「impact」の検索結果

Quantitative cost measurement for technical research — token injection costs, payload sizes, context window consumption, and file-level counts from actual repo files. Use when a technical-researcher orchestrator needs the cost dimension of adding or changing something: how many tokens will it inject, how big are the artifacts, what is the context window impact? This is NOT blast-radius analysis (which files break) — it covers size, tokens, and performance cost only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic Software Graph analysis via Ontoly CLI and MCP. Use when: (1) Codebase architecture, dependency, route, service, module, configuration, or impact questions need graph evidence, (2) A repository should be analyzed before source search, (3) You need a persistent SoftwareGraph.json for validation, MCP, or agent workflows. Triggers: "build software graph", "trace route", "impact analysis", "architecture summary", "dependency graph", "what uses this", "Ontoly".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds PIK and PIK toggle models with compound interest analysis, cash vs PIK election scenarios, and leverage impact assessment. Use when modeling PIK instruments, analyzing toggle mechanics, or evaluating accrued interest impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures operating partner involvement with portfolio company assignment, initiative tracking, and impact measurement. Use when coordinating operating partners, tracking operational initiatives, or measuring portfolio support impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates geopolitical risk impact on investment portfolios with sanctions exposure, conflict risk, and supply chain disruption analysis. Use when analyzing geopolitical risk, assessing sanctions impact, or evaluating political event exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates regulatory decision impact with approval probability, timeline analysis, and outcome scenario modeling for event-driven positions. Use when analyzing regulatory events, evaluating FDA/FCC/DOJ decisions, or modeling regulatory outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide the team through writing a change-impact record for IEC 62304 / FDA / ISO 26262 ASIL C+ projects. Surfaces the affected REQ/DES/TEST/CODE artefacts and captures human-attested verification approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage change control for validated computerized systems. Covers change request triage (emergency, standard, minor), impact assessment on validated state, revalidation scope determination, approval workflows, implementation tracking, and post-change verification. Use when a validated system requires a software upgrade, patch, or configuration change; when infrastructure changes affect validated systems; when a CAPA requires system modification; or when emergency changes need expedited approval and retrospective documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a pull request in this repository — check the description against the PR template section by section, then run a separate regression and user-impact pass that produces impact levels and a review summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates phishing email incidents from initial user report through header analysis, URL/attachment detonation, impacted user identification, and containment actions using SOC tools like Splunk, Microsoft Defender, and sandbox analysis platforms. Use when a reported phishing email requires full incident investigation to determine scope and impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes professional bug bounty reports for HackerOne, Bugcrowd, and Intigriti with CVSS 4.0 scoring, business impact, working exploits, and remediation. Runs 5-check Pre-Report Verification first: hallucination detection, AI writing patterns, PoC reproducibility, duplicate detection, and impact plausibility. Use when user describes a vulnerability, shares HTTP logs, HAR files, recon output, or screenshots; says 'write a bug report', 'format my finding', 'draft a vuln report', 'is this valid', 'rate my vulnerability', 'verify my report', or any variant. Trigger for partial or messy input — raw notes, one-liners, or full writeups all work. Do not wait for perfect input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync official Anthropic documentation and analyze impact on project components. Runs docs/reference/update-claude-docs.sh, computes diffs, and reports impacts on the skill validator, plugins, and project documentation. Use when user mentions "sync docs", "update reference docs", "refresh docs", or "check doc changes".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full nonprofit operational health analysis: validate impact measurement methodology and theory of change, optimize fundraising channels and campaign ROI, audit grant management for compliance and proposal quality, and assess donor retention with churn prediction and stewardship workflows..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze program impact measurement software for logic model completeness, indicator tracking rigor, data collection methodology, causal attribution modeling, cost-effectiveness analysis, beneficiary feedback integration, and funder reporting accuracy..