1,920 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when the user asks why a reported NVFLARE job failure signal occurred: the job failed, stalled, timed out, lost clients, ended with EXECUTION_EXCEPTION, or produced suspicious errors. Diagnose in simulation, POC, or production by collecting bounded evidence and mapping failure patterns to recovery actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recover CCB agents, panes, mounts, provider contexts, API/provider failures, config reload aftermath, clear operations, and guarded single-agent restarts. Use when the user asks to fix, recover, restart if safe, clear context, reload, remount, or keep work going after provider/API failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug live Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) incidents with a read-only, evidence-first investigation. WHEN: pod crashes or Pending, CrashLoopBackOff, OOMKilled, ImagePullBackOff, node NotReady, DNS or ingress failure, connectivity timeout, network policy, SNAT exhaustion, node-pool scaling blocked by QuotaExceeded or InsufficientVCPUQuota, upgrade stuck, spot or zone disruption, a bare VMExtensionProvisioningError or AllocationFailed wrapper, an uncataloged capacity symptom, or 'investigate my AKS cluster'. DO NOT USE FOR: packet capture (use aks-network-capture); GPU or model-serving issues (use aks-gpu-inference); cluster creation or provisioning (use azure-kubernetes); cost (use cost-analysis from the optional azure-cost plugin); pod rightsizing (use azure-kubernetes); a fully qualified documented AKS signature with every required nested qualifier (use aks-known-issues); standalone failures on non-AKS Azure resources (use azure-diagnostics). Unqualified errors and open-ended incidents stay here only for AKS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Troubleshoot and resolve issues with Azure Messaging SDKs for Event Hubs and Service Bus. Covers connection failures, authentication errors, message processing issues, and SDK configuration problems. WHEN: event hub SDK error, service bus SDK issue, messaging connection failure, AMQP error, event processor host issue, message lock lost, message lock expired, lock renewal, lock renewal batch, send timeout, receiver disconnected, SDK troubleshooting, azure messaging SDK, event hub consumer, service bus queue issue, topic subscription error, enable logging event hub, service bus logging, eventhub python, servicebus java, eventhub javascript, servicebus dotnet, event hub checkpoint, event hub not receiving messages, service bus dead letter, batch processing lock, session lock expired, idle timeout, connection inactive, link detach, slow reconnect, session error, duplicate events, offset reset, receive batch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when your agent or environment is broken — wrong answers, errors, timeouts, tool failures, or CLI issues. Reads traces and logs to diagnose root causes. Also checks prerequisites when the CLI itself isn't working. Triggers on: "agent not working", "wrong answer", "agent error", "tool call failing", "debug agent", "check logs", "read traces", "broken", "500 error", "424 error", "model access denied", "command not found", "stuck in DELETING", "maxVms exceeded", "cold start diagnosis", "cold start slow", "agentcore create error", "create failed", "exit code 7", "connection refused local dev". Not for deploy failures — use agents-deploy. Not for performance tuning without errors — use agents-optimize. Not for VPC configuration — use agents-build. Not for observability setup or missing logs — use agents-optimize.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the end-to-end AWS resilience lifecycle integrating Resilience Hub v2, Fault Injection Service, and Application Recovery Controller. Covers the Define → Test → Operate workflow: from policy creation through failure mode assessment, to FIS experiment validation, to ARC operational controls. Applicable when the user wants a complete resilience strategy, needs to connect findings to experiments to controls, or is planning a resilience program. Also applicable for the meta question of whether marking NGRH findings as resolved is enough, whether they are "done" after resolving findings, or how to validate findings before resolving them. Not applicable for resolving or remediating a specific individual finding (see resilience-hub-failure-mode-assessment), or when a single service is explicitly named (e.g. "what FIS experiment should I run").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Troubleshoots failing applications by discovering and analyzing CloudWatch log groups to identify error patterns, root causes, and actionable solutions. Use when an application is experiencing failures and log-based diagnosis is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans, builds, runs, and analyzes fault injection experiments with AWS Fault Injection Service (AWS FIS) to validate application resilience through chaos engineering. Covers experiment templates (actions, targets, stop conditions), the FIS actions catalog and action selection, the scenario library (AZ power interruption, cross-Region connectivity, EC2/EKS/EBS stress), experiment lifecycle and monitoring, logging and reports, multi-account experiments, the experiment IAM role, and blast-radius safety. Applies when a user mentions AWS FIS or fault injection, asks what experiment to run for a failure mode (AZ, Region, API errors/throttling, instance/pod/DB/cache failure, latency, packet loss), wants to author an experiment template or CLI/CloudFormation, or needs to safely run chaos experiments in pre-production or production. For the broader resilience program across Resilience Hub and ARC, see aws-resilience-lifecycle; for ARC routing controls and zonal shift, see recovery-controller-setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and root-causes Amazon MWAA workflow failures across Provisioned (Python DAG) and Serverless (YAML workflow) environments. Provisioned uses aws mwaa invoke-rest-api, CloudWatch log groups, and get-environment; Serverless uses aws mwaa-serverless API (GetWorkflowRun, ListWorkflowRuns, GetTaskInstance) and CloudWatch logs. Covers failed runs and tasks, DAGs not appearing, import errors, worker OOM, IAM denials, and dependency drift. Triggers on: DAG failed, task failed, workflow run failed, MWAA error, debug my DAG, why did my workflow fail, DAG not showing up, MWAA import error, requirements failing, worker crashed, serverless run failed. Not applicable to authoring workflows (handled by authoring-mwaa-workflow), running or smoke-testing a workflow (handled by testing-mwaa-workflow), or CI-CD deploy failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keeps production assets available — ranking equipment by consequence of failure, setting preventive and predictive intervals, sizing spares, and moving a plant off reactive maintenance. Use this to build or fix a maintenance program, decide what to put on a PM schedule, diagnose repeat failures on one asset, justify spares inventory, or work out why a plant that maintains everything still has unplanned downtime.