「agreement」の検索結果

Use before responding to pressure for agreement, manufactured urgency, authority appeals, or requests to certify unsupported claims; separate evidence from persuasion and state uncertainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eliminate sycophantic agreement patterns in AI responses. Load via /skill anti-sycophancy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create employment contracts, offer letters, and HR policy documents following legal best practices. Use when drafting employment agreements, creating HR policies, or standardizing employment documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an auditable evidence map for a contested technical choice, research synthesis, proposal review, or consequential decision. Use when Copilot must preserve supporting, contradicting, qualifying, and missing evidence with exact source regions instead of collapsing disagreement into prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight NDA, MSA, and vendor contract review for SMBs without legal on staff. Reads contracts from local files, mail attachments (Gmail or M365), a connected file store (Google Drive or M365), or DocuSign envelopes; flags non-standard terms; explains risks in plain English; and outputs a marked-up redline as a separate DOCX. Use when the user says "review this contract," "what am I signing," "red flags," "flag any concerns," "check the payment terms," or uploads/forwards a contract or legal agreement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check the status of existing agreements with a vendor across all connected systems — CLM, CRM, email, and document storage — with gap analysis and upcoming deadlines. Use when onboarding or renewing a vendor, when you need a consolidated view of what's signed and what's missing (MSA, DPA, SOW), or when checking for approaching expirations and surviving obligations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a contract against your organization's negotiation playbook — flag deviations, generate redlines, provide business impact analysis. Use when reviewing vendor or customer agreements, when you need clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions, or when preparing a negotiation strategy with prioritized redlines and fallback positions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a startup is approached by a prospective partner and someone has to decide should we sign this partner, at what partner tier (referral / reseller / OEM / SI-consulting / strategic alliance), with what joint GTM commitment, and at what revshare. Classifies partner tier from independent-demand evidence vs. preferential-terms hunting, designs a 90-day joint GTM plan, models revshare against direct-sale margin, and surfaces kill criteria for unwinding under-performing partnerships. For Head of Partnerships, Head of BD, and Founder-CEOs doing reseller agreement, OEM deal, or strategic alliance review — not technical sale enablement, not channel cost economics, not M&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for actionable defects. Correctness is the core; performance and security are optional sub-cases of the same engine. Anchors on agreements between participants across a boundary, forces a violating execution, and refutes every candidate before reporting. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, audit a codebase, or check whether a fix is safe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal document drafting -- contracts, memos, briefs, complaints, demand letters, opinions, discovery, settlements, ToS, privacy policies. Full pipeline: document structure, per-section writing, Bluebook citation, case law lookup (CourtListener API), regulation lookup (eCFR API), DOCX output, and TDD-style verification (defined terms, cross-references, placeholders, boilerplate, citation format). Triggers on: 'draft a contract', 'write a legal memo', 'create an NDA', 'write a brief', 'legal document about', 'draft a complaint', 'terms of service', 'privacy policy', 'demand letter', 'settlement agreement', 'legal opinion', 'discovery requests', any request to produce a legal or law-related document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Data Processing Agreement against your DPA playbook — auto-detects whether you're processor or controller and applies the right half of the playbook. Use when the user says "review this DPA", "check this data processing addendum", "customer sent their DPA", "is this DPA okay", or attaches a DPA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the cold-start interview — learns your AI governance practice and writes `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ai-governance-legal/CLAUDE.md` from your AI policy, a reference impact assessment, and key vendor AI agreements. Use when the practice profile is missing or contains `[PLACEHOLDER]` markers, or when user says "set up ai governance plugin", "onboard me", "configure ai governance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-closing M&A integration tracker — phased workplan, consent tracking, contract assignment at scale, weekly status reports. Initializes from whatever deal artifacts are available (purchase agreement, deal summary, closing checklist) and connects to deal-context.md and closing-checklist.yaml from the M&A cold-start. Use when user says "integration", "post-close", "post-closing", "consents outstanding", "contract assignment", "integration status", or "what's left on the deal".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a Natural Language Agreement escrow on-chain. Use when the user wants to lock ERC20 tokens in an escrow with a natural language demand that an AI oracle will arbitrate. Handles demand crafting, parameter gathering, and CLI execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "write influencer outreach", "follow up with a creator", "pitch a journalist, hunter, or launch partner", or "negotiate partnership terms"; produces personalized pitches, multi-touch follow-up sequences, negotiation scripts with objection handling, and a status pipeline tracker — the shared outreach mechanics engine for creator, media/analyst, launch-partner, and social-selling / advocate-recruitment targets. Not for finalizing signed agreements — use contract-helper; not for media-list tiering, embargo terms, or press-release structure — use press-media-relations. 达人邀约建联/合作谈判话术

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys, queries, and debugs AWS Marketplace usage-based (PAYG) metering — the pipeline (ResolveCustomer, BatchMeterUsage, EventBridge via SAM) and querying/debugging metering records, statuses, failures, discrepancies. Covers Concurrent Agreements (CustomerAWSAccountId + LicenseArn), multi-product, CloudTrail Event History (90 days; never CloudTrail Lake), Seller Reports (Billed Revenue/Usage columns + CSV/SDDS parsing), existing-stack detection, metering region for BatchMeterUsage/MeterUsage (DisabledApiException), metered AMI/Container + IAM roles, where registration data lives (customer-profile table), legacy ProductCode + CustomerIdentifier, DuplicateRecord/CustomerNotSubscribed, bad LicenseArn. Also SCOPES adjacent asks — flat-rate/SaaS-Subscription "do I still meter", CCP included-units + overage, contract term/annual renewal, forecasting future bills/usage — with the right answer or a one-line redirect. Use for any BatchMeterUsage/ResolveCustomer or SaaS usage-billing question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages the relationship with a represented workforce — administering a collective agreement, handling grievances, understanding what supervisors may and may not say, and preparing for bargaining. Use this for a grievance or arbitration question, a work rule change in a represented unit, supervisor guidance during organizing, contract interpretation and past practice, or preparation for negotiations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects, contracts, and manages suppliers and vendors — requirements, evaluation, negotiation support, onboarding, performance management, and exit. Use this to choose a vendor, run a selection process, structure a service agreement's operational terms, manage an underperforming supplier, plan an exit or migration, or assess concentration and continuity risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses and improves how personal data is collected, used, shared, and retained — data mapping, lawful basis, consent, processor agreements, subject rights, and breach obligations. Use this before launching anything that handles personal data, when adding a vendor that will process it, when a data subject request arrives, when assessing exposure under GDPR or US state privacy laws, or when preparing for a privacy review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Covers what the organization owns and what it is only borrowing — trademarks and clearance, copyright and work-for-hire, patents and trade secrets, open-source license obligations and copyleft reach, and IP terms in customer, contractor and AI-tool agreements. Use this to check whether a name is usable, establish that you own work you paid for, decide how to handle a license obligation in a dependency, or respond to an infringement claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。