335 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Qualify the exact final diff for a LoopX-managed goal. Use when goal policy enables change_quality_qualification, before a non-trivial delivery or merge, and when producing or repairing an exact-scope quality receipt. The workflow is language-neutral, permits at most one policy-authorized safe-fix pass, and never grants merge or repository authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Backlink profile for any domain — referring domains, authority, anchors, new/lost links, and a side-by-side vs a competitor. Use when asked "check my backlinks", "backlink profile of X", "who links to them", or "link gap vs competitor".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualify the exact final diff for a LoopX-managed goal. Use when goal policy enables change_quality_qualification, before a non-trivial delivery or merge, and when producing or repairing an exact-scope quality receipt. The workflow is language-neutral, permits at most one policy-authorized safe-fix pass, and never grants merge or repository authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Backlink / off-page SEO audit. Works WITHOUT a paid tool by default — it uses the Google Search Console Links report (your top linking sites, most-linked pages, and anchor text) plus any backlink export the user provides (Ahrefs / Semrush / Majestic / DataForSEO CSV). Analyzes referring-domain profile, anchor-text distribution (over-optimized / spammy patterns), most-linked pages vs. money pages (internal-linking opportunity), toxic/spam link signals, and link-building priorities. Use this skill when the user asks about backlinks, link building, off-page SEO, referring domains, anchor text, toxic/spam links, disavow, or their link profile. Trigger on: "backlinks", "backlink audit", "link building", "off- page SEO", "referring domains", "anchor text", "toxic links", "spam links", "disavow file", "who links to me", "link profile", "domain authority". NOTE: rich third-party metrics (DR/DA, full link index) require a paid data source; this skill is explicit about what it can and can't see without one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute one scoped implementation or investigation item and return evidence without changing workflow authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute one bounded CCB work item and report evidence without changing workflow authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, craft, run, debrief, save, and prepare repeatable AI-agent loops for publication. Use when a user asks to analyze code or coding threads for recurring work, find a published loop, interview them to turn a goal into a bounded loop, review a loop for weak checks or unsafe authority, execute a loop with an evidence receipt, learn from completed runs, save or reuse a project loop, or validate and submit a loop to Loop Library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "plan my site structure", "design the page hierarchy / navigation / URL taxonomy", "fix internal linking", or "find orphan pages"; runs two modes — architecture (hierarchy, nav, URL patterns, hub/spoke clusters, Mermaid site maps) and linking (link graph, authority flow, anchor text, orphan disposition, source/target/anchor plan) — and outputs a structure score /100 plus a handoff summary. Not for external backlinks — use offsite-signal-analyzer; not for XML sitemap or indexation issues — use technical-seo-checker. 网站架构/信息架构/站点地图/内链优化
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness; runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan. Not for structural tags/headers alone — use on-page-seo-checker; not for domain/citation trust — use domain-authority-auditor. 内容质量/EEAT评分
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "generate an SEO report", "出月报", "set SEO alerts", or "排名掉了提醒我"; two modes — report builds multi-metric traffic/ranking/authority/content dashboards, and alert configures threshold notifications for future ranking, traffic, technical, backlink, competitor, and AI-visibility changes. Not for raw position-by-position deltas — use rank-tracker. SEO报告/绩效仪表盘/SEO预警/排名监控
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover and validate Agent Skills, host plugins and subagents, MCP servers and configurations, hooks, and marketplace catalogs against the correct authority. Use when performing pre-merge review, external submission checks, portability audits, security checks, or validation of mixed agent-system repositories. Trigger with "validate this skill", "audit this plugin", "check this agent", "review this MCP config", or "is this marketplace ready".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and secure Alchemy credentials, browser access, wallet authority, webhook verification, and untrusted chain data. Use when securing an Alchemy-backed application. Trigger with "secure Alchemy", "Alchemy API key exposure", or "verify an Alchemy webhook".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define an Abridge reference architecture that separates vendor, EHR, identity, device, customer, and clinical authority boundaries. Use when reviewing an enterprise Abridge design. Trigger with "design the Abridge architecture".