, or padding oracles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, modify, debug, and deploy Apify Actors, and write their input and output schemas. Use when building an Actor from scratch, changing or troubleshooting Actor code, generating or updating .actor schema files, or pushing an Actor to the Apify platform. To wrap an existing non-Actor project, use apify-actorization instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and build an official Apify integration for a company's product - workflow-automation apps (Zapier/n8n-style), AI agent plugins (coding-agent skills+MCP bundles or OpenClaw/Hermes-style harnesses), AI framework packages (LangChain/LlamaIndex-style), or direct application clients via apify-client. Use when planning, creating, or reviewing an integration that exposes Apify Actors, runs, datasets, or key-value stores inside another product.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。