「did」の検索結果

Given a Japanese NLP GitHub repo/model/dataset (URL / owner/repo / tool name) OR a topic, find what's already in awesome-japanese-nlp-resources and discover related resources NOT yet listed (contribution candidates). Mines the bundled dataset, then expands via web research across GitHub and Hugging Face. Use when the user names a SPECIFIC repository, model, or tool and wants alternatives/equivalents, OR wants to discover Japanese NLP resources for a topic that are NOT yet in the list, OR wants to prepare a contribution. Trigger phrases include 'mecabに似たツール', 'fugashiの代替', 'alternatives to fugashi', 'repos like manga-ocr', 'what else is like sudachi', 'リストに無い新しい日本語NLP', 'awesome-japanese-nlpに追加できそうな', '最近公開された日本語NLPツール', 'find unlisted Japanese NLP repos', 'new Japanese models on Hugging Face', 'contribute a new resource'. For a simple lookup of what already exists, use the search skill instead.

Generate, evaluate, and narrow brand concepts during early ideation including positioning territories, naming candidates, mood directions, and narrative angles. Use this skill whenever the user is in the early phase of brand creation, exploring brand directions, brainstorming names, building moodboards, generating positioning options, or trying to choose between multiple brand directions. Triggers on brand ideation, brand concept, naming, brand name, name candidates, positioning, brand positioning, mood board, brand directions, exploring brands, early brand work, brand exploration, brand brainstorm, brand options. Also triggers when the user has multiple half-formed brand ideas and needs help converging on one, even if they do not say 'ideation' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reach into past AI conversation history through the `trellis mem` CLI. Use whenever the user asks 'how did we solve X last time', 'have we discussed this before', 'what was the decision on X', 'remind me what we did in this task', '上次怎么解的', '之前讨论过吗', '想起一段对话', or when starting a brainstorm that overlaps prior work, debugging a familiar bug, continuing a task across sessions, or doing a finish-work review. Returns raw past dialogue; decide for the moment whether to update spec, append to task notes, quote inline in the answer, or just internalize.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has changed a prompt (system prompt, RAG template, agent instruction, etc.) and wants to know whether the candidate is better or worse than the baseline. Also use when the user mentions prompt A/B testing, prompt comparison, prompt optimization validation, "did my prompt change help," or prompt regression testing. Outputs per-dimension win rates with statistical significance using OpenJudge PairwiseAnalyzer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Speculative parallel implementation methodology — dispatch N candidate implementations, audit all, score, pick best. Auditability mandate: ALL candidates logged (not just winner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly, browser heavy. Unions every sitemap each property declares without a browser, builds the candidate set from URLs not already in the indexing ledger, then drives the member's own search performance console to inspect each candidate and request indexing inside an account wide allowance. Spends what is left on sitemap health, which is unmetered. It inspects, requests, and views or submits sitemaps inside that console and does nothing else there, ever, and it never removes a sitemap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage personal local Agent Skill files as an installable skill manager. Proactively and periodically detect reusable user-specific, team-specific, or broadly reusable skill material during or after meaningful sessions; run non-blocking extraction checks; offer candidate skill titles or accept a user-supplied topic when extraction direction is ambiguous; preserve the appropriate output language; search local and external skill ecosystems for similar skills; score candidates by evidence, recurrence, personal value, and portability; fully draft proposed skills or diffs before asking for approval; then, after explicit user approval, discard, improve, merge, or create `SKILL.md` folders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Intent-driven knowledge-store and Run knowledge lifecycle management — read-only audit/prune reports, stage candidates (with signal recording), review/resolve/promote candidates, harvest artifacts, or manage wiki/domain knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recall why a past change was made, drawing on Codex session history when available and falling back to commit diff and surrounding code. Use when the user asks to "recall the rationale", "find the rationale", "look up the rationale", "why did I do X", "why did we do X", "why was this changed", or "find the transcript for this commit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recall why a past change was made by locating the Claude Code transcript that produced it. Use when the user asks to "recall the rationale", "find the rationale", "look up the rationale", "why did I do X", "why did we do X", "why was this changed", or "find the transcript for this commit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think before typing. Root cause first, two candidate fixes, pick one, ask if still unclear, then change only the files the request needs. Edit the confidence bar and scope rules to fit the project. Use when a bug report comes in, when a previous fix did not work, or when the request is vague.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and remove dead code (unused files, exports, class members) using Knip as a candidate generator, then verify each candidate through AST-level analysis and interface tracing before removing anything. Use when the user asks to clean up unused code, find dead code, or reduce the codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-engagement knowledge harvest AND harness retrospective - after a box/bugbounty/pentest/CTF is completed, first diff how the engagement was EXECUTED against the skills/hooks that governed it (what discipline was skipped) and improve the harness, then sweep the whole engagement for GENERIC reusable knowledge NOT already in wiki/ and land it via the leak-gated stage->promote pipeline. Use at close-out or when asked to "extract learnings", "what did we learn", "harvest lessons into wiki", "distill this engagement", "post-mortem into the wiki", "what did we do wrong", "improve the harness from this box".