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous, defensible email-spoofability verdict and SPF supply-chain risk analysis computed from published DNS alone. Deepens the record-level SPF/DMARC/DKIM/BIMI/MTA-STS/DNSSEC fetch recipes in the offensive-osint arsenal (§16.14) with the reasoning that section doesn't do: a priority-ordered composite verdict for whether an attacker can actually land header-From-spoofed mail in an inbox, and by which vector (exact-domain vs subdomain) — grounded in the single most-misunderstood distinction in email security: the envelope MAIL FROM that SPF authenticates vs the visible header From: that only DMARC governs. Explains precisely why SPF -all/~all alone is NOT spoof-proof without DMARC enforcement, and why SPF +all bypasses DMARC even under p=reject pct=100. Covers RFC 7208 §4.6.4's 10-DNS-lookup / 2-void-lookup PermError fail-open condition with a runnable stdlib-only lookup-counter script, plus the SPF-include-takeover supply-chain vector (an attacker re-registering a dead include inherits SPF-pass authority over the victim domain) with strict transient-vs-NXDOMAIN discrimination discipline so a temporary SERVFAIL is never mistaken for a takeover lead. Fully passive: DNS TXT reads only, no mail sent, no RCPT TO probe, no API keys. Use when auditing a domain's real spoofing resistance (not just its published records), explaining to a client why 'we have SPF -all' does not mean they're covered, investigating an SPF PermError or an unusually long include chain, evaluating a dead SPF include as a takeover lead, or writing a defensible spoofability finding for a deliverable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the seven principles of ethical persuasion (reciprocity, commitment, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity, unity) to product design, copy, and sales. Use when the user mentions "social proof", "persuasive copy", "why users dont convert", "ethical persuasion", "reciprocity", "scarcity tactics", "commitment and consistency", "shared identity", "in-group", "make my copy more persuasive", "increase trust", or "get more people to say yes". Also trigger when designing testimonial sections, crafting urgency messaging, or improving trust signals on landing pages. Covers the principles, when each applies, and ethical limits. For deal negotiation tactics, see negotiation. For viral word-of-mouth, see contagious.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate editorial calendars for blogs with topic clusters, publishing schedules, content decay detection, freshness update plans, seasonal opportunities, content mix formula, template integration, and distribution scheduling. Plans monthly or quarterly calendars optimized for SEO topic authority and freshness signals based on content priority. Use when user says "editorial calendar", "content calendar", "blog calendar", "publishing schedule", "blog plan", "content plan", "what should I write".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research what people are actually saying about a topic in the last 30 days across Reddit, X / Twitter, YouTube, Hacker News, dev.to, Medium, and other public discourse platforms. API-free; uses WebSearch with platform-targeted site operators plus recency filters. Produces DISCOURSE.md (a structured brief) and JSON output the writer can consume. Complements blog-researcher (which focuses on authority sources) with a recency-and-engagement lens. Use when user says "blog discourse", "discourse research", "what are people saying about", "research what people are saying", "voice of customer", "social listening", "30-day research", "trend research", "what's the discussion on", "real-time research", "practitioner discourse", "/blog discourse".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Owns the security posture of the organization — architecture, program strategy, risk acceptance, incident command, and the authority to stop work that creates unacceptable exposure. Use this for a security strategy or program decision, when a technical choice creates security risk that needs a verdict, when deciding whether to accept or block a risk, when standing up a security function, or when security and delivery priorities conflict and someone has to decide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author and validate durable data and ML feasibility studies using the Feasibility Study Interchange Profile, constrained YAML authority, UUID URN identity, lifecycle lineage, and evidence traceability. Use when assessing whether available data and technical evidence support a proposed outcome.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and harden Roblox client/server networking with RemoteEvent, RemoteFunction, and UnreliableRemoteEvent; server authority, argument and Instance validation, rate limits, proximity/ownership checks, targeted replication, streaming, lifecycle, prediction, and reconciliation. Use for Roblox remotes, exploits, request spam, multiplayer replication, network ownership, high-frequency cosmetic updates, or server/client desynchronization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build networked games with Godot 4.7 high-level multiplayer: set up an ENetMultiplayerPeer server/client, define RPCs with the @rpc annotation (call via rpc()/rpc_id()), set per-node multiplayer authority, and replicate state with MultiplayerSpawner and MultiplayerSynchronizer. Use when adding multiplayer/networking to a Godot project, writing @rpc functions, or syncing player/world state across peers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a consulting client discovery session — uncover the real problem, scope, and decision process. Use when asked to prepare for a client discovery call, qualify a consulting lead, scope an engagement, or run a kickoff. Produces a discovery plan — the questions that surface the real problem (not the stated one), budget/authority/timeline qualifiers, success criteria, red flags, and a follow-up that leads to a proposal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users master the art of leading without formal authority by identifying stakeholder incentives, neutralizing conflict through connection, and using co-creation to build shared ownership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。