「ploi」の検索結果

IoT and embedded device security testing methodology. Covers hardware reconnaissance (UART, JTAG, SWD, SPI flash, I2C EEPROM, eMMC chip-off), firmware acquisition (vendor portals, OTA capture, flash dump, binwalk extraction), firmware analysis (filesystem mounting, binary triage, hardcoded secrets, default credential discovery), bootloader attacks (U-Boot console, secure-boot bypass, fault injection), runtime attacks on embedded Linux/RTOS (busybox CVEs, MTD writes, /dev/mem), wireless protocol attacks (Zigbee, BLE, Z-Wave, LoRaWAN, Thread/Matter, sub-GHz), MQTT/CoAP/Modbus/BACnet/OPC-UA exploitation, mobile companion app analysis, cloud-IoT API abuse, and side-channel/glitching basics. Use for IoT pentest, smart-home assessment, ICS/OT testing, or embedded vulnerability research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure deserialization exploitation across Java, PHP, .NET, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. Covers gadget chain construction with ysoserial/phpggc/ysoserial.net, ObjectInputStream and BinaryFormatter sink identification, pickle __reduce__ RCE, phar:// wrapper abuse, Jackson polymorphic typing, Json.NET TypeNameHandling, ViewState tampering, node-serialize IIFE injection, Ruby Marshal.load and YAML.load gadgets, framework-specific chains for Spring/Hibernate/Laravel/Symfony, modern attack surfaces including Kubernetes admission webhooks and message queue consumers, WAF bypass through encoding layers and content-type manipulation, and serialVersionUID/JMX/RMI vectors. Activate when the engagement involves deserialization sinks, serialized data in cookies or request bodies, gadget chain development, magic method abuse, ysoserial payload generation, or any review of marshalling and unmarshalling logic in target applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive API security testing methodology covering REST, gRPC, and WebSocket attack surfaces. Addresses the full OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, excessive data exposure, rate limiting bypass, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF, and security misconfiguration. Includes REST-specific attacks such as HTTP verb tampering, content-type switching, and parameter pollution. Covers gRPC exploitation through protobuf interception, reflection API enumeration, and metadata injection. Addresses WebSocket vulnerabilities including origin bypass, message injection, and cross-site WebSocket hijacking. Provides tooling guidance for Burp Suite, Postman, grpcurl, websocat, and mitmproxy. Each technique includes detection signatures and defensive indicators so you understand what artifacts your testing leaves behind. Designed for authorized penetration testing engagements against API-driven architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meme coin and token security audit — rug pull detection (honeypot, hidden mint, fee manipulation, LP lock bypass), Solana SPL token analysis (freeze authority, mint authority, metadata mutability), Token-2022 extension risks (transfer hooks, permanent delegate), DEX liquidity pool attacks (sandwich amplification, LP drain, bonding curve exploits), pump.fun/Raydium/Jupiter integration risks, token_scanner.py automation, and real exploit examples from 2024-2025. Use for any token audit, rug pull assessment, meme coin security review, or pre-investment due diligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meme coin and token security audit — rug pull detection (honeypot, hidden mint, fee manipulation, LP lock bypass), Solana SPL token analysis (freeze authority, mint authority, metadata mutability), Token-2022 extension risks (transfer hooks, permanent delegate), DEX liquidity pool attacks (sandwich amplification, LP drain, bonding curve exploits), pump.fun/Raydium/Jupiter integration risks, and real exploit examples from 2024-2025. Use for any token audit, rug pull assessment, meme coin security review, or pre-investment due diligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for XSS vulnerabilities", "perform cross-site scripting attacks", "identify HTML injection flaws", "exploit client-side injection vulnerabilities", "steal cookies via XSS", or "bypass content security policies". It provides comprehensive techniques for detecting, exploiting, and understanding XSS and HTML injection attack vectors in web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for SQL injection vulnerabilities", "perform SQLi attacks", "bypass authentication using SQL injection", "extract database information through injection", "detect SQL injection flaws", or "exploit database query vulnerabilities". It provides comprehensive techniques for identifying, exploiting, and understanding SQL injection attack vectors across different database systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "escalate privileges", "get root access", "become administrator", "privesc techniques", "abuse sudo", "exploit SUID binaries", "Kerberoasting", "pass-the-ticket", "token impersonation", or needs guidance on post-exploitation privilege escalation for Linux or Windows systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "pentest AWS", "test AWS security", "enumerate IAM", "exploit cloud infrastructure", "AWS privilege escalation", "S3 bucket testing", "metadata SSRF", "Lambda exploitation", or needs guidance on Amazon Web Services security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "run pentest commands", "scan with nmap", "use metasploit exploits", "crack passwords with hydra or john", "scan web vulnerabilities with nikto", "enumerate networks", or needs essential penetration testing command references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for insecure direct object references," "find