「measure」の検索結果

Applies Eric Ries's Lean Startup methodology for building products under extreme uncertainty. Use when iterating toward product/market fit, designing MVPs, deciding whether to pivot or persevere, setting up actionable metrics, or accelerating the Build-Measure-Learn loop. Triggers include 'how do we test this idea fast', 'what should our MVP look like', 'our metrics look good but we're not growing', 'should we pivot', 'we're building features no one uses', 'how do we measure validated learning', 'vanity metrics vs real metrics', 'how to do innovation accounting'. NOT for companies with proven product/market fit scaling a known playbook (use Crossing the Chasm), not for determining Market Type (use Four Steps), not for sales methodology (use SPIN Selling), not for pricing strategy (use Monetizing Innovation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add a measured sound pass to a motion-graphics video made with Claude Code (HyperFrames, Remotion, GSAP, Claude Motion or the motion-broll skill). Builds a cue list, checks the music's beat grid against the kick drums, lands cuts on the beat, places one real sound effect per cue from a bundled CC0 library, mixes to -16 LUFS with true peaks below -4 dBFS measured on the exported MP4, and proves it with frames, waveforms and 5 timestamps for a human to check. Use when someone wants sound effects, sound design or music added to a motion-graphics video, or says their AI video sounds like cheap beeps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve mouse phenotype data from the Jackson Laboratory Mouse Phenome Database (MPD) via its REST API. Browse 520+ projects, look up per-project measure metadata, pull strain-level means (raw or LS-mean adjusted) and per-animal values, find measures by MP/VT ontology terms, and resolve strain nomenclature or gene coordinates. Use for QTL support, cross-strain comparison, mouse model selection, and ontology-driven phenotype discovery. Use monarch-database for disease-gene-phenotype knowledge graphs; ensembl-database for mouse genome annotations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Background context for invoice-system input tax credit rules (仕入税額控除) in the shinkoku tax filing plugin. Contains eligibility requirements, the 6 permanent exceptions (帳簿のみ保存の恒久特例), transitional measures for purchases from tax-exempt businesses, and storage requirements. This skill is not user-invocable — Claude loads it automatically when responding to input tax credit questions under the invoice system.

Guides the post-Schrems II Transfer Impact Assessment process following EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology. Covers destination country surveillance law assessment, European Essential Guarantees evaluation, and supplementary measures determination. Keywords: TIA, transfer impact assessment, Schrems II, EDPB recommendations, supplementary measures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, design, categorize, distribute, and measure agent skills using lessons from Anthropic's Lessons from building Claude Code: How we use skills. Use when reviewing an existing skill, deciding whether a workflow deserves a skill, planning a skill library, turning team knowledge into skills, choosing skill categories, writing trigger descriptions, designing progressive disclosure, or planning skill marketplace and usage measurement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing between engines or models for an agent pipeline and the answer must come from measurement on your own data, not from marketing pages: speech recognition for meeting recordings, the model that turns a transcript into notes, the critic model that checks it. Runs every variant in an isolated container, measures time, cost per hour of input (USD and RUB, with price source and date) and quality (WER/CER and course terms for ASR; code checks plus a judge of a different model for LLM steps), writes results.json/csv and one static analytics page. Triggers on "бенчмарк", "сравни движки", "сколько стоит час записи", "какую модель взять для пайплайна", "benchmark the pipeline", "compare ASR engines".