「complex」の検索結果

Use when Codex must make a high-quality judgment on any complex problem, not only technical problems. Trigger when a question has high complexity, uncertainty, cost of being wrong, long-term impact, value tradeoffs, possible structural causes, or when the user asks for 全面思考, 深度理解, 系统性分析, 帮我想清楚, 从根上看, 这件事到底怎么看, 方法论, 复杂问题拆解, 系统方案, 架构判断, 策略判断, or 根因分析. Also trigger for project and engineering high-risk scenarios such as multi-module, multi-environment, multi-data-source, multi-state, financial truth, live trading, ledger, revenue, customer assets, order governance, broker interfaces, online availability, major solution selection, and system closure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-based complexity assessment for task analysis. Use when determining the appropriate workflow, phases, and validation depth for a task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls. Now with automatic session recovery after /clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to optimize code, make a path faster, make this as fast as possible, reduce allocations, repair a regression, profile a target, grill every inefficiency, or run a subsystem or repo-wide performance campaign against a measured floor; when a performance requirement, slowness report, Core Web Vitals miss, or profiling evidence identifies a bottleneck; or for an "extremely optimize" performance campaign, optimizing suspected hot paths without waiting for benchmarks, or estimating hot and complexity-neutral cold paths while refusing complexity theater. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score for .NET methods, classes, or files. Use when the user asks to assess test quality, identify risky untested code, compute CRAP scores, or evaluate whether complex methods have sufficient test coverage. Requires code coverage data (Cobertura XML) and cyclomatic complexity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests, general test execution unrelated to coverage/CRAP analysis, or general code coverage reporting without CRAP context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review owned or authorized code for security using structure-first evidence: AST/structure maps, call graphs, complexity, Source/Sink flow, and defensive findings. Use when asked for security review, vulnerability review, AST structure map review, SAST triage, Source/Sink, taint flow, parser/scanner hardening, CI/CD security, LLM/agent tool boundary review, 脆弱性レビュー, 構造マップ, セキュリティレビュー.

Guide for simplifying and refining code after coding sessions. Use when cleaning up complex code, reviewing PRs for readability, or applying consistent refactoring patterns. Triggers on simplify code, refactor, clean up, code review, コード整理, リファクタ, 複雑さ削減, コードレビュー.

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in complex functions, contour integration, residue theory, and conformal mappings

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimate the full development cost of an existing codebase from lines of code, architectural complexity, and team-composition overhead. Use for 'how much would this cost to build', 'what did this codebase cost', development-cost or build-cost estimates, calendar-time estimates, and Claude/AI ROI on a delivered codebase. Estimates by measured LOC and complexity, not by ticket volume.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically assess task complexity and adjust reasoning level. Triggers on every user message to evaluate whether extended thinking (reasoning mode) would improve response quality. Use this as a pre-processing step before answering complex questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

复杂探索资产化 / Complex Exploration：当用户面对复杂、不确定、多轮迭代的产品策略、Roadmap、商业化定价、竞品定位、复杂 PRD 前置探索、项目复盘或方法论沉淀任务时使用。它先判断任务类型，暴露隐含假设，重构真正问题，规划探索路径和中间产物，并在结束后沉淀认知、结构、方法论、工具和影响力资产。不用于简单润色、翻译、摘要、明确执行任务；问题只需早期认知校准时优先用 ai-collaboration-calibration，已有方案要压力测试时用 grill-me，系统专题研究用 research-topic-compiler。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-invoked 7-phase workflow for complex-feature intent. Includes fasttrack mode for pre-approved specs. NOT for explicit user-invoked single tasks (see mk:cook); NOT for green-field autonomous builds (see mk:autobuild); NOT for simple bug fixes (see mk:fix).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates structured multi-file implementation plans before build. Scope-aware: trivial tasks exit early, simple tasks get fast plans, complex tasks get full research + phase files + validation. Enforces Gate 1. Activated by /mk:plan or /mk:cook. NOT for ticket complexity analysis against an existing codebase (see mk:planning-engine); NOT for CEO-level scope review of existing plans (see mk:plan-ceo-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Heuristic story-point estimation for a single Jira ticket via the jira-estimator agent. Read-only. Triggers: 'estimate KEY', 'story points for KEY', 'how complex is KEY'. NOT for complexity-only analysis (mk:jira-evaluator); NOT for full RCA (mk:jira-analyst).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects task agent and complexity tier at Phase 0 orient. Invoked first in every workflow. Provider adapters select any model/runtime policy. NOT for runtime agent routing inside a single skill (see orchestration-rules.md).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for ANY of the following — do not skip it even if the query seems simple: strategic decisions, business analysis, thesis building, complex problem solving, geopolitical analysis (non-market), philosophical reasoning, academic research, system design, decision under uncertainty, long-form thinking, or any question that benefits from First Principle deconstruction and multi-agent reasoning. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks about: why something works the way it does, whether a decision is correct, how to think about a complex problem, what could go wrong, analyzing a situation from multiple angles, or any "should I..." question involving real-world trade-offs. This is NOT a market/trading skill — for financial markets, BTC, gold, stocks, forex, macro economics, use money-atlas-intelligence-os instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses ChIP-seq quality across antibody specificity, fragmentation, enrichment, replicate concordance, and library complexity. Computes FRiP, NSC/RSC (phantompeakqualtools), library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), deepTools plotFingerprint (JS distance, AUC, synthetic JS), ChIPQC, IDR with ENCODE Nself/Nt rules, and detects hyper-ChIPable artifacts. Use when validating an antibody, diagnosing failed peak calls, deciding whether to proceed with downstream analysis, grading against ENCODE thresholds, or auditing replicate concordance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track complex, multi-session work with dependency graphs using bd (beads) issue tracker. Use when work spans multiple sessions, has complex dependencies, or requires persistent context across compaction cycles. For simple single-session linear tasks, TodoWrite remains appropriate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the four published expert-consensus clinical scenarios to manage GI adverse events in complex GLP-1 receptor agonist patients — persistent nausea mid-titration, GERD/heartburn after up-titration, elderly with sarcopenia risk, and insulin-treated elderly with CKD plus diarrhoea. Use when a clinician describes a patient resembling one of these archetypes, or asks "how to manage GLP-1 in an elderly patient with CKD", "patient on liraglutide developed reflux", "sarcopenia worry on semaglutide in 80-year-old", or "persistent nausea on semaglutide despite escalation". Grounded in Gorgojo-Martínez 2023 Table 4.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find overly complex code: files over 300 lines, functions over 50 lines, deeply nested conditions (4+ levels), and magic numbers. Use for code quality reviews, pre-release checks, or when asked to assess code maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。