「rspec」の検索結果

Provider-agnostic multi-LLM deliberation. Three phases — independent responses, cross-model anonymized ranking, chairman synthesis. Credentials come from explicit plugin configuration or pro-workflow-specific CLI variables. Persists transcript to a wiki page when --wiki <slug> is passed. Use when the user wants multiple AI perspectives, consensus-building, or the "LLM Council" approach for high-stakes reviews, plan critique, or contested learning rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate CHANGELOG.md entry from recent commits in conventional format. Also syncs the website changelog page. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: generate a changelog, document what changed between tags, or create a new CHANGELOG entry. If you see requests like "write the changelog for v0.17", "what changed since last release", this is the skill to use. Do NOT manually edit CHANGELOG.md without this skill — it ensures proper formatting, user-perspective writing, and website changelog sync. For full release workflows (Release PR review, tests, draft assets, publication, announcements), use /release instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review behavioral standards. Reference during code review to ensure consistent quality checks from a QA perspective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Content moderation API integration using OpenAI Moderation, Perspective API, and others

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Do NOT use for local uncommitted changes — this skill only reviews pull requests on GitHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a company update into 3-7 structurally distinct, journalist-shaped story angles. Runs the fact through proven newsroom lenses (perspective, abstraction, news values, data, contrarian, news peg) and refuses rephrasings, invented facts, named-journalist guesses, and AI-marketing slop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes from multiple perspectives with context bootstrap, depth-tier rigor, and structured findings output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two pipelines ending at a scanner-look PDF. (1) Phone photos of paper documents (contracts, stamped certificates, receipts, forms, handwritten notes) → clean scanner-quality PDF: perspective rectification + noteshrink whitening + A4 assembly + mandatory whole-document check. Trigger: "把照片 做成扫描件", "photos to scanned PDF", "make this look scanned", "手机拍的 文档转 PDF", "盖章文件扫描", replacing pages in an existing scanned PDF, any CamScanner-like request. (2) A digital document with no signature yet (rendered docx/PDF, confirmation form, contract draft) → make it look hand-signed and scanned: synthesize a handwriting-style signature, composite it onto the signature line, apply the same scan-look post-processing. Trigger: "帮我做个手写签名", "生成签名盖到这份文件上", "做成签过字的扫描件", "synthesize a signature", any request for a document that needs to look signed without a real photographed signature. Do NOT hand-roll levels/contrast enhancement for scan-look — tried and rejected twice; this skill's pipeline is the proven one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-path parallel product analysis with cross-model test-time compute scaling. Spawns parallel agents (Claude Code agent teams + Codex CLI) to explore product from multiple perspectives, then synthesizes findings into actionable optimization plans. Can invoke competitors-analysis for competitive benchmarking. Use when "product audit", "self-review", "发布前审查", "产品分析", "analyze our product", "UX audit", or "信息架构审计".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether AI agents can actually use your product — docs, APIs, onboarding, errors, and discoverability, evaluated from a non-human user's perspective. Use when asked if a product is agent-ready, to audit a site or API for AI usability, to prepare for agentic traffic, or when agents keep failing against your product. Produces a scored readiness report with per-surface findings and a prioritised fix list. For optimising a single article for AI citation use aeo-optimizer; for designing the MCP server itself use mcp-server-spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the codebase or domain is unfamiliar, the user will "know it when they see it", a reference implementation must be understood before porting, mid-build deviations from the plan need capturing, or a finished change needs buy-in or verified understanding before merge. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) — walk the quadrants to burn off fog before slicing, and feed the finished map into the spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

跨模型第二意见技能，融合 gstack 的 cross-model second opinion 能力。 当检测到高风险改动时，可选触发不同模型提供独立审查意见， 作为 multi-perspective-review 的可选叠加层。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search Experience Optimization: reads Google SERPs backwards to detect page-type mismatches, derives user stories from search intent signals, and scores pages from multiple persona perspectives. Identifies why well-optimized pages fail to rank by analyzing what Google rewards for each keyword. Use when user says "SXO", "search experience", "page type mismatch", "SERP analysis", "user story", "persona scoring", "why isn't my page ranking", "intent mismatch", or "wireframe".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep creative exploration engine. Competing perspectives, stress-tested by a 4-persona council, scored by integrity. The approach that survives attack wins — not the one that sounds best.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use to understand how Agricultural Systems (AgSy) evaluates a manuscript — single-anonymized peer review with a minimum of two reviewers and an editor decision, desk screening for fit and systems content, what reviewers weigh, and the rapid-review track for Perspectives. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as the entry point for any Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript. Routes to the right AgSy sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which article type (research paper, short communication, perspective, comment, review) fits. AgSy is a systems-science journal, so the router's first job is to confirm there is a real systems question — interactions, hierarchical levels, trade-offs — not a single-factor field trial. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a 'brand identity reveal' video from a config — a single poster frame in a real, softly-lit space (real wall, soft-focus plant in the corner, dappled leaf shadow, illuminated poster) whose artwork HARD-CUTS through ~10 on-brand poster mockups (hero product, IG post, hanging banners, sticker sheet, logo lockup, poster, two lifestyle stills, packaging, big icon) then holds on a brand end card. The environment plate is one create-image-fal generation; the mockups are real-DOM HTML frame-stepped via Playwright, perspective-composited into the detected frame quad with the plate's real leaf-shadow multiplied back onto each poster (reads as behind glass), sequenced by FFmpeg. Deterministic assembly, FREE (the plate comes from create-image-fal, the bed from create-music-elevenlabs), music bed only and approved brand copy only. Use for the brand-identity-reveal format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

General-purpose X/Twitter research agent. Searches X for real-time perspectives, dev discussions, product feedback, cultural takes, breaking news, and expert opinions. Works like a web research agent but uses X as the source. Use when: (1) user says "x research", "search x for", "search twitter for", "what are people saying about", "what's twitter saying", "check x for", "x search", "/x-research", (2) user is working on something where recent X discourse would provide useful context (new library releases, API changes, product launches, cultural events, industry drama), (3) user wants to find what devs/experts/community thinks about a topic. NOT for: posting tweets or account management. Note: currently uses recent search (last 7 days). Full-archive search is available on the same pay-per-use X API plan but not yet implemented in this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this first for any task involving images, pictures, photos, scans, frames, volumes, or visual data — including reading, writing, filtering, enhancing, denoising, sharpening, deblurring, thresholding, segmenting, masking, detecting, finding or counting objects, removing backgrounds, measuring, comparing, registering, stitching, aligning, cropping, resizing, transforming, or analyzing. Use for image I/O (TIFF, PNG, JPEG, RAW, HDR), histograms, edge detection, color processing, morphology, geometric transforms, deep learning for images, quality assessment, and 3-D volume processing. Also triggers when users describe image problems (dark, noisy, blurry, low contrast, uneven lighting, hazy, color cast) or data exploration tasks (folder of images, characterize data, understand format). Handles microscopy (cells, particles) and general scientific imaging. Routes to sibling skills for medical imaging (DICOM, NIfTI), hyperspectral data, and visual inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify requirements before implementing. Do not use automatically, only when invoked explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a business plan or product strategy through the eyes of a smart-money seed/Series-A investor. Asks the brutal questions: Is this fundable? What's the moat? What's the exit story? Outputs a verdict with one of four modes — SEED VIABLE / LATER ROUND ONLY / BOOTSTRAP-ONLY / UNFUNDABLE. Use when the user has a business plan and wants to know if it would survive an investor pitch. Triggered by: 'investor review', 'is this fundable', 'VC perspective', '投资人视角'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。