「rev」の検索結果

Fetch customer reviews for a Taobao or Tmall product by itemId, returning reviewer name, date, purchased variant, review text, and photo URLs. Use when user asks to get product reviews from Taobao, scrape Taobao customer feedback, extract buyer reviews by item ID, collect Tmall ratings and comments, 采集淘宝商品评价, 抓取淘宝买家评论, 获取淘宝商品评论, 天猫商品评价抓取, 按商品ID获取评价. Also applies to sentiment analysis of product reviews, building review datasets, and monitoring product rating changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill is designed to help users automatically extract reviews from Google Maps via the Google Maps Reviews API. Agent should proactively apply this skill when users request to find reviews for local businesses (e.g., coffee shops, clinics), monitor customer feedback for a specific brand or location, analyze sentiment of reviews for competitors, extract reviews for a chain of stores or services, track reputation of a local restaurant, gather user testimonials for a specific venue, conduct market research on service quality of local businesses, monitor reviews for a new retail location, collect feedback on public attractions or parks, identify common complaints for a specific service provider, research the best-rated places in a city, analyze recurring themes in reviews for a specific industry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users create and manage mirrord preview environments — running a modified service as an isolated pod in a shared Kubernetes cluster, scoped by an environment key and HTTP/queue traffic filtering, so teams can validate and review changes against real traffic without affecting live services. Use when a developer wants to run "mirrord preview" ad hoc, share a preview via a link (mirrord-share-ingress), or wire preview environments into CI with the metalbear-co/mirrord-preview GitHub Action (e.g. per-PR previews, least-privilege cluster access).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality and design system compliance. Evaluates using three pillars: frictionless insight-to-action, quality craft, and trustworthy building. USE FOR: PR reviews, design reviews, accessibility audits, design system compliance checks, creative frontend design, UI code review, component reviews, responsive design checks, theme testing, and creating memorable UI. DO NOT USE FOR: Backend API reviews, database schema reviews, infrastructure or DevOps work, pure business logic without UI, or non-frontend code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; adds a Phase 0 research/recon pass + rebuilt interview) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan or design, one question at a time, recommending an answer for each and exploring the codebase when it can answer itself, until every branch of the decision tree is resolved. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-me-codex", "grill me then have codex review", "grill me and stress-test the plan", "interview me about this plan then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes (auth, schema, concurrency, migrations, payments) and wants both alignment AND a cross-model sanity check before implementation. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-me (MIT). For the docs-aware variant use /grill-with-docs-codex; if you already have a plan and want only the Codex review use /codex-review. NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fiscaliste IA pour la fiscalité personnelle des particuliers français : optimisation et déclaration de l'impôt sur le revenu, IFI, revenus du capital, revenus fonciers, equity salarial, crypto-actifs et PER. Couvre le calcul de l'IR (barème, quotient familial, décote, PAS, CEHR, revenus exceptionnels), la déclaration 2042 et annexes, les revenus du capital (PFU vs barème, PEA, assurance-vie, dividendes, plus-values), les revenus fonciers (micro/réel, déficit, LMNP, SCI IR), l'equity startup (RSU, BSPCE, stock-options, PEE/PERCO), la fiscalité crypto (PAMC, 2086), l'IFI et les déductions (PER, pension alimentaire). Triggers: impôt sur le revenu, IR, 2042, quotient familial, décote, PAS, PFU, flat tax, PEA, assurance-vie, LMNP, revenus fonciers, déficit foncier, SCI IR, RSU, BSPCE, stock-options, PEE/PERCO, crypto, 2086, IFI, PER, plafond PER, niche fiscale, optimisation fiscale, simulation IR, TMI. Hors scope : succession/donation (notaire), IS/SASU/arbitrage dividende-salaire/SCI IS (comptable).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to improve their app's star rating, increase ratings volume, optimize when and how they prompt users for a review, or recover from a bad rating period. Use when the user mentions "app rating", "star rating", "review prompt", "SKStoreReviewRequest", "In-App Review API", "ask for review", "low rating", "rating drop", "get more reviews", or "recover from 1-star". For responding to reviews, see review-management. For overall ASO health, see aso-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR feedback, pull request review, or wants their code checked for bugs, style issues, or vulnerabilities — triggered by phrases like "review my code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "pull request review", or "code feedback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; with no diff, it reports project health. