「detector」の検索結果

Use IBM AI Fairness 360 for tabular fairness datasets, metrics, bias mitigation algorithms, sklearn-compatible workflows, subgroup detectors, and explainers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to humanize text, trim slop, de-AI or de-slop writing, remove AI tells, fix robotic or ChatGPT-sounding prose, or make writing sound human and natural. Also run before delivering a CV, cover letter, email, report, or essay to be sent. Removes 71 documented AI-writing patterns with a local detector, preserves numbers, names and citations, and rebuilds toward a human voice rather than a flat husk. Mode-aware, so it never fabricates voice on factual content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze source code statically to detect potential functional bugs including null dereferences, incorrect condition checks, unreachable code, inconsistent state updates, logic errors, resource leaks, and type mismatches. Report suspicious code locations with detailed explanations, severity levels, and confidence assessments. Use when reviewing code for bugs, performing code audits, or when the user asks to find bugs, detect issues, analyze code for problems, or perform static analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze failing tests to detect functional bugs in code. Takes repository and failing test output as input, analyzes execution behavior, assertions, and stack traces to identify suspicious code regions and root causes. Use when debugging test failures, investigating regression bugs, or understanding why tests fail. Explains the bug mechanism, identifies affected code, and suggests fixes based on test expectations vs actual behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statically analyze code to detect security vulnerabilities including buffer overflows, injection risks (SQL, command, XSS), insecure deserialization, improper authentication, hard-coded credentials, and unsafe cryptography. Use when: (1) Performing security code review, (2) Analyzing code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, (3) Identifying CWE-classified weaknesses, (4) Generating security audit reports, (5) Reviewing code before deployment, or (6) Assessing third-party code security. Findings categorized by CWE ID and severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect semantic-level bugs by analyzing whether code behavior matches its intended purpose inferred from function/variable names, comments, docstrings, and documentation. Use when users need to: (1) Find logic errors where implementation contradicts stated intent, (2) Identify off-by-one errors and boundary mismatches, (3) Detect inverted logic or wrong operators, (4) Catch missing edge case handling, (5) Verify code matches its documentation. Highlights mismatches between intent and implementation across multiple programming languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify design quality issues in code including high coupling, low cohesion, God classes, long methods, and other code smells. Use when: (1) Reviewing code architecture and design quality, (2) Identifying refactoring opportunities, (3) Detecting God classes or classes with too many responsibilities, (4) Finding high coupling or low cohesion issues, (5) Analyzing code maintainability and technical debt. Detects coupling smells, cohesion problems, complexity issues, size violations, and encapsulation problems with actionable refactoring suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies non-deterministic or unreliable tests through static code analysis and test result analysis. Use when Claude needs to find flaky tests, analyze test reliability, or investigate intermittent test failures. Supports Python (pytest, unittest) and Java (JUnit, TestNG) test frameworks. Trigger when users mention "flaky tests", "intermittent failures", "non-deterministic tests", "unreliable tests", or ask to "find flaky tests", "analyze test stability", or "why tests fail randomly".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and report code smells indicating poor design or maintainability issues in Python code, including duplicate code, magic numbers, hardcoded values, God classes, feature envy, inappropriate intimacy, data clumps, primitive obsession, and long parameter lists. Use when conducting code quality audits, preparing for refactoring, improving codebase maintainability, or performing design reviews. Produces markdown reports with severity ratings, locations, descriptions, and specific refactoring recommendations with before/after examples. Triggers when users ask to find code smells, identify design issues, suggest refactorings, improve code quality, or detect maintainability problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and analyzes ambiguous language in software requirements and user stories. Use when reviewing requirements documents, user stories, specifications, or any software requirement text to identify vague quantifiers, unclear scope, undefined terms, missing edge cases, subjective language, and incomplete specifications. Provides detailed analysis with clarifying questions and suggested improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Astronomical Instrumentation Scientist. Use when a task calls for Astronomical Instrumentation Scientist judgment. Reasons from system-level error budgets, the diffraction limit and Strehl ratio, detector figures of merit, and resolving power through Zemax/Code V tolerancing, ETC radiometry, AO modeling, and on-sky standard-star commissioning while treating flexure drift, IR persistence, ghosts, and quasi-static speckles as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify the technology stack powering any website — frameworks, CMS, analytics, hosting, CDN, payment processors, and marketing tools. Useful