「feed」の検索結果

Resolve PR review feedback. Use when addressing review comments, resolving review threads, or fixing code-review feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query Amazon is latest policy, regulation, and compliance feed. Supports paginated browsing by marketplace and time range (with AI-generated Chinese summaries), and fetching full article body by record ID. Trigger when users mention Amazon policies & regulations, seller compliance announcements, platform rule changes, policy alerts, FBA/fee policy updates, multi-marketplace policy tracking, policy original text, news details, or similar terms. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "policy feed," trigger this skill whenever the request involves Amazon is officially published policies, regulations, and news for sellers, including their full text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

🇺🇸 Your dev team ships features nobody asked for while user-reported bugs pile up for months. Operations blames engineering for ignoring users; engineering blames operations for not understanding technical constraints. This gives you the complete Product × Engineering × Operations alignment SOP — from unified backlog to 10-day sprint cadence to veto power rules. What's inside: • Dual-layer Kanban system (master backlog + sprint board with unified tagging) • 10-day sprint standard process (Day 1 dev → Day 6 testable build → Day 10 ship) • Issue template with reproducibility requirements (3x reported = auto-severe) • Tri-party alignment meetings (daily standup / sprint planning / sprint review) • Operations veto power on releases (P0 bug = block shipping) • User feedback → product iteration closed loop (beta testing + interview SOP) • Core metrics framework (acquisition → activation → retention → monetization → referral) • Technical debt management (20-30% sprint capacity reserved) • Ready-to-use templates: Bug Report, Sprint Planning, Responsibility Matrix Built from: Real product strategy meetings + beta testing frameworks. References Supabase sprint model, Manus/DeepSeek commercialization alignment. By @WeiYipei. 🇨🇳 你的研发团队在做没人要的新功能，用户反馈的 Bug 堆了三个月没人动。运营觉得研发不听用户，研发觉得运营不懂技术。这份 SOP 给你从统一看板到 10 天迭代节奏到一票否决权的完整产研运协同框架。 🇯🇵 開発チームは誰も求めていない機能を作り、ユーザーから報告されたバグは何ヶ月も放置。このSOPは、統一バックログから10日スプリント、リリース拒否権まで、プロダクト×エンジニアリング×オペレーションの完全な連携フレームワークを提供します。 🇰🇷 개발팀은 아무도 요청하지 않은 기능을 만들고, 사용자가 보고한 버그는 몇 달째 방치됩니다. 이 SOP는 통합 백로그부터 10일 스프린트, 릴리스 거부권까지 제품×개발×운영 완전 협업 프레임워크를 제공합니다. Triggers: "product ops" | "engineering operations" | "product development SOP" | "sprint planning" | "iteration management" | "cross-functional alignment" | "product engineering ops" | "dev ops collaboration" | "产研运协同" | "迭代管理" | "产品研发运营" | "プロダクト開発運営" | "제품개발운영"

Process external code review feedback with technical rigor. Use when receiving feedback from another LLM, human reviewer, or CI tool. Verifies claims before implementing, tracks disposition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handles PR review comments and feedback resolution. Use when user wants to resolve PR comments, handle review feedback, fix review comments, address PR review, check review status, respond to reviewer, verify PR readiness, review PR comments, analyze review feedback, evaluate PR comments, assess review suggestions, or triage PR comments. Fetches comments via GitHub CLI, classifies by severity, applies fixes with user confirmation, commits with proper format, replies to threads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classical control and system dynamics for engineered systems — feedback and closed-loop control, transfer functions and block diagrams, poles/zeros and stability, time-domain response (rise time, overshoot, settling time), PID controllers and tuning, and frequency response (Bode plots, gain and phase margin). Traces feedback control from the flyball governor to modern controllers. Use when analyzing feedback loops, designing or tuning a PID controller, assessing stability from poles or margins, or characterizing transient response of a dynamic system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Send feedback or bug reports to the Deepline team. Use when the user asks to report feedback or share a session, and proactively when a Deepline Play is disproportionately slow, appears stuck, or an ordinary outcome requires avoidable product steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a pull request end-to-end using GitHub CLI. Covers diff analysis, commit history review, CI/CD check verification, severity-leveled feedback (blocking/suggestion/nit/praise), and gh pr review submission. Use when a pull request is assigned for review, performing a self-review before requesting others' input, conducting a second review after feedback is addressed, or auditing a merged PR for post-merge quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design AI feedback loops for continuous improvement. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-feedback-loop related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build feedback collection for AI outputs. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-feedback-collector related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI customer feedback analysis systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-feedback-analyzer related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design 360-degree feedback programs with surveys. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with 360-feedback related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-DLCへのフィードバックを送信するスキル。 フィードバック内容のヒアリングとGitHub Issue作成を案内する。 Use when the user says "AIDLCフィードバック", "aidlc feedback", "フィードバック送信".

