「critique」の検索結果

Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정, revisar artículo, revisión entre pares, revisión de manuscrito, informe de árbitro, revisa mi artículo, criticar artículo, simular revisión, revisión editorial, calibrar revisor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Supports authorized review of scientific manuscripts, protocols, preprints, or research proposals; reporting-guideline selection; claim–evidence checks; methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, figure/table, and citation critique; or revision-response planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supports research proposal preparation and review for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC, including opportunity-specific requirements, aims, review criteria, budgets, broader impacts, forms, and resubmissions. Use for investigator-authored grant development, compliance matrices, and proposal critiques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a landing page, sales page or checkout page for conversion leaks and return a fix list ordered by expected revenue impact. Use when asked to review, critique or improve a landing page, sales page, opt-in page, product page or checkout flow, when conversion rate is low, when paid traffic is not converting, or when someone asks "why isn't this page converting" or wants a CRO / landing page review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authors a Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain Management Solution Blueprint from scratch through a structured, section-by-section architect interview, establishing scope, target operating model, application and data architecture, integration landscape, migration strategy, security model, ALM, testing, deployment, and support approach, with a decision log capturing rationale and rejected alternatives. Use when the user wants to create D365 implementation architecture documentation, start a D365 implementation, design the architecture, prepare a Solution Blueprint, or identify the architectural decisions the programme must make. Do not use for critique of an existing design; that is a review task rather than blueprint authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The meta skill. Turn any raw feature into a properly-skilled, tested, resolvable unit of agent capability. Idempotent: running on an existing skill improves it (bug fix, new input, quality pass) instead of starting from scratch. Every skill declares an EVAL CONTRACT (its goal + skill-specific dimensions + hard-fails) so the cross-modal eval judges THIS skill's real purpose, not generic slop. Cross-modal eval runs BEFORE tests: 3 frontier models from different providers critique the output against the contract, you iterate to quality, THEN write/update tests that lock in the proven-good behavior. NO-REGRESSION LAW: any edit to a skill must score >= the previous iteration's eval — forward only, never back. For skills that back a scheduled job, an edit MUST re-run a representative task and eval it before shipping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a doc, guide, README, or block of prose against the good-docs-writing style guide and report violations. Use when the user asks to review, critique, lint, or check the voice and tone of documentation or text. Produces a structured findings report (file:line, rule violated, offending text, suggested rewrite) and does NOT edit files unless explicitly asked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial analysis deploying parallel expert agents to stress-test ideas, strategies, and plans — decomposes into atomic claims, attacks them, then steelmans and counter-argues, producing severity-ranked findings with remediation. USE WHEN red team, attack idea, counterarguments, critique, stress test, devil's advocate, find weaknesses, break this, poke holes, strongest objection. NOT FOR collaborative debate to find best path (use Council).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex-only writing and layout overlay for AI Berkshire investment research reports. Use whenever Codex creates, rewrites, revises, or critiques company/industry/fund research reports, especially long-form Markdown reports that need financial rigor, readable business mechanics, contrarian analysis, valuation-to-action guidance, investor-specific recommendations, restrained typography, and clear buy/hold/sell signals. Do not use this to modify Claude Code slash-command sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critique and improve the visual design of an existing UI component with concrete implementation guidance. Use when the user asks to redesign, restyle, reimagine, polish, or improve a component, screen, or interface, especially in React and Tailwind codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Have the Claude and GPT partners critique each other's answers across a configurable number of rounds (default 1) before converging on a synthesis. Use when the user wants the two perspectives stress-tested against each other, not just shown side by side.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structural feedback on a legal writing draft (memo, brief, paper, exam essay) — organization, analysis depth, clarity, citation form. NEVER rewrites the draft. Use when the user says "feedback on my memo", "read my draft", or "critique my brief".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Product Design is explicitly invoked, or when the user's main goal is to explore a design, research UX, audit or critique a flow, faithfully clone a visual source, check a built design, or share a prototype. Do not use Product Design for ordinary implementation unless the user explicitly asks for it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a Canva design and return structured, actionable design feedback — visual hierarchy, copy/messaging, layout & spacing, consistency, readability, and accessibility. Read-only; makes no changes to the design. Use when the user asks to "review my design", "give me feedback on this", "critique my deck/poster/flyer", "how can I improve this design", or "what's wrong with this slide".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, critique, read, write, render, and implement UML and UML-like software diagrams. Use when the user mentions UML, sequence diagrams, class diagrams, activity diagrams, state machines, use case diagrams, component diagrams, deployment diagrams, object diagrams, package diagrams, profile diagrams, timing diagrams, communication diagrams, interaction overview diagrams, composite structure diagrams, ERDs, database schema diagrams, C4, BPMN, swimlanes, flowcharts, network diagrams, application architecture diagrams, software architecture diagrams, diagram-as-code, model-as-code, XMI, UMLDI, PlantUML, Mermaid, Graphviz DOT, D2, Structurizr, DBML, diagrams.net/draw.io, Kroki, or interactive diagram editors and explorers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, critique, route, and implement Gantt charts and schedule visualizations. Use when the user mentions Gantt charts, project schedules, roadmaps with task spans, milestones, dependencies, predecessors, critical path, baselines, WBS, resource plans, capacity timelines, MS Project, Primavera P6, Jira Advanced Roadmaps, GitHub Projects, Smartsheet, monday.com, Asana, ClickUp, Azure DevOps iterations, or importing/exporting project-management data for a timeline chart.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route web data visualization work. Use when the user needs chart choice, visual critique, dashboards, maps or geospatial views, Gantt timelines, UML/software diagrams, scrollytelling, reports or exports, testing, accessibility, browser implementation, or concept-first visual design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, stress test assumptions, audit evidence quality, or find blind spots before committing. Do NOT use for building plans, making decisions, or generating solutions — this skill only challenges and critiques. For a multi-agent panel that challenges and then commits to a verdict, use the-jury.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draws original hand-written SVG spot scenes in the Line interior style, wide airy rooms or terraces where slim, realistic people do design and coding work. A thin uniform indigo outline (1.4 px at 480 wide) runs around mostly white fills. Sparse flat accents (teal, sage, coral, mustard, lavender, peach wood) cover under 7% of the card. Pale lavender 1 px background decor (brick clusters, pendant lamps, framed posters) sits behind, and a long floor line with end dashes runs under it all. Covers the palette, line weights, heads and hands from a parts toolkit, composition and a render-critique loop. Use when asked for line-art, thin-line or outline illustrations, indigo line art, office, desk, home-workspace, remote-work or team scenes, or interior spot illustrations for empty states, onboarding screens, 404 pages, blog headers, feature spots, landing sections or marketing cards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draws hand-authored SVG spot illustrations in a halftone line style for design and coding scenes. Identifying traits are a confident black line with a slight hand wobble and contours left open, grey tones made only of fine halftone dots clipped to shapes, a few solid black masses (hair, leaves, a bag, a black tee), warm off-white paper and no colour at all. Covers the two-ink palette, line weights, the open-contour and stipple techniques, a seeded compiler that turns tone tags into dot fills, rubbery long-limbed characters and expressive hands, doodles, floor pools and a render-and-critique loop. Use when someone asks for halftone, stipple, dotted, risograph-like, newsprint, black-and-white, monochrome line, editorial line or zine-style illustrations, or for empty states, onboarding, 404 pages, blog headers, feature spots and marketing cards in that look.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。