126 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Structured ideation for technical problems: divergent generation, constraint framing, and convergent selection. Use when stuck on a design, naming, architecture, or feature approach and need fresh options.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find question-based Google Autocomplete suggestions for any topic. Prepends question modifiers (what, how, why) to a seed topic and returns real autocomplete suggestions — useful for AEO prompt research, content ideation, and understanding what people ask about a topic. Use when the user wants to discover questions people search for, find content angles, or do keyword/prompt research for a topic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rapidly generate up to 25 distinct ad creative hypotheses for testing. Produces a matrix of angles (pain, benefit, social proof, urgency, curiosity, comparison) x formats (static, carousel hook, UGC-style, bold-text overlay) with headline, visual prompt, and rationale for each, then generates the visuals with any image tool. Use when the user wants "ad variations", "ad concepts", "creative testing batch", "give me 25 ads", or paid-social creative ideation. Part of the Creative Production set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect crisis signals in user content using NLP, mental health sentiment analysis, and safe intervention protocols. Implements suicide ideation detection, automated escalation, and crisis resource integration. Use for mental health apps, recovery platforms, support communities. Activate on "crisis detection", "suicide prevention", "mental health NLP", "intervention protocol". NOT for general sentiment analysis, medical diagnosis, or replacing professional help.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate project ideas via creative constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate interactive brainstorming sessions using diverse creative techniques and ideation methods. Use when the user says help me brainstorm or help me ideate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for tradeoff analysis, or when the user must pick between concrete options: "A or B?", "which library should we use?", "build vs buy", "compare these approaches". Scores options on weighted criteria, tests sensitivity and reversibility. Skip for open ideation or single-option reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Content] Use when you need to brainstorm as a PO/BA — structured ideation for problem-solving, new product creation, or feature enhancement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-PRD Research methodology combining Business Analysis, Creative Problem-Solving, Brainstorming, and Innovation Strategy. Use before writing any PRD for problem validation, market research, competitive analysis, stakeholder interviews, ideation, root cause analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exploratory data-migration validation and QA ideation workflow. Use when you need to discover hidden risks, generate new validation angles, and converge mapping specs/validation reports into a prioritized QA backlog for CRM migrations. Version 2.0, updated 2025-12-28.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meta-skill: Structured thinking as a 3-phase workflow. Combines analysis (think), ideation (brainstorm), and decision-making (decide) into one continuous process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft IA shard sections from reconciled ideation and architecture sources, with write-as-you-go section locking
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define system architecture, error architecture, and data strategy with map guards and ideation context reload
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exhaustive idea extraction through recursive breadth-before-depth exploration with Deep Think protocol and fractal structure. Use during /ideate to transform raw ideas into comprehensive, structured ideation output. Writes to a fractal folder hierarchy — every node has an index, CX file, and children.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate ideation completeness through constraints, exhaustion, rubric checks, and output compilation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute recursive breadth-before-depth ideation discovery with Deep Think, CX gate enforcement, and feature deepening
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end Android indie idea workflow — feature-build phase only (no monetization). Phased — discover (if no idea) → generate 2 candidates → refine scope (offline/online, sharing, MVP vs full, core-value features) → risk/reward/tradeoff analysis when scoping down → emit idea brief. Use for greenfield app concepts, new feature ideation, idea discovery, or pre-design discovery before writing a design document. Triggers — new app idea, feature concept, indie dev brainstorm, validate idea, refine idea, what should I build, find an app idea, idea pipeline, I have no idea, help me find an app idea, scope down, MVP scoping, core value features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate ideas via named methods from creative practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey the whole tdmcp project and produce a prioritized list of NEW features it could implement — across artist controls, CLI/DX, AI/LLM integration, and TouchDesigner depth. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm, discover, survey, list, or audit what features/tools/effects/controls/commands/prompts/capabilities tdmcp *could* add, asks 'what could we build / what's missing / what are the opportunities / ideas for the project', or wants a feature backlog or gap analysis. Also for follow-ups: re-run, refresh, update, re-survey, deepen, or re-prioritize the backlog, or survey just one surface (e.g. 'CLI ideas only'). This is the IDEATION harness — it produces a list to decide from; it does NOT build. When the user has already chosen a feature and wants it implemented/shipped/added, use tdmcp-pipeline instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Combines multi-agent brainstorming, the /grill-me slash command, and the 3 Core Godmodes (godmode-engineering, godmode-ui-ux, godmode-shipping) to force a comprehensive, multi-agent ideation and technical design workflow, ending in a plan-canvas review and a hand-off to /startcycle-graph. Use when the user asks to brainstorm, ideate, design, scope or sharpen a plan, idea or product, or when broad exploration before a build is the situation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate project ideas via creative constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use hypothesis-generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation and testing on tabular datasets. Use when you want to systematically explore hypotheses about patterns in empirical data (e.g., deception detection, content analysis). Combines literature insights with data-driven hypothesis testing. For manual hypothesis formulation use hypothesis-generation; for creative ideation use scientific-brainstorming.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate interactive brainstorming sessions using diverse creative techniques and ideation methods. Use when the user says help me brainstorm or help me ideate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。