233 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Query grid electricity forecasts and submit load events using EnergyKit to help users optimize home electricity usage. Use when building smart home apps, EV charger controls, HVAC scheduling, or energy management dashboards that guide users to use power during cleaner or cheaper grid periods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug iOS apps and profile performance using LLDB, the interactive Memory Graph Debugger, and Instruments. Use for crashes, retain-cycle inspection, hangs, build failures, and generic CPU, memory, energy, or network profiling. Use ios-memgraph-analysis for .memgraph capture, leaks CLI ownership paths, or persistent heap growth; use ios-ettrace-performance for ETTrace capture and JSON.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calibrated interrogation of a fuzzy idea before it becomes a spec. Asks one question at a time, recommends an answer, and lands each answer in §G (goal) or §C (constraints) — unknowns parked as `?` items, never guessed. The cheapest place to kill a bad idea is before §T exists. Triggers when the user has a vague idea, says "grill me", "stress-test this", "challenge my plan", "interview me before I spec", or invokes /ck:grill. Defers the actual write to the spec skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when unsure which of many installed skills applies to a request, if any, or when asked to make skill loading cheaper or more accurate. Jev ranks the whole catalog and may say no skill is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to pick the cheapest good-enough model or effort for a turn or a delegated task (lanes small to escalate), to decide continue/retry/verify/escalate/complete after each cycle, or to tune routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated content creation pipeline for business growth. Creates blog posts, landing pages, email sequences, social media content, and video scripts with a supply-demand topic gate, 5-dimensional quality diagnosis, one-core resonance check, per-sentence information density scoring, 12-signal authenticity audit, headline impact matrix, content substance scoring, and a cheap-format MVP testing ladder. Use when the user needs content marketing, blog posts, email sequences, copywriting, video scripts, or says 'write content', 'blog post', 'email sequence', 'content calendar', 'marketing copy', 'video script', or 'hook'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Estimate the dollars saved by routing eligible Claude Code work to a cheaper model family, using the Agent Monitor pricing engine. Re-prices each model's token mix at the target family's rates and quantifies the delta. Uses /api/pricing (rates), /api/pricing/cost (current per-model spend), /api/sessions, and /api/analytics. Use when hunting for cost cuts or comparing model tiers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark one session (or a small recent set) against the rolling average using Agent Monitor data — cost, total tokens, tool count, and workflow complexity score — and report where each metric lands as a percentile of the population. Tells you whether a session was normal, cheap, or an outlier. Use when judging whether a session was typical or out of band.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate a third-party control repo across four automated layers plus one printed manual recipe. Layer 1 asserts native-source structure (Android getName() and iOS +moduleName to manifest nativeModule; @ReactMethod / RCT_EXPORT_METHOD to methods; no @ReactModule) plus load/init readiness (ReactPackage public no-arg constructor, iOS [cls new] no-arg init, requiresMainQueueSetup NO, non-throwing eager construction), so launch-time crashes surface before any build. Layer 2 validates the committed `./manifest.json` against the ppmplugin-format rules. Layer 3 asserts request/response/error-code agreement across native and PCF. Layer 4 compiles the PCF (auto-skipped if absent). Layer 5 prints a device end-to-end recipe. Native compile belongs to /build-android-binary and /build-ios-binary — this is the cheap structural pre-flight before those slow builds. Reports pass/fail per layer with a fix hint and updates .extension-state.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "batch LLM requests", "should I use the batch API", "estimate batch vs realtime cost", "design a bulk LLM job", or "process thousands of prompts cheaply".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces an adversarial attack on a legal argument that survives reply. Runs the opposing-counsel discipline twice: an unrestrained first pass, then the same instrument turned on that pass to cut every point that collapses under challenge - attacks on conceded facts, wrong-forum objections, speculation about documents and motives, gotchas with innocent explanations, overclaims, self-refuting assertions, and padding. The deliverable is one standalone attack containing only what can be defended, capped at five heads, not a discussion of the discarded draft. Use to attack, stress-test, red-team or rebut a submission, brief, motion, witness statement, letter or structured legal reasoning. Triggers on "attack this but only with points that hold", "no cheap shots", "what survives reply", "which points can I actually defend", "give me the version I can file", "double-pass adversarial review". Also use when an earlier adversarial review came back overlong or scattershot. Formal British English.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When you want to brainstorm and check available .com domains for a new project — brand naming, aftermarket pricing (HugeDomains / Afternic / Sedo / Dan), USPTO trademark screening, and social handle availability. Built on Laura Roeder's "work backwards from availability" method. Combines Vercel CLI, whois, Domainr, Namecheap, and agent-browser, each for what it reliably does. Workflow: budget → brainstorm → availability check → whois cross-check → price → aftermarket sweep (plus liveness probe and drop-watch) → bucket → negotiate → trademark + socials → buy. Triggers on "/domain," "find a domain," "check domain availability," "brainstorm a domain," "what .com is available for X," "domain hunt," "name my project," "is X.com available," "aftermarket price on X.com," "trademark check for X."