2,245 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when starting any conversation in a loopkit-enabled project - establishes how to find and use loopkit's 49 skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design referral programs and viral growth loops. Use when asked to create referral systems, viral mechanics, word-of-mouth campaigns, or growth loops. Trigger phrases: "referral program", "viral loop", "refer a friend", "word of mouth", "viral coefficient", "referral incentive", "growth loop", "invite system", "ambassador program".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manual QA harness for the senpi coding agent itself. MUST USE after changing packages/ai, packages/agent, packages/coding-agent, or packages/tui — a green typecheck and `npm test` are NOT QA. Drives the real CLI from source in an isolated sandbox (never touches ~/.senpi or real credentials) across four channels: remote RPC (--mode rpc JSONL stdio), TUI smoke (node-pty on Windows, tmux on POSIX), mock loop (a local fake model server for deterministic, zero-token agent-loop runs), and CLI smoke (--help/--print/--list-models). Every helper ships a --self-test. Use whenever someone says qa senpi, test the agent, verify my change, rpc qa, tui qa, mock-loop qa, smoke the cli, or needs evidence that an agent-loop, tool, keybinding, or provider change works end to end. Capture evidence to local-ignore/qa-evidence/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative worker-reviewer cycle that spawns a critic subagent to score work 1-10 and provide actionable feedback, then revises until a quality gate is met. Use when implementing features, writing specs, reviewing existing code, or completing any task where quality matters more than speed. Trigger phrases: "use review-loop", "polish this", "iterate on this", "/review-loop", "review with feedback loop".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive a PR to an approved code review by looping OCR's multi-agent review and address steps. Runs /ocr:review then /ocr:address repeatedly until the review verdict is APPROVE, then one final /ocr:address for leftover suggestions, posting every review and every address round to the GitHub PR as comments. Use when the user asks to 'review and address in a loop', 'iterate review until approved', 'auto review-and-fix this PR', 'loop /ocr:review and /ocr:address', or to take a changeset all the way to a clean APPROVE with the default reviewer team. Wraps the /ocr:review (.ocr/commands/review.md) and /ocr:address (.ocr/commands/address.md) skills; needs a feature branch with an open GitHub PR and the gh CLI for posting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides hand-vs-compiler for loop transforms (unrolling, SIMD, fusion, branchless). Use when reviewing/authoring a hot loop or tempted to hand-optimize one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cost discipline for recurring /loop runs. A loop multiplies per-iteration cost by iteration count, so waste compounds. Encodes cache-aware pacing (avoid the 300s dead zone), event-driven-over-polling, a no-change short-circuit, a compact state handle carried between ticks, and a stop condition. Use when a /loop is running or being set up — especially long-lived or frequently-firing ones.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
POS analytics tracking patterns (WooPosAnalyticsEvent sealed class, WooPosAnalyticsTracker, WooPosAnalyticsEventConstant). Use when writing, editing, exploring, debugging, or reviewing analytics tracking in POS (WooPos*) code. NOT for main store app — use the `store-analytics` skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides cooperation with GDPR supervisory authorities under Article 31, including procedures for responding to investigations, information requests, and on-site inspections. Covers controller and processor obligations during supervisory authority interactions. Keywords: supervisory authority, Article 31, cooperation, DPA investigation, information request, inspection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage the deferred-work ledger for the bmad-loop orchestrator: verify every selected open entry against the actual codebase and return a machine-readable partition (bundles, already-resolved, blocked, skip, human decisions). Also migrates legacy pre-DW-format ledgers when invoked with --migrate. Automation-only — invoked by bmad-loop sweep runs, not by humans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to add an in-site feedback loop to a website repo — a floating "提个建议" button where allowlisted visitors submit suggestions that become a GitHub Issue, which GitHub Actions turns into an automatic code change via Claude Code, auto-merges and deploys, and records on a /_feedback dashboard with one-click revert. Triggers — "给网站加个反馈对话框", "提一句话就自动改网站", "装上反馈闭环", "feedback loop", "/wjs-looping-feedback".