「aims」の検索結果

HealthSim generates realistic synthetic healthcare data for testing EMR systems, claims processing, pharmacy benefits, and analytics. Use for ANY request involving: (1) synthetic patients, clinical data, or medical records, (2) healthcare claims, billing, or adjudication, (3) pharmacy prescriptions, formularies, or drug utilization, (4) HL7v2, FHIR, X12, or NCPDP formatted output, (5) healthcare testing scenarios or sample data generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insurance policy analysis, claims evaluation, coverage assessment, and risk management for individuals and businesses

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HealthSim generates realistic synthetic healthcare data for testing EMR systems, claims processing, pharmacy benefits, and analytics. Use for ANY request involving: (1) synthetic patients, clinical data, or medical records, (2) healthcare claims, billing, or adjudication, (3) pharmacy prescriptions, formularies, or drug utilization, (4) HL7v2, FHIR, X12, or NCPDP formatted output, (5) healthcare testing scenarios or sample data generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HealthSim generates realistic synthetic healthcare data for testing EMR systems, claims processing, pharmacy benefits, and analytics. Use for ANY request involving: (1) synthetic patients, clinical data, or medical records, (2) healthcare claims, billing, or adjudication, (3) pharmacy prescriptions, formularies, or drug utilization, (4) HL7v2, FHIR, X12, or NCPDP formatted output, (5) healthcare testing scenarios or sample data generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RxMemberSim generates realistic synthetic pharmacy data for testing PBM systems, claims adjudication, and drug utilization review. Use when user requests: (1) pharmacy claims or prescription data, (2) DUR alerts or drug interactions, (3) formulary or tier cohorts, (4) pharmacy prior authorization, (5) NCPDP formatted output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage construction contract administration from the field perspective. Covers AIA contract forms (A101, A201, A401), bond types and requirements, mechanics lien law, insurance verification, indemnification, dispute resolution, and subcontractor default procedures. Provides practical field guidance for notice requirements, lien waiver processing, COI verification, and claims documentation. Integrates with pay-application (lien waivers), change-order-tracker (constructive changes), delay-tracker (notice provisions), sub-performance (default triggers), and cost-tracking (back-charges). Triggers: "contract", "contract admin", "AIA", "A201", "A101", "bond", "performance bond", "payment bond", "lien", "lien waiver", "mechanics lien", "insurance", "COI", "certificate of insurance", "OCIP", "CCIP", "indemnification", "dispute", "mediation", "arbitration", "notice", "cure notice", "default", "sub default", "termination for cause", "claims", "ConsensusDocs", "EJCDC".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Coverage and insurance resources with payer diversity including Medicare, Medicaid, commercial, Tricare, VA, and self-pay. Use when user mentions coverage, insurance, payer, Medicare, Medicaid, benefits, or coordination of benefits. For claims and EOB see the claims-eob skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walidacja claims - co wolno a czego nie wolno mówić w copy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Total-loss determination and settlement pricing. Triggers: "total loss valuation", "claims value", "settlement offer", "salvage estimate", "insurance claim pricing", "total loss threshold", "what's the claim worth", "settlement range", "pre-loss value", "diminished value", "total loss determination", insurance claim vehicle valuation, total-loss determination, settlement pricing, or salvage value estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当需要审核理赔材料、分类理赔请求、指导理赔流程时使用。触发场景：理赔材料审核、理赔流程指导、材料清单生成。当用户提到“理赔“、“保险赔付“、“claims“、“理赔材料“时应触发此技能。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Despliega soluciones de IA para insurance claims automation con arquitectura modular, metricas auditables y decisiones alineadas al contexto del dominio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insurance Claims Processor

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A survey of the best-known active scientific controversies in nutrition — saturated fat and cardiovascular disease, dietary cholesterol, low-carb vs low-fat, ultra-processed foods, red meat and cancer, salt and blood pressure, and the replication status of popular single-nutrient claims. Use when a question asks whether a widely reported nutritional claim is settled, or when the department needs to distinguish "contested but plausible" from "settled" from "disproven."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the primary outcome is comparing documentation claims with implementation evidence, synchronizing docs from verified changes, or freshness review, including drift, missing coverage, stale claims, and post-change updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content against primary sources using web lookups. Spawns parallel verification agents that must use WebFetch/WebSearch/gh — training data recall is explicitly rejected as evidence. Produces VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with citations. Use when items are marked UNVERIFIED or when verifying tool API claims, CLI flags, or documented software behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for handling freight exceptions, shipment delays, damages, losses, and carrier disputes. Informed by logistics professionals with 15+ years operational experience. Includes escalation protocols, carrier-specific behaviors, claims procedures, and judgment frameworks. Use when handling shipping exceptions, freight claims, delivery issues, or carrier disputes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for returns authorization, receipt and inspection, disposition decisions, refund processing, fraud detection, and warranty claims management. Informed by returns operations managers with 15+ years experience. Includes grading frameworks, disposition economics, fraud pattern recognition, and vendor recovery processes. Use when handling product returns, reverse logistics, refund decisions, return fraud detection, or warranty claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether each claim in a manuscript is supported by the source it cites, reading the project's per-source Markdown knowledge base. Flags contradicted, unsupported, overclaimed, out-of-scope, and misattributed claims with verbatim source quotes. Runs citation-check first, and stops at a pre-flight gate when the knowledge base is missing, incomplete, or holds unconverted PDFs. Use to verify that a draft's claims match the sources it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skeptical analysis and critique of claims, plans, and code without taking anyone at face value. Use when the user says "don't trust me", wants adversarial review, red-teaming, assumption checking, or verification that generated or proposed code is actually correct. Triggers on skepticism, critique everything, verify claims, challenge assumptions, red team, devil's advocate, prove it, smell test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review user-facing docs, CLI reference text, examples, and scaffolds for truthfulness, prose quality, and RFC leakage. Use when a broad review needs a dedicated docs/claims pass or when the user asks for docs-truth review specifically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for JWT, JWS, and JWE validation paths, header parsing, key selection, claim acceptance, audience and issuer checks, role derivation, and token-to-identity confusion bugs. Use when the user asks to inspect JWT headers or claims, key lookup, `kid` handling, `alg` confusion, audience or issuer validation, role claims, or explain how a token becomes accepted identity or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds credible TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with external validation and sensitivity testing for startup fundraising: top-down, bottom-up, or both. Use when the user asks to size a market or check market claims and gives something to size: a product or service description, a market segment, or a deck with TAM/SAM/SOM claims. A full run takes about 15–20 minutes and searches the web, 30 or more with a large data room or a revision round, so for a passing question about market size, answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, every figure is externally sourced and stress-tested, never estimated from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only for user-provided academic text, explicit scholarly claims, existing citations, or known bibliographies needing citations added, verified, replaced, extracted, or formatted. Supports claim-to-source matching, citation-support checks, replacements, and common academic citation formats. Do not use for general fact-checking, legal/journalistic citation work, open-ended 'find literature about X', topic-level exhaustive discovery, systematic-review corpus construction, PRISMA searches, or creating new research claims. Chinese: 为已有段落补参考文献、核验已有引用、替换错误引用、提取需引文论断、GB/T 7714 格式化.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan the current market landscape and produce a ground-truth ecosystem snapshot. Chains /last30days for live research, validates with user, and writes brand/landscape.md with a Claims Blacklist that hard-gates all content generation. Use when: "landscape", "ecosystem", "market snapshot", "ground truth", "what's happening", "refresh landscape", "market trends", or before any content campaign to verify claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。