for competitive intelligence, sales prospecting, and technology landscape research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test application security against OWASP Top 10 (2025) with automated CI tooling: OWASP ZAP (DAST), dependency/supply-chain scanning (OSV-Scanner, SBOM, provenance), Semgrep SAST, auth/session tests (JWT, OAuth, RBAC), and XSS/CSRF/SQLi/SSRF Playwright patterns. Use when: "security test," "OWASP," "vulnerability," "ZAP," "XSS," "SSRF," "dependency scan," "auth testing," "OWASP LLM Top 10." Scope is automated scanning + negative-path security tests in CI, not manual penetration testing. Not for: mapping security controls to regulations (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR) — use compliance-testing; pipeline stage wiring and deploy gating mechanics — use ci-cd-integration; purely functional API auth/input tests with no attacker model — see api-testing; testing your product's own LLM features or defending the agent itself (prompt-injection detector, indirect injection, jailbreak red-teaming) — use ai-system-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, compliance-testing, api-testing, shift-left-testing, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect common technical and organizational anti-patterns in proposals, architectures, and plans. Use when strategic-cto-mentor needs to identify red flags before they become problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh HitKeep's checked-in bot/AI-agent, IP metadata, and spam-filter datasets through their canonical generators. Use for routine generated-data maintenance; do not use for hand-editing generated assets or changing detector policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI(ChatGPT·Claude·Gemini 등)가 쓴 한글 텍스트를 "사람이 쓴 글처럼" 윤문해주는 오케스트레이터 스킬. 번역투·영어 인용 과다·기계적 병렬·관용구·피동태 남용·접속사 남발·리듬 균일성·이모지/불릿 과다 등 10대 카테고리 70개 AI 티 패턴을 탐지·분류해 내용은 한 글자도 건드리지 않고 문체·리듬·표현만 자연스러운 한국어로 재작성한다. shim의 route_hint(light|standard|heavy)로 경로를 정해 잘 쓴 글은 1콜, 표준은 2콜, 중증·장문만 3+콜(진단→겨냥 윤문→finalize)로 처리한다. 트리거 — "AI 티 없애줘", "AI 같은 글 자연스럽게", "GPT/ChatGPT 문체", "AI 번역투 고쳐", "사람이 쓴 것처럼 윤문", "AI 윤문", "ChatGPT 티 제거", "한글 AI 탐지·윤문", "AI 글 사람처럼", "번역투 제거", "영어 인용 많은 글 윤문", "AI 글 티 안 나게", "휴머나이저", "humanize Korean", "AI detector bypass 한글". 후속 작업 — "특정 카테고리만 다시", "윤문 강도 조정", "장르 바꿔서", "이 문단만", "2차 윤문" 도 모두 이 스킬. 단순 맞춤법·오탈자 교정은 직접 처리, 번역은 번역 스킬, 내용 추가·삭제를 동반한 재작성은 별도 집필 스킬.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and search for similar utility/invention patents based on product information. Trigger when users mention utility patent detection, patent infringement risk, patent similarity search, patent screening, invention patent search, patent risk assessment, TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) risk analysis, utility patent, invention patent detection, patent infringement risk, patent search, TRO risk, Ruiguan. Even if the user does not explicitly say "utility patent", trigger this skill whenever their need involves checking whether a product may infringe existing utility/invention patents before selling in a target market.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Text trademark detection and infringement risk analysis for e-commerce product listings. Trigger when users mention trademark detection, trademark risk check, brand infringement screening, product title trademark scan, text trademark search, listing compliance check, intellectual property risk assessment, text trademark detection, trademark infringement, brand infringement screening, listing compliance, intellectual property risk, Ruiguan. Even if the user does not explicitly say "trademark", trigger this skill whenever their need involves checking whether product text (titles, descriptions, bullet points) contains potentially infringing trademarks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove the AI-script tells viewers hear in a TikTok spoken script and caption: 2026 vocabulary by density, reveal bridges, staccato stacks, stacked triads, performed sincerity, written-not-spoken phrasing, "hey guys" filler; caps em dashes. Includes --mode audit pre-film check (hook, completion design, caption fit) and --mode profile. Not for beating AI detectors (no edit reliably does). Not for writing from scratch (use tt-hook-scripter). Keywords: humanize script, de-AI, audit before filming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have captured session evidence — session-retro / session- observatory-live traces in .planning/patterns/, tool logs, correction records — and want to induce a reusable skill from it. Segments the traces into candidate skill units (an LLM judgment, not a deterministic parse) and decomposes each candidate into a four-part structured spec: workflow structure, execution semantics, and runtime attachments (verification, safety, rollback, state). It emits a spec object, NOT a finished SKILL.md, and hands that spec to skill-forge. It sits between skill-integration (upstream frequency detector) and skill-forge (downstream author). Backed by Agent-Trace-to-Skill Induction (arxiv 2606.06893v1). Triggers on inducing a skill from captured traces, turning a repeated pattern into a skill spec, and preparing evidence for skill-forge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The **Coherence Composer** is an epistemological skill that validates structural consistency and explores counterfactual worlds while respecting constraints from both **Commitment Tracker** (ontology) and **Opacity Detector** (epistemology).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose work into stages with physical artifacts and acceptance checklists. Gap detector. Use when opening a WP ≥3h (open-loop/problem-framing) or on explicit request to break into stages. Executes R29 Decomposer role.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。