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a high-thoroughness end-to-end implementation loop using clean worker worktrees, per-slice planning, implementation, explicit review/fix iteration, orchestrator integration, and final commit/PR drafting. Use when the user explicitly wants a Ralph/Wiggum-style loop, autonomous multi-agent execution, a delegated feature/bugfix carried from confirmed scope through review-ready completion, or RFC-driven implementation that should be reviewed, bumped to In Progress, decomposed into phases, and executed through nested sub-loops. Supports Codex subagents by default and external CLI workers such as OpenCode when explicitly requested and available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomously work a `.pm` workstream to completion — pick the next pending milestone, implement every task end to end, /ship it, then move to the next until none remain. Use when the user asks to "loop", drain, or work through a whole workstream's backlog (e.g. `/loop-worker w1`). Sequential, not interval-based; for a timed poll use /loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to run an autoresearch-style experiment loop — improve a measurable artifact by trying changes, measuring against one objective metric, keeping if better and reverting if not, on an isolated git branch with a logged trail. Trigger on "/experiment", "run an experiment loop", "autoresearch X", "tune/optimize X against a metric", "hill-climb X". Follows references/sops/experiment-loop.md. Enforces the autonomy gate (objective metric + reversible sandbox + no PHI/external) before any unsupervised looping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining `04-prd.md` into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different decision at step 5/8. Phase 0 also defines compressed intake, the path a user's explicit "just build it" choice takes on full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored, and copywriting cores: one batched round of questions in place of the shelf, writing a thinned archive at the same paths so Phase 1 (or, on copywriting, that core's own mining step), `ux-planner`, and the Re-entry pass all keep their documented source. Also use for the Re-entry pass, which mines new scope into additional intents without re-running the shelf, on any core with a module axis to add an intent to (full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored) — landing-page has none, so its own new-scope path runs through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s Correction Protocol instead. Invoked by the `planner` agent, which decides the path; don't run standalone. landing-page runs this skill's Phase 0 on first run, then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s own planning-intake section, that core's counterpart to this skill's Phase 1. copywriting runs this skill's Phase 0 the same way (full or compressed), then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-copywriting-loop`'s own planning-intake section into a what/audience/register brief — no module axis, so its own new-scope path runs through that loop's Correction Protocol rather than the Re-entry pass below. An authored core runs this skill's Phase 0, then `hedgehog-core-design`, then this skill's Phase 1 mining against the designed layer sequence. A brownfield adoption (`hedgehog-adopt`) never runs this skill's shelf at all — the drivers BMAD elicits are already settled facts of a repo that already exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
设计 Loop 的 Goal 和 Verification 环节: 将模糊目标转化为可验证的停止条件。 当用户发现 loop 产出质量不稳定、循环无法停止、或"不知道什么时候算做完"时使用。 不适用于: 目标已经非常清晰可量的任务、或非循环场景。 关键 trigger: "loop 停不下来"、"产出质量不稳定"、"怎么定义完成"、"goal 怎么写"。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging playbook for the Forge agentic loop (src/core/loop.ts and src/agents/executor.ts). Use when a task is stuck, looping, or emitting wrong tool calls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging playbook for the Forge agentic loop (src/core/loop.ts and src/agents/executor.ts). Use when a task is stuck, looping, or producing wrong tool calls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Leveraged-prototype dev loop (`pulp loop`) — focus marker plus normal watch/rebuild loop, with AOT analyzer guidance and deferred ar-swap/PR-monitor playbook. Use when porting an existing UI/bundle to Pulp, doing visual/behavioral parity work, or batching upstream framework gap fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity game loop and progression design-to-code translation. Core loop scaffolding, session lifecycle, win/lose condition architecture, meta loop hooks, tunable difficulty, pacing & encounter timing. DESIGN INTENT format: INTENT/WRONG/RIGHT/SCAFFOLD/DESIGN HOOK. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Connect and operate the Loophole Bridge (Ableton Live MCP server). Use when the user wants to check Live/bridge prerequisites, wire an MCP client to Loophole, or run a Live editing recipe (humanize, build arrangement, batch rename, chord from prompt). Triggers: "is my Ableton bridge working", "set up loophole", "connect Claude to Ableton", "/doctor", "/setup".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute an autonomous development loop that picks one task per iteration, implements it, verifies it, and commits the result — each iteration in a fresh context window. Use when user runs /ralph, mentions "ralph loop", "autonomous loop", "builder verifier", "run tasks automatically", "iterate on tasks", "develop autonomously", or wants an automated build-verify-commit cycle with task tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when orchestrating Loop Factory specs from factory/specs/inbox or factory/specs/active, dispatching work to Codex or Claude agents, generating implementation prompts, or deciding next loop state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when orchestrating Loop Factory specs from factory/specs/inbox or factory/specs/active, dispatching work, generating implementation prompts, or deciding next loop state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。