3,798 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Provides AI and machine learning techniques for CTF challenges. Use when attacking ML models, crafting adversarial examples, performing model extraction, prompt injection, membership inference, training data poisoning, fine-tuning manipulation, neural network analysis, LoRA adapter exploitation, LLM jailbreaking, or solving AI-related puzzles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides binary exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when you already have a vulnerable native target or service and need to turn memory corruption or low-level primitives into code execution or privilege escalation, such as buffer overflows, format strings, heap bugs, ROP, ret2libc, shellcode, kernel exploitation, seccomp bypass, sandbox escape, or Windows/Linux exploit chains. Do not use it when the main blocker is understanding what the binary does; use reverse engineering first. Do not use it for pure web bugs, disk or packet forensics, or standalone crypto/math challenges.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Solves CTF challenges by performing first-pass triage, identifying the dominant category, and routing execution to the right specialized ctf-* skill. Use when the user gives you a challenge bundle, a remote service, a suspicious file, or only a vague challenge description and you must determine where to start. Do not use it when the category is already clear and a specialized skill can be invoked directly; this is the dispatcher and recon entrypoint, not the deepest reference for category-specific techniques.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides digital forensics and signal analysis techniques for CTF challenges. Use when analyzing disk images, memory dumps, event logs, network captures, cryptocurrency transactions, steganography, PDF analysis, Windows registry, Volatility, PCAP, Docker images, coredumps, side-channel power traces, DTMF audio spectrograms, packet timing analysis, CD audio disc images, or recovering deleted files and credentials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides web exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the target is primarily an HTTP application, API, browser client, template engine, identity flow, or smart-contract frontend/backend surface, including XSS, SQLi, SSTI, SSRF, XXE, JWT, auth bypass, file upload, request smuggling, OAuth/OIDC, SAML, prototype pollution, and similar web bugs. Do not use it for native binary memory corruption, reverse engineering of standalone executables, disk or memory forensics, or pure cryptanalysis unless the web flaw is still the main path to the flag.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides miscellaneous CTF challenge techniques for problems that do not cleanly fit the main categories. Use for encoding puzzles, pyjails, bash jails, RF/SDR, DNS oddities, unicode tricks, esoteric languages, QR or audio puzzles, constraint solving, game theory, unusual sandbox escapes, and hybrid logic puzzles. Prefer a more specific skill first when the challenge is mainly web, pwn, reverse, forensics, malware, OSINT, or crypto. Treat this as the fallback skill for genuine cross-category or edge-case challenges, not the default starting point.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides cryptography attack techniques for CTF challenges. Use when attacking encryption, hashing, signatures, ZKP, PRNG, or mathematical crypto problems involving RSA, AES, ECC, lattices, LWE, CVP, number theory, Coppersmith, Pollard, Wiener, padding oracle, GCM, key derivation, or stream/block cipher weaknesses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides reverse engineering techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, game clients, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides open source intelligence techniques for CTF challenges. Use when gathering information from public sources, social media, geolocation, DNS records, username enumeration, reverse image search, Google dorking, Wayback Machine, Tor relays, FEC filings, or identifying unknown data like hashes and coordinates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, review, and edit developer documentation for SDKs, libraries, and frameworks, including sites such as ai-sdk.dev and chat-sdk.dev. Use for getting-started guides, tutorials, API references, conceptual explanations, integration guides, migration guides, troubleshooting, and code examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query TradingView market data through the bundled tradingview MCP server without a desktop app or login. Use whenever the user wants a technical analysis readout (RSI, MACD, Bollinger rating, BUY/SELL summary), multi-timeframe alignment (weekly→daily→4h→1h→15m), exchange-wide scans (Bollinger squeeze, volume breakout, consecutive candles, smart volume), top gainers/losers by exchange, futures market data (NQ/ES/CL/GC overview, overnight movers, category snapshots), pre-market / after-hours quotes, a quick options chain or unusual options activity (volume/OI by strike), bulk stock prices, a global market snapshot, strategy backtests (Sharpe, drawdown, win rate), or crypto exchange scans. Triggers include "TA on X", "multi-timeframe read", "BB squeeze scan", "futures movers", "NQ overnight", "pre-market price", "unusual options activity", "backtest RSI on AAPL", and "top gainers on NASDAQ". For options greeks, watchlists, alerts, or chart screenshots use tradingview-reader instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Current technical or business fact to cite from web: web lookup lane - settle a current-facts question in one cited retrieval round with retrieval dates and source-quality notes; for pre-spec grounding across reference implementations use `research`. Use when the user says: web-research, web research, web search, search the web, internet search, look up, look up sources, latest sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] High-stakes technical proposal needing approval: consensus planning with review gates. Use when the user says: ralplan, consensus plan, reviewed plan, issue to PR, acceptance criteria, verification command, reviewable PR, risky planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Live rate, score, or local time a work task needs: policy overlay for live lookups - add provider, freshness, units, and source-quality gates after preferring native live-data tools for ordinary weather, finance, sports, maps, and time-zone requests. Use when the user says: live-info-operator, live info operator, live information, real time information, real-time information, weather today, current weather, weather forecast.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Uncertain technical choice for a spike: bounded decision prototype workflow: resolve one uncertain interaction, API, performance, or integration choice with a disposable, isolated experiment whose observed result feeds planning. Use when the user says: decision-prototype, decision prototype, prototype this uncertain choice before planning, prototype before planning, prototype the uncertain choice, run a small spike, small spike, spike solution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Technical proposal facing adversarial scrutiny: independent perspectives attack a proposal, then distill into a bundle a separate planner consumes. Use when the user says: adversarial-consensus, adversarial planning, adversarial plan review, red team this plan, red-team this plan, red team the proposal, multi-perspective review, multiple perspectives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate maintainer docs structure, standards freshness, manifest paths, and plan state. Run this after modifying any file under .agents/docs/standards/, .agents/docs/plans/, .agents/docs/architecture/, or AGENTS.md — it catches stale metadata, broken manifest paths, and plan state drift before CI does.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dot-pattern rendering technique that simulates shades with a limited palette for nostalgic, retro, high-contrast visuals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete the Classic technical design and obtain user confirmation. Use when the user invokes /comet-design or Classic Runtime enters Design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Make AI-generated writing read as human-written, in fiction and in professional prose. Repairs the narrative architecture of fiction and stories (based on StoryScope, arXiv:2604.03136); routes professional text through domain rules for release notes, announcements, PR and issue replies, code-review comments, incident postmortems, tickets, work orders, technical articles, blog posts, and long-form journalism. Four operations - write, review (diagnose AI tells without editing), refactor (minimal in-place edits), recreate (full rewrite). Use when asked to humanize, de-AI, unslop, or strip AI flavor from any text; when writing or revising any of these document types; or whenever output must not read as machine-written.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides implementation of code tasks using test-driven development in an Explore, Plan, Code, Commit workflow. Acts as a Technical Implementation Partner and TDD Coach — following existing patterns, avoiding over-engineering, and producing idiomatic, modern code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write an MVP technical design from agreed requirements, including architecture choices and relevant tradeoffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create project agent instructions and tool configuration from agreed product and technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research an app idea or resolve product and technical uncertainties before committing to a design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。