1,130 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Performs comprehensive Rust security review for safe/unsafe boundary issues, memory safety in unsafe blocks, concurrency hazards, panic-induced DoS, FFI safety, and async runtime mistakes. Use when auditing Rust crates, services, or libraries — particularly those with `unsafe`, FFI, or concurrent code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan any agent skill for security risks before you install or use it. Powered by Tencent Zhuque Lab A.I.G (AI-Infra-Guard). 100% local static analysis — no file contents or credentials leave your device. Compatible with CodeBuddy, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, OpenClaw and more. Triggers on: `这个 skill 安全吗`, `skill 安全扫描`, `检查 skill 安全`, `audit skill`, `scan skill`, `check skill safety`, `analyze skill`, `inspect skill`, `verify skill`, `skill security`, `skill supply chain`. Do NOT trigger for general agent usage, full system health checks, project debugging, or normal development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Activation requires either supplied .NET coverage reports/percentages/line, branch, or condition metrics, or an explicit request to collect .NET coverage for analysis. USE FOR: interpreting that evidence, including Cobertura data, partial conditions, plateaus, target arithmetic, project-wide coverage-backed CRAP, and coverage-backed refactoring safety. Analyze supplied reports directly without rerunning tests or installing tools. DO NOT USE FOR: requests with neither coverage evidence nor explicit coverage-collection intent, including hypothetical change-survival questions (use test-gap-analysis); CRAP or refactoring safety for one named target (use crap-score); or requests owned by test-tagging, find-untested-sources, test-anti-patterns, run-tests, or code-testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the agent is about to recommend or apply a change that touches DPU / NIC hardware state on a live system — mlxconfig firmware-parameter write, NIC firmware burn, BFB reflash, NIC ↔ DPU mode flip, SR-IOV or device-emulation slot enable, kernel boot-parameter change (IOMMU, hugepages, VFIO), PCIe rebind / rescan / link-state flip, or BlueField cold reboot. Wraps the change in pre-flight inventory, OOB reachability, a maintenance window, the mlxconfig cold-power-cycle rule, replica rehearsal, and rollback. Trigger even when the user does not say "hardware safety" — implicit phrasings: "flip BlueField mode over SSH", "enable SR-IOV and reboot", "burned firmware but mlxconfig shows old value", "reflashed BFB and lost representors", "reflash during business hours", "vendor says this is one-way". Refuse for general DOCA orientation (doca-public-knowledge-map), install or env debug (doca-setup), and program-side debug (doca-debug, doca-programming-guide) — those belong to other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defensive Golang coding against accidental bugs — nil panics, typed-nil interfaces, `append` backing-array aliasing, silent int64-to-int32 truncation, float `==` comparison, `defer` inside loops, defensive copies of slices and maps, and usable zero values. Use when a Go program panics on a nil map write or nil pointer dereference, when reviewing code for nil-safety, numeric conversion overflow, or resource lifecycle, or when designing a type whose zero value must be safe. Not for designing concurrent access with goroutines, channels, or sync primitives (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency` skill), not for exploitable vulnerabilities such as injection, weak crypto, or leaked secrets (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security` skill), and not for debugging an already-failing program (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting` skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security best practices and vulnerability prevention for Golang — injection (SQL, command, XSS), cryptography, path traversal, SSRF and HTTP security headers, cookies, secrets management, memory safety, PII in logs, STRIDE/DREAD threat modeling, plus `gosec` SAST, race detection, and fuzz testing. Apply when writing, reviewing, or auditing Go code for security, or when touching crypto, file or network I/O, secrets, user input, or authentication. Not for non-exploitable defensive bugs such as nil panics or slice aliasing (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-safety` skill), dependency vulnerability scanning with govulncheck (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-management` skill), or wiring security scanners into CI pipelines (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration` skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build content moderation applications with Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Java. Use when implementing text/image analysis, blocklist management, or harm detection for hate, violence, sexual content, and self-harm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures AWS Application Recovery Controller (ARC) for operational resilience: routing controls with safety rules for cross-Region failover, and zonal shift / zonal autoshift for AZ-impairment recovery. Applies when setting up failover routing, configuring safety rules, enabling zonal shift, or configuring zonal autoshift with practice runs. Also applies when shifting traffic out of a specific Availability Zone (AZ) for an ALB/NLB or other resource. For a broader "an AZ is impaired, what is my response across services" question, see aws-resilience-lifecycle. Does not apply to Resilience Hub setup or FIS experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a local repository risk receipt before Claude Code or other AI-agent edits. Use when the user asks to prepare a repository for agent changes, check for risky hooks or credential-writing automation, or run the /agent-preflight command. Trigger with "run agent preflight", "check this repo before agent edits", or "/agent-preflight".