「arr」の検索結果

Use only when the user asks to produce a finished multi-scene narrator-led video and explicitly requests a faceless channel, YouTube automation, narrated explainer/story/education, documentary, storybook or myth retelling, or kids song video. Topic alone is never enough: a generic video of/about something, including a historical topic, uses ordinary video generation. Do not use for planning or ideas, single clips, silent animation, image-to-video, footage edits, ads, product demos, or UGC. This workflow requires a consistent non-photoreal style, reusable assets, narrator voiceover, and burned subtitles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate when the user explicitly names the narrator skill or requests production-ready narration in either case: (1) numbered takes fitted to fixed video windows, or (2) one continuous long-form story read in a locked voice that must be measured and retried for timbre or internal pauses. Collect missing text, voice_id, or voice_type after activation; their absence is not a reason to skip this workflow. Own pacing, speech-duration gates, retries, and ready audio delivery; never time-stretch. Do not use for ordinary TTS, "read this aloud", an unconstrained voiceover, voice browsing, music, SFX, singing, dubbing existing speech, or voice cloning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze how a private SaaS company's ARR valuation multiple changed across funding rounds, and attribute the compression or expansion to rate cycles and macro selloffs, growth deceleration, narrative shifts (including an AI premium), competition, and investor demand, benchmarked against private-market medians and peers. Use this skill whenever the user asks about valuation compression, ARR multiples, round-to-round valuation or multiple changes, down rounds, or wants to compare a VC-backed software company's funding rounds. Research the rounds rather than answering from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smallest personal narrated-explainer-video pipeline (spoken narration over visuals, not an audio podcast), fully tool-agnostic and autonomous by default — topic → research ∥ asset collection → script → TTS → video → 4K render ∥ publish info + cover. The skill defines the pipeline logic and self-verified checkpoints; any TTS backend and any video tool (Remotion, HyperFrames, CapCut, ...) work, and how much human oversight to apply is set by the working project's AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md, not here. Use when the user wants a quick personal narrated video with minimal steps, whether or not they name the tool stack. Do NOT trigger for audio-only podcasts, written episodic content, or heavy multi-format production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up the essentials in the right order after moving to a new country — the ID/registration, bank account, phone, address, and social/tax number that unlock each other — so you don't get stuck in the chicken-and-egg loops that trap newcomers. Use when someone says 'I just moved to a new country', 'what do I do first after arriving', 'set up my life in [country]', or 'I can't open a bank account without an address but can't rent without a bank'. Produces a sequenced arrival checklist with dependencies and the official offices for each. Routes to official sources; rules are local.