「rebuttal」の検索結果

Refine a Stage 4 follow-up response using condensed prior discussion context, current follow-up question, and the user's draft.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Condense Stage 3 combined discussion content into compact markdown context for Stage 4 multi-round follow-up drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Historical argumentation, evidence-based writing, and oral history methods. Covers thesis development for historical arguments, evidence selection and deployment, counterargument construction and rebuttal, historical writing conventions, and the methodology of oral history as both source and practice. Use when constructing historical arguments, writing analytical essays, conducting oral history interviews, or assessing the quality of historical writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic evaluation of arguments for structure, validity, soundness, and charitable interpretation. Covers premise identification, conclusion extraction, argument mapping, steel-manning, and the distinction between validity (form) and soundness (form plus true premises). Use when assessing an argument, reconstructing an opponent's position fairly, or preparing a rebuttal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or restructure research-paper sections, refine local prose, and audit manuscript-wide consistency. Use for evidence-grounded academic writing and revision, not independent acceptance-risk review or official rebuttal management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when research writing, reviews, rebuttals, or related-work planning needs academic evidence. Searches literature, screens candidate papers, audits novelty and missing work, verifies DOI/BibTeX/reference metadata and citation authenticity, and checks whether sources support the stated claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative manuscript improvement workflow where a reviewer agent critiques, an author agent revises, a verifier checks the revision, and the loop repeats until acceptance or a human-pause condition is reached. Use for virtual peer review, reviewer-author revision loops, rebuttal preparation, resubmission polishing, journal paper improvement, response-to-reviewers drafting, and deciding when additional data, experiments, theory, modeling, or author judgment is required before further revision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stops defensive writing across the entire paper lifecycle — writing, revising, cutting, and organizing experiments. Treats the paper as a press conference, not a project summary, lab log, or self-audit: identify the single most publishable strength of the work and build the most favorable, complete, and persuasive narrative around it. Never present everything evenly, never volunteer weakness, never write an experiment diary, never attack the paper on the reviewer's behalf. Triggers: polish my paper, revise manuscript, write abstract, write introduction, write conclusion, shorten paper, rebuttal, respond to reviewers, organize experiments, defensive writing, AI-flavored academic writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

论文写作、修改、压缩和实验组织全流程中阻止【防御性写作】。把论文视为一场学术发布会， 而不是项目总结、实验日志或自我审查报告：识别这项工作最值得发表的价值，围绕它建立 最有利、最完整、最有说服力的叙事。不平均展示、不主动示弱、不写实验流水账、不替审稿人 攻击自己。 触发词：论文润色、论文修改、写摘要、写引言、写结论、压缩论文、rebuttal、回复审稿意见、 组织实验、论文AI味、防御性写作、心虚。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first academic research workflow for topic ideation, scholarly search, paper reading, literature and systematic reviews, study and experiment design, statistics and data analysis, scientific figures, manuscript drafting and polishing, citation checks, peer review, rebuttals, submission packages, theses, and paper-to-presentation work. Use when an agent must plan, execute, audit, write, revise, or package research while keeping claims traceable to verified sources, data, analysis, or official requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine academic writing for computer science research papers targeting top-tier venues (NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, AAAI, IJCAI, ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, CVPR, WWW, KDD, SIGIR, CIKM, and similar). Use this skill whenever a user asks to improve, polish, refine, edit, or proofread academic or research writing — including paper drafts, abstracts, introductions, related work sections, methodology descriptions, experiment write-ups, or conclusion sections. Also trigger when users paste LaTeX content and ask for writing help, mention "camera-ready", "rebuttal", "paper revision", or reference any academic venue or conference. This skill handles both full paper refinement and section-by-section editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevent MSHA citations at cement plants before the inspector arrives. Free CementOps Compliance Suite skill. 30 CFR Part 56 hazard classification, stop-work authority, citation defense strategies, walk-through prep checklists, and rebuttal letter drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an Appellee's Response Brief defending the trial court's judgment and arguing for affirmance. Covers standard of review analysis, record-based rebuttal, authority distinction, and procedural compliance. Trigger when drafting appellee briefs, response briefs, answering briefs, or defending trial court judgments on appeal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds the "Report Sources" child page for a finished Weekly Community Signal report — an evidence-backed defense of WHY every item landed in the column/section/rank it did. The agent argues each placement like a lawyer (claim → evidence → rule → rebuttal) but is under oath: it CANNOT invent, spin, or overstate — every claim ties to a verifiable fact (issue #, label, PR type, quoted comment, npm output, the front-door test). Not CYA — it's so Nathan can defend the report with facts and see the exact reasoning behind each call. Runs after the report (invoked by weekly-report, last steps) and on "report sources", "defend the report", "why is this here".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve, validate, and audit manuscript integrity and applicable requirements for academic manuscripts and paper artifacts. Use when Codex needs to determine active paper rules from manuscript state, paper type, venue, submission stage, or workflow mode; lint a LaTeX paper project; assess submission readiness; create or update a paper policy profile; explain why a rule is active; or validate the paper-policy registries. Do not use as the primary skill for prose drafting, peer review, rebuttal writing, citation discovery, or figure/table creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an author's manuscript, its argument and paragraph structure, analyze reviewer comments, draft rebuttals, and verify revisions. Use for self-review, structural edit plans, simulated reviewer objections, author responses, revision closure, and submission-readiness assessment. Formal assigned peer review is outside this skill; manuscript edits and final figures/tables use their owning skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, revise, and validate publication-ready academic paper figures and tables. Use for LaTeX tables, related-work comparison tables, result tables, notation/dataset/taxonomy tables, precise source-data-driven experiment plots from CSV/JSON/logs, generated conceptual figures such as system overviews/pipelines/architectures/threat models, captions, artifact specs, source-data traceability, and paper-ready PDF/SVG/PNG/LaTeX exports. Do not use for prose-only paper writing, self-review, reviewer response, rebuttal drafting, or external literature-management workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment from the referee perspective rather than an author rebuttal. Use when the user wants a pre-submission review, reviewer report, peer-review style critique, novelty/significance/technical soundness assessment, reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, 审稿人视角评估, 预审稿意见, or Nature reviewer report. Return 3 reviewer reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded only in the local Nature reviewer source basis. Also trigger on general pre-submission review requests during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as getting a mock peer review for any journal, critiquing a draft as a reviewer would, assessing novelty/rigor before submission, and Chinese phrasings like 审稿人视角、模拟审稿、预审、帮我审一下论文、投稿前自审、审稿意见模拟、找论文问题.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consult a virtual board of 4 strategic advisors (Donald Miller, Seth Godin, Alex Hormozi, Daniel Priestley) on any major business decision. Two rounds of argument + rebuttal, then a decision brief, interactive dashboard, and clear recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewer comments arrive and each one needs a tracked decision, when a revise and resubmit letter must map every comment to a manuscript change, or when contradictory reviewer demands need evidence-based, editor-facing framing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Companion to the generic report-writing skill. Use when working specifically on Bugcrowd submissions where VRT mapping, OOS-clause rebuttals, or per-program target selection matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。