212 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Routes heterogeneous queries to the appropriate index, tool, or answering engine before retrieval. Use when one endpoint serves multiple handlers, such as summary, vector retrieval, text-to-SQL, or tools, and query types require different paths. Covers LLM, semantic, and rule-based routers, confidence thresholds, fallbacks, and framework mappings. Do not use when one handler serves all queries or branching is fixed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a held-out eval set, run it on every prompt/model change, and block regressions in CI. An LM change is a code change — gate it with a test suite (eval set + metric + threshold). Cross-framework SOP not surfaced by any single base skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Symbol-level code context for LLM coder-agents: tree-sitter extracts symbols, PageRank ranks them over the cross-file reference graph, and the top class/function signatures are fed to the LLM as a token-budgeted read-only map (not RAG, no vector index, human-auditable). Use when an agent must locate the right files in a large/multi-file repo, when builds/refreshes/scopes a repo-map, or when "model edits the wrong file" needs fixing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A 5-minute gate the coder runs at project kickoff (and again whenever the repo shape changes). Classifies the workspace into Greenfield / Brownfield-large / Mid-size-familiar / Library-SDK, then maps the state to an agent strategy (autonomy, context primitive, tool choice). Use BEFORE picking Cursor vs Claude Code vs Aider, BEFORE turning on repo-map, BEFORE writing the first prompt. Skip only if the same repo was gated within the last day and nothing changed. Search keywords: greenfield vs brownfield, new project vs existing codebase, project setup strategy, legacy codebase agent, where to start a coding agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adds and tunes a reranker stage for RAG using the retrieve-wide, rerank-narrow pattern. Use when relevant documents appear in the initial top-N but are buried by noise, top-1 precision or MRR is low despite adequate recall, or too many marginal chunks consume context. Covers cross-encoder, API, and local rerankers; N-to-k selection; and latency/cost tradeoffs. Do not use when retrieval recall itself is failing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project-kickoff rubric for the self-host vs managed-cloud decision — when is running your own inference engine / LLM platform worth the ops cost vs paying per-token for a managed API? Decide on two axes — VOLUME (a cost-crossover slider) and COMPLIANCE (a hard gate). Use at kickoff when choosing where to run inference, or when cost / data-residency pressure forces a re-evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOP for terminal-based, git-native AI pair programming with Aider (git work-tree + tree-sitter repo-map + edit-format + human-in-loop REPL). Use when editing code in an existing git repo via an LLM, when you need to converge a change to 2-5 files, pick an edit format that fits the model, run architect+editor mode, or wire an auto-test loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision protocol for managing the context/session state of an AI coding tool: when to /clear, when to keep context, and how to detect "context bleed" — the failure mode where stale conversation history biases the model against the current task. Surfaces a discipline that Aider (/clear), Claude Code (/clear), CrewAI (memory=False, re-instantiate), and LangGraph (new thread_id, subgraph isolation) all encode separately but none name as a skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision rubric for promoting a prose prompt into a typed DSPy Signature. This is an ENHANCE overlay on top of the [[dspy]] library skill: it does NOT teach DSPy syntax — it answers the coder-agent decision "when do I stop hand-writing a prompt string and declare it as a `dspy.Signature`, and how do I name/describe its fields so the optimizer and the calling code both get a clean contract." Activate when: a prompt string grows past ~50 lines; the LM output is consumed by code (parsed, branched on, stored) rather than read by a human; the same prompt is reused across >1 call site; or a teammate asks "should this be a Signature?". Do NOT activate for one-shot throwaway prompts, or for HOW-TO questions about DSPy modules /optimizers/compile — defer those to the [[dspy]] skill and the [[agentsop-dspy]] workflow skill. Search keywords: typed prompt, structured prompt, DSPy Signature, prompt as a function, prompt contract, when to formalize a prompt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tool skill for declaring reducers on LangGraph state keys so parallel writes merge instead of crashing. Activates whenever a coder agent designs a StateGraph with parallel branches, fan-out via Send, multi-agent topologies, or whenever a run raises `InvalidUpdateError: At key '<k>': Can receive only one value per step`. Encodes the rule "every state key is single-writer or has a reducer — nothing in between."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enhancement-overlay decision protocol for STREAMING the output of long-running LLM / agent runs from the *backend*, not just wiring a typing animation in the UI. Activates when a coder agent must stream final tokens to a chat client, surface intermediate agent steps (which tool, which node, partial reasoning), emit custom tool-progress events, choose a transport (SSE vs WebSocket), or decide what to do when the client disconnects mid-stream. The langchain / langgraph skills mention stream modes but stop at "you can stream"; this skill encodes *what to stream, over what transport, and how to fail safely*.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide where to enforce structured LM output (constrain at decode time with Outlines vs validate-and-retry with Instructor vs grammar with Guidance) and which failure stance to take (Assert/hard-fail vs Suggest/soft-retry). Use when an LM's output is parsed or typed by downstream code and you must pick one enforcement library plus its failure handling, when malformed output is burning tokens on retries, or when choosing between decode-time vs validation-time constraints for local vs API models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enhancement overlay for multi-agent / tool-using coder agents. Encodes the per-agent tool- scoping discipline that role-based frameworks (CrewAI, LangChain) document only as a passing best-practice: which agent gets which tool, and why blanket-sharing every tool to every agent is a correctness and blast-radius risk. Activates when an agent system has tools AND there is more than one agent (or one agent holding many tools). Treat a tool as a capability grant; scope by least-privilege. ENHANCE overlay — read alongside [[crewai]], [[agentsop-http-tool-wrapping]], [[agentsop-llm-tool-idempotency]]. Search keywords: which tools per agent, least-privilege agent, agent tool access, tool permissions, limit agent tools, scope tools to roles.overlay_type: enhancement