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the storyline and slide structure for a board presentation. Use when asked to create a board deck, board presentation narrative, board meeting slides, or quarterly board update. Produces a complete slide-by-slide structure with narrative beats, talking points, and slide content guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble a narrated motion-graphic LISTICLE video ad from a config — a spoken voiceover (cloned or cast, in the chosen tone) carries a numbered listicle while N web-animated hyperframe beats (HTML plus the Web Animations API, one branded design system of alternating tiles, big hero numerals, and callouts in the chosen visual style) are rendered frame-by-frame via Playwright and anchored to the VO's word-level timestamps, optional color-graded breather windows (brand clip, AI clip, or motion-graphic) give visual breath, and captions burn ONLY inside those B-roll windows (2-word chunks, ASS Format header carrying a Name field so none drop) with the VO mixed under a low music bed. This is the FREE deterministic assembly stage (Playwright beat render plus ffmpeg concat plus window-masked caption burn plus VO-and-music mix plus final composite) — the VO, the music bed, and any AI breather clips come from create-vo-elevenlabs, create-music-elevenlabs, and create-video-fal. Use for the vo-anchored-motion-listicle format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stores and operates on sparse expression matrices for single-cell and large bulk RNA-seq, covering dgCMatrix/dgRMatrix/dgTMatrix when-each-is-fast, the dgCMatrix (CSC, R) <-> CSR (Python) implicit transpose, AnnData (cells-rows) <-> SingleCellExperiment (cells-cols) orientation flip, HDF5/h5ad vs Zarr cloud-native shift, HDF5SummarizedExperiment + DelayedArray for out-of-memory bulk, scanpy backed mode for large h5ad, the ~10-15% density crossover where dense beats sparse, 10X format proliferation (MTX vs CellRanger H5 vs h5ad), the dense-conversion memory blow-up, and Dask + Zarr for consortium-scale matrices. Use when choosing sparse format, working with single-cell-sized matrices, importing/exporting 10X, debugging R/Python interop transposes, processing matrices too large for RAM, or building cloud-native pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design antennas, arrays, and PCB antennas using MATLAB Antenna Toolbox. Covers catalog antenna design and pattern analysis, custom antenna construction (customAntenna + shape.*), PCB antenna design (pcbStack + antenna.*), finite and infinite array design, AI-accelerated design exploration (AIAntenna, patternFromAI), and optimization (SADEA/TR-SADEA). Use when the user wants to design, create, model, analyze, optimize, or fabricate an antenna or array.