「iter」の検索結果

Use when a Scenario output must be checked and improved rather than accepted first roll: iterating a generation until it matches the brief, fixing a batch that came back off-brief, retrying failed shots methodically, wiring an automated generate, review, revise loop, or deciding whether to re-prompt, swap references, inpaint, post-process, or change model. Keywords: refine, iterate, critique, review loop, QA, self-correction, verify, acceptance criteria, retry, drift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Jobs-to-be-Done framework as applied product methodology. Job statements, struggling moments, hire and fire criteria, the difference between feature-thinking and job-thinking. Honest about where JTBD adds clarity (discovery, prioritization, positioning) and where it becomes performative ritual (job-statement workshops that do not drive decisions, persona-theater disguised as JTBD). Triggers on jobs-to-be-done, JTBD, job statements, struggling moments, hire criteria, fire criteria, switch triggers, functional emotional social jobs, outcome-driven innovation. Also triggers when a team is over-relying on feature-request lists or persona archetypes that do not drive product decisions, when a positioning conversation needs the framing JTBD provides, or when discovery is producing outputs that do not connect to product strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Literature review for academic and R&D research: search strategy, source assessment, synthesis, and citation management. Use when conducting a systematic literature review, building a bibliography, or preparing a research-grounded report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RFP creation, distribution, evaluation, and shortlisting for in-house legal teams selecting outside counsel. Draft a new legal services RFP from scratch, evaluate firm responses against weighted criteria, produce a shortlist recommendation with selection rationale for GC sign-off, or design the end-to-end RFP process from scratch. Trigger on: 'draft an RFP', 'run an RFP process', 'evaluate firm responses', 'score the RFP submissions', 'which firms should we shortlist', 'selection recommendation', 'how do we run a panel RFP', 'RFP for legal services', 'pitch process', 'firm selection process', 'compare the proposals', 'we're reviewing our panel', 'panel refresh RFP', 'we need to go to market', 'request for proposal', 'evaluate the pitches', 'which firm won the RFP', 'write a legal RFP', 'RFP evaluation criteria', 'design the RFP process', 'how do we weight the criteria'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Panel structure design, firm selection criteria, right-sourcing analysis, and coverage gap assessment for in-house legal teams. Build panel frameworks from scratch or formalise existing informal arrangements. Define weighted selection criteria for firm evaluation. Run right-sourcing analysis (ABC tiering) to identify work sent to expensive providers that doesn't require that level of resource. Assess existing panels for practice area, geographic, and capability gaps. Trigger on: 'design our panel', 'how many firms do we need', 'panel structure', 'firm selection criteria', 'which firms should we use', 'right-sourcing', 'are we sending work to the right firms', 'panel gaps', 'too many firms', 'consolidate our panel', 'we need a firm for', 'preferred provider', 'panel tiers', 'do we need BigLaw for this', 'convergence', 'D&I panel targets', 'how do we choose firms'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a RULER emotional literacy sequence for recognising, understanding, labelling, expressing, and regulating emotions. Use when students struggle with emotional regulation, conflict, or anxiety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a criterion-referenced rubric with descriptive performance levels for a task or objective. Use for marking guides and general curriculum contexts. For Manning programmes where Competent = success, use coherent-rubric-logic-builder instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a learning sequence teaching prompt quality — comparing vague vs. refined prompts to show why specificity and context transform AI output. Use when students use AI without understanding why output quality varies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform. Also use when the user mentions 'ad copy variations,' 'ad creative,' 'generate headlines,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'ad iterations,' 'creative testing,' or 'ad performance optimization.' This skill covers generating ad creative at scale, iterating based on performance data, and enforcing platform character limits. For campaign strategy and targeting, see paid-ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an SEO content brief for writers. Use when the user says "content brief", "SEO brief", "writing brief", "brief for", "writer brief", "outline for SEO", or asks about creating a structured brief to hand to a writer for producing search-optimized content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules, deterministic 0-100 decision bands (Accept/Minor/Major/Reject) that drive a target-met early stop, and a Devil's Advocate concession-threshold guard that blocks acceptance on unresolved critical findings. Maintains a worklog and snapshots each iteration so revert is real, not symbolic. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 5 or when the user asks to "refine the draft", "iterate on the paper", or "run peer review on this paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing whether an OpenSpec change's execution goal, acceptance criteria, and implementation or verification tasks are aligned. This should trigger for requests such as Review this OpenSpec change with ATDD; Check acceptance criteria against tasks; Find acceptance criteria without task coverage; Detect tasks that diverge from the execution goal; Explain what is missing, vague, ambiguous, partial, absent, or divergent in this OpenSpec change. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to find related work, survey a research area, identify literature gaps, or discover open-source implementations. Triggers on phrases like "find papers on", "related work", "literature review", "what papers exist", "open source implementation", or "papers with code".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategies for searching scientific literature across PubMed, arXiv, Google Scholar, and AI-assisted tools. Covers PICO framework for clinical questions, three-tiered search (database-specific, AI-assisted, content extraction), PubMed field tags and MeSH, boolean query construction, and full-text extraction. Use when planning a literature search or choosing a search tier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducting systematic, scoping, and narrative literature reviews. Covers PRISMA/PRISMA-ScR protocols, search strategy (Boolean, MeSH), database selection (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase), screening, data extraction, evidence synthesis (narrative, meta-analysis, thematic), and reporting. Use when planning or executing a formal literature review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides fault tolerance patterns for Spring Boot 3.x using Resilience4j. Use when implementing circuit breakers, handling service failures, adding retry logic with exponential backoff, configuring rate limiters, or protecting services from cascading failures. Generates circuit breaker, retry, rate limiter, bulkhead, time limiter, and fallback implementations. Validates resilience configurations through Actuator endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects shared stack membership and iterates a command across all PRs in base-to-tip order. Use when a command supports --stack flag for multi-PR iteration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes and restructures technical documentation - READMEs, tutorials, how-to guides, user guides, architecture docs, onboarding guides, runbooks and SOPs, troubleshooting guides, release notes, and knowledge base articles - grounded in the actual code or product, with commands and examples verified where possible. Use when the user asks to document a project, feature, system, or process, write or fix a README, explain a codebase to new developers, turn notes into a guide, or make existing docs clearer. For endpoint-by-endpoint API reference or OpenAPI specs, use api-documentation-writer; for CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md files, use claude-md-writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides audit findings remediation program management including finding prioritization by severity (critical, high, medium, low), owner assignment, remediation planning, deadline tracking, verification testing, closure criteria, escalation protocols, and management reporting. Covers remediation lifecycle from finding issuance to verified closure. Keywords: audit remediation, finding management, prioritization, verification testing, closure criteria, remediation tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a comprehensive literature survey on a specific research topic. Outputs a complete PDF survey (6–20 pages, 60+ real citations, 100+ recommended) with LaTeX source, topic-specific publication figures, and a classified literature table. Single-stage, no Python runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review comparison article writer deliverables with audience, evidence, voice, and conversion-quality controls. Use when the user explicitly asks for comparison article writer work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review alternative blog writer deliverables with audience, evidence, voice, and conversion-quality controls. Use when the user explicitly asks for alternative blog writer work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage persistent coding sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity (agy), Cursor, and OpenCode engines. Use when orchestrating multi-engine coding agents, starting/sending/stopping sessions, running multi-agent council collaborations, cross-session messaging, ultraplan deep planning, ultrareview parallel code review, autoloop autonomous workspace iteration, ultraapp building deployable web apps from a structured Q&A interview, switching models/tools at runtime, exposing the orchestrator's 69 tools as an MCP server to Hermes Agent / Claude Desktop / Cursor / Cline / Continue / Zed / Windsurf / Goose, or running as an Agent Client Protocol (ACP) agent that Zed / JetBrains / Neovim / Emacs / VS Code / dsh can drive directly. Triggers on "start a session", "send to session", "run council", "ultraplan", "ultrareview", "autoloop", "ultraapp", "Forge tab", "build a web app", "one-click app", "AppSpec", "autonomous iteration", "iterate until goal", "deep paper review", "auto research", "switch model", "multi-agent", "coding session", "session inbox", "cursor agent", "opencode", "mcp server", "clawo-mcp", "hermes mcp", "model context protocol", "ultracode", "dynamic workflow", "fanout", "fan-out", "best-of-N", "steer turn", "interrupt turn", "fork thread", "rollback turns", "acp", "agent client protocol", "clawo acp", "zed agent", "jetbrains agent", "external agent", "dsh subagent", "deepseek harness".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。