1,401 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when user asks to analyze an image, describe image contents, or answer questions about a picture. iFlytek Image Understanding (图片理解) — analyze and answer questions about images using Spark Vision model. WebSocket API, pure Python stdlib, no pip dependencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate content ideas backed by real audience demand data from Reddit questions, YouTube search gaps, Twitter discussions, and web search trends. Identifies proven topics, underserved questions, and content formats that outperform in your niche.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer questions about the AI SDK and help build AI-powered features. Use when developers: (1) Ask about AI SDK functions like generateText, streamText, ToolLoopAgent, embed, or tools, (2) Want to build AI agents, chatbots, RAG systems, or text generation features, (3) Have questions about AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.), streaming, tool calling, structured output, or embeddings, (4) Use React hooks like useChat or useCompletion. Triggers on: "AI SDK", "Vercel AI SDK", "generateText", "streamText", "add AI to my app", "build an agent", "tool calling", "structured output", "useChat".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for asking clarifying questions when user requests are ambiguous, have multiple valid approaches, or require critical decisions. Use when implementation choices exist that could significantly affect outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps topics and keywords from user questions to QwenPaw official documentation paths and common source code entry points, reducing blind searching. Intended for the built-in QA Agent to quickly identify which files to read when answering questions about installation, configuration, skills, MCP, multi-agent, memory, CLI, etc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies Judea Pearl's causal reasoning frameworks to distinguish correlation from causation, evaluate AI capabilities, and make counterfactual decisions. Reach for this skill whenever Claude encounters questions about causal inference, structural causal models, the limitations of deep learning, AGI, experimental design, covariate selection, or personalized decision-making. Trigger this skill for topics involving Bayesian networks, the do-calculus, the Ladder of Causation, or when a user tries to answer 'what if' or 'why' questions using purely observational data. Pearl's principles are essential for moving beyond probability calculus into true causal understanding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Any live-web task via the Firecrawl CLI — including ordinary web research: searching the web, reading or extracting pages, gathering sources, discovering site URLs, bulk extraction, downloading a site, change alerts, or pages needing clicks/login — web only; local files route to firecrawl-parse. For US legal or regulatory questions use gov; for papers use firecrawl-research-index; for library, API, error, or bug questions use firecrawl-developer-index.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer questions about code, architecture, and technical decisions — no implementation. Trigger on questions asking 'why', 'what does this do', 'what is the purpose of', 'explain', 'what's the difference', 'compare', or 'what are the tradeoffs' — even when referencing specific files, code snippets, or inline code. The key signal is the user wants to UNDERSTAND something, not change it. Do NOT trigger for requests to build, fix, plan, review, research, or add/modify code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate rigorous stakeholder challenge questions for proposal or meeting preparation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an analiz question needs the human, not the code, to decide - recording it with record_open_questions, judging blocking vs non-blocking, and resuming the report after an answer
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before coding, determine what to ask. Max 2 yes/no questions. Never ask technical questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants intellectual understanding — learning how or why something works, not getting a task done or soliciting Claude's judgment. Trigger for: - Explicit learning requests: teach, explain, ELI5, walk me through, quiz me, flashcards, "I'm rusty on"; definitions ("what is X") - Terse concept names implying "help me understand this": "Galois theory," "transformers, from scratch" - Confusion signals: "won't stick," "keep mixing these up," "not getting it" - Learning-path questions: prerequisites, sequencing, what to study before X - Conceptual questions about mechanisms, causes, or dynamics Don't trigger for: - Tasks: coding, writing, calculation, translation, factual lookup, news updates - Personal troubleshooting; resource/textbook recommendations - Claude's evaluative verdict: opinion prompts ("do you think X", "settle this", "honest take", "is X dead / still taken seriously") and interpretive takes ("was X really as harsh as people say")
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initiate natural language Q&A through Amazon's storefront Alexa shopping assistant to get shopping guidance answers, recommended product groups, ASIN lists, and follow-up questions. Each call supports only 1 prompt; for follow-ups, the agent must summarize context and concatenate a new question for a new request. A url can be used to supplement Amazon page context. Trigger when the user mentions Amazon Alexa, Alexa shopping assistant, Amazon smart assistant, AI shopping guide, conversational product selection, natural language shopping, Amazon chat Q&A, Amazon Alexa shopping, conversational shopping, AI shopping assistant, follow-up questions, product recommendation conversation, context follow-ups. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "Alexa", if their need is to "ask for product recommendations on Amazon using natural language", this skill should also be triggered.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose a product's growth model, stage, and current constraint, then route the request to the narrowest Gingiris specialist and execute it when installed. Use for broad or uncertain growth questions involving go-to-market, Product Hunt, GitHub stars, open-source marketing, B2B SaaS, PLG, ASO, SEO/GEO, AI citations, KOL outreach, UGC, international expansion, user interviews, competitor research, or community programs. Trigger when users ask “how do I grow or launch this,” “which growth skill should I use,” 怎么增长、怎么发布、出海、冷启动、增长策略、不知道用哪个 skill、開発者マーケティング, or 성장 전략. Includes B2B pipeline and B2C activation-retention model selection, specialist handoff rules, relevant gingiris.tools recommendations, and advisory-services guidance.