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate brand storytelling and narrative video prompts for Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield. Use whenever the user wants to create a brand story video, company origin story, mission video, about us video, brand film, corporate narrative, founder story, brand anthem, company culture video, or emotional brand content. Triggers on: brand story, brand video, company story, origin story, about us, mission video, brand film, brand anthem, corporate video, company culture, founder story, brand narrative, or any request for brand/company storytelling video. Use even for "tell our company story" or "make a video about our mission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Craft a brand's origin story, founder narrative, and "why we exist" statement. Use when the user says "brand story", "origin story", "founder story", "why we exist", "about us", "our story", "company narrative", "brand narrative", "write our about page", "tell our story", "founding story", "brand history", or wants to articulate the deeper purpose and human story behind the brand. Also use when the About Us page feels generic or corporate and needs a rewrite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Primary router skill for broad .NET work. Classify the repo by app model and cross-cutting concern first, then switch to the narrowest matching .NET skill instead of staying at a generic layer. USE FOR: general .NET requests without a narrower framework; C# implementation, debugging, review, or refactoring; routing to framework and tooling skills. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; tasks already covered by a narrower .NET skill. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flowcharts are composed of **nodes** (geometric shapes) and **edges** (arrows or lines). The Mermaid code defines how nodes and edges are made and accommodates different arrow types, multi-directional arrows, and any linking to and from subgraphs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NEB-IRC activation energy pipeline for reaction barriers using GFN2-xTB and pysisyphus. Optimize reactant and product geometries, run CI-NEB path search, optimize the transition state with a Hessian, verify with IRC (one imaginary mode, endpoints matching reactant/product, single NEB maximum), and report the electronic and Gibbs barriers. Use when you need a transition state, reaction barrier, activation energy, minimum energy path, or intrinsic reaction coordinate. Covers reactant/product atom-ordering pitfalls, feasibility sizing for single-core runs, and thermochemistry corrections. Renders an IRC energy-profile plot and an animated TS imaginary-mode HTML viewer. For 2D reaction scheme drawing use rdkit-chemdraw-cdxml.