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Modes, named as the first word: drift for staleness detection, deep for a full documentation audit, closeout to close a finished feature, experience to capture a repeated pattern. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoice review, non-compliance flagging, rejection communication, billing trend analysis, and conversation preparation for in-house legal ops teams managing outside counsel. Review invoices against billing guidelines; flag block billing, prohibited fees, rate violations, staffing violations, late submission. Produce line-item review report and approval note. Draft rejection letter to outside counsel. Build invoice review checklist. Analyse billing trends across multiple invoices and produce a structured conversation guide for the relationship review. Identify systemic patterns and produce formal non-compliance notice. Trigger on: 'review this invoice', 'flag billing issues', 'check invoice against guidelines', 'write the rejection letter', 'build an invoice checklist', 'block billing', 'UTBMS', 'billing non-compliance', 'analyse our invoices', 'billing trends', 'prep for the billing conversation', 'relationship review', 'the firm keeps doing this', 'escalate'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a leader must review or approve TEXT-based team output before it ships — content briefs checked for angle, pillar, and CTA, ad copy and creative checked for substantiated claims, on-brand tone, a hook inside the first 125 characters, and platform policy, ending in an Approve, Revise, or Redo verdict with point-by-point feedback. Trigger on 'review this brief', 'approve the ad copy', 'check ads before launch', 'review team output', 'is this good enough to publish', 'my team keeps sending me drafts'. Not for — reviewing a visual design, see `47-design-review-global`; evaluating a person over a period, see `65-team-performance-review-global`; writing the copy yourself, see `05-ad-copy-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Educator peer review management for Canvas LMS. Tracks completion rates, analyzes comment quality, flags problematic reviews, sends targeted reminders, and generates instructor-ready reports. Trigger phrases include "peer review status", "how are peer reviews going", "who hasn't reviewed", "review quality", or any peer review follow-up task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Revenue decomposition, segment breakdown, geographic revenue split, product-line waterfall, revenue mix analysis, business segment performance, divisional revenue, revenue concentration, customer revenue dependency, channel revenue analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find academic papers across up to 8 sources (OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / CrossRef / PubMed / arXiv for English, OpenReview for AI venues, plus native-Chinese retrieval via NSSD 国家哲社文献中心 + yiigle 中华医学期刊) with adjustable depth — Quick scan (5 min) to Audit prep (3 hr). Use when the user wants to find papers, run a literature search, gather references, scope a research topic, search Chinese-language / 中文原生 literature (中文文献/中文核心/CSSCI/C刊/国内研究/国内文献/中华××期刊/心理学报/经济研究), or filter results by journal tier (中科院分区/一区/几区, Q1, JCR/SJR quartile, 影响因子/impact factor, 期刊分区, 顶刊/top journal, '按分区筛'), or export paste-ready professional search strategies / 检索式 for external databases (PubMed / WOS / Scopus / Embase / 知网 CNKI / 万方 / SinoMed — '写检索式', '导出检索式', 'WOS 检索式', '知网专业检索', 'search strategy', 'boolean search strategy'). Triggers on search verbs ('find papers', 'literature search', 'papers about X'), review types ('scoping review', 'systematic review', 'SR prep', 'literature review', 'lit review', 'help me write a lit review'), Chinese ('找文献', '找论文', '论文搜索', '学术检索', '文献检索', '文献综述', '综述前期', '求文献', '中文文献', '中文核心', 'CSSCI', 'C刊', '国内研究', '找中文的'). Outputs Shadcn HTML report + BibTeX/RIS/CSV + PRISMA-S log. Do NOT use for: concept explanations ('what is X' / 'X 是什么', e.g. '影响因子怎么算'), writing ('帮我写' / 'help me write a paragraph'), single-paper interpretation or PDF download with metadata (use paper-downloader-portable), or when the user already has a literature set (use literature-set-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in the human side of code review. Covers giving feedback that lands, receiving criticism gracefully, navigating disagreements, and building a healthy review culture. Understands that code review is as much about relationships as it is about code quality. Use when "code review, PR feedback, review