「hardening」の検索結果

Senior SecOps engineer skill for application security, vulnerability management, compliance verification, and secure development practices. Runs SAST/DAST scans, generates CVE remediation plans, checks dependency vulnerabilities, creates security policies, enforces secure coding patterns, and automates compliance checks against SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR. Use when conducting a security review or audit, responding to a CVE or security incident, hardening infrastructure, implementing authentication or secrets management, running penetration test prep, checking OWASP Top 10 exposure, or enforcing security controls in CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage environment-variable hygiene and secrets safety across local development and production. Practical auditing, drift awareness, rotation readiness. Use when auditing .env files for committed secrets, planning a credential rotation, debugging missing-env-var production incidents, or hardening a new project against secrets leakage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and implements backend systems including REST APIs, microservices, database architectures, authentication flows, and security hardening. Use when the user asks to "design REST APIs", "optimize database queries", "implement authentication", "build microservices", "review backend code", "set up GraphQL", "handle database migrations", or "load test APIs". Covers Node.js/Express/Fastify development, PostgreSQL optimization, API security, and backend architecture patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review through the lens of real engineers' documented philosophies (Torvalds, Thompson, Carmack, Kent Beck, Jobs, Cagan). Complements abstract-role adversarial review with named, sourced perspectives. Use when automated review findings feel generic, when a PR has architectural or UX impact, or when the author wants pre-submit hardening beyond standard checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close out a launched Claude Managed Agent — recap every primitive the founder now owns, regenerate the single-file overview page, and suggest the next 1-2 upgrades. Use when the user says "wrap up", "close this out", "what do I own now", "give me the summary", "recap the agent", or when the orchestrator routes phase=wrap-up. primitives_inventory.py tables everything owned (agent, environment, session, memory, outcome, deployment); overview_page.py regenerates a self-contained ./my-agent/agent-overview.html; upgrade_suggester.py ranks the next moves from recorded deferrals plus standing hardening steps. Companion to run-without-you; the last stop before phase=done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages core GKE cluster provisioning, credentials, Autopilot vs Standard selection, and workload deployment. Use when creating GKE clusters, fetching kubectl credentials, or deciding between Autopilot and Standard modes. Don't use for Workload Identity (use gke-workload-identity), GKE networking (use gke-networking), security hardening (use gke-platform-security or gke-workload-security), or cluster upgrades (use gke-upgrades).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits, configures, and hardens workload-level security controls for Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) applications and namespaces. Covers running security audits (`audit_cluster.sh`), enforcing Network Policies (default-deny and Dataplane V2 logging), isolating high-risk pods inside GKE Sandbox (`gVisor`), enforcing Pod Security Standards (`restricted` labeling) and pod securityContext, and mounting Secret Manager secrets via CSI (`SecretProviderClass`). Use when auditing workload security posture, isolating namespaces, applying pod security standards, or configuring network policies and secret volume mounts. Don't use for Workload Identity (use gke-workload-identity), cluster-wide control plane security, RBAC hardening, Binary Authorization, Shielded Nodes, or enabling platform-level GKE add-ons (use gke-platform-security instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assertion-first AI eval framework aligned to Anthropic's 'Demystifying evals for AI agents' — typed deterministic asserts + a forced-structured LLM judge over an input→assert case schema, pass^k/pass@k, capability vs regression suites, subscription-billed. USE WHEN eval, evaluate, benchmark, regression test, assertion, assert, llm-rubric, judge, pass@k, pass^k, grade output, compare prompts/models, test agent. NOT FOR scientific-method framing (use Science), property/mutation testing of code (use Hardening), or live UI verification (use Interceptor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develops custom WordPress themes and plugins, creates and registers Gutenberg blocks and block patterns, configures WooCommerce stores, implements WordPress REST API endpoints, applies security hardening (nonces, sanitization, escaping, capability checks), and optimizes performance through caching and query tuning. Use when building WordPress themes, writing plugins, customizing Gutenberg blocks, extending WooCommerce, working with ACF, using the WordPress REST API, applying hooks and filters, or improving WordPress performance and security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing authentication/authorization, securing user input, or preventing OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities — including custom security implementations such as hashing passwords with bcrypt/argon2, sanitizing SQL queries with parameterized statements, configuring CORS/CSP headers, validating input with Zod, and setting up JWT tokens. Invoke for authentication, authorization, input validation, encryption, OWASP Top 10 prevention, secure session management, and security hardening. For pre-built OAuth/SSO integrations or standalone security audits, consider a more specialized skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guidance for integrating Jupiter APIs (Swap, Lend, Perps, Trigger, Recurring, Tokens, Price, Portfolio, Prediction Markets, Send, Studio, Lock, Routing). Use for endpoint selection, integration flows, error handling, and production hardening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security best practices for gh-aw workflows and Go code: template injection prevention, shell script security, supply chain hardening, and static analysis integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers — tool poisoning, prompt injection via tool descriptions and results, unscoped/over-privileged tools, path traversal in file tools, command injection in shell/exec tools, SSRF in fetch tools, secret leakage through tool output, missing approval gates on state-changing actions, confused-deputy and rug-pull tool redefinition, token passthrough, and unsafe stdio/HTTP transport config. Covers auditing both first-party and third-party MCP servers (Python FastMCP, Node MCP SDK) and their client configs (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, Zed). Use when reviewing, hardening, or hunting bugs in an MCP server, an agent's tool integrations, or a mcpServers config block. 中文触发词：MCP审计、工具投毒、提示注入、智能体安全、MCP服务器漏洞