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the establishment and management of joint controller arrangements under GDPR Article 26, including determination of joint controllership, allocation of responsibilities, and transparency obligations. Activate when two or more controllers jointly determine purposes and means of processing, or when evaluating shared data platforms. Keywords: joint controller, Article 26, shared responsibility, arrangement, joint determination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Antenna Engineer. Use when a task calls for Antenna Engineer judgment. Reasons from gain–directivity–efficiency, Chu–Harrington bandwidth limits, and array factor through HFSS/CST/FEKO synthesis, IEEE 149-2021 NF/FF/CATR metrology, CTIA TRP/TIS/ECC OTA, and Friis link budgets while treating ground-plane truncation, active impedance in arrays, range ripple, and S₁₁≠pattern conflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in crafting launch narratives - product launches, feature releases, company announcements, and milestone communications. Covers launch timing, narrative arc, channel strategy, and the art of creating buzz. Knows how to turn a release into an event, and when quiet launches are better than splash. Use when "product launch, launch story, announcement, feature release, launch narrative, go live, release announcement, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

企业财务与 CFO 视角 (企业财务与 CFO 视角 (Corporate Finance & the CFO Lens) — 面向创业公司与中小企业主/创始人/业务负责人的『看懂钱、管住钱、用好钱』的财务判断,不是考注会/中级职称的准则背诵,也不是投行卖方并购执行或 VC 投资人的看项目视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **利润是观点,现金是事实(权责发生制下的利润由收入确认时点、折旧摊销年限、存货计价、资本化与费用化的选择拼出来,是一组可辩论的判断;银行户头的钱是唯一不能辩论的事实——所以 CFO 看三张表的顺序是现金流量表→资产负债表→利润表,与外行相反) ⇄ 增长本身要烧钱(账面盈利的公司照样会因营运资金被增长吸干而倒闭:先付供应商、后收客户钱,规模越大缺口越大,这是『增长性破产』;所以现金转换周期比毛利率更早预警) ⇄ 记账合规派 vs 管理决策派(一套账是给税局与审计看的准则语言,另一套视图是给经营者看的贡献边际与单位经济;同一笔成本在两种语言里归属不同,把合规科目直接拿来做定价决策是中小企业最常见的错) ⇄ 全成本分摊 vs 贡献边际(把固定成本按产量分摊进单件成本,会在淡季得出『卖一件亏一件所以停产』的错误结论;边际思维只问增量收入是否覆盖增量成本,但长期只看边际会让公司永远收不回固定成本) ⇄ 预算是承诺 vs 预算是地图(传统年度预算把数字变成考核契约,导致部门年底突击花钱与藏预算;滚动预测与超越预算派主张预算只是当前最好的猜测,该月月刷新) ⇄ 融资是里程碑 vs 融资是负债(融资新闻稿把估值当成绩,但优先股、优先清算权、对赌与回购条款让创始人在低价退出时可能一分不拿;自筹派认为最便宜的钱是客户的预付款) ⇄ 估值方法之争(DCF 的数学严谨但对增长率与折现率假设极敏感,业内讥为『垃圾进垃圾出』;可比公司倍数简单但把市场情绪打包进来;早期公司两者都不成立,实际靠谈判与稀释目标倒推) ⇄ EBITDA 是不是有用(PE 与并购圈把它当经营现金流代理,巴菲特与芒格公开斥其忽略了折旧背后真实的资本开支;调整后 EBITDA 的『加回』项在业内被视为高危信号) ⇄ 财务是记分员 vs 财务是业务伙伴(传统财务事后出报表,财务 BP/FP&A 主张财务应在决策前进场做定价、投产、招人的经济性测算) ⇄ 中国中小企业的两套账现实 vs 合规红线(金税四期与社保入税之后,业内公认的做法是尽早并账,但这条张力必须如实呈现而不是装作不存在,也绝不给出规避税收的操作建议)); (b) 工具栈(记账层与决策层是两套东西) — 记账与 ERP(用友、金蝶、Odoo、QuickBooks、Xero、NetSuite、SAP Business One)、中国财税合规(电子税务局、金税四期发票与进销项比对、百望/航天信息电子发票、慧算账等代账 SaaS、个税与社保申报)、FP&A 与预算(Excel 与 Google Sheets 仍是绝对主力,之上是 Cube、Causal、Jirav、Mosaic、Runway、Abacum、Pigment、Anaplan、Planful)、现金流预测(Float、Fathom、13 周滚动现金流模板)、股权与 cap table(Carta、Pulley、AngelList、Excel 稀释模型,中国的股权代持与持股平台)、订阅计费与收入确认(Stripe Billing、Chargebee、Maxio)、费控报销(Ramp、Brex、Expensify、汇联易、分贝通)、BI 与看板(Power BI、Tableau、Metabase、帆软)、以及最被低估的纸笔工具(一页纸的驱动因素模型、贡献边际表、13 周现金日历)—— 选型的真正分岔是『公司在哪个阶段、由谁来维护这个模型』,不是厂商功能清单; (c) 心智模型层 — 三张表的勾稽关系(利润表的净利经现金流量表调整后落到资产负债表的未分配利润)、权责发生制与收付实现制的差、现金转换周期 CCC 与 DSO/DIO/DPO、营运资金与增长的耦合、贡献边际与盈亏平衡点、经营杠杆与固定成本结构、单位经济与 LTV/CAC 及回本周期、烧钱率与现金跑道 runway、自由现金流与业主收益 owner earnings、资本成本与机会成本、净现值与内部收益率、投入资本回报率 