「edge cases」の検索結果

Generate adversarial inputs, edge cases, and boundary test payloads for stress-testing LLM robustness

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, writing, or debugging Go code under exercises/part2/ (and matching embedded code in docs/part2/**/*.mdx). Thinks hard about correctness, idiomatic Go, error handling, resource cleanup, concurrency, and — crucially — what the tests would catch: edge cases, races, leaks, timeouts, and port conflicts. Knows the repo's module-mode quirk (GO111MODULE=off) and which dirs carry go.mod.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference patterns for graph algorithm problems including BFS, DFS, Dijkstra, topological sort, union-find, MST, Bellman-Ford, and bipartite checking. Provides recognition signals, Python templates, edge cases, and common mistakes for each technique. Use when solving problems involving graphs, trees, shortest paths, connectivity, or dependency ordering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for dynamic programming patterns — recognition signals, constraint mapping, Python templates, edge cases, and common mistakes for 8 core DP techniques

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for string algorithm patterns — KMP, Z-function, Rabin-Karp, Manacher's, string hashing, suffix arrays, and Aho-Corasick. Covers recognition signals, core ideas, Python templates, edge cases, and common mistakes for each technique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a competitive programming or LeetCode solution for correctness, edge cases, and performance. Use when asked to "verify my solution", "check my code", "is this solution correct", "test my solution", "review my competitive programming answer", "validate my algorithm", or any solution verification request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-critique specification documents using extended thinking — surfaces hidden assumptions, contradictions, missing edge cases, and scope creep before implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aims for high test coverage using pytest, testing both common and edge cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pitfalls, examples, and edge cases for workers executing a Surogates subagent task. Loaded automatically when the dispatcher spawns a session bound to a Task (Session.task_id is set).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design reliable, safe, and trustworthy agent systems that fail gracefully and operate within bounds. Use when building guardrails, handling edge cases, preventing harmful outputs, monitoring for failures, implementing safety constraints, or designing error recovery. Covers failure modes, constraint systems, oversight mechanisms, and safety validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strengthen test coverage around changed behavior, edge cases, and regressions without writing noisy or brittle tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DeFi attack pattern playbook. Use when analyzing flash loan attacks, price oracle manipulation, MEV sandwich attacks, governance exploits, bridge vulnerabilities, and token standard edge cases in decentralized finance protocols.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit SQL Injection vulnerabilities in Django applications, specifically focusing on edge cases involving raw querysets (`RawSQL`), improper use of `.extra()`, and poorly sanitized filters where Django's typical ORM protections are bypassed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a comprehensive product or engineering specification before implementation. Use when the user asks for `/spec`, PRDs, feature specs, API specs, refactor specs, acceptance criteria, user stories, edge cases, or open decision tracking before code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smart contract and Web3 security audit skill for Solidity, Vyper, Move, and Cairo. Covers reentrancy, access control, oracle manipulation, MEV/sandwich exposure, signature replay, upgrade safety, ERC token edge cases, bridge risk, and DeFi invariants. Tooling includes Slither, Mythril, Echidna, Foundry, Halmo, Certora, and custom invariant tests. Use for design review, code audit, and incident analysis on contracts you own or are authorized to assess.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this whenever the user asks to "implement", "add", "build", "create", or "modify" a feature, page, view, component, or module in this Vue project. Three phases: Phase 0 scope analysis (flows + edge cases + UI needs + plan validation, STOP for user), Phase 1 implementation (layered UI → Store → API, Vue 3 Composition + Vuetify 4, /ui design rules), Phase 2 Definition-of-Done checklist + /verify + /pull-request. Auto-runs /create-module if the target module doesn't exist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSV processing done right — parsing edge cases, dialects, and large files — use when ingesting or exporting CSV data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when writing test-first, behavior-driven acceptance criteria in Given/When/Then format for a Salesforce user story. Covers happy path, edge cases, negative paths, permission boundaries, and data-state preconditions so the AC block can drive UAT scripts and Apex test design downstream. Trigger keywords: given when then, gherkin, behavior driven AC, test first acceptance criteria, scenario outline, BDD acceptance criteria. NOT for the user-story format itself (use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce). NOT for UAT script writing (use admin/uat-test-case-design). NOT for Apex test method generation (use agents/test-class-generator). NOT for high-level UAT planning (use admin/uat-and-acceptance-criteria). More triggers: acceptance criteria record, ac_id, req_id on a criterion, artefact under test, negative case for a rule-type requirement, no-match fall-through criterion, oracle for a Then clause, test type apex flow manual, criteria linter, check_ac_format.py, --manifest-dir.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。