「supply-chain」の検索結果

Threat-models and hardens an application, API, data flow, dependency, or deployment against authentication and authorization flaws, injection, secrets exposure, unsafe deserialization, SSRF, abuse, privacy loss, and supply-chain risk. Use for security review, threat modeling, hardening, or sensitive changes. Not for generic code style review or an unexplained bug without a security hypothesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scanning and eradicating supply-chain malware (Shai-Hulud/S1ngularity npm/PyPI worms): IoC scan, OS/IDE persistence, safe credential rotation. Not for SAST (Sentinel) or skill/MCP audit (Chain).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when auditing an input handler for vulnerabilities, when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations, or when checking a login flow is safe against the OWASP Top Ten. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data, manages user sessions, or interacts with third-party services. Use when auditing dependencies for known vulnerabilities, triaging package-manager audit findings, or assessing supply-chain risk in a new package. Use when personal data or privacy compliance (GDPR, CCPA) is involved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a dependency scanning program — CVE detection, license checks, and CI gates. Use when asked to "scan our dependencies", "set up CVE detection", or "add a dependency CI gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an SBOM generation pipeline — format, tooling, and integration into CI/CD. Use when asked to "generate an SBOM", "build an SBOM pipeline", or "add CycloneDX to CI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit existing dependency security — find unscanned packages, license violations, and SBOM gaps. Use when asked to "audit our dependencies", "do we have an SBOM", or "find license violations".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to audit or harden security in this repo — e.g. "security audit", "auditoría de seguridad", "revisa la seguridad", "is this secure", "hardening", "vulnerabilities". Audits code, config, workflows, and secrets exposure. Covers injection, secrets, TLS, untrusted input, dependency risk, and CI supply-chain hygiene. Runs when the user asks about security, not just for code reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for CI/CD, registry, dependency drift, artifact provenance, image build, release pipeline, and runtime consumer challenges. Use when the user asks to trace dependency drift, registry pulls, malicious packages, build or release tampering, CI execution, artifact signing, or which shipped artifact the runtime actually consumes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AI-agent, prompt-injection, MCP or toolchain, cloud, container, CI/CD, and supply-chain challenges. Use when the user asks to analyze prompt-to-tool flows, retrieval poisoning, mounted secrets, deployment drift, runtime-vs-manifest mismatches, registry provenance, or CI-produced artifacts under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

供应链安全时使用。适用于依赖漏洞扫描 / 镜像安全 / CI 投毒防护 / SBOM。融合 SLSA + Sigstore + Snyk + Trivy。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use apko to build small OCI images from declarative package manifests when supply-chain clarity and minimal contents matter more than a conventional Dockerfile flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a focused security pass on GitHub Actions workflows before merge so token misuse, dangerous permissions, and unpinned actions are caught early.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CI/CD pipeline and software-supply-chain exploitation: Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Azure DevOps, Gitea/Forgejo, self-hosted runners/agents, poisoned pipeline execution, artifact/cache abuse, dependency confusion, third-party Action trust, GitOps/registry poisoning, workload identity/OIDC, and emerging agentic CI/CD. Use this skill when the operator has access to a CI/CD system, source repository, build/deploy configuration, runner/agent, artifact/package/registry path, or software delivery trust chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses critical mineral investments with supply chain mapping, geopolitical risk, and processing infrastructure analysis. Use when evaluating critical minerals, analyzing lithium/cobalt supply, or assessing rare earth investments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated security scanner for external skill/agent content fetched from GitHub or web sources. Runs a 7-step PASS/FAIL security gate against fetched markdown/text content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to deploy, operate, secure, or scale running infrastructure — cloud architecture (multi-region, VPC, FinOps), CI/CD and deployment strategies, secrets/IAM/supply-chain security, observability and SLO alerting, SRE and incident response, Kubernetes vs ECS and autoscaling, Terraform/Pulumi/CDK, or platform engineering and DORA metrics. Also for generating runbooks, pipeline configs, Terraform modules, or Kubernetes manifests. For choosing the system's architecture or stack before it runs (monolith vs microservices, which database), use software-architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only audit of a GitHub repository's security posture. Gathers ref protection (rulesets AND classic branch protection), Actions token permissions, code and supply-chain features (Dependabot, secret scanning, push protection, CodeQL), and repo hygiene toggles via `gh api`, then classifies findings against essential / recommended / advanced tiers into a PASS/GAP report. Makes NO changes. Use when reviewing a repo before open-sourcing or a release, auditing a public user-owned repo whose CI auto-commits to the default branch, verifying a hardening change actually took effect, or producing a baseline security posture report for a repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run AI agent tasks on a Volcengine (火山引擎) cloud phone via the Mobile Use Agent OpenAPI. Use when the user asks to drive, automate, operate, or test an Android app on a cloud phone for enterprise use cases (e.g. reply to WeCom customer messages, add leads in a CRM, clock in on DingTalk, check invoicing stats, query inventory in a supply-chain app, ship e-commerce orders, approve OA requests) or personal ones (open 小红书 and search, place an order, check nearby places on a map), or to check status, fetch result, cancel, or list a Mobile Use run. Requires one-time setup to store Volcengine AK/SK locally; ProductId and PodId can be saved as a default device during setup, the user prompt is provided per run. Supports optional GPS injection (GpsInfo) with user consent (auto-asked only for location-related tasks).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Analyze supply chain operations using the SCOR model across Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, and Return processes. Use this skill when the user needs to optimize supply chain efficiency, evaluate supplier performance, improve logistics, or design an end-to-end supply chain strategy — even if they say 'our deliveries are slow', 'supply chain costs are too high', or 'we keep running out of stock'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate supply chain and adversarial machine learning attacks by injecting poisoned data or targeted backdoors into training and fine-tuning datasets. Use this skill when assessing the integrity controls of MLOps pipelines or evaluating the resilience of AI models against highly targeted, stealthy manipulation intended to alter model behavior on specific triggers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrastructure code review patterns. Use when reviewing CI/CD workflows, Dockerfiles, deployment configs, and IaC. Covers supply-chain pinning, secret exposure, container hygiene, least-privilege permissions, and deployment safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DevSecOps skill for securing CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure as code, containers, Kubernetes, cloud deployments, secrets handling, dependency management, SAST/DAST/SCA, release gates, supply-chain controls, SBOMs, policy-as-code, and secure SDLC workflows. Use for pipeline hardening, deployment risk reviews, security automation, and remediation planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure containerized workloads — image hardening, registry scanning, runtime protection, and supply-chain integrity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。