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Microsoft 365 / Entra ID red-team attack chain — current 2026 reality. AADSTS code reference, user enumeration vectors (with hardening status), Smart Lockout math, Conditional Access bypass options, ROPC + SAML SSO browser flow, Burp/Playwright templates. Built from authorized red-team work where ROPC spray surfaced pre-existing lockouts and CA-blocked credentials, plus real-time external attacker activity correlation. Use for any M365/Entra credential attack, password spray, user enumeration, CA-bypass exploration, or active-attacker-detection scenario.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PLAINTEXT-ONLY: the shipped `doca_flow_grpc` server uses `grpc::InsecureServerCredentials()` with NO TLS / mTLS / token-auth knob on the binary — transport security must come from external infrastructure (e.g. an mTLS proxy / sidecar) on a trusted segment. Use this skill when bringing up, configuring, hardening, or debugging `doca_flow_grpc` — the DOCA-shipped gRPC remote-control surface in front of `doca-flow` that lets non-C++ clients (Python, Go, Rust, Java) program Flow pipes and entries over RPC instead of linking `libdoca_flow.so` directly. Trigger even when the user doesn't say 'doca-flow-grpc-server' or 'gRPC' — e.g. 'program Flow rules from Python on another host', 'remotely configure pipes on the BlueField', 'client times out connecting to the Flow server', 'where is the .proto for Flow', 'UNAUTHENTICATED / FAILED_PRECONDITION on a Flow RPC'. Route elsewhere for the underlying doca-flow API, generic gRPC tooling (protoc, language bindings), or DOCA install / BFB bring-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; its docs-aware mode covers this variant) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening with living documentation. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan, one question at a time, challenging it against your project's existing domain model and glossary (CONTEXT.md), sharpening fuzzy terms, stress-testing with concrete scenarios, cross-referencing code, and updating CONTEXT.md + ADRs inline as decisions crystallise. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-with-docs-codex", "grill me against the docs then have codex review", "stress-test this against our domain model then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes in a project with established terminology/ADRs and wants alignment, documentation, AND a cross-model sanity check. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs (MIT). NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; adds a Phase 0 research/recon pass + rebuilt interview) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan or design, one question at a time, recommending an answer for each and exploring the codebase when it can answer itself, until every branch of the decision tree is resolved. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-me-codex", "grill me then have codex review", "grill me and stress-test the plan", "interview me about this plan then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes (auth, schema, concurrency, migrations, payments) and wants both alignment AND a cross-model sanity check before implementation. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-me (MIT). For the docs-aware variant use /grill-with-docs-codex; if you already have a plan and want only the Codex review use /codex-review. NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deploying your agent to AWS, or when a deploy has failed. Handles pre-flight validation, CDK/IAM/quota error diagnosis, version management, rollback, and canary deployments. Triggers on: "deploy my agent", "agentcore deploy", "deploy failed", "CDK error", "rollback", "canary deploy", "pin version", "redeploy", "deploy stuck". Not for production hardening — use agents-harden. Not for adding capabilities before deploy — use agents-build or agents-connect. Not for VPC configuration errors — use agents-build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connects an existing AWS Lambda function to Amazon API Gateway by creating a REST or HTTP API with resource/method setup, Lambda proxy integration, permissions, and deployment. Always use this skill when connecting Lambda to API Gateway — it handles CORS, throttling, access logging, and production security hardening that are easy to miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages Amazon DocumentDB end-to-end — serverless-on-8.0 cluster setup, TLS/VPC/driver config, flexible-schema and vector-search data modeling, MongoDB compatibility assessment, DMS-based migration, slow-query diagnosis, major version upgrades (4.0->5.0->8.0), Well-Architected reviews (41-check wa_review.py), cost estimation, and security hardening. Retrieve for every DocumentDB question and when the user asks to set up or migrate MongoDB to AWS — DocumentDB is AWS's MongoDB-compatible managed database. Triggers: JSON document store, document database, MongoDB on AWS, Nested fields, Lambda cannot connect, TLS handshake, VPC port 27017, IAM auth, Secrets Manager, encryption at rest, $graphLookup, flexible schema, COLLSCAN, compound index, DMS migration, CDC cutover, $vectorSearch, RAG, Global Clusters, DR replication, cost sizing, audit, health check, production-readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure Apify API tokens, configure proxy access, and protect Actor data. Use when hardening API key management, setting up environment-specific tokens, rotating a leaked token, or auditing Apify security configuration. Trigger with "apify security", "apify secrets", "secure apify token", "apify API key security", "rotate apify token".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and harden Anima and Figma tokens for design-to-code pipelines. Use when protecting API credentials, restricting Figma access scope, or hardening CI/CD design automation pipelines. Trigger with: "anima security", "anima token safety", "figma token security".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate Alchemy integration changes with deterministic unit, contract, fork, secret, and negative-path checks. Use when adding Alchemy to CI or hardening an existing pipeline. Trigger with "Alchemy CI", "Alchemy GitHub Actions", or "test Alchemy in CI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish least privilege, credential rotation, webhook authenticity, signed-URL custody, log minimization, and destructive-action controls. Use when designing or hardening Adobe integrations. Trigger with "secure Adobe integration", "rotate Adobe secret", or "verify Adobe webhook".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。