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harvest every `honey:` comment in the codebase into a debt ledger, so the deliberate shortcuts Lever 1 leaves behind get tracked instead of rotting into "later means never". Flags markers with no revisit trigger — those are the ones that go permanent silently. Use when the user says "honey debt", "/honey-debt", "what did honey defer", "list the shortcuts", or "what did we mark to do later". One-shot report; changes nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recover assets (images, videos, data) that weren't directly archived by Wayback Machine by crawling archived pages that reference them. Use when: (1) Direct asset URL returns 404/503 from Wayback, (2) Asset was hosted on CDN that Wayback didn't crawl, (3) You have the page URL but not the asset URL, (4) Recovering avatars, thumbnails, or embedded media from defunct services. The key insight: pages often got archived even when their assets didn't - extract URLs from archived HTML, then try alternative fetch methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search past Claude Code sessions to recall commands, solutions, and context from prior conversations. TRIGGER on 'remember when', 'last time', 'we did this before', 'how did we', or /woz-recall.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantically search past Claude Code sessions to recall commands, solutions, and context from prior conversations. TRIGGER on 'remember when', 'last time', 'we did this before', 'how did we', or /woz-recall.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps GWAS-implicated loci to candidate effector (causal) genes by integrating variant-to-gene (V2G) features via Open Targets L2G (Mountjoy 2021), MAGMA gene-based association (de Leeuw 2015), FUMA SNP2GENE, cS2G combined SNP-to-gene scores (Gazal 2022), Polygenic Priority Scores (PoPS, Weeks 2023), FLAMES, INQUISIT, DEPICT, and enhancer-gene predictors (ABC, ENCODE-rE2G). Use when narrowing a GWAS lead locus to a candidate causal gene, picking between proximity, eQTL-based, and similarity-based prioritizers, integrating multi-evidence streams (fine-mapping, colocalization, ABC enhancer-gene, distance, chromatin), reconciling discordant L2G vs PoPS calls, prioritizing tissue-specific eQTL evidence, or triangulating across at least three independent lines of evidence for a publication-grade effector-gene nomination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a research-paper figure Skill Factory: build, patch, package, or use reusable specialized paper-figure-making skills from lawful literature/corpus evidence. Generated skills must use a specialized-skill-first workflow, full-feasible local PDF coverage where available, startup-plan-only first replies, target-paper candidate/final image isolation, mandatory image-embedded visual-structure explanation, mandatory non-target concept/modeling example display for abstract visual decisions, saved subtype/style illustration atlases, ChatGPT web Create image / ChatGPT Images 2.0 rendering, Codex $imagegen-first rendering, sample-image transfer rules, all-step/current-position state footers, and a mandatory first-round diverse candidate board followed by P6b/P6c paper-local best-practice optimization before final prompt construction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a Xiaohongshu niche and needs to find, compare, and extract reusable content structures from low-follower high-performing posts, or diagnose why a post did or did not become a breakout using click rate, retention, and interaction signals. Trigger phrases: "找对标", "低粉爆款", "拆爆款", "内容骨架", "点击率", "停留时长", "互动率", "competitor pattern", "viral post structure". Do not use before the monetization direction is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a Xiaohongshu niche and needs to find, compare, and extract reusable content structures from low-follower high-performing posts, or diagnose why a post did or did not become a breakout using click rate, retention, and interaction signals. Trigger phrases: "找对标", "低粉爆款", "拆爆款", "内容骨架", "点击率", "停留时长", "互动率", "competitor pattern", "viral post structure". Do not use before the monetization direction is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 王建硕 wants to evaluate whether a change to VoiceDrop's 挖矿 system prompt is actually better than the live version — runs the local eval harness (golden fixtures × champion-vs-candidate, same input), dispatches blind pairwise judge subagents, aggregates a win-rate verdict, and on approval promotes the candidate into agent/src/prompts/mine.js. Triggers — "评估 prompt"、"挖矿 prompt 改好了吗"、"eval prompt"、"比一比两版 prompt"、"/wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to know if something works — the answer requires running code, not analyzing it. Output is a verdict backed by evidence: passed, failed, or broken. Primary triggers: 'run the tests', 'does X still work after my change?', 'did the merge break anything?', 'verify the fix worked', 'check if the endpoint returns X', 'confirm nothing regressed', 'run tests/unit/test_foo.py', 'let me know the results', 'make sure my changes didn't break anything'. Hard stops — do NOT use for: reviewing test code for quality/coverage gaps, debugging why test infrastructure/databases/seed scripts are misbehaving, writing or fixing tests, diagnosing root causes of unexpected behavior. The deciding question: is the user asking for the result of executing something, or asking for help understanding/analyzing/improving something? If it's the latter, use diagnose or review-code instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A dated chronology of one topic across the user's recorded coding-agent sessions — the lessons the graph learned about it and the prompts that named it, oldest first. Use only when the user explicitly asks for the history or timeline of a topic across their sessions ("how did X evolve", "when did we first discuss X") or invokes /cognee-timeline. Not for questions about code or the current task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。