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes and interprets treatment effect measures (OR, RR, RD, HR, NNT) with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen, MOVER, profile likelihood, Bender NNT) and reports marginal vs conditional estimands per FDA 2023 covariate adjustment guidance. Use when reporting treatment effects in confirmatory trials, comparing effect sizes across studies, or constructing forest plots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit X Ads measurement, X Pixel and Conversions API, campaign objectives, keyword and conversation targeting, creative, budgets, brand safety, app measurement, and reporting. Use for X Ads, Twitter Ads, promoted posts, X Pixel, X Conversions API, conversation targeting, or paid campaigns on X.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define success criteria and tracking setup for launch during PRD v0.9 Go-to-Market. Triggers on requests to define launch metrics, set up tracking, or when user asks "how do we measure launch success?", "launch KPIs", "tracking setup", "success criteria", "analytics", "launch goals". Outputs KPI- entries specialized for launch measurement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define measurable success metrics (KPIs) tied to product type during PRD v0.3 Commercial Model. Triggers on requests to define success metrics, set KPI targets, determine what to measure, establish go/no-go thresholds, or when user asks "how do we measure success?", "what metrics matter?", "what's our target?", "how do we know if this works?", "define KPIs", "success criteria". Consumes Product Type Classification (BR-) from v0.2. Outputs KPI- entries with thresholds, evidence sources, and downstream gate linkages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure what matters. Event tracking design, attribution modeling, funnel analysis, experimentation platforms. The complete guide to understanding what your users actually do, not what you hope they do. Good analytics is invisible until you need it. Then it's the difference between guessing and knowing. Use when "analytics, tracking, events, funnel, conversion, attribution, segment, amplitude, mixpanel, posthog, ab testing, experiment, cohort, retention, measure, metrics, analytics, tracking, events, funnel, conversion, attribution, data" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UTM parameter strategy, campaign tracking, and marketing attribution modeling. Build consistent UTM taxonomies, configure attribution models, measure cross-channel performance, and connect marketing spend to revenue. Use when the user asks about UTM parameters, campaign tracking, attribution models, marketing measurement, or cross-channel analytics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Content Analytics workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Track engagement metrics, measure campaign ROI, and analyze content performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Content Analytics workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Track engagement metrics, measure campaign ROI, and analyze content performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

