282 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a repo has its own generators, scripts or turbo tasks and an agent reaches for a generic skill instead — derive a Playbook context (ADR-244) from the real config, graded by the tree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agents with competing priorities reach consensus through structured trade-offs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writing documents an agent consumes. Use when creating or editing a skill, an AGENTS.md, a README section, a docblock, or any file reached by a pointer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintains four living project files (overview and progress log, decision log, RAID log, links) from the mail, channel posts, documents and meeting notes the user attaches or the agent can reach, returns each touched file complete in the chat for the user to save, and builds a weekly DRAFT status report from those files. Use when the user asks to "set up tracking for project X", "catch the project files up", "log this decision against the project", "add this risk to the RAID log", "save this link to the project" or "write this week's status report". Do not use for reviewing an existing RAID log for stale or ownerless entries, use raid-log-review instead; for an HTML status page, use project-dashboard-builder; for minutes of one meeting, use meeting-minutes-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sweeps a SharePoint library listing (an export or a listing the agent can reach, with file name, link, review-date column and owner column) for documents past their review date and returns a dated DRAFT review sweep report (Overdue, Due soon, No review date, Summary) plus one ready-to-paste reminder per document owner for the user to send. Never changes metadata, sends a message or invents a document, date or owner. Use when the user asks to "find the documents past their review date", "run the review sweep on the policies library", "which documents are overdue for review", "audit the review dates in this library export" or "draft reminders to owners about stale documents". Do not use for duplicate, conflict and ownership checks across knowledge files, use knowledge-base-hygiene-review instead; for gaps in an engineering deliverables register, use master-document-register-check. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a DRAFT month-end, quarter-end or year-end close checklist and status table for a finance team from the close calendar, the open items list and last month's close issues that the user attaches, pastes or the agent can reach, marks every task on time, due, late, at risk or blocked, and flags dependency chains and repeat issues. Use when the user asks to "build the close checklist", "where are we on the month-end close", "what is late or blocked in the close", "refresh the close tracker as of today" or "prepare the close status note". Do not use for a project tracker or weekly project status, use project-status-tracker instead; for corrective actions from audits or NCRs, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answers an employee's or manager's HR policy question strictly from the policy documents the user supplies or the agent can reach as knowledge: a DRAFT answer that quotes the governing clause with its document, version and clause reference, lists the conditions and exceptions the text states, returns UNKNOWN where the documents are silent and names the role to ask. Never invents a rule, fills a gap from general practice or decides an individual's case. Use when the user asks to check a policy, for example "what does the policy say about", "am I entitled to", "how many days of leave do I get", "what is the process for requesting", "does the handbook allow" or "which clause covers". Do not use for comparing two policy versions or briefing a change, use policy-change-briefing instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read MIKE+ .res1d results via the mike-plus MCP server — list contents, summarize peaks, extract a single time series, or check which nodes flood (peak water level vs ground level). Use when an agent needs to inspect or pull numbers from MIKE+ network results (node water levels, link/reach discharge, velocities, flooding). No MIKE+ license or installation required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en prospection à froid avancé (email sequences, LinkedIn, personalization, CRM sync, DZ market)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor social platforms for security threats, vulnerability discussions, and breach intelligence using Xpoz. Use when asked to "find CVE discussions", "security threat monitoring", "OSINT social media", "vulnerability intelligence", "breach mentions", or "threat intel from Twitter/Reddit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry point for the BDB Agent OS suite installed as a Claude Code plugin. Use to find out which of the 200+ AOS skills, the seven startcycle subagents, or the pipeline workflows apply to a task, and where their contracts live. Reach for a specific skill directly when you already know its name — this skill only routes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Personal App-in-Skill customer-support desk (help desk) that triages incoming support tickets from email, WhatsApp, web chat, contact forms, and WeChat, drafts KB-grounded replies, and proposes actions, then holds every send behind a human approval queue with a pre-send quality gate (support-qa) that outputs SHIP/FIX/BLOCK, plus SLA and CSAT tracking. Use when the user invokes $kelly-support or /kelly-support, mentions 客服 / 工单 / 支持台, a support desk, help desk, customer service, support tickets, ticket triage, a knowledge base or canned macros, SLA / first-response time, CSAT, escalations, or refund requests, wants incoming tickets triaged into a needs_review → approved → done pipeline, agent-drafted replies grounded in a knowledge base and reviewed before sending, refunds and commitments gated behind human approval, or breaching-SLA tickets surfaced. This is the OPERATOR desk (agent + human), distinct from a visitor-facing chat bubble.