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision SOP for serving LLMs with vLLM. Covers PagedAttention mental model, quantization/parallelism/batching tradeoffs, OOM triage, and when NOT to use vLLM. Activates when a coder-agent is choosing or tuning an inference engine, debugging vLLM throughput/latency/OOM, or comparing vLLM against TGI/SGLang/TensorRT-LLM/llama.cpp.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screens biomedical / life-science papers for signs of data fabrication, image manipulation, and statistical anomalies, using the detection techniques distilled from the field's canonical exposure platforms (PubPeer, Data Colada, Science Integrity Digest, For Better Science) and tools (ImageTwin/Proofig, statcheck, GRIM/GRIMMER, Problematic Paper Screener, Seek & Blastn). Use when asked to check a paper/figure for image duplication, blot splicing, impossible statistics, paper-mill or tortured-phrase signals, research integrity, or "is this data faked"; or when a user shares a figure, Western blot, supplementary dataset, or DOI and asks whether it looks manipulated. Reports observable anomalies as questions for clarification — it never accuses anyone of fraud.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lens — Add a cognitive lens to any problem. It accepts a task description and produces an enhanced description that surfaces hidden dimensions, prerequisites, and lines of inquiry—the things you do not know you do not know. Use when the user asks to brainstorm, analyze, generate a skill, distill, or fuse, or when the input is too simple and needs to be expanded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
复刻蒸馏写作技能 —— 分析一位作者的多篇文章，深度还原其思维方式与写作风格，生成专属写作分身子技能与风格提示词。支持公众号、抖音多平台自动采集素材，也可手动粘贴文章或指定文件路径。触发词：蒸馏写作风格、写作分身、克隆写作风格、复刻蒸馏写作技能。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Python FastAPI development with uv package manager, modular project structure, SQLAlchemy ORM, and production-ready patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate integration tests for multiple interacting components in Python. Use when testing interactions between: (1) Multiple services or APIs (REST/GraphQL endpoints, microservices), (2) Database operations with repositories/ORMs (SQLAlchemy, Django ORM), (3) External services (payment gateways, email services, third-party APIs), (4) Message queues and event-driven systems, (5) Full stack workflows (API + database + business logic). Provides test structure templates, fixtures, test data builders, and patterns for pytest-based integration testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate database integrity, test migrations forward and backward, verify schema constraints, manage seed data, detect migration drift, and identify query performance issues. Covers PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB with Prisma, TypeORM, Drizzle, and SQLAlchemy, plus Testcontainers test databases. Use when: "database test," "migration test," "migration rollback," "rollback test," "data integrity," "SQL test," "schema validation," "seed data," "query performance," "Testcontainers." Not for: synthetic data generation/masking at scale — use test-data-management; Docker/IaC test-environment provisioning — use test-environments; SQL injection — use security-testing. Related: test-data-management, test-environments, security-testing, ci-cd-integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned SMS and MMS marketing discipline. Use when evaluating SMS as a channel, designing consent-aware sequences, drafting messages, setting cadence, comparing number types or platforms, or defining measurement (TCPA consent, A2P 10DLC, quiet hours, cart-recovery and win-back texts. NOT FOR: email campaigns (use suede-emails), phone capture UX (use suede-site-alchemy), or legal certification) this skill does not give legal advice and never sends, schedules, imports, or registers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-affiliated in-product monetization design for paywall screens, feature gates, trial-expiry states, usage-limit prompts, and free-to-paid upgrade moments. Use when the user needs trigger timing, message structure, plan presentation, or experiment design after users have experienced value. NOT FOR: public pricing pages (use suede-site-alchemy), tier architecture (use suede-pricing), or cancellation and save flows (use suede-churn-prevention).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned signup conversion discipline. Use when auditing or redesigning account creation, registration, or trial-start flows, including field friction, progressive profiling, identity options, mobile behavior, abandonment, and measurement. NOT FOR: post-signup activation (use suede-onboarding), lead-capture forms (use suede-site-alchemy), or deploying auth and compliance changes without review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned launch-appeal grader for public pages. Grades findability, first-screen clarity, CTA pull, proof quality, design signal, and AI citation readiness. Use when a public page needs a fast A-F visibility grade before or after launch. NOT FOR: the deep nine-lane SEO audit with rewrite fixes (use suede-seo-audit); implementing conversion changes (use suede-site-alchemy); getting cited by AI answer engines (use suede-ai-seo).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。