「cohere」の検索結果

Build GraphRAG retrieval pipelines on Neo4j using the neo4j-graphrag Python package (v1.22.0+). Covers retriever selection (VectorRetriever, HybridRetriever, VectorCypherRetriever, HybridCypherRetriever, Text2CypherRetriever, ToolsRetriever), external vector DB retrievers (Weaviate, Pinecone, Qdrant), retrieval_query Cypher fragments, query_params, filters, GraphRAG pipeline wiring (GraphRAG + LLM + prompt), all LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini/VertexAI, Bedrock, Cohere, Mistral, Ollama), embedder setup, index creation, token usage tracking, Cypher 25 SEARCH clause, and LangChain/LlamaIndex integration. Does NOT handle KG construction — use neo4j-document-import-skill. Does NOT handle plain vector search — use neo4j-vector-index-skill. Does NOT handle GDS analytics — use neo4j-gds-skill. Does NOT handle agent memory — use neo4j-agent-memory-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect and diagnose minimal-zine posters, photo restyles, editorial images, and social-card series for subject preservation, factual and text integrity, composition, paper realism, print-process coherence, color signal, anti-AI craft, platform fit, and series continuity. Use when the user asks whether an image has高级感, feels AI-generated, matches Paper Signal or gc-minimal-zine quality, needs improvement, or should be regenerated. Returns evidence-based findings and a targeted correction prompt; regenerates only when the user also asks for a fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Art-direct and generate one high-craft minimal-zine bitmap from a landscape, portrait, person, object, product, food, plant, building, interior, photograph, mood, sentence, or article concept. Use when the user wants a standalone poetic poster, editorial cover, visual concept, aesthetic photo upgrade, photo-to-zine restyle, or a subject-aware minimal-zine image without the overhead of a social carousel. Chooses adaptive composition and a physically coherent print process, preserves subject identity, saves the final prompt, invokes the runtime-native image generator, and audits the raster result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, write, art-direct, generate, and package a coherent 2-10 image minimal-zine social series from notes, articles, photographs, travel stories, products, reviews, cultural topics, data, PDFs, or mixed subjects. Use for Xiaohongshu/小红书图片, Instagram carousels, social visual essays, recommendation posts, photo diaries, evidence-backed explainers, or any multi-image editorial sequence. Produces analysis, card roles, subject-aware composition, saved prompts, real raster images, natural caption copy, evidence provenance when needed, and series-level QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Blender animation attempts before accepting them by rendering contact sheets, checking silhouette stability, flicker, framing, subject dominance, layer separation, export compatibility, and motion-design coherence. Use after animation renders or when the user says motion/morph/outside elements look bad.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harmonize multiple Blender skills into a coherent pipeline with clear activation precedence, handoff artifacts, dependency gates, and conflict-resolution rules. Use when a Blender task spans several skills, when reference-locked work conflicts with generic production workflow, after adding/updating skills, or when repeated failures indicate skill interference or missing inter/intra-play.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a criterion-referenced rubric with descriptive performance levels for a task or objective. Use for marking guides and general curriculum contexts. For Manning programmes where Competent = success, use coherent-rubric-logic-builder instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, critiquing, or stress-testing an existing strategy document. Evaluates seven dimensions — diagnosis quality, guiding policy strength, action coherence, assumption exposure, falsifiability — with optional 7S, Five Forces, Balanced Scorecard, and Hoshin Kanri lenses. Triggers on: review my strategy, poke holes in this plan, what's weak here, strategy audit, red team this. Does NOT build strategy (use strategy-interview) or brainstorm project ideas (use brainstorm-beagle).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a coherent visual identity (palette, typography, spacing, radius) from a brief and serialise to JSON for the design-tokens skill. Use when establishing brand identity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A **codescent object** is the 2-categorical analogue of a coequalizer. While coequalizers identify elements under an equivalence relation, codescent objects identify 1-cells under a coherent system of 2-cells. They are the fundamental tool for:

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert Chinese provinces, municipalities, autonomous regions, cities, counties, ancient cities, and cultural regions into restrained contemporary posters led by one culturally transformed Chinese character. Supports direct one-shot final image generation and layered production. Use when the user asks for a 中国省域文化海报、城市文化海报、地域文化视觉、极简大字海报、地区系列海报、展览主视觉、出版或社交封面，requests 直接生成、一次成图、不合成、不要后期、direct generation, or wants cultural analysis, art direction, image prompts, rendered poster images, or a coherent batch series for places such as 北京、广东、福建、江南、岭南、巴蜀 or 关中.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text: discovery vs. measurement, STM/LDA/BERTopic choice, preprocessing, covariate formulas, choosing K across coherence, FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validating topics against human coding, robustness, and reporting. Coding against a fixed codebook goes to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize the currently staged Git changes as a human-readable, intent-grouped narrative. Use when the user wants a concise and brief report of what changed and why. Optionally can check the diff for intent coherence and show a risk and blast radius report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing the structure, ordering, coherence, and narrative flow of the book as a whole or across chapters. Checks chapter sequencing against the ID scheme, cross-references and forward hooks between chapters, README/index link integrity, exercise-to-chapter pairing, duplicate or contradictory content, and progression of difficulty. Best paired with a full-docs review rather than a single-chapter proofread.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality-assure integrated tdmcp features: run the four PR gates + recipe/bridge tests, cross-boundary coherence checks (tool schema↔CLI↔docs↔registry, operator↔createable, bridge↔client), and live TouchDesigner validation (preview + post-cook error check) when the bridge is reachable. Use when validating/QA-ing/testing tdmcp tools, checking a feature actually cooks in TD, verifying CLI matches a tool, or gating a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying that a model in the imp inference engine produces coherent output without repetition loops, token-stuck states, or state corruption across turns or streams. Triggers on "degenerates", "check degeneration", "repetition loop", "own own own", "stuck token", "empty content", "multi-turn regression", "does it still work", "NIAH", and after enabling CUDA graphs / changing forward pass / MoE routing / KV cache or KV dtype / GDN state or scan / sparse attention / PDL / speculation (MTP, n-gram) / ragged prefill / batched-decode kernels (smallm, producer quantize) / FA2 softmax.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when keeping imp's docs and config examples coherent after a change - updating docs/internals/ARCHITECTURE.md / README / docs/GOAL.md / docs/MODELS.md / docs/roadmap.md / imp.conf.example / CHANGELOG / MISSION_JOURNAL, or "is this doc stale", "document this change", "the example config is out of date", "the README says X but the code does Y", "add a roadmap ledger row". Do NOT use for layer/frontmatter/lint questions (docs-layers), structural code audits (codebase-audit), measuring perf or refreshing the perf baseline (benchmark-cuda), or the agent's private memory (MEMORY.md).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit content and assets for brand compliance — style guide validation, tone of voice checking, visual identity consistency, brand asset management, and cross-channel coherence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically interpret nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (1H, 13C, DEPT, and 2D experiments) to elucidate molecular structure. Covers chemical shift assignment, coupling pattern analysis, integration, and correlation of multi-dimensional data into coherent structural proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI self-healing through systematic subsystem assessment, rebalancing, and integration. Maps healing modalities to AI-internal processes: memory foundation, reasoning clarity, tool use accuracy, communication alignment, and creative coherence. Covers assessment triage, subsystem scanning, drift correction, and memory integration. Use mid-session when responses feel formulaic or disconnected, after a chain of errors suggesting subsystem drift, when context overload may have staled earlier assumptions, or as proactive maintenance between complex tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。