「code mode」の検索結果

Delegate code review to a subagent running a specific model. Use ONLY when user explicitly names a model to review changes ("review with opus", "use sonnet to review", "review with gemini"). The root agent reconstructs changes from conversation history and spawns a subagent with the code-review skill using the specified model. Do NOT use for general code review (use code-review skill instead), for reviewing PRs from git history, or when no model is specified by the user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete operational workflow for implementer agents (Codex, Gemini, etc.) making code changes and writing tests. Drives all work through atomic commits — each loop operates on the smallest complete, reviewable change. Defines the Code Change Loop, Test Writing Loop, Lint Gate, and Issue Filing process with circuit breakers, severity levels, and escalation rules. Requires `committer` for all commits. Includes bundled provider-aware review scripts that keep same-model shell-outs as the last resort, plus a fresh-context Codex fallback for code review and test audit. Use this skill when starting any implementation task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connects to and performs inference with Google Cloud Agent Platform GenAI models, including First-Party Gemini models and Third-Party OpenMaaS models (Llama, DeepSeek, Qwen, etc.). Use when asked to perform inference, ask a model a question, run a test prompt, execute chat completions, or generate code for calling Gemini or OpenMaaS models, authenticate with GenAI SDK, OpenAI SDK, or legacy Agent Platform SDK, configure base URLs and global/regional endpoints, or troubleshoot 429 Resource Exhausted (DSQ), 400 User Validation, or 404 Not Found errors. Don't use for deploying models to endpoints or for running model evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode for technical work — a thinking partner for {{engine_name}} code, architecture, and implementation decisions before you write any code. Use it to investigate a technical solution, design the architecture of a feature, choose between frameworks or libraries, compare implementation approaches, analyze how existing code or a system works, or deeply root-cause a complex bug without fixing it yet. The ultra mode adds adaptive artifacts (a C4 view, ADRs, a dependency graph) to the research folder — run it on "ultra research", "ultra explore" or "ultraresearch"; otherwise run the default. Trigger on "let's explore this technical solution", "how should we architect this feature", "which framework should we use", "run an ultra research on the save system", "investigate this error deeply". Research and analysis only — it never writes code. This is the CODE / engineering explorer — for GAME-DESIGN, GDD, mechanics, or balance research (no code) use /unikit-gd-explore.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a code review on {{engine_name}} {{engine_code_language}} code. Checks for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and best practices against the project's coding rules, design principles, and framework-specific conventions. Supports four modes — staged changes, a pull request, a commit range, or individual files. Use when the user says "review code", "check my code", "code review", "review PR", "review staged changes", "review these commits", or "is this code okay". Optional +check flag validates findings via a fresh-context subagent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve CodeRabbit review feedback on a GitHub pull request. Collects every open CodeRabbit finding (inline threads, plus the nitpick and outside-diff findings packed into review bodies), judges and fixes each one against the real code with subagents, unifies fixes that share a pattern, commits locally, asks before pushing, then shows every reply draft linked to its finding and posts only on approval. Runs only on top-tier models. Use on "resolve the CodeRabbit feedback", "address coderabbit comments", "answer the rabbit", "fix what CodeRabbit flagged on

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls ChIP-seq peaks with MACS3, MACS2, HOMER, or SPP across narrow (TF) and broad (histone) modes. Handles input control matching, fragment-size modeling vs --nomodel, effective genome size, ENCODE-style IDR vs naive overlap, hyper-ChIPable artifacts, and aligner-specific shifts. Use when calling peaks from ChIP-seq alignments, choosing between narrow vs broad mode for a histone mark, deciding model vs nomodel for low-depth data, applying ENCODE pseudoreplicate IDR, or reconciling MACS vs HOMER vs SPP results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic framework for resurrecting and modernizing legacy codebases through archaeology, resurrection, and rejuvenation phases. Activate on "legacy code", "inherited codebase", "no documentation", "technical debt", "resurrect", "modernize". NOT for greenfield projects or well-documented active codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mescle múltiplos modelos ajustados usando mergekit para combinar capacidades sem retreinar. Use ao criar modelos especializados misturando expertise específica de domínio (math + coding + chat), melhorando performance além de modelos únicos, ou experimentando rapidamente variantes de modelos. Cobre SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, mesclagem linear e estratégias de deploy em produção.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kontokonzept für den budgetierten Einsatz teurer oder knapper Modelle (Advisor, Reviewer, Spezialmodelle, Dauer-Worker) in längeren Agentenläufen. Beginnt mit einer gemeinsamen Aushandlung zwischen Nutzer und Modell über verfügbare Modelle, Rollen und Kontingente je Zeitfenster, führt ein Konto über jeden Einsatz, setzt vor jeder Eskalation ein Puzzleteil-Vorverfahren und erlaubt Anpassungen mitten im Lauf. Verwenden bei "Budget", "Kontingent", "Konto führen", "nur einmal pro Stunde", "Reviewer sparsam einsetzen", "Fable/Codex/Sol/Astra/Luna/Advisor nur begrenzt", "/budgetierung", und immer dann, wenn ein Operator-, Forschungs- oder Automationslauf mehrere Modelle mit unterschiedlichen Kosten kombinieren soll — auch wenn der Nutzer das Wort Budget nicht nennt, aber Einsatzgrenzen für Modelle vorgibt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs, asks about Codex itself or choosing Codex surfaces, needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, latest/current/default-model prompting guidance, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; use OpenAI docs MCP tools for non-Codex docs questions, use the Codex manual helper first for broad Codex self-knowledge, and restrict fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orientation for custom (non-OpenAI) models running in the Codex app through the codex-router proxy. Explains that the app's native tools arrive as flattened codex_app__ and mcp__ names, that the router restores them so the app executes them, which companion skills to read before threads, browser, or computer-use work, and that a turn with no tool call ends the task. Use when the session uses a custom (non-OpenAI) model, for example deepseek-v4-flash or mimo-v2.5, when codex_app__ or mcp__ tool names appear in the tool list, when a tool result just arrived and more work remains, or when thread, browser, or computer-use work is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ScalarDBレビューエージェント - 設計レビュー（--mode=design）とコードレビュー（--mode=code）を実行。/review-scalardb --mode=design で呼び出し。

