Read accumulated cost-tracking spend + budget config, compute utilization, emit 50/75/90/100% alert ladder
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
411 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Read accumulated cost-tracking spend + budget config, compute utilization, emit 50/75/90/100% alert ladder
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-baseline counterfactual cost analysis. Compares actual session spend to hypothetical always-haiku / always-sonnet / always-opus routing baselines. Answers "is the routing earning its keep?" Negative savings flag over-escalation; positive savings quantify the router's win.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Single-shot programmatic dump of all cost data — total spend, per-tier, top session, budget status, federation aggregate. JSON or markdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forward-looking spend extrapolation. Computes a USD-per-day rate from the recent measurement window, projects to 7d/30d/90d/365d horizons, and surfaces "days until budget exhausted" when a budget is configured. Predictive counterpart to `cost-budget-check` (reactive).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MAD-based outlier detection on session spend. Robust to the very outliers it hunts (unlike mean+sigma). Surfaces specific anomalous sessions with modified-z scores; optional --alert-on-outliers exit code for CI gates. Distinct from cost-burn (aggregate trend) — this answers "which INDIVIDUAL session is the outlier?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimisation findings from your own Claude Code and Codex logs — low cache hit ratio, 1-hour cache writes that did not pay back, sub-agents on a top-tier model, Codex reasoning share, bloated sessions — each with evidence and a what-if saving. Use when asked how to cut spend or why it is high.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenRouter real spend — key limit and usage today/week/month, one request's billed cost by generation id, account credits. Use when asked what OpenRouter charged or whether a key is near its limit. Network and API key: asks first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, write, or manage Meta ads and assets: ad copy, campaigns, spend, reports, audiences, catalogs, product feeds, feed refresh schedules, experiments, and policy. Always load for any request to create or write an ad, or to advertise a product or service, even when no platform is named; this includes sensitive or restricted categories. Always load for any question asking what a Meta, Facebook, or Instagram advertising policy means, allows, prohibits, or requires, including a standalone policy-definition question with no account context. Those questions must use ads_policy_tool, never browser search or memory. Load for a specifically named catalog or feed with an upload or refresh-schedule request; use Ads reads to resolve ownership before writing. Generic unnamed feeds need context. Whether an image, claim or piece of copy may be used in an ad is ALWAYS a Meta Ads task — 'can I use this in an ad', 'is it allowed', 'is this against policy', and any rights, likeness, celebrity, logo or trademark question about advertising with an image, including a follow-up about one just generated. Those are ads-policy questions, not general legal ones. An ad request uses the campaign workflow unless explicitly only an image or organic post.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Queries the U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data REST API for federal financial data. No API key required. Use for national debt (Debt to the Penny), Daily Treasury Statements, Monthly Treasury Statements, Treasury securities auctions, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, savings bonds, or U.S. government revenue and spending statistics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reduce AWS spend with rightsizing, autoscaling, commitment planning, and storage lifecycle policies. Use when running FinOps reviews, lowering cloud bills, or improving cost-per-request metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-stage series — a request for several classrooms that belong together, like 「7 天学 Python」, a four-week onboarding track, a semester unit split across lessons, or "turn this book into a lesson per chapter". Clarifies the series brief, gets the user's explicit sign-off on the full lesson list before spending anything, then builds the stages one at a time into a shared folder. Use when the ask is a sequence of classrooms; not for a single stage, however large.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize cloud costs across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI through resource rightsizing, tagging strategies, reserved instances, and spending analysis. Use when reducing cloud expenses, analyzing infrastructure costs, or implementing cost governance policies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and improve GitHub Codespaces efficiency. Use this skill when a user wants faster Codespaces startup, lower Codespaces spend, slim devcontainers, right-size machines, tune idle timeout, or scope prebuilds to branches with sustained usage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a personal Claude Code usage & impact report ("receipts") from this machine's local session transcripts — for justifying Claude Code usage/spend to a manager, self-review, or "what have I been using this for" check-ins. Mines ~/.claude/projects locally (no extra API calls beyond one final write-up), cross-references local git history, and writes a markdown report plus a self-contained HTML receipt to your home directory. Use when the user asks for "receipts", an "impact report", "usage report", wants to "show my Claude Code activity", "prove the value of Claude Code", or runs `/receipts`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tiered LLM extraction pattern for large corpus processing (email archives, document dumps, transcript libraries). A utility-tier model triages and classifies at speed; the reasoning tier does the default deep read; the deep tier is the escalation for the highest-value content. Prevents spending deep-tier money on noise while ensuring the important content gets the best eyes. A deterministic privacy wall runs before any LLM call.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score and tier a list of accounts (or your full book) against ICP fit and engagement signals to prioritize where to spend time. Use when the user asks to "tier my accounts", "prioritize my book", "which accounts should I focus on", or "score these accounts".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates demand generation campaigns, optimizes paid ad spend across LinkedIn, Google, and Meta, develops SEO strategies, and structures partnership programs. Use when planning demand gen strategy, growth marketing, advertising campaigns, PPC optimization, lead generation, pipeline generation, or marketing budgets. Covers multi-channel acquisition (Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Meta Ads), CAC analysis, MQL/SQL workflows, attribution modeling, technical SEO, and co-marketing partnerships. Default calibration profile is a Series A+ B2B SaaS scaling internationally (EU/US/Canada, hybrid PLG/Sales-Led) — adapt benchmarks for other stages and motions rather than skipping the skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/cs:cfo-review <plan> — Numerate-skeptic interrogation of any plan that touches money. Unit economics, runway, dilution, capital allocation. Use when a plan commits meaningful spend — e.g. a hiring wave, a fundraise decision, or a new channel budget.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates Google Cloud workloads for cost efficiency and FinOps alignment using the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework Cost Optimization pillar. Use when the user asks to analyze Google Cloud spend, reduce cloud bills, rightsize resources (for example, Compute, GKE, Storage, Databases), evaluate discount options (for example, CUDs, SUDs, Spot VMs), or eliminate idle capacity. Do not use for standalone product pricing lookups or non-cost architecture design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides diagnostic workflows and step-by-step root-cause analysis procedures for actively broken, failing, or slow BigQuery jobs, execution graph and query plan stage bottlenecks, system performance issues, or unexpectedly expensive workloads. Use when interpreting symptoms, isolating bottlenecks, diagnosing cost spikes (on-demand query spend, capacity slot autoscaling, storage growth), execution graph stages or substep variables, identifying root causes, and determining remediation steps. Don't use for writing or optimizing SQL, proactive capacity planning, or storage layout design (use bigquery-optimization), or when the user already knows which telemetry they want and just needs the query (use bigquery-observability).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Weekly SaaS spend audit loop for {{subscription_sheet}}. Pulls recurring card and bank charges from Plaid, reconciles them against the subscription register, flags duplicate/overlapping tools, unused seats, price hikes, upcoming renewals, and shadow IT, and posts a digest to {{alert_channel}} — recommending cancellations and downgrades only, never acting on them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, deploy and operate Kortix Apps through the pre-authenticated CLI or SDK: static sites and SPAs, Dockerfile or OCI servers, workers, and stateful backends (a database, a Convex backend) with persistent volumes, snapshots and built-in Kortix sign-in. Use when the user asks to publish, host, deploy, preview, inspect, scale, wake, suspend, roll back, debug, or remove an App; asks for a database, an API, a backend, a data model, auth, or 'store this'; asks for an internal tool, business app, CRM, tracker, dashboard, portal, or any app the team logs in to; before writing any Convex code; or asks what an App costs or how it runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。