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create safety-bounded draft structures and run local deterministic checks for clinical case, diagnostic, trial, safety, and aggregate research reports. Use only with synthetic, de-identified, or aggregate inputs and verified source-fact manifests; every output requires qualified review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for one-drug whole-profile safety mapping using signal detection, subgroup analysis, onset/seriousness characterization, and conservative label-gap interpretation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for multi-drug or class-level safety comparison inside one predefined SOC or AE family using active comparators, disproportionality analysis, subgroup characterization, and reviewer-facing evidence control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement safety interlocks and protective mechanisms to prevent equipment damage and ensure safe control system operation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work through the first hours and days after a disaster — a fire, flood, storm, or evacuation — in the right order: safety and people first, then documenting for insurance and aid, then the immediate recovery steps, without missing the things that cost money or health later. Use when someone says 'my house flooded/burned', 'what do I do after the disaster', 'we just evacuated, now what', or 'the storm damaged everything'. Produces a triaged action plan (safety → document → claim → recover), the do-not-miss list, and where to get help. Not legal advice; routes to emergency services and official aid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check for open safety recalls on a vehicle using the CarsXE API. Use this when a user asks whether a car has any recalls, safety issues, or wants to know if their vehicle needs a recall repair.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
E-commerce warehouse and inventory optimization advisor. Analyzes inventory health, calculates safety stock and reorder points, performs ABC analysis, evaluates fulfillment costs, and provides actionable recommendations for improving efficiency. Supports all major fulfillment models: Self-fulfillment, Amazon FBA/FBM, Walmart WFS, 3PL, Shopify Fulfillment, TikTok Shop, Dropshipping, and Hybrid setups. No API key required. Use when: (1) reducing stockouts or overstock, (2) calculating safety stock levels, (3) optimizing warehouse costs, (4) improving Amazon IPI score, (5) analyzing inventory KPIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "audit prompts for safety", "check prompts for injection vulnerabilities", "manage a prompt catalog", "version control prompts", or "review prompt quality and compliance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to test their LLM/agent application for safety and security vulnerabilities — jailbreaks, prompt injection, PII extraction, harmful content generation, or evaluator gaming. Also use when the user mentions security testing, adversarial testing, red teaming, safety evaluation, ASR (Attack Success Rate), or "is my app safe to deploy." Outputs ASR paired with over-refusal rate and an audit document.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design trauma-informed classroom practices that prioritise safety, predictability, connection, and regulation. Use when student behaviour may be trauma-related or the class needs a sensitive approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for Microsoft Foundry (aka Azure AI Foundry) development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when building Foundry agents with Azure OpenAI, AI Gateway, MCP tools, Entra auth, or BYO VNet networking, and other Microsoft Foundry related development tasks. Not for Content Safety in Foundry Control Plane (use azure-content-safety), Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools (use azure-content-understanding), Azure Speech in Foundry Tools (use azure-speech), Microsoft Foundry Classic (use microsoft-foundry-classic).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for Microsoft Foundry Classic (aka Azure AI Foundry classic) development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when building Foundry agents with Azure OpenAI, RAG, Azure AI Search, MCP tools, or multi-agent routing, and other Microsoft Foundry Classic related development tasks. Not for Microsoft Foundry (use microsoft-foundry), Microsoft Foundry Local (use microsoft-foundry-local), Content Safety in Foundry Control Plane (use azure-content-safety), Azure Speech in Foundry Tools (use azure-speech).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, and integrations & coding patterns. Use when building Content Understanding analyzers, RAG document flows, agentic workflows, REST/SDK calls, or GA migrations, and other Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools related development tasks. Not for Content Safety in Foundry Control Plane (use azure-content-safety), Azure Speech in Foundry Tools (use azure-speech), Azure AI Vision (use azure-ai-vision), Azure AI Document Intelligence (use azure-document-intelligence).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Java concurrency code for thread safety, race conditions, deadlocks, and modern patterns (Virtual Threads, CompletableFuture, @Async). Use when user asks "check thread safety", "concurrency review", "async code review", or when reviewing multi-threaded code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent safety boundaries - input validation, output filtering, scope constraints, and document creation policy
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。