「reviews」の検索結果

Senior engineer conducting thorough, constructive code reviews. Round-2+ reviews use adversarial framing to find missed cases and convergent failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Submit a pull request following the repo's contribution guidelines. Reviews the diff, checks for common rejection reasons, and helps the user write their own PR description. The LLM reviews. the user writes. Use when implementation is complete and tests pass. Not for responding to review comments after the PR is open. Use oss-post-pr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate rigorous, fair peer review on a paper — in two modes. (A) Red-team YOUR OWN draft before submission to predict the reviews you'll get and get a fix list. (B) Review SOMEONE ELSE'S paper when you're an assigned reviewer or helping your advisor — produce a fair, venue-formatted, submission-ready review. Use whenever the user gives a paper (PDF, .tex, .md, arXiv link, or pasted text) and wants to predict reviews, find weaknesses before reviewers do, stress-test a submission, OR write a real review of another paper. Grounded in official NeurIPS/ICLR/ACL reviewer guidelines; every criticism pinned to a location, and checked against ACL's H1–H17 list of illegitimate critiques. 两种模式:审自己的稿(投稿前红队)/ 审别人的稿(当审稿人或帮导师),按会议官方标准评,绝不脑补、绝不发不正当批评。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5つの専門エージェント（backend-reviewer, frontend-reviewer, test-reviewer, security-reviewer, ux-reviewer）がチームでコードレビューするスキル。 git diff ベースで変更ファイルを検出し、各専門家が並列でレビューして 統合レポート（Markdown）を docs/reviews/ に出力する。 Use when: コードレビューしたい、変更をレビュー、レビューチーム、 チームレビュー、実装をチェック、品質チェック。 Triggers: "レビュー", "review", "コードレビュー", "code review", "チームレビュー", "team review", "変更をチェック", "品質チェック"

SwiftUI のレイアウト落とし穴・ベストプラクティス・非推奨パターンと、 iOS / watchOS アプリの実機配布 (Provisioning / App Group / Code Signing / Apple Watch Developer Mode / Xcode 15+ Debug dylib) トラブルシューティング のガイド。コード生成・修正時に既知のレイアウトバグを防ぎ、 App Group + watchOS + Apple Watch の実機インストール失敗を 7 段階フレームワークで診断・解消する。 Use when: SwiftUI のコードを書く・修正するとき。 レイアウト崩れを修正するとき。safeAreaInset や ViewThatFits を使うとき。 マルチデバイス対応するとき。iOS + watchOS アプリの実機ビルド / 配布で provisioning / App Group / Manual Signing / Apple Watch の UDID / Xcode 自動署名の 罠に詰まったとき。Apple Watch に "Could not install at this time" が出たとき。 Triggers: "SwiftUI", "layout", "safeAreaInset", "ViewThatFits", "GeometryReader", "レイアウト", "崩れ", "表示バグ", "iPhone SE", "ATT", "ATTrackingManager", "requestTrackingAuthorization", "AdMob", "広告", "Provisioning Profile", "App Group", "Manual Signing", "Code Signing", "Apple Watch", "watchOS", "Install できない", "Could not install at this time", "Bundle ID 紐付け", "Xcode Automatic Signing", "embedded.mobileprovision", "Spaceship", "App Store Connect API", "WKCompanionAppBundleIdentifier", "Developer Mode", "Privacy & Security", "watchOS Developer Mode", "Apple Watch に App を入れられない", "整合性を確認できなかった", "integrity check", "ENABLE_DEBUG_DYLIB", "__preview.dylib", "debug.dylib", "Xcode 15 Preview", "SwiftUI Preview dylib", "ENABLE_PREVIEWS", "AppIntents", "AppShortcut", "AppShortcutsProvider", "AppEntity", "AppEnum", "Siri", "Siri に流れる", "Siri がリマインダーに流れる", "updateAppShortcutParameters", "Invalid parameter type", "Invalid Utterance", "applicationName", "CFBundleDisplayName", "CFBundleSpokenName", "TaskEntityQuery", "AppEntityQuery", "TimelineProvider", "recommendations", "WatchConnectivity", "WCSession", "updateApplicationContext", "sessionDidBecomeInactive", "iPhone と Watch でデータ共有", "App Group 共有できない", "scenePhase", "ポーリング", "watchOS バッテリー", "TextField 文字色 watchOS", "Picker 文字色 watchOS", "Single Size AppIcon", "watchOS AppIcon"

Design and build runnable iOS UI mockups in SwiftUI, including UI direction, multiple visual or interaction variants, realistic sample data, state switching, Xcode Previews, and Simulator validation. Use when the user wants to explore what an iOS screen should look like, compare SwiftUI UI ideas, create a clickable native prototype, validate an app flow before production implementation, or asks for a SwiftUI mock, iOS mockup, native prototype, 画面モック, UI案, SwiftUIで動くモック, or 実際に触れるiOSモック.

