136 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
深挖一组 subreddit 的"社区研究"技能。给一个品牌或项目,先摸清相关(自家品牌+竞品)的 subreddit:爬规则原文、爬高赞帖逐帖学、找共性、产出"能不能提品牌/能不能发链接/要不要披露"的逐社区政策矩阵。用于任何新品牌/新项目上 Reddit 前的社区尽调。触发词:"研究 subreddit""摸清社区规则""Reddit 社区尽调""subreddit deep research""某品牌相关的 sub"。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate format-controlled research reports with evidence tracking, citations, and iterative review. This skill should be used when users request a research report, literature review, market or industry analysis, competitive landscape, policy or technical brief, or require a strict report template and section formatting that a single deepresearch pass cannot reliably enforce.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Curate, review, or repair ai-gene-review ModuleReview YAML documents under modules/, including pathway/module boundary setting, parts and variant modeling, annoton-level molecular functions, representative UniProt/PTN grounding, module deep-research provenance, validation, rendering, and project batch updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep research on technical topics using EXA tools with intelligent two-tier caching. Use when user asks to research a topic, investigate best practices, look up information, find patterns, or explore architectures. Also invoked by /research command. Triggers: "research", "look up", "investigate", "deep dive", "find information about", "what are best practices for", "how do others implement".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run multi-source web research with adversarial verification and produce a cited report: decomposes the question into 3-6 distinct queries (broad, specific, comparative, recency-anchored), searches and ranks sources by authority, recency, and specificity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
多源深度调研与专业报告生成。适用场景广泛——只要用户的问题涉及需要深度分析的专业话题，就应使用此技能。包括但不限于：(1) 用户明确要求调研/research/综述/报告/发现；(2) 用户提出一个技术或科学话题，话题复杂度需要多源深度分析；(3) 用户要求对比多种技术方案的优劣；(4) 涉及生物医药、蛋白质、基因、药物靶点等需要专业数据库支撑的问题。核心能力：根据问题性质自动组合 arXiv 论文检索 + ToolUniverse 科学工具（UniProt/OpenTargets/PubMed/FAERS 等 1000+ 工具）+ Web 搜索，多源采集数据，交叉分析，生成专业 PDF/DOCX 研究报告。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-first multi-step research with bounded parallel collection, contradiction checks, and cited synthesis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a technical topic thoroughly by exploring the codebase and summarizing findings. Use when asked to investigate how something works, research an area of the codebase, trace a data flow, or understand a component in depth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute tarefas de pesquisa autônoma que planejam, buscam, leem e sintetizam informações em relatórios abrangentes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skill de pesquisa profunda alimentado por NotebookLM MCP. Conduz pesquisa estruturada em múltiplas fontes (análise de mercado, inteligência competitiva, análise de tendências, pesquisa de prospects) usando Google NotebookLM como mecanismo de pesquisa, depois entrega briefs formatados e artefatos opcionais de estúdio (slides, podcasts de áudio, vídeos, infográficos, relatórios, mapas mentais).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Research] Use when deeply researching top sources from web-research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quick one-shot lookup over Ahmad's OpenMark bookmark knowledge graph (15k+ items from Edge, LinkedIn, YouTube, Raindrop). Use whenever Ahmad asks "find my bookmarks on X", "what did I save about X", "anything in OpenMark about X", or any single-topic search where he wants results in under 10 seconds. NOT for newsletter drafting or deep research — for those use openmark-deep-research or openmark-newsletter. Triggers on "find my", "what did I save", "openmark", "my bookmarks", "search bookmarks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a dossier on a person: recall everything the vault already knows, map their public profiles by web research, emit a deep-research prompt for external tools, and persist a well-linked person card. Triggers: "/portret <name>", "dossier on <name>", "profile <name>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fan one deep-research prompt out to several external LLMs at once through a logged-in browser, then collect the reports, archive the originals and synthesize a consensus. Use at the final stage of a research protocol, instead of hand-pasting one prompt into N sites. Triggers: "/dr-fanout", "fan out the DR", "distribute the research prompt".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision protocol for strategic work: recall the knowledge vault, run a gap analysis, emit a deep-research prompt for external tools, then synthesize the returned reports into a decision memo. Use before any new product, feature, market, pricing, GTM or architecture call, where local recall alone is not enough. Triggers: "/alfa-search-recall-deepresearch", "alpha protocol", "R+DR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform comprehensive, multi-source research on any topic using AI-powered web search and analysis. Covers deep_research for broad discovery and semantic_content_search for site-specific knowledge retrieval. Use when you need to research brands, markets, competitors, or trends with citations — before creating content, planning campaigns, or making strategic decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow, 연구부터 논문까지, 연구 주제 설정부터 논문 완성까지, 논문 전체 워크플로.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run autonomous research tasks that plan, search, read, and synthesize information into comprehensive reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。