「evaluate」の検索結果

Installs the CARLA Autonomous Driving Leaderboard (leaderboard.carla.org) at a chosen version — 1.0, 2.0 or 2.1 — together with the exact scenario_runner branch and CARLA build each one requires, then wires the four-root PYTHONPATH and verifies the whole stack imports. Detects which version an existing checkout is by reading its code, not its branch name. Use when the user asks to "install the leaderboard", "set up the CARLA challenge", "evaluate my driving agent", "reproduce my leaderboard score", or names a leaderboard version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the CARLA Leaderboard evaluator over a set of routes with your agent — routes/routes-subset/repetitions/track selection, checkpoint and live-results endpoints, resume after a crash, recording, and the debug levels — for leaderboard 1.0, 2.0 or 2.1. Preflights the whole stack (version pairing, maps, ports, agent class, sensor budget) before spending hours, and hands the world back in async mode. Use when the user asks to "run the leaderboard", "evaluate my agent", "run routes_training", "resume an evaluation", or "reproduce my submission locally".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TikTok Ads deep analysis covering creative quality, tracking, bidding, campaign structure, and TikTok Shop. Evaluates 28 checks with emphasis on creative-first strategy, safe zone compliance, and Smart+ campaigns. Use when user says TikTok Ads, TikTok marketing, TikTok Shop, Spark Ads, Smart+, or TikTok campaign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides systematic implementation of new sustainability metrics in OSS Sustain Guard using the plugin-based metric system. Use when adding metric functions to evaluate project health aspects like issue responsiveness, test coverage, or security response time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-platform creative quality audit covering ad copy, video, image, and format diversity across all platforms. Detects creative fatigue, evaluates platform-native compliance, and provides production priorities. Use when user says creative audit, ad creative, creative fatigue, ad copy, ad design, or creative review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate accessibility and WCAG compliance of UI components and pages. Use when the user asks to "check accessibility", "audit a11y", "WCAG review", "screen reader test", or needs to verify inclusive design practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate learning materials and technology for WCAG, Section 508, and accessibility compliance with remediation recommendations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help a user talk through whether to change jobs, stay, or change something in their current work, starting from uncertainty, distress, a vague sense of stagnation, an offer in hand, a counter-offer from the current employer, or pressure from family or colleagues. Clarify what matters, separate deadlines that order the next steps from the decision itself, compare conditional options, and agree on a small next step and a time to revisit it. Use when someone asks whether they should quit, wonders whether leaving is just running away, has second thoughts after receiving an offer or being asked to stay, feels stuck because others say it would be a waste, wants to leave soon after joining, or wants advice before deciding to start a job search; do not make the final stay-or-leave decision, evaluate offer terms, plan the resignation, or predict hiring outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a Japanese job posting closely and report what it actually states: base pay separated from fixed overtime allowance, the range converted to an hourly basis, required versus preferred requirements, and the terms left ambiguous. Use when a user wants a 求人票 or job description examined before applying, wants two postings compared on the same basis, or wants questions prepared about pay and working conditions; do not use to judge whether the user will be hired, to infer duties the posting does not state, or to evaluate the employer's reputation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates downstream tests for coverage and edge cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify the first beachhead market segment for a product launch. Evaluates segments against burning pain, willingness to pay, winnable market share, and referral potential. Use when choosing a first market, targeting an initial customer segment, or planning market entry strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates genome assembly quality across the three orthogonal axes - contiguity (QUAST auN/NG50/NGx, not bare N50), completeness (BUSCO/compleasm gene-space plus Merqury k-mer completeness), and correctness (reference-free Merqury QV, Inspector/CRAQ structural errors, asmgene false-duplication/collapse). Covers why N50 is the most-gamed metric, why QV measured on the polishing reads is circular, distinguishing uncollapsed haplotigs from real WGD, and the EBP/VGP 6.C.Q40 standard. Use when judging whether an assembly is good enough to annotate or publish, comparing assemblers, diagnosing a fragmented or duplicated assembly, or assessing a phased diploid assembly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate deliverable quality — scorecard, outcome tracking, regression checklist, and aggregate stats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uncorrelated Evaluator — 4軸ルーブリック専門エージェント（functionality-reviewer・code-reviewer・design-reviewer・originality-reviewer）と security-reviewer を5並列実行し、成果物を多面的に独立評価します。PASS / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED 判定を返します。Self-leniency 防止のため、実装エージェントのコンテキストを引き継がない新規エージェントとして起動します。「レビューして」「評価して」「実装を確認して」などのリクエストで起動します。

Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Codeセッションの効率を分析・スコアリングするWebツール。セッションログ（JSONL）を解析し、7観点100点満点で「無駄の有無」を評価。npx session-evaluatorで起動し、ブラウザUIでセッション選択→分析→改善提案まで実行可能。

Systematically evaluate weak, stale, or low-conviction theses for upgrade, monitoring, or closure. Use when user says "prune", "kill list", "clean up theses", "what should I close", or "reduce portfolio".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Introduce the cross-section read interface boundary (I<Section>ServiceRead) for one section's service per memory/architecture/section-read-write-split.md. Audits the surface, evaluates which methods belong on the read interface, sets up the workspace, dispatches a subagent that introduces the interface and migrates non-section callers, opens a PR. Use when the user says 'read split for X', 'split <Section>Service', 'add I<Section>ServiceRead boundary', 'apply the section-read-write-split rule to <Section>', or any variation of carving the cross-section read surface out of a section's full service interface. Reference implementation is Teams (PR 678). Operates on one section per invocation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to brainstorm, evaluate whether an idea is worth building, run office hours, or think through a new product idea or design direction before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," "free resource," "ROI calculator," "grader tool," "audit tool," "should I build a free tool," or "tools for lead gen." Use this whenever someone wants to build something useful and give it away to attract leads or earn links. For downloadable content lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates), see lead-magnets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Live developer experience audit. Uses the browse tool to actually TEST the developer experience: navigates docs, tries the getting started flow, times TTHW, screenshots error messages, evaluates CLI help text. Produces a DX scorecard with evidence. Compares against /plan-devex-review scores if they exist (the boomerang: plan said 3 minutes, reality says 8). Use when asked to "test the DX", "DX audit", "developer experience test", or "try the onboarding". Proactively suggest after shipping a developer-facing feature. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx audit", "test the developer experience", "try the onboarding", "developer experience test".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate learning progress, identify blockers, and adjust the learning plan

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。