comments, how to give feedback, harsh review, review culture, constructive criticism, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate a broad Incan review using specialized reviewer roles, parallel slice reports, and a canonical merged review report. Use when the user asks for delegated review, multi-agent review, or when a broad dirty worktree should be reviewed by specialized passes rather than one generic reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent adversarial code review. Spawns three reviewer subagents (Auditor, Adversary, Pragmatist) on a single model, runs a cross-examination round, then deterministically synthesizes a single ranked report. Use this for non-trivial PRs, security-sensitive changes, refactors that touch many files, or any change where one perspective has obvious blind spots. Trigger phrases include "adverse review", "adversarial review", "multi-perspective review", "review my changes from multiple angles", "panel review". NOT suitable for trivial diffs (typos, dependency bumps, formatting).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SwiftUI のレイアウト落とし穴・ベストプラクティス・非推奨パターンと、 iOS / watchOS アプリの実機配布 (Provisioning / App Group / Code Signing / Apple Watch Developer Mode / Xcode 15+ Debug dylib) トラブルシューティング のガイド。コード生成・修正時に既知のレイアウトバグを防ぎ、 App Group + watchOS + Apple Watch の実機インストール失敗を 7 段階フレームワークで診断・解消する。 Use when: SwiftUI のコードを書く・修正するとき。 レイアウト崩れを修正するとき。safeAreaInset や ViewThatFits を使うとき。 マルチデバイス対応するとき。iOS + watchOS アプリの実機ビルド / 配布で provisioning / App Group / Manual Signing / Apple Watch の UDID / Xcode 自動署名の 罠に詰まったとき。Apple Watch に "Could not install at this time" が出たとき。 Triggers: "SwiftUI", "layout", "safeAreaInset", "ViewThatFits", "GeometryReader", "レイアウト", "崩れ", "表示バグ", "iPhone SE", "ATT", "ATTrackingManager", "requestTrackingAuthorization", "AdMob", "広告", "Provisioning Profile", "App Group", "Manual Signing", "Code Signing", "Apple Watch", "watchOS", "Install できない", "Could not install at this time", "Bundle ID 紐付け", "Xcode Automatic Signing", "embedded.mobileprovision", "Spaceship", "App Store Connect API", "WKCompanionAppBundleIdentifier", "Developer Mode", "Privacy & Security", "watchOS Developer Mode", "Apple Watch に App を入れられない", "整合性を確認できなかった", "integrity check", "ENABLE_DEBUG_DYLIB", "__preview.dylib", "debug.dylib", "Xcode 15 Preview", "SwiftUI Preview dylib", "ENABLE_PREVIEWS", "AppIntents", "AppShortcut", "AppShortcutsProvider", "AppEntity", "AppEnum", "Siri", "Siri に流れる", "Siri がリマインダーに流れる", "updateAppShortcutParameters", "Invalid parameter type", "Invalid Utterance", "applicationName", "CFBundleDisplayName", "CFBundleSpokenName", "TaskEntityQuery", "AppEntityQuery", "TimelineProvider", "recommendations", "WatchConnectivity", "WCSession", "updateApplicationContext", "sessionDidBecomeInactive", "iPhone と Watch でデータ共有", "App Group 共有できない", "scenePhase", "ポーリング", "watchOS バッテリー", "TextField 文字色 watchOS", "Picker 文字色 watchOS", "Single Size AppIcon", "watchOS AppIcon"

Run a Duck Critic producer-critic loop: you (main) keep producing the plan/code/tests and gate your own work at checkpoints with a different-model critic, revising until it passes. Use when asked for rubber duck, ラバーダック, 別モデルレビュー, second opinion, critic, or a different-model code review, design review, plan critique, or review by another model/agent harness. Not for readability refactoring or code cleanup alone.

Phase 4 of the feature-pipeline suite. Use this after /fp-review has posted a sandbox review comment — it reads the outstanding checkbox items, applies fixes, then watches CI until green (or exits cleanly so you can retry). Trigger phrases: "address review items", "fix review feedback", "resolve review checklist", "watch CI", "poll CI", "check if CI is green", "iterate on PR", "fp-iterate", "Phase 4", "after review comment", "fix the review issues and watch CI". Always bounded — max 10 poll rounds, never loops forever. Exits with a clear status: green (hands off to /fp-drift), still-pending (re-invoke), or failed (diagnose before touching anything).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a single Codex (ChatGPT/OpenAI) review check-fix cycle on a PR using gh CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: check and fix Codex review comments, request a Codex code review on a PR, or iterate on PR feedback from the chatgpt-codex-connector bot. Trigger on phrases like 'codex review', '@codex review', 'fix codex comments', 'iterate on PR', 're-review with codex', or when the user mentions 'gh pr' with 'codex'. Combine with /loop for automated repeated cycles, e.g. '/loop 2m /codex-review'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep code review - Elixir idioms, Phoenix patterns, architecture, safety. Launches 3 parallel reviewers + plan-reviewer gate. Use when: review, review this, code review, check this code, review my changes, is this good, what do you think, code smells.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。