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Owns execution: how work actually gets done across the organization, including process, program management, capacity, vendors, supply chain, and service delivery. Use this when execution is the problem rather than strategy, to design or fix a process, to resolve cross-functional handoff failures, to plan capacity, to assess delivery risk, or when the same failure keeps recurring. Also use to decide whether to build, hire, or outsource a capability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handles customer situations that have exceeded normal support — severity assessment, incident communication, executive escalation, and recovering a relationship after a failure. Use this when a customer issue is escalating or has gone to leadership, during a customer-affecting outage, when a major account is at risk, when a relationship needs repairing after a failure, or to design the escalation path itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug live Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) incidents with a read-only, evidence-first investigation. WHEN: pod crashes or Pending, CrashLoopBackOff, OOMKilled, ImagePullBackOff, node NotReady, DNS or ingress failure, connectivity timeout, network policy, SNAT exhaustion, node-pool scaling blocked by QuotaExceeded or InsufficientVCPUQuota, upgrade stuck, spot or zone disruption, a bare VMExtensionProvisioningError or AllocationFailed wrapper, an uncataloged capacity symptom, or 'investigate my AKS cluster'. DO NOT USE FOR: packet capture (use aks-network-capture); GPU or model-serving issues (use aks-gpu-inference); cluster creation or provisioning (use azure-kubernetes); cost (use cost-analysis from the optional azure-cost plugin); pod rightsizing (use azure-kubernetes); a fully qualified documented AKS signature with every required nested qualifier (use aks-known-issues); standalone failures on non-AKS Azure resources (use azure-diagnostics). Unqualified errors and open-ended incidents stay here only for AKS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Troubleshoot and resolve issues with Azure Messaging SDKs for Event Hubs and Service Bus. Covers connection failures, authentication errors, message processing issues, and SDK configuration problems. WHEN: event hub SDK error, service bus SDK issue, messaging connection failure, AMQP error, event processor host issue, message lock lost, message lock expired, lock renewal, lock renewal batch, send timeout, receiver disconnected, SDK troubleshooting, azure messaging SDK, event hub consumer, service bus queue issue, topic subscription error, enable logging event hub, service bus logging, eventhub python, servicebus java, eventhub javascript, servicebus dotnet, event hub checkpoint, event hub not receiving messages, service bus dead letter, batch processing lock, session lock expired, idle timeout, connection inactive, link detach, slow reconnect, session error, duplicate events, offset reset, receive batch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design LLM-as-Judge evaluators for subjective criteria that code-based checks cannot handle. Use when a failure mode requires interpretation (tone, faithfulness, relevance, completeness). Do NOT use when the failure mode can be checked with code (regex, schema validation, execution tests); use `write-code-eval`. To validate an existing judge, use `validate-evaluator`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users navigate product failure by diagnosing root causes, evaluating conviction, and executing successful pivots or turnarounds based on proven industry frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for AI-assisted Unity work that needs live repo discovery, project-derived routing, runtime-owner proof, runtime-visible output hard stops, runtime numeric proof for repeated visible-output failures, state-step guards, multi-agent scope ownership, modular C#/asmdef safety, UI/scene/visual asset gates, data-first content changes, validation, cleanup proof, or durable workflow rules. Best when agents must prove the actual folder/module/scene/prefab/runtime owner before editing, especially runtime UI, generated assets, code graphs, tutorial/state flows, guided selection/action flows, overlay/dim source-bound mistakes, coordinate conversions, focus/highlight/marker/HUD alignment, predictive lead aiming, ballistic trajectories, spatial IoU verification, or repeated "fix still not visible" failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when SLCI code inspection has failed due to compatibility issues and you need to diagnose the incompatibilities. Traces inspection failures back to root-cause incompatibility settings or known limitations by matching failed code lines against known incorrect code generation patterns and documented limitation scenarios. Hands off to slci-compatibility-analysis for fixes. Trigger keywords: inspect, inspection failed, trace inspection errors, why did inspection fail, SLCI verification failures, limitation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when fitting accelerated life models, computing mean time to failure (MTTF), B10 life and similar quantities, fitting life distributions like Weibull for reliability analysis, comparing distribution fits, computing confidence intervals on reliability quantities with bootstrapping, performing lifetime prediction, computing failure rates, plotting Kaplan-Meier curves, computing survival functions, or doing reliability analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug systematically with root-cause analysis before fixes. Use for bugs, test failures, unexpected behavior, performance issues, CI failures, or system investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Periodically analyze open pull requests for CI failures, code review feedback, and quality issues, then fix them in batch. Use this skill when the user asks to check PR status, triage CI failures, fix review comments, analyze open PRs, or run a scheduled PR health check across the repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trace error propagation through a multi-agent session by agent depth — where failures originated, the depth at which they appeared, and how they cascaded up to parent agents — using the Agent Monitor workflow intelligence API and the session event stream. Use when a multi-agent run failed and you need to find the origin and blast radius of the failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan recent Claude Code activity for errors and failure signals across all sessions using Agent Monitor data — APIError events and PreToolUse→PostToolUse gaps (tools that started but never completed) — then group failures by tool and model and rank them by frequency. Use when checking for errors or asking "what's failing right now".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review web application code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and stack-specific anti-patterns. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review code, debug a production issue, investigate a build failure, audit security, or check a PR before merging. Triggers on code review, review my code, debug, build error, broken, not working, why is X failing, check this code, security check, PR review, audit code, refactor. Also triggers when investigating 4xx or 5xx errors, deploy failures, environment variable issues, and CMS integration problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。