「costs」の検索結果

Starter: compare model costs for a described task — maps task shape to the cheapest adequate seat and shows the price spread

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show full session token usage, costs, TLDR savings, and hook activity

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-cloud orchestration for ML workloads with automatic cost optimization. Use when you need to run training or batch jobs across multiple clouds, leverage spot instances with auto-recovery, or optimize GPU costs across providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Revenue and costs tracker. AWS spend via aws ce, credits tracker, project revenue stages. Shows burn rate, runway estimate, credits expiring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch a real product's current price, stock, rating, or images from retailer pages over the Apify MCP server, and return them as typed fields rather than prose. Use when someone asks what a product costs right now, whether it is in stock, how it is rated, to compare a product across retailers, or to check a product URL they pasted. Also use when an agent would otherwise answer a product question from training data. Not for managing your own store's catalog, not for payments, and not for questions answerable without live retailer data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze how liquid a stock is using Yahoo Finance data (yfinance): bid-ask spreads, volume and dollar volume (ADTV), top-of-book and options depth, square-root market impact and slippage estimates, turnover ratio, and Amihud illiquidity, rolled into a liquidity grade. Use this skill whenever the user asks about liquidity or trading costs — how easily a position can be entered or exited, what a large order would do to the price, spread or execution-cost estimates, order book depth, volume patterns, or liquidity comparisons — especially for small caps, penny stocks, and thinly traded names.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end orchestrator: from a business idea, app idea, or existing app to running Azure deployment with cost estimates and pre-deploy approval. Analyzes your app, auto-detects the right Azure services, scaffolds infrastructure code, and deploys — tailored to your app, not a template. Handles moving existing apps to Azure without rewriting or with minimal changes. WHEN: bring your app to Azure, plan my app, cost to run, is my code ready to deploy, deploy my app to the cloud, deploy all my services, what Azure services do I need, plan my Azure deployment, deploy my new app to Azure, one-click deploy, I have an app and want it on Azure, migrate my app to Azure, help me get started, build an app, no code yet, starter project. DO NOT USE FOR: use azd for deployment(use azure-deploy), optimizing existing costs (use cost-optimization), code readiness checks only (use azure-app-onboard-prereq).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Govern Azure costs with budgets, alerts, tags, and policy restrictions. WHEN: "Azure budget health", "configured budget overrun", "list Azure budgets", "create Azure budget", "budget alerts", "budget coverage", "missing CostCenter tags", "allowed VM SKUs", "allowed Azure regions", "would this SKU be denied", "cost guardrails". DO NOT USE FOR: planning-target forecasts, bill investigations, pricing, rightsizing, or commitments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize existing Azure resources and analyze Reservations or Savings Plans. WHEN: "optimize Azure costs", "reduce cloud spending", "rightsize resources", "find idle resources", "orphaned disk", "deleted VM still charged", "public IP still charging", "reservation utilization", "Savings Plan coverage", "commitment recommendation", "why is pay-as-you-go still charged". DO NOT USE FOR: cost spikes, forecasts, pricing estimates, budgets, or governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Google Cloud Platform to AWS — plus AI and agentic workloads from any provider. Triggers on: migrate from GCP, GCP to AWS, move off Google Cloud, migrate Terraform to AWS, migrate Cloud SQL to RDS, migrate GKE to EKS, migrate Cloud Run to Fargate, migrate App Engine to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate from OpenAI to Bedrock, move off OpenAI, switch from ChatGPT API to AWS, migrate from Gemini to Bedrock, migrate LangChain to Bedrock, migrate LangGraph to AWS, migrate agentic workloads to AWS, move AI workloads to AWS, migrate my AI app to AWS. Runs a 6-phase process: discover GCP resources from Terraform, app code, or billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. Do not use for: Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), on-premises migrations, AWS-to-GCP reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or GCP-to-GCP refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Heroku to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Heroku, Heroku to AWS, move off Heroku, migrate Heroku Postgres to RDS, migrate Heroku Redis to ElastiCache, migrate Heroku Kafka to MSK, migrate dynos to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate dynos to Fargate, migrate Heroku Private Space, Heroku to ECS, leave Heroku, what-if workshop, compare migration scenarios, workshop mode. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Heroku resources live via the authenticated Heroku CLI (read-only, consent-gated) and/or from Terraform, Procfile/app.json, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. An optional post-Estimate what-if workshop reprices region/HA/compute/Graviton scenarios. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), AWS-to-Heroku reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or Heroku-to-Heroku refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, runs, debugs, and operates event-driven applications using EventBridge Event Bus - a managed, centrally governed publish/subscribe event bus that an organization can share across many teams and accounts. Applicable when workloads need event-driven architectures, decoupling, choreography, asynchronous integration, pub/sub, fan-out, event ordering, delivered in sequence, event router, event broker, event bus, event store, event retention, event replay, deduplication, avro, protobuf, cloudevents, uses events or messages. Designed as a centrally managed event bus platform allowing governance and control - such as subscriber control, revocation, per-account throttling - while giving application owners flexibility across an organization spanning multiple accounts, with end-to-end open-standards observability and cost allocation. Also helps reduce costs in high fan-out scenarios where multi-account forwarding adds cost. A serverless, managed alternative to self-managed event streaming platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects, investigates, and compares AWS object, file, and block storage services, and answers cost, performance, configuration, security, and troubleshooting questions about storage services. Applies when a user asks where to store or archive data based on their usage patterns; which storage service to choose or how two compare; how to migrate data from on-premises or between AWS services; how to protect, replicate, or recover data; how to optimize storage costs; where to deploy shared NFS, SMB, or POSIX file systems; where to store vector embeddings or tabular data; what storage backs enterprise file shares, self-managed databases on EC2, VMware, or stateful containers; or asks what an AWS storage service can do or how it works. Relevant for storage needs for workloads such as AI/ML, analytics, EDA, HPC, media, genomics, or financial trading. Not applicable for SQL query engines (Athena, Spark, Redshift, EMR), ETL (Glue), streaming (Kafka, MSK, Kinesis), or managed database services (RDS, Aurora, DynamoDB).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize AppFolio API costs through efficient usage patterns. Trigger: "appfolio cost".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize Anima API costs through caching, incremental generation, and tier selection. Use when managing Anima API usage, reducing unnecessary code generations, or right-sizing your Anima plan for team size. Trigger with: "anima cost", "anima pricing", "anima budget", "anima API usage".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to think about names in the Grida repo — not conventions, but what a name commits you to, reveals about the system, and costs to change. The central discipline is that a strict, honest name refuses to grow, and that refusal drives the repo's shape (flat modules, small agnostic packages, suffix siblings). Use when planning a new package, crate, module, directory, route group, or test corpus — the name comes first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and interrogates a project schedule — logic-driven sequencing, dependency types and lags, float and the critical path, resource loading and leveling, schedule risk analysis, and measuring progress against a baseline rather than against optimism. Use this to construct a schedule, audit one you have inherited, find out why a plan keeps slipping, work out what a date change actually costs, or judge whether a reported percentage complete means anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, runs, and optimizes paid acquisition across search, social, and display — account structure, targeting, creative, bidding, budget, and the analysis that says whether to scale or stop. Use this to set up or restructure campaigns, write and iterate ad creative, diagnose rising costs or falling performance, decide budget allocation, or judge whether a channel is working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establishes what something actually costs — fixed, variable and mixed cost behavior, absorption versus variable costing, job-order, process and activity-based methods, breakeven and operating leverage, and price/volume/mix decomposition. Use this to set a price floor, explain why revenue or margin moved, decide make versus buy, judge whether a product line earns its place, or work out how an allocation basis is distorting a reported margin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for parsing structured unit commitment input data from JSON, CSV, benchmark cases, spreadsheets, databases, or nested tables; finding fields for time periods, resources, load, reserve, generator limits, initial conditions, startup data, renewable availability, and production costs without assuming one source-specific schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Permutation and sequencing integer-programming formulations with ordered local-window variables, prefix/suffix continuity, and overlap penalties. Use when assigning exams, jobs, tasks, visits, blocks, or resources to ordered positions and costs depend on adjacent pairs, sliding triples, n-grams, short-horizon pressure, or overlapping local patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generator economic dispatch and cost optimization for power systems. Use when minimizing generation costs, computing optimal generator setpoints, calculating operating margins, or working with generator cost functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for formulating, solving, debugging, and validating mixed-integer linear optimization models with open-source solvers, including variable indexing, sparse constraints, linearized costs, solver limits, MIP gaps, incumbent extraction, numerical tolerances, and deterministic output reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create detailed 3-5 year financial model with revenue, costs, cash flow, and scenarios

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。