ROIC 与增长的价值条件(只有 ROIC 高于资本成本时增长才创造价值)、股权稀释与优先清算权的退出瀑布、递延收入是负债不是收入; (d) 工作流/SOP — 月度关账与管理报表包(关账日历、计提、对账、出具一页纸经营分析)、13 周滚动现金流预测的搭建与每周刷新、年度预算与滚动预测(自上而下目标与自下而上驱动因素模型的对撞)、定价与成本核算(标准成本、作业成本法、贡献边际定价与报价审批)、应收账款与账期管理(信用政策、账龄表、催收节奏、保理与供应链金融)、融资轮次建模(投前投后估值、期权池扩容对创始人的额外稀释、SAFE 与可转债转股、优先清算权下的退出分配)、投资决策与产能/招人测算(增量现金流、回收期、敏感性分析)、税务合规日历与汇算清缴、董事会与投资人财务包、尽调与数据室准备、以及财务模型的三表联动搭建; (e) 知识正典(en 一手极厚,中文一手集中在高校教授与准则原文) — 《Financial Intelligence》Berman & Knight(给非财务经理的入门标准)、《Financial Statements》Thomas Ittelson、Brealey·Myers·Allen《Principles of Corporate Finance》(公司金融教科书)、Damodaran 的估值三部曲与《Narrative and Numbers》及其 NYU 公开课与免费数据集、《Simple Numbers, Straight Talk, Big Profits!》Greg Crabtree(中小企业实操)、《Venture Deals》Feld & Mendelson(条款与稀释)、《Financial Shenanigans》Howard Schilit(识别财务粉饰)、《The Outsiders》Thorndike(资本配置)、《Accounting for Value》Penman、伯克希尔股东信中的业主收益与商誉摊销讨论、《The Essays of Warren Buffett》、《Profit First》Michalowicz(流行但有争议)、IFRS 15/16 与 ASC 606 收入与租赁准则原文、中国企业会计准则 CAS 与小企业会计准则、肖星《一本书读懂财报》与清华的财务分析公开课、张新民的财务报表分析体系; (f) 行业大佬/figures — Aswath Damodaran(NYU,估值教父,博客与公开课与数据集全免费开放,一手素材极厚)、Michael Mauboussin(ROIC 与资本配置的实证写作)、Howard Schilit(财务舞弊识别)、Karen Berman 与 Joe Knight(财务素养普及)、Greg Crabtree(中小企业现金与利润实操)、Brad Feld 与 Jason Mendelson(创业融资条款)、David Skok 与 Jason Lemkin 与 David Sacks(SaaS 单位经济与烧钱效率指标)、Warren Buffett 与 Charlie Munger(对 EBITDA 与股权激励费用化的著名批评)、CJ Gustafson 等现役 CFO 的时事通讯作者、以及中文圈的肖星与张新民等高校学者; (g) 争议/批判(必须保留不洗白) — 调整后 EBITDA 与非公认会计准则指标的滥用(把股权激励与一次性费用年年加回)、DCF 对假设的极端敏感与被用来事后合理化结论、独角兽估值与优先清算权造成的『纸面身价』幻觉、对赌与回购条款把股权融资变成隐性债务、Profit First 现金分桶法被专业会计批评为回避真实成本结构、作业成本法的实施失败率高、预算游戏与年底突击花钱、财务 BP 沦为报表美化、中国中小企业两套账的历史现实与金税四期后的合规收敛(如实呈现风险,不提供规避操作)、以及『融资额等于成功』的媒体叙事对创始人的误导; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — **准则与合规派(IASB/FASB/财政部,信可比性与审计留痕,语言是准则条文)** vs **管理会计/决策派(IMA 与贡献边际、作业成本法、有效产出会计,信决策相关性高于合规一致性)** vs **公司金融/估值派(Brealey-Myers-Allen 与 Damodaran,信现金流折现与资本成本)** vs **价值投资/资本配置派(巴菲特-芒格-Thorndike-Mauboussin,信业主收益与 ROIC,公开鄙视 EBITDA)** vs **创业与 SaaS 指标派(Skok-Lemkin-Sacks-Bessemer,信单位经济、回本周期与烧钱倍数)** vs **中小企业现金实操派(Crabtree、Profit First 一脉,信老板看得懂的少数几个数)**。不含: 投行卖方并购执行与尽调建模(已由 investment-banking-mna 覆盖)、VC 投资人的看项目与投后视角(已由 vc-investor 覆盖)、个人理财与二级市场投资(已由 personal-investing 覆盖)、注册会计师考证与准则条文背诵、以及任何税收规避操作建议。) Master O

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

加密链上交易 (加密 / 链上交易 (Crypto & On-chain Trading) — 以加密资产为标的、强调链上活动的主动交易认知操作系统：从「看叙事/选赛道 → 找标的 → 链上尽调与风控 → 选场所(DEX/CEX/链上合约) → 建仓与仓位管理 → 监控链上流向与情绪 → 退出与复盘」的完整决策链。覆盖 (a) 第一性张力 — **链上 on-chain (DEX 现货/AMM、钱包追踪 wallet tracking、资金流向 flow、MEV、memecoin、链上衍生品 Hyperliquid/GMX、自托管 self-custody, 'not your keys not your coins') ⇄ 链下 CEX (中心化交易所现货/合约 Binance/OKX/Bybit、订单簿、托管、出入金法币)**; **合约/杠杆/衍生品 (perps 永续、资金费率 funding、清算 liquidation、爆仓、做多做空、高频/择时) ⇄ 现货/价值/长持 (spot、HODL、定投 DCA、基本面/估值、'time in market > timing the market')**; **价值/基本面派 (协议收入、TVL、代币经济学 tokenomics、真实使用、估值模型) ⇄ meme/叙事/情绪派 (memecoin、narrative rotation 叙事轮动、attention is the asset、纯博弈/PvP、Ponzinomics)**; **链上数据/量化/客观 (on-chain analytics, Nansen/Arkham/Dune、聪明钱 smart money、链上指标、系统化/机械化) ⇄ 直觉/盘感/叙事阅读 (narrative、KOL