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Busabase-backed App-in-Skill CRM operator for contacts, companies, deals, and agent-drafted follow-ups in a reviewable follow-up queue. Use when the user invokes $kelly-crm or /kelly-crm, mentions CRM, pipeline, contacts, companies, deals, follow-ups, relationship management, meeting-note capture, outreach drafts, next steps, or wants to review/approve agent-drafted follow-up messages before they are sent through other channels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug the signals pipeline locally end-to-end. Covers emitting test signals from fixtures, monitoring Temporal workflows via the REST API, reading sandbox agent logs from object storage, inspecting Docker sandbox containers, and diagnosing common failures (stale ClickHouse embeddings, agentsh network denials, inactivity timeouts). Use when a signal isn't reaching the inbox, a signal-report-summary workflow fails, or a sandbox task run times out.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Official HeyGen plugin for OpenClaw — adds HeyGen as a first-class provider for the built-in video_generate tool. Identity-first avatar videos: pick an avatar_id, a voice, a script, and get an on-brand presenter video back. Use when: (1) generating a video where a specific avatar/person speaks specific lines, (2) "make a video of me / our brand presenter", (3) outreach, announcements, pitch decks, product walkthroughs, or any presenter-led video, (4) needing landscape or portrait output with deterministic aspect ratios, (5) integrating HeyGen into an OpenClaw agent through the standard provider interface (no bespoke REST glue required). Covers: HeyGen v3 Video Agent (api.heygen.com), avatar-presenter video, identity-preserving video, talking-head AI video, scripted avatar narration, brand spokesperson video. NOT for: cinematic b-roll (use Veo / Runway / Kling), video translation, TTS-only, streaming avatars, or photo-to-talking-head v2 pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vitest (Vite ネイティブテストフレームワーク) リファレンス。 test, describe, it, expect, vi.fn, vi.mock, vi.spyOn、 beforeEach / afterEach / beforeAll / afterAll、coverage (v8 / istanbul)、snapshot、 vitest.config.ts、ワークスペース、ブラウザモード、UI モード、bench。
Lay out how a job search will actually run alongside a current job: the hours available each week and what they go to, how weekday daytime slots for interviews will be found, which routes to use (direct applications, job boards, scout sites, agents, referrals, public employment services) and what each one discloses to whom, how to keep the search from reaching the current employer through public profiles or workplace equipment, a single tracker of every application's stage, next action, and deadline, and a date and conditions for reviewing, reducing, or pausing the search. Use when someone has decided to start looking, or to gather information while employed, and asks how to fit it in, which routes to use, whether the applications they are running fit the time they have, or how to keep track of them; do not use to decide whether to change jobs, to pick or rate employers or job postings, to predict outcomes, or to send applications, publish profiles, or contact agents on the user's behalf.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute an internal network penetration test simulating an insider threat or post-breach attacker to identify lateral movement paths, privilege escalation vectors, and sensitive data exposure within the corporate network.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TypeScriptのパッケージ内部への直接参照や循環依存を検出し、公開ファイルだけを入口にする構成を、設定・検証・文書化まで整えるスキル。
External agent skill (MIT, github.com/DietrichGebert/ponytail). Forces the laziest solution that actually works: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reuse what is already in the codebase, reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Climb the ladder on every coding task — writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Never cut validation, error handling, security, or accessibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reaches web pages the user's browser cannot open: WAF-blocked and bot-scored hosts, platform-native readers (Chinese and social platforms), archive snapshots with provenance, and a browser you own for stealth or throwaway profiles. Not for plain search, an unblocked static fetch, or a page the user's browser can open.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Application security testing (AppSec) across a whole product with Strix — decide which asset needs which test (source code, running web app, API, CI pipeline), run it, and turn the results into a ranked remediation plan. Autonomous agents exploit and prove each issue instead of emitting static-analysis alerts, so the plan is ordered by what is actually reachable. Use when the user asks for an application security review or audit, an appsec assessment, vulnerability scanning across their stack, a security review before a launch or a customer security questionnaire, or does not yet know which kind of security test they need.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Supports multivariate severity assessment and exploratory endpoint-time score forecasting for laboratory animal studies using the RELSA (RELative Severity Assessment) score and ARIMA-based foRcast forecasting. Use when combining welfare readouts — body weight or weight loss, body temperature, clinical or nesting scores, biomarkers, activity, heart rate, burrowing, wheel running — into one severity score per animal per day, when asking which animals are at risk of reaching a humane endpoint at a specified future observation time, when defining attention/danger zones or thresholds on a severity scale by kernel density estimation, or when reporting severity for a 3Rs, refinement, animal-welfare, or EU Directive 2010/63/EU severity-assessment context. Covers directionality ("turned" variables), baseline normalization, reference sets, RELSA weights, ARIMA prediction intervals, and RMSE/PICP/MPIW evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes user-requested Screenpipe history windows to detect repeated research workflows, match existing scientific skills, and stage new skill drafts or composition recipes for review. Requires a reachable Screenpipe HTTP API, normally on localhost:3030. Detection and embedding inference run locally; the selected LLM receives redacted app/title cluster summaries and matched skill descriptions. Use only when the user explicitly asks to analyze their recent work and propose skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。