IDOR vulnerabilities," "exploit broken access control," "enumerate user IDs or object references," or "bypass authorization to access other users' data." It provides comprehensive guidance for detecting, exploiting, and remediating IDOR vulnerabilities in web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-stage pipeline for validating that vulnerability findings are real, reachable, and exploitable, preventing wasted effort on hallucinated findings, dead code paths, or findings with unrealistic preconditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized post-exploitation testing after initial access, including privilege escalation, persistence, lateral movement, data collection, and cleanup considerations. Use when a task belongs to the post-exploitation domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, game clients, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Heap exploitation playbook. Use when targeting ptmalloc2/glibc heap vulnerabilities including UAF, double free, overflow, off-by-one/null, and leveraging tcache/fastbin/unsortedbin attacks for arbitrary write or code execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format string exploitation playbook. Use when printf-family functions receive user-controlled format strings, enabling arbitrary stack reads (%p/%s), arbitrary memory writes (%n/%hn/%hhn), GOT/hook overwrites, and canary/libc/PIE leaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phases small variants, SVs, and methylation from Oxford Nanopore and PacBio long reads (read-backed/physical phasing) with WhatsHap, LongPhase, or HiPhase, and haplotags the BAM (HP/PS tags) for allele-resolved downstream analysis. Covers why phase blocks break at het-sparse gaps (read length x heterozygosity), why phasing the VCF is useless until the BAM is haplotagged, the GT-pipe/PS and read HP/PS tag spec, reporting block N50 with switch error, the diploid-assumption/CNV/haploid-region traps, trio phasing as the gold standard, and the boundary to statistical panel phasing. Use when phasing long-read variants, haplotagging reads for allele-specific methylation/expression or phased SVs, choosing WhatsHap vs LongPhase vs HiPhase, trio phasing, or assessing phasing quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assembles haplotype-resolved diploid and telomere-to-telomere (T2T) genomes from PacBio HiFi reads with hifiasm (HiFi-only, Hi-C, or trio phasing) and verkko (HiFi + ultralong ONT for T2T), extracting contigs from GFA and routing phasing QC to k-mer/trio metrics. Covers why a primary assembly is a haplotype mosaic that exists in no cell, partial-vs-full phasing (the .bp. vs .dip. filename convention), the purge-default trap on inbred samples, the --hom-cov coverage-estimate alarm, and verkko-vs-hifiasm for T2T. Use when assembling a diploid eukaryote from HiFi, phasing haplotypes with parents (trio) or Hi-C, deciding whether to chase T2T, or diagnosing switch errors invisible to N50/BUSCO/QV.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect, date, and contextualize whole-genome duplication (WGD / paleopolyploidy) events using wgd v2 (Chen et al 2024), KsRates (Sensalari 2022 substitution-rate-corrected Ks dating), DupGen_finder (Qiao 2019), MAPS (Li 2018 phylogenomic), POInT (Conant 2008 ordered-block), SLEDGe (2024 ML-based), Whale.jl (Bayesian DL+WGD), and synteny-anchored paranome construction. Use when identifying ancient polyploidy from Ks distributions and synteny block analysis, positioning WGD events relative to speciation, distinguishing tandem from segmental from WGD duplications, dating the 2R/3R vertebrate / fish / salmonid WGDs, building paranome and Ks-age mixture models, applying KsRates substitution-rate correction across lineages, or testing alternative biased-fractionation / dosage-balance models post-WGD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub Actions security review for workflow exploitation vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "review GitHub Actions", "audit workflows", "check CI security", "GHA security", "workflow security review", or review .github/workflows/ for pwn requests, expression injection, credential theft, and supply chain attacks. Exploitation-focused with concrete PoC scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate security findings for exploitability, reachability, and real-world impact using Bug Hunter-native findings artifacts. Use after security scans, before patch generation, or whenever the user wants confirmation that a suspected vulnerability is actually exploitable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building a client-side browser exploit — V8/JSC JIT type confusion to renderer R/W, V8 heap-sandbox escape, renderer-to-browser sandbox escape (Mojo IPC, GPU/Dawn/ANGLE), Electron/webview IPC abuse, 1-click RCE chains

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wiki-first "what do I use" lookup - pick the automated TOOL (wiki/tools/), then the PAYLOAD/technique (wiki/payloads/ + wiki/cheatsheets/), for a surface/service/vuln-class BEFORE hand-rolling or working from memory. Use for "tool for <service>", "automated tools for web/<service>", "what should I run on <surface>", "which tool for <X>", "payloads for <X>", "payload arsenal", "cheatsheet for <X>", "how do I exploit <tech/class>", "exploit/attack chain for <X>", "arsenal", any SSRF/XSS/SQLi/SSTI/LFI/JWT/XXE/IDOR/NoSQL/deserialization/CSRF/CORS/CRLF/GraphQL/smuggling/web-cache/OAuth/SAML/MFA/crypto/LDAP/XPath/WebAuthn/file-upload/IMDS/prompt-injection/Modbus ask, plus "privesc arsenal", "CVE arsenal", "default creds", "nuclei templates", "sqlmap/hydra/nmap/bloodhound", "password attacks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。