alpha、社群情绪、tape reading)**; **自托管/去中心化/抗审查 (DeFi、自托管钱包、抗审查、'be your own bank') ⇄ 便利/合规/中心化 (CEX、合规出入金、KYC、托管、ETF)**; **主动交易/择时/高换手 (trading、波段、合约、撸毛/空投 airdrop farming、套利 arbitrage) ⇄ 被动配置/低换手 (配置 BTC/ETH、ETF、长期叙事 beta)**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量 + CLI 化) — 通用链: 叙事/赛道判断 (宏观周期/减半/流动性/板块轮动) → 标的发现 (链上扫链/聪明钱跟单/新币/叙事映射) → 尽调 due diligence (代币经济学/解锁 unlock/团队/合约审计/honeypot 检测/流动性与持仓分布) → 风控前置 (仓位 sizing/最大回撤/止损/相关性) → 场所与执行 (CEX vs DEX、滑点/MEV/gas、限价 vs 市价、TWAP) → 持仓监控 (链上流向/巨鲸/资金费率/解锁日历/情绪指标) → 退出与复盘 (止盈分批/再平衡/记录交易日志); 子流派 SOP: 链上 degen 打新与 memecoin 流程、合约交易者的资金费率与清算地图、空投/撸毛 farming、套利与 MEV、被动配置与定投; (c) 工具栈 — 链上分析 (Nansen 聪明钱/Arkham 实体标注/Dune 自建仪表盘/Dexscreener & DEX Screener 新币/GMGN & Photon & BullX memecoin 终端/Etherscan & Solscan 区块浏览器/DeBank 钱包总览/Token Terminal 协议基本面/DefiLlama TVL/Glassnode & CryptoQuant 链上指标)、交易场所 (CEX: Binance/OKX/Bybit/Coinbase; 链上现货 DEX: Uniswap/Jupiter/Raydium/Aerodrome; 链上衍生品: Hyperliquid/GMX/dYdX)、钱包与安全 (MetaMask/Rabby/Phantom 热钱包、Ledger/Trezor 硬件冷钱包、Revoke.cash 授权管理、honeypot/合约扫描)、行情与图表 (TradingView、CoinGecko/CoinMarketCap)、信息与聚合 (Twitter/X、Telegram、DeFiLlama、RootData/ICO 日历、解锁日历 Token Unlocks)、自动化 (交易机器人、链上 bot/sniper、Telegram trading bot); (d) 知识正典 — 注意加密交易 canon 偏少且新: 通用交易/风控经典 (Edwin Lefèvre 'Reminiscences of a Stock Operator'、Van Tharp 'Trade Your Way to Financial Freedom' 仓位管理、Mark Douglas 'Trading in the Zone' 交易心理、Michael Mauboussin、Nassim Taleb 'Fooled by Randomness/Antifragile')、加密原生 (Bitcoin whitepaper 中本聪、'The Bitcoin Standard' Saifedean、Vitalik 博客与 Ethereum whitepaper、'DeFi and the Future of Finance'、Lyn Alden 宏观、a16z crypto 文章、Messari/Delphi/Bankless 研报)、链上分析方法 (Glassnode/CryptoQuant 教程、Nansen/Arkham/Dune 文档、Dune Analytics SQL)、交易方法论散见于 podcast/Substack/Twitter thread 而非书; (e) figures/流派 — 价值/基本面派 (Vitalik Buterin 以太坊、Hasu/Su Zhu(争议)、Arthur Hayes BitMEX 创始人/宏观+衍生品、Raoul Pal、Lyn Alden 宏观、Cobie/Jordan Fish UpOnly podcast、DeFi 研究 Bankless Ryan Adams/David Hoffman); 链上分析派 (Nansen Alex Svanevik、Arkham、Adam Cochran、Ansem(blknoiz06) 链上交易、Murad memecoin supercycle、链上侦探 ZachXBT 反诈); 合约/衍生品派 (Arthur Hayes、GCR(GiganticRebirth) 传奇合约、Pentoshi、CryptoCred 技术分析、Tyler Durden); meme/叙事派 (Ansem、Murad、Cobie、各 Solana memecoin KOL); 宏观/周期派 (Raoul Pal、Lyn Alden、PlanB stock-to-flow(争议)、Benjamin Cowen 数据/周期); 量化/系统化 (各匿名量化、Hyperliquid 生态); 中文圈 (链上分析/合约 KOL、币圈大 V、播客如 '无人之境'/'Web3 佛学院'、研究机构如 Foresight/PANews/律动 BlockBeats); 反诈/安全 (ZachXBT、SlowMist 慢雾、go+ 安全); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — 现货 spot / 合约 perps 永续 / 杠杆 leverage / 多空 long-short / 爆仓 liquidation 清算 / 资金费率 funding rate / 开多开空 / 止损 SL 止盈 TP / 仓位 position sizing / 满仓梭哈 ape in / 梭 / FOMO / FUD / 钻石手 diamond hands / 纸手 paper hands / 韭菜 / 镰刀 / 庄 / 出货 / 拉盘砸盘 / 插针 wick / 针 / 上车下车 / 埋伏 / 潜伏 / 链上 on-chain / 钱包 wallet / 地址 / 聪明钱 smart money / 巨鲸 whale / 跟单 copy-trade / 老鼠仓 / 貔貅盘 honeypot / 貔貅 / rug 跑路 rug-pull / 归零 / 土狗 (memecoin/小币) / 金狗 (暴涨百倍) / meme 币 / 叙事 narrative / 赛道 / 板块轮动 / 撸毛 撸空投 airdrop / 女巫 sybil / 交互 / 解锁 unlock / 砸盘解锁 / 代币经济学 tomomics / TVL / APY APR / 无常损失 IL / 滑点 slippage / MEV / 三明治 sandwich / gas / 抢跑 frontrun / 貔貅检测 / 授权 approve / 撤销授权 revoke / 私钥 助记词 seed phrase / 冷钱包 热钱包 / 自托管 / 减半 halving / 牛熊 / 山寨季 altseason / 比特币市占率 BTC.D / 山寨 alt / 主流币 / DeFi 暑期 / GM / WAGMI / NGMI / 归零归零 / PvP / Ponzi 庞氏; (g) 争议/批