Feedback loop implementation for continuous CTI improvement. Consumer feedback, analyst retrospectives, source quality tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and act on code-review feedback with technical judgment. Use before applying external suggestions, especially when feedback is ambiguous, broad, or may conflict with repository constraints, and carry confirmed corrections to relevant consumers without widening scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, configuring, distributing, or troubleshooting Salesforce Surveys and Feedback Management. Triggers: 'create a survey', 'NPS score', 'survey invitation', 'survey response report', 'customer feedback form', 'guest user survey access', 'SurveyInvitation', 'SurveySubject', 'SurveySettings', 'sendSurveyInvitation', 'survey not linked to case', 'deploy a survey between orgs'. NOT for choosing between CSAT, NPS, and CES as your CX metric — use architect/customer-effort-scoring. NOT for third-party survey tools like SurveyMonkey or Qualtrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when planning or executing the human side of an Agentforce or Einstein AI feature rollout — user trust-building, AI-specific training, structured feedback collection via the Feedback API, and adoption measurement via Agentforce Analytics. NOT for turning the Einstein for Sales features on — use agentforce/agentforce-sales-ai-setup. NOT for rollout training with no AI in scope — use admin/change-management-and-training.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve CodeRabbit review feedback on a GitHub pull request. Collects every open CodeRabbit finding (inline threads, plus the nitpick and outside-diff findings packed into review bodies), judges and fixes each one against the real code with subagents, unifies fixes that share a pattern, commits locally, asks before pushing, then shows every reply draft linked to its finding and posts only on approval. Runs only on top-tier models. Use on "resolve the CodeRabbit feedback", "address coderabbit comments", "answer the rabbit", "fix what CodeRabbit flagged on

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and submit developer feedback to the LiveAvatar team. Use when: (1) A LiveAvatar integration is done, working, finished, or complete, (2) The user says "it works", "we're done", "that's it", "ship it", (3) The user is frustrated, stuck, or giving up — "this is broken", "this doesn't work", "I'm stuck", "I give up", "this is frustrating", "I want to report an issue", (4) The user explicitly asks to give feedback, report a bug, file an issue, or share a suggestion about LiveAvatar, (5) You've seen 3+ failed attempts at the same integration step, (6) You just finished writing or generating LiveAvatar integration code for the user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks iteration progress toward task completion goals. Monitors quality trends, detects plateauing, and recommends when to stop iterating. Activate on 'convergence tracking', 'iteration progress', 'quality trend', 'stop iterating', 'progress monitoring'. NOT for iteration detection (use dag-iteration-detector) or feedback synthesis (use dag-feedback-synthesizer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Address GitHub PR review feedback at line, file, and PR level — fetch, evaluate, fix, commit, and resolve. Use when given a PR URL, a review-comment URL, or a PR-level comment URL. Triggers: GitHub discussion URLs, "fix this review comment", "address PR feedback", "resolve PR comments", PR URLs with #discussion_, #issuecomment-, or #pullrequestreview- fragments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When shaping feedback — situation-behavior-impact, growth-vs-corrective split, cadence design, ladder-of-inference checks. Triggers on 'how do I give this feedback', 'perf review shape'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Durable categorized record-keeping for any predicate-enabled walk. Trigger when: - Classifying a step's output for recording (decision, finding, debt, feedback). - Promoting a scratch artifact to the ledger, to repo/docs, or to a category home (.ledger/tech-debt/, .ledger/process-feedback/). - Auditing whether a draft is structurally ready for its destination. - Running a zero-context sensibility read before committing to promotion. - Recording a known limitation as a tech-debt entry (not prose in the log). - Recording a friction, miss, improvement, or process amendment. - Prompt contains: /record, record-keeping, promote, ledger note, zettelkasten, scratch-to-ledger, zero-context read, over-strip, classification trigger, tech-debt, process-feedback, amendment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。