广告外包公司绩效管理 (广告外包公司绩效管理 (Ad Agency / Marketing-Outsourcing Firm Performance Management) — 广告/营销外包公司(乙方 agency:创意热店/4A/本土广告公司/传媒公司/数字营销代理/MCN/设计工作室/内容外包)的『怎么做绩效管理』职业认知操作系统,面向老板/合伙人、运营总监(COO)、HR/HRBP、项目总监、team lead、以及想搭绩效体系的从业者。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 绩效管理的核心世界观分歧: **创意/知识工作『不可量化』 vs 『必须可考核』(创意难归因、难标准化,硬套 KPI 杀创意;但不考核养懒人——这是本行绩效的元矛盾) ⇄ 结果导向(KPI/业绩/回款) vs 过程导向(OKR/能力/成长) ⇄ 个人绩效 vs 团队协作(广告是集体产物,创意-AE-媒介-设计协作,难拆到个人) ⇄ 强激励(提成制:多劳多得但抢单/短视/不协作/吃老客户) vs 稳定(固定+奖金:公平但大锅饭) ⇄ 规模/流水 vs 利润/人效(低价接单冲规模 vs 保毛利)**; (b) 绩效体系设计 — KPI(关键指标法)/OKR(目标与关键成果)/BSC(平衡计分卡)/360 环评/MBO(目标管理)/KSF(关键成功因子)/积分制/计件提成;考核周期(月/季/年+项目制);绩效面谈、绩效改进 PIP、强制分布(271/活力曲线)争议、绩效结果应用(调薪/晋升/淘汰/奖金); (c) 分岗位绩效(本行难点,各岗量化差异极大) — 创意(文案/美术/创意总监:作品质量、获奖、比稿命中率——最难量化)、AE/客户执行(客户满意度、续约、回款、增购、客诉)、媒介/投放(可量化:ROI/ROAS/CPM/转化——最易量化)、策略/策划(方案通过率、洞察)、设计(产能/返稿率/品质)、项目管理(交付准时率、利润率)、销售/BD(新签、回款、毛利); (d) 项目与客户维度绩效(agency 特有,专业服务公司逻辑) — 项目利润率(收入-人力成本-外部成本)、工时制与人效(billability 可计费工时率/utilization 利用率/realization 实现率,借鉴咨询律所)、人均产值/人均毛利、客户续约率与 LTV、客户集中度风险、比稿投入产出、改稿次数失控; (e) 激励与分配机制 — 提成制(按签单/毛利/回款抽成)、项目奖金分成(如何在创意-AE-媒介间分)、年终奖包、合伙人制/事业合伙人/工作室 studio 制/阿米巴、股权期权、创意人才的非物质激励(署名/获奖/成长); (f) 人效、成本与文化 — 人效比(人力成本占收入比,业内估计通常 40-55%,非普适)、毛利率、加班/血汗工厂文化批判(乙方 996/改稿到凌晨)、人才流失率与保留、招聘与培养、组织架构(客户组 vs 职能组 vs 项目制矩阵); (g) 外包/乙方特有张力对绩效的侵蚀 — 甲乙方权力不对等(甲方压价、无限改稿、比稿白嫖创意、账期长垫款重回款难)、低价内卷与红海、项目制不确定性(旺淡季、大客户依赖)、创意工时不可控如何计入绩效、外包 vs 自建团队的成本对比; (h) 争议/批判 — KPI 量化派 vs 创意不可考核派、提成制养蛊 vs 团队协作、强制分布/末位淘汰是否适合小 agency、工时制(billable hours)被咨询律所验证但绑架员工健康、『向甲方看齐做 OKR』水土不服、绩效主义扼杀创意(索尼绩效主义之殇式批判)、乙方绩效本质是『用考核对冲甲方不确定性』的转嫁; (i) 流派/思想谱系 — 专业服务公司管理派(David Maister《Managing the Professional Service Firm》PSF 圣经:leverage 杠杆/utilization 利用率/billing;借鉴咨询律所会计所) vs agency 专家经营派(David C. Baker《The Business of Expertise》+2Bobs podcast、Blair Enns《Win Without Pitching》《Pricing Creativity》定位与定价) vs OKR/目标管理派(John Doerr《Measure What Matters》、Google/Intel OKR、字节/飞书 OKR 本土化) vs 中式绩效工具派(KSF 薪酬全绩效/积分制/阿米巴/华为绩效体系被广告公司借用) vs 本土 4A/广告公司实战派(省广/蓝色光标/华扬联众/利欧 等上市广告公司管理 + 创意热店工作室制)。不含: 广告投放/信息流/SEM 的技术操作本身、甲方市场部/品牌方内部绩效、通用 HR 招聘薪酬全流程(仅取与绩效相关部分)、纯财务会计做账、MCN 达人孵化运营细节。) Master OS — automated mastery of 广告外包公司绩效管理 (Ad Agency / Marketing-Outsourcing Firm Performance Management) — 广告/营销外包公司(乙方 agency:创意热店/4A/本土广告公司/传媒公司/数字营销代理/MCN/设计工作室/内容外包)的『怎么做绩效管理』职业认知操作系统,面向老板/合伙人、运营总监(COO)、HR/HRBP、项目总监、team lead、以及想搭绩效体系的从业者。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 绩效管理的核心世界观分歧: **创意/知识工作『不可量化』 vs 『必须可考核』(创意难归因、难标准化,硬套 KPI 杀创意;但不考核养懒人——这是本行绩效的元矛盾) ⇄ 结果导向(KPI/业绩/回款) vs 过程导向(OKR/能力/成长) ⇄ 个人绩效 vs 团队协作(广告是集体产物,创意-AE-媒介-设计协作,难拆到个人) ⇄ 强激励(提成制:多劳多得但抢单/短视/不协作/吃老客户) vs 稳定(固定+奖金:公平但大锅饭) ⇄ 规模/流水 vs 利润/人效(低价接单冲规模 vs 保毛利)**; (b) 绩效体系设计 — KPI(关键指标法)/OKR(目标与关键成果)/BSC(平衡计分卡)/360 环评/MBO(目标管理)/KSF(关键成功因子)/积分制/计件提成;考核周期(月/季/年+项目制);绩效面谈、绩效改进 PIP、强制分布(271/活力曲线)争议、绩效结果应用(调薪/晋升/淘汰/奖金); (c) 分岗位绩效(本行难点,各岗量化差异极大) — 创意(文案/美术/创意总监:作品质量、获奖、比稿命中率——最难量化)、AE/客户执行(客户满意度、续约、回款、增购、客诉)、媒介/投放(可量化:ROI/ROAS/CPM/转化——最易量化)、策略/策划(方案通过率、洞察)、设计(产能/返稿率/品质)、项目管理(交付准时率、利润率)、销售/BD(新签、回款、毛利); (d) 项目与客户维度绩效(agency 特有,专业服务公司逻辑) — 项目利润率(收入-人力成本-外部成本)、工时制与人效(billability 可计费工时率/utilization 利用率/realization 实现率,借鉴咨询律所)、人均产值/人均毛利、客户续约率与 LTV、客户集中度风险、比稿投入产出、改稿次数失控; (e) 激励与分配机制 — 提成制(按签单/毛利/回款抽成)、项目奖金分成(如何在创意-AE-媒介间分)、年终奖包、合伙人制/事业合伙人/工作室 studio 制/阿米巴、股权期权、创意人才的非物质激励(署名/获奖/成长); (f) 人效、成本与文化 — 人效比(人力成本占收入比,业内估计通常 40-55%,非普适)、毛利率、加班/血汗工厂文化批判(乙方 996/改稿到凌晨)、人才流失率与保留、招聘与培养、组织架构(客户组 vs 职能组 vs 项目制矩阵); (g) 外包/乙方特有张力对绩效的侵蚀 — 甲乙方权力不对等(甲方压价、无限改稿、比稿白嫖创意、账期长垫款重回款难)、低价内卷与红海、项目制不确定性(旺淡季、大客户依赖)、创意工时不可控如何计入绩效、外包 vs 自建团队的成本对比; (h) 争议/批判 — KPI 量化派 vs 创意不可考核派、提成制养蛊 vs 团队协作、强制分布/末位淘汰是否适合小 agency、工时制(billable hours)被咨询律所验证但绑架员工健康、『向甲方看齐做 OKR』水土不服、绩效主义扼杀创意(索尼绩效主义之殇式批判)、乙方绩效本质是『用考核对冲甲方不确定性』的转嫁; (i) 流派/思想谱系 — 专业服务公司管理派(David Maister《Managing the Professional Service Firm》PSF 圣经:leverage 杠杆/utilization 利用率/billing;借鉴咨询律所会计所) vs agency 专家经营派(David C. Baker《The Business of Expertise》+2Bobs podcast、Blair Enns《Win Without Pitching》《Pricing Creativity》定位与定价) vs OKR/目标管理派(John Doerr《Measure What Matters》、Google/Intel OKR、字节/飞书 OKR 本土化) vs 中式绩效工具派(KSF 薪酬全绩效/积分制/阿米巴/华为绩效体系被广告公司借用) vs 本土 4A/广告公司实战派(省广/蓝色光标/华扬联众/利欧 等上市广告公司管理 +