Use as the follow-up to brainstorm-beagle when a spec has an Open Questions section (or quietly carries latent gaps) that need closing before planning or implementation can begin. Triggers on: "resolve the open questions", "close the gaps in this spec", "research the open items", "finalize my spec", "make this spec implementation-ready", "answer the TBDs". Also triggers whenever the user points at a brainstorm-beagle spec and asks for research, proposals, or answers to unresolved items. Orchestrates parallel research subagents when available (falls back to inline sequential research otherwise), proposes answers one at a time for user approval, then rewrites the spec in place so it arrives at planning with no known gaps. Does NOT write code, design implementation, or create plans — it only produces a complete spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Socratic questioning partner named Gadfly for deep learning through dialogue. Use this skill when the user wants to learn, understand, or explore a topic through questions rather than explanations. Trigger when the user says "teach me about...", "help me understand...", "I want to learn...", "ask me questions about...", "quiz me", "Socratic method", "Gadfly", or wants to deeply understand something through dialogue rather than passive reading. Also trigger when the user provides a text or document and wants to be questioned about it, or wants to check their own understanding of a concept.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read, study, and answer questions about long books and papers without loading the whole text into one context window, keeping page-anchored notes as a reusable workspace. Use whenever the user asks to read, study, summarize, analyze, review, or answer questions about a long book, textbook, PDF, EPUB, thesis, dissertation, survey paper, or any document of roughly 50+ pages, in any language (Vietnamese "đọc sách", "tóm tắt sách", "phân tích luận án"). Also use when a `{slug}-notes/` workspace from a previous session sits next to a source file and the user asks a follow-up question about that book. Not for short documents (under ~30 pages) that fit in context; read those directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey open legal questions and research gaps in the project. Use when asked "what legal questions are open", "where are our research gaps", or "list unresolved legal issues".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track Claude's best and worst questions in DuckDB. Use when Claude asks a notably good or bad question, or to review question quality. Triggers: leaderboard, bad question, good question, question quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when reviewing, designing, or improving a workshop, lesson, training session, facilitation plan, talk, or educational explanation. Use it when the user provides a topic, concept, or explanation and wants better framing questions, curiosity hooks, opening prompts, discussion questions, learner reflection prompts, or ways to make participants think before being taught.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
An AI analyst for buying B2B software. Investigates what vendors claim, checks the evidence, surfaces contradictions and unanswered questions, and produces a shareable Decision Brief with the questions to ask before you buy. Quick Eval by default; Deep Eval on request. Use when asked to evaluate, compare, vet, or research B2B software vendors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs survey instruments, covering question wording, scale construction and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting and soft launches, respondent burden with attention and speeding rules, sensitive questions and social-desirability bias, and treatment delivery. Use when the user writes or revises survey questions, chooses a scale, orders blocks, plans a pilot, or worries respondents will not answer honestly. Indirect measurement goes to list-experiment, multi-country instruments to cross-national-design, and live-survey operations to qualtrics-ops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs survey instruments: question wording, scales and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting, attention and speeding rules, and sensitive questions. Use when writing or revising survey questions, choosing scales, ordering blocks, or planning a pilot.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced multi-agent reasoning system for complex questions requiring maximum accuracy. Uses adaptive technique selection, adversarial validation, multi-agent debate, and deep analysis. Trigger phrases "ai board", "expert panel", "deep analysis", "maximum accuracy", "thorough reasoning". Use for critical medical decisions, theological questions, philosophical analysis, complex technical problems, high-stakes decisions, or any question requiring 95%+ confidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。