OpenAI API (developers.openai.com) の運用・管理リファレンス。 Administration API, admin API keys, RBAC, roles, groups, invites, projects, spend limits, audit logs, usage / costs API, Terraform provider (openai/openai), workload identity federation (WIF, OIDC/SPIFFE), safety best practices, moderation API, production best practices, deployment checklist, cost / latency optimization, fast mode, Realtime API costs。rate limits・error handling・prompt caching は openai-api-core、Codex のワークスペース 管理は openai-codex が担当。

Calls ChIP-seq peaks with MACS3, MACS2, HOMER, or SPP across narrow (TF) and broad (histone) modes. Handles input control matching, fragment-size modeling vs --nomodel, effective genome size, ENCODE-style IDR vs naive overlap, hyper-ChIPable artifacts, and aligner-specific shifts. Use when calling peaks from ChIP-seq alignments, choosing between narrow vs broad mode for a histone mark, deciding model vs nomodel for low-depth data, applying ENCODE pseudoreplicate IDR, or reconciling MACS vs HOMER vs SPP results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls ChIP-seq peaks with MACS3, MACS2, HOMER, or SPP across narrow (TF) and broad (histone) modes. Handles input control matching, fragment-size modeling vs --nomodel, effective genome size, ENCODE-style IDR vs naive overlap, hyper-ChIPable artifacts, and aligner-specific shifts. Use when calling peaks from ChIP-seq alignments, choosing between narrow vs broad mode for a histone mark, deciding model vs nomodel for low-depth data, applying ENCODE pseudoreplicate IDR, or reconciling MACS vs HOMER vs SPP results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enables Claude Code to collaborate with OpenAI Codex CLI on Windows. Use this skill when the user wants to get a second opinion from Codex, compare approaches between Claude and Codex, or leverage both AI assistants for collaborative problem-solving. This skill supports both non-interactive mode (automatic response retrieval) and interactive mode (visual pane splitting with tmux).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add descriptions for new models from the HuggingFace router to chat-ui configuration. Use when new models are released on the router and need descriptions added to prod.yaml and dev.yaml. Triggers on requests like "add new model descriptions", "update models from router", "sync models", or when explicitly invoking /add-model-descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze any codebase's source code in depth and produce structured analysis documents saved as markdown files. Use this skill whenever the user asks to understand how a codebase works — architecture, module design, call flows, data models, design patterns, performance characteristics, or any implementation detail. Trigger on phrases like "analyze the source", "explain this code", "how does X work", "where is Y implemented", "trace the flow of", "what happens when", "read through the code", "code walkthrough", "源码分析", "代码解读", "实现原理", "架构分析", "调用链路", "模块分析", or any code-exploration request. Works with any programming language: TypeScript/JavaScript, Java, Python, Go, Rust, C/C++, and more. Even if the user's question seems simple (e.g., "这个文件是干什么的"), use this skill — a thorough, source-backed analysis document is always more valuable than a surface-level guess.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic framework for resurrecting and modernizing legacy codebases through archaeology, resurrection, and rejuvenation phases. Activate on "legacy code", "inherited codebase", "no documentation", "technical debt", "resurrect", "modernize". NOT for greenfield projects or well-documented active codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Codeが読み込むエージェント、スキル、ルール、MCP設定の情報量を点検するスキル。重複や長すぎる定義を見つけ、削減案を優先順位付きで示します。

• コンテキストがすぐ埋まる原因調査
• スキルやMCP追加後の設定点検
• 長いファイルや指示の重複確認

大規模言語モデルの知識・推論・コード生成を共通の課題で評価するスキル。複数モデルの比較表や学習途中の成績推移を作り、評価結果と個別の回答を保存します。

• MMLU・GSM8Kでのモデル評価
• 複数モデルの比較表作成
• 学習途中のモデルの成績追跡

言語モデル内部の反応を少数の特徴に分解し、学習した概念を調べます。学習済みSAEの分析、自作SAEの訓練、特徴を使った出力調整と品質評価を案内します。

• 学習済みSAEで特徴を調べたいとき
• 特定のモデル層にSAEを訓練する
• 入力文ごとの特徴の反応を比較する