「instrumentation」の検索結果

Full instrumentation from day one. PostHog consolidates product analytics + feature flags + error tracking (one platform, one bill). GA4 via GTM (14-step automation, custom dimensions over events, server-side tagging). Sentry (deep error tracking + performance). Stripe (webhook-first with idempotent processing). Listmonk on Coolify (newsletters via Amazon SES SMTP relay). PLG 7-layer framework. Programmatic SEO (5 page types). Incident auto-remediation via Sentry→Inngest pipeline. AI search (GEO) awareness. Local business conversions (phone_click, direction_click, form_submit, booking_click) with CRO patterns for both SaaS and local.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sentry Unity SDK integration patterns for error tracking, performance monitoring, transactions, spans, and custom instrumentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electronics Engineer working on RF, analog, and mixed-signal hardware — closing an RF link budget for a wireless telemetry radio, sizing an op-amp or instrumentation-amplifier front end against a gain-bandwidth constraint, designing an anti-alias or IF filter to a cutoff and Q, pre-checking a design against FCC/IEC EMC radiated-emissions limits before formal compliance testing, or picking between a superheterodyne and direct-conversion receiver architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runtime profiling with multi-metric measurement, instrumentation, and performance map generation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instrument applications with Azure Application Insights and OpenTelemetry for end-to-end observability. Use this skill when users ask about telemetry, tracing, metrics, logging, or monitoring setup. Covers SDK setup, correlation, sampling, dashboards, and alerts per OpenTelemetry standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive backend development guide for Langfuse's Next.js 14/tRPC/Express/TypeScript monorepo. Use when creating tRPC routers, public API endpoints, BullMQ queue processors, services, or working with tRPC procedures, Next.js API routes, Prisma database access, ClickHouse analytics queries, Redis queues, OpenTelemetry instrumentation, Zod v4 validation, env.mjs configuration, tenant isolation patterns, or async patterns. Covers layered architecture (tRPC procedures → services, queue processors → services), dual database system (PostgreSQL + ClickHouse), projectId filtering for multi-tenant isolation, traceException error handling, observability patterns, and testing strategies (Jest for web, vitest for worker).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level seismology covering earthquake seismology, seismic wave propagation, seismometer instrumentation, earthquake source parameters, seismic hazard, and induced seismicity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when validation needs entry, business-logic, environment, and instrumentation guards so a bad value cannot reach the failure point — turns a local bug fix into a structural one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting to production code, or when a past incident lacks diagnostic data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and analyzes malicious behavior in mobile applications through behavioral analysis, permission abuse detection, network traffic monitoring, and dynamic instrumentation. Use when analyzing suspicious mobile applications for data exfiltration, command-and-control communication, credential stealing, SMS interception, or other malware indicators. Activates for requests involving mobile malware analysis, app behavior monitoring, trojan detection, or suspicious app investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes the piping content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: line inventory with off-page continuity and required ancillary lines, line identification elements per the project line numbering procedure, connection items at nozzles matched to a quoted schedule, per quoted standards, specification break questions and observations. Every proposal cites its source and revision; no source, no proposal; never sizes a line or selects a class. Use when the user asks to "run the piping enrichment", "start the discipline enrichment", "list the lines the P&ID adds to this PFD" or "fill the line identifiers from the numbering procedure" after gate G2. Do not use for instruments, loops or instrument tags, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use before gate G2, use process-model-check. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a process flow diagram (image, PDF or native export) with its job header and returns a provenance-tagged extraction register: equipment, streams, tags, connectivity, instruments already shown, notes and legends, connectivity findings and an explicit UNKNOWN list, then holds at gate G1. Extracts and records only; never enriches, tags or proposes. Use when the user asks to "start a PFD to P&ID job", "read in the attached PFD", "extract the equipment and streams from this PFD" or "read this PFD into a register". Do not use for checking the model, use process-model-check instead; do not use to propose lines, instruments or tags, use piping-enrichment or instrumentation-and-control-enrichment after gate G2. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "monitor my launch", "track our Product Hunt / Hacker News ranking", or "watch the launch window"; runs the T-0 to T+30 window watch — pre-launch instrumentation verification (UTM/event checks, the upstream of RAMP P1), HN rank/points/comments polling with a comments-over-points flamewar early-warning (Estimated heuristic), PH votes/featured status, store charts and reviews, news echo, D0/W1/M1 KPI snapshots vs targets, spike-vs-sustain and owned-capture reads, and alert thresholds against the launch-tier KPI targets. Not for launch-day go/rollback calls — use launch-day-conductor; not for metric deep-dives — use performance-analyzer; not for SEO rank tracking — use rank-tracker. 发布监控/排名轮询/火焰战比/spike-sustain

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve conversion performance on marketing pages and forms through diagnosis, message hierarchy, friction analysis, proof, UX hypotheses, instrumentation and experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Monitor OpenTelemetry Distro for Python. Use for one-line Application Insights setup with auto-instrumentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Next.js 16.2.4 with TypeScript — App Router, Server Components, use cache directive, Turbopack dev, Server Actions, ISR, SSR, SSG, MCP devtools, metadata API, route handlers, instrumentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose, fix, or validate SwiftUI animation and scroll behavior by temporarily instrumenting views with MotionEyes, capturing console traces over time, and comparing motion data to user intent or test expectations. Use when users report bugs such as wrong direction, premature fade, timing or easing mismatch, unexpected movement, missing movement, incorrect relative movement between views, scroll jumps, scroll restoration drift, content-offset desynchronization, or when they want to turn MotionEyes traces into focused assertions. Prefer XcodeBuildMCP log capture first and fallback to CLI log streaming; remove only agent-added MotionEyes instrumentation after validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pixel-based motion and UI change analysis from frame sequences or screenshots using computer vision and visual comparison. Use when `.transition` or visual effects are not observable via MotionEyes logs, when you only have screenshots/video, when you need regression diffs across builds, or when you need to summarize on-screen changes without instrumentation. Do not use when MotionEyes traces are available and you need precise timing/values; use `motioneyes-animation-debug` instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Monitor OpenTelemetry Distro for Python. Use for one-line Application Insights setup with auto-instrumentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Android APK reverse engineering — apktool, jadx, Frida dynamic instrumentation, native .so analizi, root/SSL bypass

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and analyzes malicious behavior in mobile applications through behavioral analysis, permission abuse detection, network traffic monitoring, and dynamic instrumentation. Use when analyzing suspicious mobile applications for data exfiltration, command-and-control communication, credential stealing, SMS interception, or other malware indicators. Activates for requests involving mobile malware analysis, app behavior monitoring, trojan detection, or suspicious app investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。