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a project's infrastructure and SaaS stack, then produce a cost report showing what the user currently pays and what they would save by consolidating onto Temps (self-hosted or Temps Cloud). Detects hosting platforms (Vercel, Netlify, Railway, Render, Heroku, Fly.io), analytics (PostHog, Plausible, Mixpanel, Amplitude, Fathom), error tracking (Sentry, Bugsnag, Rollbar, Honeybadger), session replay (LogRocket, FullStory, Hotjar, Highlight), uptime monitoring (Pingdom, UptimeRobot, Better Stack, Checkly), managed databases (Supabase, Neon, PlanetScale, MongoDB Atlas, Upstash, RDS), and transactional email (SendGrid, Postmark, Resend, Mailgun) from dependencies, config files, and env var names. Use when the user wants to: (1) Know how much they would save by switching to Temps, (2) Audit their SaaS/infrastructure spend, (3) Compare their current stack's cost against self-hosting, (4) Decide whether Temps is worth it, (5) Build a business case for consolidating tools. Triggers: "how much would I save", "temps savings", "cost comparison", "audit my stack", "am I overpaying", "saas spend", "calculate savings", "is temps cheaper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a near-complete company list for any ICP by learning how your real customers label themselves, pulling every industry and keyword they use, judging every single row with a cheap AI model (Jev or gpt-5-nano), and running a Claygent lookalike loop until it runs dry. The method from the SCULPT 2026 talk "Build the perfect company list". Use when a database filter feels too narrow or too noisy, when someone says "find every company like our customers", "our TAM looks too small", or "why is this list full of junk".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expand a hard-to-build niche list from ~10 known-good seed companies into a full qualified TAM. Seed fingerprinting (how do good-fit companies ACTUALLY show up in the company database's filters) → lookalike generation (Prospeo company_lookalike, Exa findSimilar, Parallel.ai entity search) → filter mining with a precision/volume scorecard → wide pull with auto-sharding → cheap-AI qualification → live-website verification → client transparency report. Use when a vertical list feels "too small" (medical groups, hedge funds, Medicare brokerages), when known good-fit companies don't show up in keyword searches, or when someone says "expand this list", "the TAM should be bigger", "find more companies like these".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Split the Plan/Act/Verify loop across three model tiers — frontier planner, cheap executor, frontier judge — via env vars read by run.sh.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Credit card to loyalty program transfer ratios. Cross-references seats.aero award prices with transfer ratios to find the cheapest path from UR, MR, TYP, Capital One, or Bilt to any mileage program.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find the cheapest award dates for a route over a date range. Searches seats.aero across all programs, groups by date, and shows a calendar grid of the best deals. Use when dates are flexible and you want to find the sweet spot.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search award flight availability across 27 mileage programs via Seats.aero Partner API. Find cheapest award flights, compare programs, and get booking links.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add a measured sound pass to a motion-graphics video made with Claude Code (HyperFrames, Remotion, GSAP, Claude Motion or the motion-broll skill). Builds a cue list, checks the music's beat grid against the kick drums, lands cuts on the beat, places one real sound effect per cue from a bundled CC0 library, mixes to -16 LUFS with true peaks below -4 dBFS measured on the exported MP4, and proves it with frames, waveforms and 5 timestamps for a human to check. Use when someone wants sound effects, sound design or music added to a motion-graphics video, or says their AI video sounds like cheap beeps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the free official .NET diagnostics CLI tools for profiling and runtime investigation in .NET repositories. USE FOR: the repo needs performance or runtime profiling for a .NET application; the user asks about slow code, high CPU, GC pressure, allocation growth, exception storms, lock. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing realistic performance tests or load tests with ad-hoc tracing alone; production heap collection when the pause risk has not been. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cut token usage across the whole session without losing correctness or substance — concise user replies, lean tests/docs/plans/comments, tight code, disciplined context and tool use, and cheap sub-agent delegation. Load when the user wants less verbosity, lower cost, fewer tokens, or a "token diet" / "lean mode"; also triggered by /token-diet or "token diet on".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a native app, service, or user-mode driver host allocation fails; distinguish VA exhaustion, fragmentation, and commit pressure. Not for managed .NET heap growth, proving a leak from one snapshot, or corruption.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for generics quality — including avoiding raw types, applying the PECS (Producer Extends Consumer Super) principle for wildcards, using bounded type parameters, designing effective generic methods, leveraging the diamond operator, understanding type erasure implications, handling generic inheritance correctly, preventing heap pollution with @SafeVarargs, and integrating generics with modern Java features like Records, sealed types, and pattern matching. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with Generics; Apply Generics; Refactor the code with Generics; Improve generic type safety in Java APIs; Fix raw types and unchecked casts in Java code. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。