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarizes Google Cloud Data Lineage graphs to help users debug data quality issues and understand data provenance for BQ/GCS. Use when summarizing upstream and downstream data flows, and presenting complex lineage data as an intuitive Markdown report. Don't use for generic BigQuery queries, editing lineage relationships, or downstream deprecation. Don't use for downstream blast-radius impact analysis (use datalineage-bigquery-asset-impact-analysis skill instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing for a Salesforce seasonal release — triaging release notes, reviewing Release Updates, opting into Sandbox Preview, and communicating change impact to stakeholders. Triggers: 'upcoming Salesforce release', 'release notes triage', 'Release Updates', 'sandbox preview opt-in', 'release readiness checklist', 'production upgrade date', 'feature impact', 'critical update', 'roll out the Spring release safely', 'is our org ready for the Spring release', 'release update settings metadata', 'FlowSettings release update field', 'release run sheet', 'preview sandbox refresh freeze', 'settings deploy flipped a release update'. Also covers: which Release Updates are deployable as Settings metadata, the release run sheet artefact, and the preview opt-in refresh-date rule. NOT for planning your own release train — use devops/release-management. NOT for user training and go-live comms — use admin/change-management-and-training.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design guidance for program outcome measurement in Salesforce nonprofit orgs: logic model structure, indicator taxonomy, impact reporting design, and grant compliance reporting using NPSP Program Management Module (PMM) or Nonprofit Cloud (NPC) Outcome Management. NOT for configuring PMM programs, cohorts and service deliveries - use admin/npsp-program-management. NOT for setting up grant tracking, funding awards and disbursements - use admin/grant-management-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, score, and prioritize Salesforce AI use cases before any implementation begins — opportunity identification, Impact-Effort matrix scoring, feasibility evaluation across Technical/Operational/Data/Risk dimensions, and ROI framing. NOT for the license checks and enablement steps once a use case is approved — use agentforce/agentforce-service-ai-setup or agentforce/agentforce-sales-ai-setup. NOT for making the data model AI-ready — use architect/ai-ready-data-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when planning user adoption, structuring Salesforce training materials, drafting release communications, or running a change impact assessment for a Salesforce rollout or update. Triggers: user adoption plan, training materials, release announcement, change impact, go-live communication, communication plan, training plan by persona, adoption metrics, LoginHistory adoption report, PromptAction, training sandbox, go-live checklist, post-go-live feedback, super user program, pilot group. NOT for org deployment mechanics or sandbox promotion — use admin/change-management-and-deployment. NOT for adoption of an Agentforce or Einstein AI feature — use admin/ai-adoption-change-management. NOT for configuring the in-app prompts themselves — use admin/in-app-guidance-and-walkthroughs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mechanical consistency check for game design — answers "is the design consistent with itself?" — plus changed-scope impact analysis across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Offline and deterministic: greps the facts registry against the documents (numbers, terms, IDs, duplicate & dangling references, roster↔disk, map freshness, Depends 3-way, status/version, AC presence, placeholder leaks, flow & content schema), and from a git diff computes which dependent systems, flows, and content a change affects. Scope is inferred: a named document checks that document; an unverified diff triggers a changed-scope pass; otherwise everything. Use when the user wants a consistency or impact check, e.g. "verify the design", "what did this change affect", "find broken references in the design". Conflicts triage into four tracks; the entailed fixes hand off to /unikit-gd-apply in one pass. This is the mechanical pass — for a subjective "is this design good" quality critique use /unikit-gd-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking. Use when practicing HM rounds or calibrating story depth for target level. Activate on "hiring manager round", "HM screen", "staff level", "scope of impact". NOT for coding interviews, system design, behavioral/values rounds, or resume writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amplify safe or boring designs to make them more visually interesting and stimulating. Increases impact while maintaining usability. Use when the user says the design looks bland, generic, too safe, lacks personality, or wants more visual impact and character.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates stakeholder communications including investor updates, board reports, annual impact reports, and partner communications aligned with B Corp PSG standards. Use when user asks about investor relations, board communications, stakeholder reporting, impact reports, annual reports, or partner/supplier communications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a .NET pull request for breaking changes that may affect other microservice repositories. Detects cross-repo API, DTO, endpoint, EF entity, and NuGet-package breaks, and checks whether a compatible downstream PR already exists. Keywords: cross-repo impact, breaking change, microservice compatibility, downstream break, compatible PR, blast radius review, api compatibility, contract break, dto shape change, endpoint break.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。