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

游戏设计 (Game Design) — 设计游戏的规则 / 系统 / 机制 / 体验 的从业者认知操作系统 (以电子游戏为主, 含桌游 / 卡牌 / 棋盘游戏): 决定「玩家做什么、为什么有意义、每一刻的体验如何」的学科 —— 区别于游戏程序 (引擎 / 代码)、游戏美术 (视觉 / 音频)、游戏制作 (排期 / 预算 / 团队)。覆盖 (a) 核心设计理论与框架 (MDA 机制-动态-美学 Hunicke/LeBlanc/Zubek + Schell 的「透镜」+ Koster「乐趣即学习」理论 + Sid Meier「一连串有趣的决策」+ Salen & Zimmerman「有意义的游玩」/「二阶设计」/「魔法圈」+ Costikyan 论不确定性 + Suits/Huizinga 游戏哲学), (b) 系统与机制设计 (核心循环 + 游戏经济 sink/source/产出-消耗 + 正负反馈环 + 资源与成长系统 + 涌现 vs 脚本 Will Wright「可能性空间」+ Machinations 经济建模 Dormans + 支配 / 退化策略 + 正交设计 Garfield), (c) 关卡与遭遇设计 (灰盒 blockout + 节奏与张力 + 预告 telegraphing + 主线 vs 探索 + 环境叙事 + 锁钥 gating + 难度曲线), (d) 游戏手感与「juice」(Steve Swink《Game Feel》+ 即时响应 + 屏震 / 反馈 / 打磨 + 输入与镜头 + 「手感」是设计出来的不是附带的), (e) 玩家心理与 UX (Celia Hodent《The Gamer's Brain》+ 心流通道 挑战 vs 技能 Csikszentmihalyi/陈星汉 Jenova Chen + Bartle 玩家类型 + 动机与奖励节奏 + 新手引导 FTUE / 教学化 + 认知负荷 + 无障碍), (f) 平衡与调优 (Ian Schreiber《Game Balance》+ 对称 / 非对称 + 动态难度 DDA + 传递 / 非传递平衡 + nerf/buff + 消除支配策略 + 测试驱动调优), (g) 叙事与任务设计 (ludonarrative 失调 / 和谐 + 环境与系统叙事 + 分支 vs 线性 + Amy Hennig 角色驱动 + 任务结构), (h) 以玩家为中心的迭代流程 (Tracy Fullerton《Game Design Workshop》playcentric + 纸面原型 + 垂直切片 + 测试协议「看而不说 / 你不是你的玩家」+ 快速迭代 + game jam), (i) 类型与形态工艺 (roguelike/roguelite 与程序生成 Derek Yu + 平台跳跃 + RPG 系统 + 策略 4X + 解谜设计 Jonathan Blow + 多人 / PvP 平衡 + 桌游 / 卡牌设计 Reiner Knizia/Richard Garfield/Brenda Romero), (j) F2P / 长线运营 / 商业化设计 (核心 / 元 / 经济循环 + 抽卡 gacha / 开箱 loot box / 战令 battle pass 机制 + 留存 D1/D7/D30 + 转化 + 鲸鱼 + live ops 内容节奏 —— 并诚实处理掠夺式暗黑模式 / 强迫循环 / 剥削式商业化的伦理), (k) 设计师角色与工艺职业 (系统 / 关卡 / 叙事 / UX 设计师之分 + 通才 vs 专才 + 独立作者 vs 3A 团队 + 设计文档 + 传达设计意图 + GDC 工艺社区)。跨 3A / 独立 / 手游 F2P / 桌游。不含 游戏程序 / 引擎 (Unity/Unreal 编码 / 图形 / 网络同步) / 游戏美术 / 动画 / 音频 / 游戏制作 / 项目管理 / 排期 / QA / 游戏作为生意 / 发行 / 市场 / 电竞运营为终点 / 泛泛「我想做游戏」的 game-dev 教程 —— 本 skill 是「设计」学科: 规则 / 系统 / 机制 / 体验。 (Game Design — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who design the rules, systems, mechanics, and experiences of games (video games primarily, plus tabletop/board/card games): the discipline of deciding WHAT the player does, WHY it is meaningful, and HOW the moment-to-moment experience feels — distinct from game programming (builds the engine/code), game art (visuals/audio), and game production (schedule/budget/team). Covers (a) core design theory & frameworks (MDA Mechanics-Dynamics-Aesthetics Hunicke/LeBlanc/Zubek, Schell's Lenses, Koster's theory of fun = learning, Sid Meier 'a series of interesting decisions', Salen & Zimmerman 'meaningful play'/'second-order design'/'magic circle', Costikyan on uncertainty, Suits/Huizinga play philosophy), (b) systems & mechanics design (core loops, game economy sink/source/faucet-drain, feedback loops positive/negative, resource & progression systems, emergence vs scripting Will Wright 'possibility space', Machinations economy modeling