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits whether scores, benchmarks, LLM judges, or surveys measure what we think. Use when a benchmark is saturated, a score unreliable, or judge agreement untrustworthy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product analyst — metrics architecture, funnel analysis, A/B test design, retention, and growth measurement. Use when asked to "design an A/B test", "analyze the funnel", "define a north star metric", or "measure retention".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the developer onboarding experience — measure TTFC and find friction points. Use when asked "why do developers drop off", "audit our onboarding", or "measure time to first call".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational concepts in nutrition science — macronutrients, micronutrients, energy balance, Atwater factors, reference intakes (DRI/RDA/AI/UL), food composition tables, and the methods of human nutrition research. Grounds the rest of the department in a shared vocabulary and in the measurement limits of the field, including controlled-trial history, observational-study limits, and the biochemical basis for calorie accounting. Use when a question asks what something "is" nutritionally, how energy and nutrients are measured, or what the reference numbers mean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methods for assessing what people actually eat — 24-hour recall, food frequency questionnaires, diet diaries, biomarkers, duplicate-plate studies, and controlled feeding. Covers the relative strengths and biases of each instrument, how to choose among them for a given question, and how to interpret results in the presence of measurement error. Use when a user wants to estimate population-level intake, individual-level intake, or evaluate the plausibility of a dietary claim that depends on how intake was measured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bench instruments and measurement techniques for electronics — digital multimeter, oscilloscope, logic analyzer, spectrum analyzer, function generator, power supply, and their proper use. Covers probing technique, ground loops, loading effects, trigger modes, FFT mode pitfalls, signal integrity, noise budget analysis, and debugging workflows from "it doesn't work" to "here is the failure mechanism." Use when measuring, debugging, or characterizing any electronic circuit or firmware-hardware interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, shipping, or regression-testing a SKILL.md and you hold one or more captured trajectories where that skill was actually loaded. Translates the skill's instructions into behavior constraints, then reports which were EXERCISED (coverage) versus untested, and flags any that were in-scope but VIOLATED (compliance) — a cheap single-trajectory test-adequacy gate. It surfaces untested instructions rather than auto-blocking, and escalates fail-closed only when a violation touches shared repo state, never-surface memory, or self-modification. Complements skill-counterfactual-audit (which measures EFFECT) and skill-causal-curation (which measures contribution); this one asks ADEQUACY. Backed by the agent-skill-coverage metric (arxiv 2606.20659v2). Triggers on skill review, ship gating, and regression-testing a skill against its trajectories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。