Initialize a worktree-based repo layout for parallel development. Creates a main worktree, a reviews worktree for PR reviews, and N numbered work branches. Handles .env creation, dependency installation, and branchlet config. TRIGGER when user asks to set up the repo from scratch, initialize worktrees, bootstrap their dev environment, "setup repo", "setup worktrees", "initialize dev environment", "set up branches", or when a freshly cloned repo has no sibling worktrees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate personalized review responses for negative, neutral, and positive reviews — empathetic, professional, conversion-focused with platform-specific tone

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews design artifacts for quality, pattern application, and API design. Use when performing design reviews in Construction Phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an explicit end-to-end goal loop with frozen Scope/criteria, worker delegation, external verification, evaluator review, and bounded retries. Use when the user asks for 'goal-loop', 'ゴールまで回す', '必ずやり遂げる', 'loop until done', 'until it actually works', or an orchestrator + evaluator loop. Do not use for ordinary planning, casual advice, reviews, or small single-file fixes.

Write balanced, evidence-based performance reviews for employees. Covers achievements, development areas, and goal setting using the SBI (Situation-Behavior-Impact) feedback model. Produces reviews that are fair, legally defensible, and growth-oriented. Use during annual or semi-annual review cycles. Do not use for disciplinary actions, PIPs, or compensation calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare customer or executive business reviews with outcome tracking, adoption health, ROI narrative, risks, commitments, and next-quarter plan using customer success and CX frameworks. Use when teams need QBRs, success plans, churn-risk conversations, or executive account reviews. Do not use for generic slide beautification or cold outreach prospecting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze CSAT, NPS comments, reviews, and support feedback for sentiment, recurring themes, customer pain, and service improvement actions. Use for customer support and CX feedback reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search academic papers and conduct literature reviews using OpenAlex API (free, no key needed). Use when the user needs to find scholarly papers by topic/author/DOI, explore citation chains, get structured paper metadata (title, authors, abstract, citations, DOI, open access URL), fetch full text of open access papers, or conduct automated literature reviews with theme identification and synthesis. Triggers on requests involving academic search, paper lookup, citation analysis, literature review, research synthesis, or scholarly reference gathering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two superpowers for AI agents: a collective brain and a Base ecosystem mentor. BRAIN: Before debugging/compiling/architecting, search for existing solutions. After solving, propose so no agent repeats your mistake. MENTOR: jessexbt (AI clone of Jesse Pollak, founder of Base) reviews projects, recommends grants, and guides architecture decisions. Consult him directly when building on Base/crypto/onchain/web3. Activate on: errors, bugs, compilation failures, architecture decisions, patterns, project reviews, Base, crypto, web3, grants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic literature review methodology for social science research. Use when conducting systematic reviews, research synthesis, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, or comprehensive literature searches across economics, political science, sociology, education, public health, and development. Produces structured notebook cells with search strategy, evidence table, thematic synthesis, and gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review application and infrastructure changes for exploitable security risks by tracing assets, trust boundaries, attacker-controlled input, authorization, sensitive data, and dangerous sinks. Use for security reviews, threat-focused PR reviews, authentication or authorization changes, input handling, secrets, dependencies, and infrastructure permissions; do not use to exploit live systems or modify code unless separately requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

インシデント発生後の振り返りと根本原因分析を体系的に実施するスキル。 ログファイル解析や技術デバッグが必要な場合は log-debugger を使用すること。 本スキルはインシデント管理プロセス（タイムライン構築、影響評価、 是正措置計画、再発防止策）に特化する。ログデータの分析ではなく、 組織的な振り返りプロセスと是正措置の策定が主目的である。 Use when conducting post-incident reviews without log analysis, creating corrective action plans, or performing organizational root cause analysis focused on process improvement. NOT for log file debugging. Triggers: "post-incident review", "corrective action plan", "incident report作成", "再発防止策", "RCAレポート", "是正措置", "インシデント振り返り"

Use when evaluating, designing, drafting, revising, stress-testing, or preparing academic articles, empirical research reports, literature reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, journal submissions, reviewer responses, research methods, sampling, measurement, analysis, publication readiness, or citation/source audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory docs/reviews. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor PR review comments and automatically classify and address reviewer feedback including code changes, questions, and nits. Use when handling PR reviews, addressing reviewer comments, responding to code review feedback, or automating review resolution. Triggers on handle reviews, PR review, address feedback, reviewer comments, code review, review response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Business Officer archetype, covering commercial model, partnerships, deal structure, market positioning, strategic fit and opportunity cost, and returns a DRAFT review with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, commercial risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CBO review", "pressure-test this partnership", "check the deal structure" or "what would a commercial executive say about this". Do not use for pipeline, quota, sales-motion or forecast reviews, use cro-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesises a batch of customer feedback (survey answers, reviews, ticket and chat comments) into a DRAFT themed report: coded themes with record counts and shares, anonymised verbatim quotes cited to record codes, contradictions and unverified claims, and the follow-up questions to answer next. Produces no sentiment score or percentage positive as fact; ratings appear only as distributions with n. Use when the user asks to "theme this feedback", "what are customers saying", "summarise these survey answers", "analyse these reviews", "find the top complaints in these comments" or "code this voice of the customer data". Do not use for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis instead; for sorting a live queue and drafting replies, use ticket-triage-pack; for project retrospectives, use lessons-learned-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck, pricing plan, go-to-market plan or forecast in character as a Chief Revenue Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to exact passages, revenue risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CRO review", "pressure-test the revenue plan", "what would sales leadership say about this" or "challenge this forecast". Do not use for partnership, deal-structure or market-positioning reviews, use cbo-reviewer instead; for the finance seat use cfo-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。