Dormans, dominant/degenerate strategy, orthogonal design Garfield), (c) level & encounter design (blockout/greybox, pacing & tension, telegraphing, critical path vs exploration, environmental storytelling, gating & lock-and-key, difficulty curve), (d) game feel & juice (Steve Swink 'Game Feel', moment-to-moment responsiveness, screenshake/feedback/polish, input & camera, the 'feel' is designed not incidental), (e) player psychology & UX (Celia Hodent 'The Gamer's Brain', flow channel challenge-vs-skill Csikszentmihalyi/Jenova Chen, Bartle player types, motivation & reward schedules, onboarding/FTUE/tutorialization, cognitive load, accessibility), (f) balancing & tuning (Ian Schreiber 'Game Balance', symmetry/asymmetry, dynamic difficulty adjustment DDA, transitive/intransitive balance, nerf/buff, dominant strategy elimination, playtesting-driven tuning), (g) narrative & quest design (ludonarrative dissonance/harmony, environmental & systemic storytelling, branching vs linear, Amy Hennig character-driven, quest structure), (h) player-centric iterative process (Tracy Fullerton 'Game Design Workshop' playcentric design, paper prototyping, vertical slice, playtesting protocol 'watch don't talk / you are not your play

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draws an activity flow / system architecture diagram as ONE self-contained, INTERACTIVE HTML+SVG page (2-pane app layout — left: diagram, default fit-to-view with zoom/pan; right: sidebar with explainer cards), styled like a real hand-drawn enterprise doc (Stripe/AWS-docs style — real brand logos for MongoDB/Odoo/n8n/etc. from a bundled Simple Icons library, neutral white boxes, sans-serif, no "AI neon" look), scroll-to-zoom, auto light/dark with a toggle button — clicking a flow (a legend chip, a line, or a step badge) highlights that flow with traveling dots along the arrows in their direction, a ping at the destination box, and a sidebar panel that slides out, while everything else dims; two-way arrows (OUT = solid blue / RETURN = dashed green) carry numbered step badges, colored by semantic meaning (red = auth checkpoint, purple = scheduled flow, amber = data pipeline), a small "hop" arc where two lines are forced to cross, dashed group regions, one explainer card per flow in the right sidebar. Use this skill ANY TIME the user wants to "draw a diagram", "draw a flow", "draw a system diagram", "redraw this so it's easier to follow", "interactive diagram", "two-way diagram", "request/response flow", "make a free-form HTML diagram" — even if they never say the word HTML. Especially good when both the request direction AND the response direction need to be shown, or when a templated tool (archify, mermaid) is too rigid. Do NOT use for data charts (bar/line/pie), and do not use when the user asks specifically for archify or mermaid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide carrier appointments. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with insurance-carrier-appointment related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。